The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Apologetics Forum > Defending the Faith

Defending the Faith Discussion of Apologetical Issues with Unbelievers and Unorthodox groups
always ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope in you, with meekness and fear (1 Pe. 3:15)

» Online Users: 55
9 members and 46 guests
AThornquist, Chippy, Christoffer, Knight, LeeJUk, satz, Tim
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:14 PM
et et is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
Question The need to reclaim the term :Evangelical

A friend and I were talking about how many people "recoil" now from the term Evangelical my friend who holds his Theological from Duke, was in agreement that the use of Evangelical SHOULD be removed from the "saw-dust trail" connotations and be restored in it's classic and historic context, he gave an interesting analogy, the RCC has usurped the term "catholic" which is not their sole property, yet people shy from it because of the Roman use, when in fact in a broader semantic range can apply to the universal or whole body of Christ, a true Christian is in fact catholic "lower case c". In much the same manner Evangelical has been misused and usurped by certain churches as their OWN badge. In short the Church is catholic in nature and Evangelical in the sense of her mandate/or calling if you prefer, simply to make known the Truth delivered to the saints. I feel there is a tendency to flee right and truthful "words" when they have been misused rather than attempt to reclaim and restore them to their right proper and Biblical place. The list could go on, I am thankful the OPC did not "shy" from using Orthodox,it means straight/right/correct/proper. It is not the "property" of the Eastern Church. In short there is indeed a Divine Mandate upon the Church to be Evangelical, to my mind and that of my friends this means placing it back within a Biblical, Historic, Classic, and Semantic context. I wanted to "bounce" the idea here and see the feel of the PB on the reformed Christians in regard to reclaiming a VERY Biblical concept which has sadly been dropped on the basis of it's misuse. Would love any thoughts. Grace and Peace.
__________________
et
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:36 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,221
Thanks: 779
Thanked 391 Times in 278 Posts
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Roanoke VA.
Covenant Reformed Episcopal Church.

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:44 PM
Knoxienne's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,667
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 971 Times in 581 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
A friend and I were talking about how many people "recoil" now from the term Evangelical my friend who holds his Theological from Duke, was in agreement that the use of Evangelical SHOULD be removed from the "saw-dust trail" connotations and be restored in it's classic and historic context, he gave an interesting analogy, the RCC has usurped the term "catholic" which is not their sole property, yet people shy from it because of the Roman use, when in fact in a broader semantic range can apply to the universal or whole body of Christ, a true Christian is in fact catholic "lower case c". In much the same manner Evangelical has been misused and usurped by certain churches as their OWN badge. In short the Church is catholic in nature and Evangelical in the sense of her mandate/or calling if you prefer, simply to make known the Truth delivered to the saints. I feel there is a tendency to flee right and truthful "words" when they have been misused rather than attempt to reclaim and restore them to their right proper and Biblical place. The list could go on, I am thankful the OPC did not "shy" from using Orthodox,it means straight/right/correct/proper. It is not the "property" of the Eastern Church. In short there is indeed a Divine Mandate upon the Church to be Evangelical, to my mind and that of my friends this means placing it back within a Biblical, Historic, Classic, and Semantic context. I wanted to "bounce" the idea here and see the feel of the PB on the reformed Christians in regard to reclaiming a VERY Biblical concept which has sadly been dropped on the basis of it's misuse. Would love any thoughts. Grace and Peace.
Reverend David Silversides has an excellent message on these problems with this very issue on Sermon Audio called, "What is an Evangelical?". I highly recommend it.
__________________
Toni Cunningham, Wife of Bill (Theognome)
Parkwoods OPC, Overland Park KS


"Vice is a monster of so frightful mien, As, to be hated, needs but to be seen; Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, We first endure, then pity, then embrace." ~ Alexander Pope
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Knoxienne For This Useful Post:
et (02-21-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 05:02 PM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
i doubt that "evangelical" will be able to be restored to have any significant meaning, at least for a generation. the word is too widely used by everyone that it really doesn't have any meaning. you'll have much more sucess modifying it, like "confessing evangelical", like ACE or ditching it all together for a different term. maybe this is why more people are gravitating toward the label "reformed", even if they're not TR (sorry if it aggrevates you TR folks).
__________________
Alex
Member of Carmel Baptist Church (SBC)
Matthews, NC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 05:21 PM
Staphlobob's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 665
Thanks: 57
Thanked 102 Times in 58 Posts
When I was Lutheran I often shocked people by referring to us as "catholic." I love the term and defend its use.

Though Machen wasn't crazy about using it, I think the term "fundamentalist" ought also to be reclaimed and stood upon. I like it.

I also rejoice in being referred to as "TR" by my liberal (PCA) co-workers and publicly embrace their insult.
__________________
Kevin Guillory
Pastor
Redeemer Christian Congregation
Baltimore, MD

I don't interpret Scripture. Scripture
interprets itself. And in the process ...
Scripture interprets me!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Staphlobob For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (02-20-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2009, 05:58 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
quote=asc;552713]i doubt that "evangelical" will be able to be restored to have any significant meaning, at least for a generation. the word is too widely used by everyone that it really doesn't have any meaning. you'll have much more sucess modifying it, like "confessing evangelical", like ACE or ditching it all together for a different term. maybe this is why more people are gravitating toward the label "reformed", even if they're not TR (sorry if it aggrevates you TR folks).[/quote]

[
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." John Calvin

John from Scotland
Denomination: Attending Baptist church
Confessional Subscription:London Baptist Confession
Blog: [url]www.three-streams.co.uk[/url]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Jon 316 For This Useful Post:
Classical Presbyterian (02-21-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:30 PM
et et is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post
quote=asc;552713]i doubt that "evangelical" will be able to be restored to have any significant meaning, at least for a generation. the word is too widely used by everyone that it really doesn't have any meaning. you'll have much more sucess modifying it, like "confessing evangelical", like ACE or ditching it all together for a different term. maybe this is why more people are gravitating toward the label "reformed", even if they're not TR (sorry if it aggrevates you TR folks).
[[/QUOTE]
ALL the more reason to reclaim it! We always take the path of least resistance! EVEN if Evangelical were not replace in our lifetimes, this suggest we tuck tail and run like a cur dog, yelping: "You messed up and usurped a word so we don't want it anymore!" Words have VALUE and MEANING, we should not so lightly abandon them. If a group emerges the "redefines" reformed will we drop it. I do hope not.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:41 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post
quote=asc;552713]i doubt that "evangelical" will be able to be restored to have any significant meaning, at least for a generation. the word is too widely used by everyone that it really doesn't have any meaning. you'll have much more sucess modifying it, like "confessing evangelical", like ACE or ditching it all together for a different term. maybe this is why more people are gravitating toward the label "reformed", even if they're not TR (sorry if it aggrevates you TR folks).
[
ALL the more reason to reclaim it! We always take the path of least resistance! EVEN if Evangelical were not replace in our lifetimes, this suggest we tuck tail and run like a cur dog, yelping: "You messed up and usurped a word so we don't want it anymore!" Words have VALUE and MEANING, we should not so lightly abandon them. If a group emerges the "redefines" reformed will we drop it. I do hope not.[/QUOTE]

I'm not sure you can. Once something evolves and broadens it has by nature changed. You cant stop people from using the new definition. E.G Gay... gay can never, seriously, be reclaimed. imho.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:45 PM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
ALL the more reason to reclaim it! We always take the path of least resistance! EVEN if Evangelical were not replace in our lifetimes, this suggest we tuck tail and run like a cur dog, yelping: "You messed up and usurped a word so we don't want it anymore!" Words have VALUE and MEANING, we should not so lightly abandon them. If a group emerges the "redefines" reformed will we drop it. I do hope not.
i don't think "retreating" from a name is cowardly. words are only useful if they can communicate something with meaning. if a word like evangelical is too ambiguous to be useful, toss it aside for a more meaningful word. it's not like it's a word used in the Bible (i know it's rooted in the Biblical word for gospel).

on a more practical note, i don't think you or i have the ability to recapture the word's meaning. as far as i can tell, the "evangelical" goats far out number the sheep, and i don't think they plan on giving up the name. or to switch analogies, the horse is already out of the barn.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:49 PM
et et is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post
quote=asc;552713]i doubt that "evangelical" will be able to be restored to have any significant meaning, at least for a generation. the word is too widely used by everyone that it really doesn't have any meaning. you'll have much more sucess modifying it, like "confessing evangelical", like ACE or ditching it all together for a different term. maybe this is why more people are gravitating toward the label "reformed", even if they're not TR (sorry if it aggrevates you TR folks).
[
ALL the more reason to reclaim it! We always take the path of least resistance! EVEN if Evangelical were not replace in our lifetimes, this suggest we tuck tail and run like a cur dog, yelping: "You messed up and usurped a word so we don't want it anymore!" Words have VALUE and MEANING, we should not so lightly abandon them. If a group emerges the "redefines" reformed will we drop it. I do hope not.
I'm not sure you can. Once something evolves and broadens it has by nature changed. You cant stop people from using the new definition. E.G Gay... gay can never, seriously, be reclaimed. imho.[/QUOTE]
Don't agree my Brother. ARE you saying if a group began to misuse Reformed we should drop it. The Church has some guilt in letting "semantic" robbery occur and simply.......not caring, the English language is degraded,we did little to stop it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:55 PM
OPC'n's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Blog Entries: 8
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
I think the same could be said about the term "Christian"...seems everyone is a Christian these days.
__________________
sarah
WI
OPC
My Pastor's Sermons: Mark Jenkins...he's awesome!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OPC'n For This Useful Post:
et (02-21-2009), Knoxienne (02-21-2009)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 03:09 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
etexas
Quote:
Don't agree my Brother. ARE you saying if a group began to misuse Reformed we should drop it. The Church has some guilt in letting "semantic" robbery occur and simply.......not caring, the English language is degraded,we did little to stop it.
To be honest, many people are taking up the name reformed these days who would not be considered reformed by by some who most who consider themselves reformed. The fact that many charismatics are taking up the term means it is already evolving. And again there is the issue of those who do not commit to a 'confession' but still consider themselves reformed. There is a sense that the new use of the word refprmed will already be causing problems for those who hold to a more traditional definistion.

However, Like your man has already said, the real issue is the meaning behind the term. Reformed is not a scriptural term. The reformed faith will survive even if the word reformed begins to use its meaning.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Jon 316 For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (02-21-2009)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 04:30 PM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post

I'm not sure you can. Once something evolves and broadens it has by nature changed. You cant stop people from using the new definition. E.G Gay... gay can never, seriously, be reclaimed. imho.
Good example. I don't think "gay" will be used to mean "happy" for a long time, if ever. Languages change with time. The fact that pastors ranging from Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, and RC Sproul would all be considered by most people in the US to be "evangelical" means the term already has no more use for us, IMO.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 04:34 PM
et et is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by asc View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post

I'm not sure you can. Once something evolves and broadens it has by nature changed. You cant stop people from using the new definition. E.G Gay... gay can never, seriously, be reclaimed. imho.
Good example. I don't think "gay" will be used to mean "happy" for a long time, if ever. Languages change with time. The fact that pastors ranging from Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, and RC Sproul would all be considered by most people in the US to be "evangelical" means the term already has no more use for us, IMO.
I would not equate gay and Evangelical. My point is that within a proper theological understanding it is Biblical and should not be tossed aside.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 05:23 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 640
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
I would not equate gay and Evangelical. My point is that within a proper theological understanding it is Biblical and should not be tossed aside.
To be fair it is the same issue though. Once the term is redefined and the majority of people are using the redefined term, use of the old term by a minority can become pointless as it will always need to be followed by several disclaimers and clarifications.

Quote:
I think the same could be said about the term "Christian"...seems everyone is a Christian these days.
I wouldnt bother if the church abandoned this term either. Acts informs us it was the pagans who first gave us this name anyway.

I'm pretty sure we can just refer to ourselves as disciples of Christ and explain our doctrines rather than having to hang on to terms which are not essential to the faith.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 06:01 PM
CatechumenPatrick's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 191
Thanks: 8
Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
A friend and I were talking about how many people "recoil" now from the term Evangelical my friend who holds his Theological from Duke, was in agreement that the use of Evangelical SHOULD be removed from the "saw-dust trail" connotations and be restored in it's classic and historic context, he gave an interesting analogy, the RCC has usurped the term "catholic" which is not their sole property, yet people shy from it because of the Roman use, when in fact in a broader semantic range can apply to the universal or whole body of Christ, a true Christian is in fact catholic "lower case c". In much the same manner Evangelical has been misused and usurped by certain churches as their OWN badge. In short the Church is catholic in nature and Evangelical in the sense of her mandate/or calling if you prefer, simply to make known the Truth delivered to the saints. I feel there is a tendency to flee right and truthful "words" when they have been misused rather than attempt to reclaim and restore them to their right proper and Biblical place. The list could go on, I am thankful the OPC did not "shy" from using Orthodox,it means straight/right/correct/proper. It is not the "property" of the Eastern Church. In short there is indeed a Divine Mandate upon the Church to be Evangelical, to my mind and that of my friends this means placing it back within a Biblical, Historic, Classic, and Semantic context. I wanted to "bounce" the idea here and see the feel of the PB on the reformed Christians in regard to reclaiming a VERY Biblical concept which has sadly been dropped on the basis of it's misuse. Would love any thoughts. Grace and Peace.
1) What problems, exactly, will reclaiming a word solve?
2) It may be wise to first consult what current scholars working on this topic are saying, especially the Reformed of course. Perhaps the best place to start would be D.G. Hart's Deconstructing Evangelicalism--http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52494617&referer=brief_results See Here--where he argues for the essential meaninglessness of the term. From there I'd move on to recent work by Michael Horton, David Wells, and D.A. Carson.
__________________
Patrick
Covenant (OPC), Brighton, MI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 06:36 PM
Knoxienne's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,667
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 971 Times in 581 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by asc View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 View Post

I'm not sure you can. Once something evolves and broadens it has by nature changed. You cant stop people from using the new definition. E.G Gay... gay can never, seriously, be reclaimed. imho.
Good example. I don't think "gay" will be used to mean "happy" for a long time, if ever. Languages change with time. The fact that pastors ranging from Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, and RC Sproul would all be considered by most people in the US to be "evangelical" means the term already has no more use for us, IMO.
I would not equate gay and Evangelical. My point is that within a proper theological understanding it is Biblical and should not be tossed aside.
As far as the term "gay" and even "homosexual/ity" go, I believe that we need to use the terms "sodomite" and "sodomy" when speaking of that perversion, since those are the terms the Bible uses. My

Last edited by Knoxienne; 02-21-2009 at 06:51 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:46 PM
et et is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatechumenPatrick View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
A friend and I were talking about how many people "recoil" now from the term Evangelical my friend who holds his Theological from Duke, was in agreement that the use of Evangelical SHOULD be removed from the "saw-dust trail" connotations and be restored in it's classic and historic context, he gave an interesting analogy, the RCC has usurped the term "catholic" which is not their sole property, yet people shy from it because of the Roman use, when in fact in a broader semantic range can apply to the universal or whole body of Christ, a true Christian is in fact catholic "lower case c". In much the same manner Evangelical has been misused and usurped by certain churches as their OWN badge. In short the Church is catholic in nature and Evangelical in the sense of her mandate/or calling if you prefer, simply to make known the Truth delivered to the saints. I feel there is a tendency to flee right and truthful "words" when they have been misused rather than attempt to reclaim and restore them to their right proper and Biblical place. The list could go on, I am thankful the OPC did not "shy" from using Orthodox,it means straight/right/correct/proper. It is not the "property" of the Eastern Church. In short there is indeed a Divine Mandate upon the Church to be Evangelical, to my mind and that of my friends this means placing it back within a Biblical, Historic, Classic, and Semantic context. I wanted to "bounce" the idea here and see the feel of the PB on the reformed Christians in regard to reclaiming a VERY Biblical concept which has sadly been dropped on the basis of it's misuse. Would love any thoughts. Grace and Peace.
1) What problems, exactly, will reclaiming a word solve?
2) It may be wise to first consult what current scholars working on this topic are saying, especially the Reformed of course. Perhaps the best place to start would be D.G. Hart's Deconstructing Evangelicalism--http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52494617&referer=brief_results See Here--where he argues for the essential meaninglessness of the term. From there I'd move on to recent work by Michael Horton, David Wells, and D.A. Carson.
Words have both meaning and value...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:19 PM
Jesus is my friend's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: E. Bridgewater MA
Posts: 1,327
Thanks: 726
Thanked 229 Times in 169 Posts
How does"Calvinist Evangelical" sound it seems to be flying about these days,any thoughts?
__________________
Brian
Grace Bible Church;E.Bridgewater
East Bridgewater MA
http://www.gracebiblehome.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69