Was reading Vos' Commentary on the WLC with my wife tonight and he made an interesting argument. Not sure it's watertight but it's interesting:

Why must a book which gives all glory to God be genuine?

It must be genuine, that is it must be what it claims to be, the Word of God, because no one but God could have had a motive for writing it. Wicked men would not write a book which condemns wickedness and gives all glory to a holy, sin-hating God. Good men could not write a book on their own initiative and represent it falsely as the Word of God, for if they did that they would be deceivers, and therefore not good men. For the same reasons neither devils nor holy angels could have written it. Therefore God is the only person who could be the real Author of the Bible.

__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

It's the sort of argument that is better put: This is EXACTLY the book that the GOD it describes would have written.

I'm not sure it is the case that a devil wouldn't present a lying representation of a God that didn't exist.

__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI


When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --

This is one of the traditional proofs for the divine authority of Scripture. We see from Paul's Pharisaic days what influence limited religious conviction can play on producing wicked works from a genuine and zealous advocate. For that reason I think the argument is better stated when it traces the authority of Old and New Testaments back to the Lord Jesus Himself, as the Prophet of the Church. The impossibility of His being mistaken in such a matter is generally accepted, so that people are left with the choice of accepting His claims on the merit of His character or rejecting wholesale Him and His message so as to deny all possibility of truth. This is basically the dilemma the Lord set before Pilate.

__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."

That is exactly what happened to me during my conversion in middle age. It hit me like a ton of bricks that Jesus testified to the truth of Scripture. I was faced with the same dilemna: either reject Jesus as authority or take what he said to be true. Praise God his Spirit brought me under his authority.

On the other hand, my wife, who was converted a mere few months before me, was overwhelmed by the other argument. She had a Christian friend who told her that the Bible is THE Word of God. So my wife decided to sit down and read it for herself. She got through Genesis 1 and said to herself, "Uhoh, Cindy is right, this is the Word of God."

__________________
Raymond Victor Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Wow. Never heard that before but it sounds pretty solid.

__________________
Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo
Deacon
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.

"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.

Man...that is a seemingly wonderful description. I like it.

Praise God for His holy Word

__________________
Michael P Doyle
Waukesha WI
Member of http://www.cornerstone-pca.com/
Attending http://www.lampseminary.org/

Interesting argument......

__________________
Ben Franks

I attend: Ketoctin Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
in Purcellville, Virginia
I'm a member of: Heartland Community Church (PCA)
in Wichita, Kansas
I blog here (along with my Dad): http://rrfranks.blogspot.com/
And I'm a student here: www.phc.edu

"Remember the speeches we have spoken so often over our mead, when we raised boast on the bench, heroes in the hall, about hard fighting. Now may the man who is bold prove that he is."-Aelfwine at the Battle of Maldon

Don't know enough about the Qur'an but could this argument be used for it?

__________________
Mark Maney
Edmonton Chinese Baptist Church
Master of Theological Studies
Master of Arts (Cross Cultural)
Trinity Western University, ACTS Seminaries
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

What little I do know of the Koran is that it promotes and encourages wickedness on the part of it's adherents, so I would think this argument could not be used in it's defense.

__________________
Brad
Member- Eagle Heights PCA
Winchester, VA

Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.

I think CS Lewis makes this argument in one of his most famous quotes:

__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000

Perhaps similarly but not quite. The false god of the Qur'an's view on sin is pretty soft. No sacrifice for sin is necessary and certainly nobody needs to stand in the place of a Muslim for his inability to be righteous.

Hard-core atheists and evolutionists would poke holes in this argument by saying that belief in a supreme being confers some sort of evolutionary advantage. So they would say that the "motive" for writing the Bible comes from a evolutionarily driven desire to have an all-powerful creator. Obviously this makes no sense on a variety of levels.

Going along with Vos and the OP, the most striking thing about the Bible is that from a human perspective it is counter-intuitive to starting a fictitious religion. All of the authors and heroes (except Jesus) are horribly flawed, from Adam and Eve all the way through the disciples and Paul. The only common thread is the grace of God in using these imperfect humans. As Rich says in his post, either the Scriptures were written by evil men, which fits the description of everyone in the Bible except Christ, or good men doing a poor job of pulling off a wicked scheme, which would make them wicked (and incompetent) as well. The only plausible explanation for the Bible is that it is God-inspired truth.

__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18

Mason,

I agree it makes no sense for an evolutionist to try to argue that way. A pagan deity makes sense if you buy into the "...we're frightened by lightning so let's make up god to explain it..." myth but why would someone invent a God that is more frightening than nature (Mark 4:41)?

Right, I agree. In fact, I would go so far as to say if God didn't exist humans would never have come up with the idea of Him on their own - particularly in an infinite, all-powerful being. Belief in God is too great of an abstraction and too unfathomable for humans to invent if He didn't exist. Of course I can't prove that, but to me it makes sense - how could random biochemical reactions imagine the idea of God?

What about men who thought they were writing a divinely inspired book? They would not be willfully deceiving anyone, because they themselves would be mistaken.

After all, many militant nonbelievers shrug Christians off as delusional. And all it would take is a delusional person to start it off, because other people could buy into the religion.

Of course, at this point, we're reaching low probabilities, but I'm trying to see what weaknesses the argument has.

__________________
Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH
When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH

“Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards-

I think you've hit the nail on the head with the weakness of the argument. It could be the case that the men writing the Bible were writing what they thought to be divinely inspired. We would say, for example, that Joseph Smith probably falls into the camp of writing a text that he thought was divine. Ultimately, it is not possible to know the motives of someone like Joseph Smith...perhaps he was trying to deceive...however, that fact doesn't remove the possibility stated in your excepted to Vos' argument.

I don't believe we can escape the fact that ultimately, the source of convincing for one's mind / soul regarding the Bible being God's word resides in the Holy Spirit. There is no proof in the Enlightenment sense of proof...at least not for we who rely on the words of the closed canon rather than being like OT / NT believers who saw the acts of God in history.

__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN

I believe that many would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand. - CS Lewis

I really like the Vos book!

Muhammad set out the right for "god" to be contradictory and capricious. There's no holiness or consistency to be found there.

__________________
JWithnell
Member Bethel OPC
Virginia
http://learningyesican.blogspot.com/