» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 110 | | 33 members and 77 guests | | ADKing, Anton Bruckner, Augusta, AV1611, Backwoods Presbyterian, BertMulder, Bladestunner316, Blueridge Baptist, BobVigneault, CalvinandHodges, CovenantalBaptist, Daniel Ritchie, doctorcello, Glenn Ferrell, Gomarus, goretorade, JBaldwin, JDWiseman, Jerusalem Blade, LadyFlynt, matt.meisberger, panicbird, py3ak, reformedfox, Reformingstudent, Rick Larson, tcalbrecht, victorbravo, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
03-07-2008, 01:12 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | | Judge Roy Moore to Speak in Wytheville, VA I know its too far off the beaten path for most everyone on the board, but I thought I'd post this for anyone who may be in the area or close enough to travel.
Judge Roy Moore ("the Ten Commandments Judge") will be speaking in Wytheville, VA, Saturday, April 5th, from 9 AM to 2 PM. This is part of his "Jeremiah Project" and he will be speaking on "the First Amendment, Separation of Church and State, and the crucial role that the pulpit has played as the 'conscience of the nation' throughout American history".
The event is hosted by my home church, Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church.
You will find more information HERE.
Blessings!
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2
Last edited by Southern Presbyterian; 03-07-2008 at 08:47 AM.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2008, 07:08 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
| | | will there be audio afterwards? | 
03-07-2008, 08:45 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | | Yes, we will be recording and producing CD sets as well as posting it to our website.
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2 | 
03-07-2008, 10:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,677
Thanks: 595
Thanked 631 Times in 324 Posts
| | There will also be mountain rednecks like myself there. 
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org | 
03-08-2008, 11:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge Baptist There will also be mountain rednecks like myself there.  |
The more the merrier! 
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2 | 
03-10-2008, 09:33 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 335
Thanks: 90
Thanked 72 Times in 47 Posts
| | Romans 13:1 Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian Judge Roy Moore ("the Ten Commandments Judge") will be speaking in Wytheville, VA, Saturday, April 5th, from 9 AM to 2 PM. Blessings! | I've always wondered what Judge Moore's understanding of Romans 13:1 is, and how he justified defying the federal court's order to remove the taxpayer funded monument he erected in his court's building without the consent of his fellow justices on the Alabama Supreme Court, and for which he was removed from office by the duly-appointed authorites in Alabama.  | 
03-27-2008, 01:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | Will anyone besides BlueRidge Baptist be attending? If so, PM me. I wouldn't want to miss an opportunity to say "Hello" in person. 
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2 | 
03-27-2008, 04:21 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Kirkland,WA U.S.A.
Posts: 6,858
Thanks: 227
Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts
| | I would go but being in Kirkland,Wa dont help  | 
03-27-2008, 07:46 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,677
Thanks: 595
Thanked 631 Times in 324 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian Judge Roy Moore ("the Ten Commandments Judge") will be speaking in Wytheville, VA, Saturday, April 5th, from 9 AM to 2 PM. Blessings! | I've always wondered what Judge Moore's understanding of Romans 13:1 is, and how he justified defying the federal court's order to remove the taxpayer funded monument he erected in his court's building without the consent of his fellow justices on the Alabama Supreme Court, and for which he was removed from office by the duly-appointed authorites in Alabama.  | Could you give a link to this matierial brother? Would love to read it.
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org | 
03-27-2008, 07:50 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,677
Thanks: 595
Thanked 631 Times in 324 Posts
| | CNN.com - Ten Commandments judge removed from office - Nov. 14, 2003
At the end of the day judge Moore was right and on the side of God and the federal court as usual was against Christ and in league with Satan. 
God's law trumps everytime. Roy Moore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org
Last edited by Blueridge Baptist; 03-27-2008 at 09:18 AM.
| 
03-27-2008, 10:15 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 219
Thanks: 28
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge Baptist | Having lived in Alabama when this debacle was going on, I must disagree that Roy Moore was on the "side of God" in this case. The issue of the Ten Commandments being displayed is a different argument altogether. The bottom line in this case is that the state supreme court (unanimously), state governor, and attorney general (the governor and AG are both conservative Christians) all told Moore to remove the monument and he refused, clearly violating Paul's admonition in Romans 13.
Now, I like having the Ten Commandments displayed in public places (eg, government buildings), though I understand the opposing argument completely - if you allow the Bible to be displayed, you also must allow the Koran. But there is no Biblical mandate to display the Ten Commandments in secular government buildings. So, I don't believe Romans 13 applies at all in this case. Moore should have obeyed his civil authorities and removed the monument.
As a side note, Moore is seen by most people in Alabama (a very conservative state) as being a political opportunist rather than a devout follower of God. He has a very suspect track record when it comes to making "stands" like this, and many saw it (correctly, as it turns out) as a starting point for his campaign for governor. So, what looks like piety on the surface isn't always so...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
03-27-2008, 10:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge Baptist At the end of the day judge Moore was right and on the side of God and the federal court as usual was against Christ and in league with Satan. 
God's law trumps everytime. | 
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2 | 
03-27-2008, 10:20 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 464
Thanked 166 Times in 133 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladestunner316 I would go but being in Kirkland,Wa dont help  | Well, I suppose that's a good enough reason.
But we could've made room on the couch for you.
BTW, we plan on making audio available of the seminars, barring technical difficulties or ineptitude. I'll post links as soon as they are available.
Blessings,
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2 | 
03-27-2008, 10:20 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
| | Quote: |
Having lived in Alabama when this debacle was going on, I must disagree that Roy Moore was on the "side of God" in this case. The issue of the Ten Commandments being displayed is a different argument altogether. The bottom line in this case is that the state supreme court (unanimously), state governor, and attorney general (the governor and AG are both conservative Christians) all told Moore to remove the monument and he refused, clearly violating Paul's admonition in Romans 13.
| The prosecuation disagrees with you. They made it clear that the issue was not about some monument, but wether the state may acknowledge God as the source of law. | 
03-27-2008, 10:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 219
Thanks: 28
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote: |
Having lived in Alabama when this debacle was going on, I must disagree that Roy Moore was on the "side of God" in this case. The issue of the Ten Commandments being displayed is a different argument altogether. The bottom line in this case is that the state supreme court (unanimously), state governor, and attorney general (the governor and AG are both conservative Christians) all told Moore to remove the monument and he refused, clearly violating Paul's admonition in Romans 13.
| The prosecuation disagrees with you. They made it clear that the issue was not about some monument, but wether the state may acknowledge God as the source of law. | Link?
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
03-27-2008, 10:25 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge Baptist | Having lived in Alabama when this debacle was going on, I must disagree that Roy Moore was on the "side of God" in this case. The issue of the Ten Commandments being displayed is a different argument altogether. The bottom line in this case is that the state supreme court (unanimously), state governor, and attorney general (the governor and AG are both conservative Christians) all told Moore to remove the monument and he refused, clearly violating Paul's admonition in Romans 13. | Note that if you are correct, then we should see in the prosecution a clear reference to the monument. But note that is precisely what we do not see. Quote: |
Now, I like having the Ten Commandments displayed in public places (eg, government buildings), though I understand the opposing argument completely - if you allow the Bible to be displayed, you also must allow the Koran. But there is no Biblical mandate to display the Ten Commandments in secular government buildings. So, I don't believe Romans 13 applies at all in this case. Moore should have obeyed his civil authorities and removed the monument.
| Your last 2 sentences are contradictory (never mind the erroneous reading of Romans 13). You believe that Romans 13 doesn't apply in this case. If so, lacking a theological argument, how was Moore wrong in disobeying the state? But in your first paragraph you say he violates Romans 13, but in this one you say it doesn't apply. Which is it? | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
03-27-2008, 10:35 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 3,677
Thanks: 595
Thanked 631 Times in 324 Posts
| | | Deu 6:7 And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
Deu 6:8 And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes.
Deu 6:9 And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.
Imo, anytime any state tells any christian to remove the 10 commandments from view or violate the law of God in any manner they are outside of Romans 13 protection thier actions. Government is just as responsible to God's law as individuals are.
__________________ 1689 Baptist Confession
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley, Wilderness Road Baptist Assembly.
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann. www.wildernessroadbaptist.org | 
03-27-2008, 10:39 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
| | | Also, the historic Reformed position on Romans 13 is that the lesser civil magistrate (which includes everything from Sherriffs to Judges) may rise up and interpose themselves.
Calvin and John Knox taught this. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ivanhoe For This Useful Post: | | 
03-27-2008, 10:49 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 219
Thanks: 28
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
Your last 2 sentences are contradictory (never mind the erroneous reading of Romans 13). You believe that Romans 13 doesn't apply in this case. If so, lacking a theological argument, how was Moore wrong in disobeying the state? But in your first paragraph you say he violates Romans 13, but in this one you say it doesn't apply. Which is it? | Very nice Michael Moore-esque video splicing short segments together without context! You missed the entire point of Pryor's (the prosecutor) cross examination. Pryor was pointing out that Moore can acknowledge God in numerous other ways, and didn't need a monument to do so. While it hurt Moore's case in displaying the monument, it actually illustrated that a justice can reference God in many other ways. Pryor essentially demonstrated what Moore was doing: unnecessary grandstanding under the guise of piety. That video is dishonest and misleading in that implies that Moore was on trial for "acknowledging God," which was not the issue at all.
Fair point about my Romans 13 comments - I was very unclear. Let me clarify: I do believe Romans 13 applies in this case, and that Moore was wrong for disboeying civil authority. What I meant to say is that there are no exceptions to Romans 13 in this particular case, because obeying the supreme court would not be violating God's law. So, Moore should have obeyed the court, and not doing so violates the concept of Romans 13. How is my reading of Romans 13 erroneous?
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
03-27-2008, 11:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 4,949
Thanks: 1,509
Thanked 769 Times in 523 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe
Your last 2 sentences are contradictory (never mind the erroneous reading of Romans 13). You believe that Romans 13 doesn't apply in this case. If so, lacking a theological argument, how was Moore wrong in disobeying the state? But in your first paragraph you say he violates Romans 13, but in this one you say it doesn't apply. Which is it? | Very nice Michael Moore-esque video splicing short segments together without context! You missed the entire point of Pryor's (the prosecutor) cross examination. Pryor was pointing out that Moore can acknowledge God in numerous other ways, and didn't need a monument to do so. While it hurt Moore's case in displaying the monument, it actually illustrated that a justice can reference God in many other ways. Pryor essentially demonstrated what Moore was doing: unnecessary grandstanding under the guise of piety. That video is dishonest and misleading in that implies that Moore was on trial for "acknowledging God," which was not the issue at all.
Fair point about my Romans 13 comments - I was very unclear. Let me clarify: I do believe Romans 13 applies in this case, and that Moore was wrong for disboeying civil authority. What I meant to say is that there are no exceptions to Romans 13 in this particular case, because obeying the supreme court would not be violating God's law. So, Moore should have obeyed the court, and not doing so violates the concept of Romans 13. How is my reading of Romans 13 erroneous? | Judge Moore is not disobeying legitimate civil authority, because he is a legitimate civil authority, being a civil magistrate he is one of &quo | |