» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 95 | | 24 members and 71 guests | | AltogetherLovely, austinww, Chippy, christabella_warren, dannyhyde, dfranks, DMcFadden, duncan001, Edward, Hamalas, Hebrew Student, Jake Terpstra, Julio Martinez Jr, Pergamum, Piano Hero, raekwon, reformed trucker, Simply_Nikki, Wayne, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: Which hills would you die on? | |
Predestination
|    | 54 | 78.26% | |
Everlasting Punishment of the wicked
|    | 44 | 63.77% | |
non-continuism (regarding charismatic gifts
|    | 8 | 11.59% | |
Continuism (REGARDING CHARISMATIC GIFTS)
|    | 2 | 2.90% | |
Confessionism (your creed)
|    | 13 | 18.84% | |
infant-baptism
|    | 14 | 20.29% | |
believers baptism
|    | 9 | 13.04% | |
ecclesiology
|    | 13 | 18.84% | |
church government
|    | 11 | 15.94% | |
once saved always saved
|    | 41 | 59.42% |  | | 
02-26-2009, 01:17 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | | which hills would you die on?
So which of these hills would you die on...?
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." John Calvin
John from Scotland
Denomination: Attending Baptist church
Confessional Subscription:London Baptist Confession
Blog: [url]www.three-streams.co.uk[/url]
| 
02-26-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | |
I didn't see a poll, so I looked at your avatar and saw only a lake and not a hill. So I suppose I could die in the lake if I couldn't swim.
Theognome
__________________
Bill Cunningham
Covenant Reformed Church, URC
Kansas City
There are three kinds of people- those who can count, and those who can't.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:20 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 655
Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
| | |
What are the options?
__________________
[B]Manley Beasley[/B]
Southern Baptist Convention
Fayetteville, Arkansas
[B]Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum (We are beggars. This is true.).--Luther's dying words[/B]
| 
02-26-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 So which of these hills would you die on...? | You mean, "So on which of these hills would you die....?"   Sorry, I couldn't resist since you had nothing else to say.
| 
02-26-2009, 01:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | |
Ah- there's the poll. This is an easy one- none of them.
The only hill I'll defend to the last ounce of strength is Salvation through Grace in Christ alone.
Theognome
| | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Monrovia, CA
Posts: 1,305
Thanks: 184
Thanked 96 Times in 76 Posts
| | | Seems to easy....
I mean...too easy...Those choices make it too easy...in my mind...Predestined, can define God's sovereignty in ALL things....so...that's it!
__________________ WWW.SURFWRITERS.BLOGSPOT.COM
Trevor
Christian/Husband/Father/Writer/Teacher--
--In that order.
Bethany Church
CALIFORNIA
God is my King
Love God--Live Large
| 
02-26-2009, 01:26 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 655
Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
| | |
I'm not sure how some picked predestination and not perseverance.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to ManleyBeasley For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | |
I must qualify "once saved always saved" to mean Perseverance of the Saints.
Not the "easy believism" version of the doctrine.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Roanoke VA.
Covenant Reformed Episcopal Church. Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MrMerlin777 For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ManleyBeasley I'm not sure how some picked predestination and not perseverance. | Got to have the beginning before you can have the ending! | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OPC'n For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: va
Posts: 6,234
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,486 Times in 890 Posts
| | |
What are our options?
__________________ Shalom, jessi PCA
Steelers fan exiled to Virginia “Whatever your heart clings to and confides in, that is really your God.” Martin Luther | 
02-26-2009, 01:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 671
Thanked 843 Times in 395 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome Ah- there's the poll. This is an easy one- none of them.
The only hill I'll defend to the last ounce of strength is Salvation through Grace in Christ alone.
Theognome |
I would only die on the hill of something that is absolutely crucial to the Gospel. While several of those I hold dear, I don't consider any of them to be absolute essentials of the faith.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
02-26-2009, 01:35 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 655
Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sjonee Quote:
Originally Posted by ManleyBeasley I'm not sure how some picked predestination and not perseverance. | Got to have the beginning before you can have the ending!  | I'm just saying if you have predestination then you also have perseverance. On this poll you can choose both.
| 
02-26-2009, 01:36 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,911
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,702 Times in 745 Posts
| | |
Without having voted, I will say I am hitherto more than slightly disappointed. For all the rhetoric and vitriol thrown around these forums on baptism, nobody wants to make their last stand upon that hill.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: va
Posts: 6,234
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,486 Times in 890 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome Ah- there's the poll. This is an easy one- none of them.
The only hill I'll defend to the last ounce of strength is Salvation through Grace in Christ alone.
Theognome |
I would only die on the hill of something that is absolutely crucial to the Gospel. While several of those I hold dear, I don't consider any of them to be absolute essentials of the faith. |
Essential as in: the wicked will perish but for the grace of God sovereignly electing to save them, and thus holding on to them until they reach glory? If so, I saw those three, which I think ARE the Gospel!
| | The Following User Says Thank You to he beholds For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Monrovia, CA
Posts: 1,305
Thanks: 184
Thanked 96 Times in 76 Posts
| | | I didn't look close enough....
sorry, I didn't know you could pick two...but, predestined, includes, perseverance...in my opinion. | | The Following User Says Thank You to tdowns For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: va
Posts: 6,234
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,486 Times in 890 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock Without having voted, I will say I am hitherto more than slightly disappointed. For all the rhetoric and vitriol thrown around these forums on baptism, nobody wants to make their last stand upon that hill. | I did! I almost didn't, because I was thinking, "Well, they can still grow up and be baptized, so maybe it isn't worth dying for," but I couldn't get past the fact that we are able to bring our infant children into God's covenant by baptizing them! So sure, someone could grow up and become baptized, but why deny him the benefits of being a part of the covenant from the very beginning of life onward?
The others I chose were:
predestination, for I think it is essential that we understand that our salvation comes from God as a gift that we cannot earn by making the right choice to accept him;
punishment of wicked, for I think it is essential that we determine exactly from what we are being saved;
and perseverance of the saints, because I think it is essential that we know that since the work is begun by God, He will finish it!
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to he beholds For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 01:55 PM
|  | Reformed Dane | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Breum, Denmark
Posts: 6,346
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 1,014 Times in 736 Posts
| |
Non of the above !
I would kill the oponent if he did not hold mine | 
02-26-2009, 02:30 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome I didn't see a poll, so I looked at your avatar and saw only a lake and not a hill. So I suppose I could die in the lake if I couldn't swim.
Theognome | lol!
I'm curious about the ones who chose
Ecclesiology and church government
Which model of church and government do you think is so essential to the faith (I ask this because I think both of these are more essential than is ofetn realised.)
| 
02-26-2009, 02:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 256
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome Ah- there's the poll. This is an easy one- none of them.
The only hill I'll defend to the last ounce of strength is Salvation through Grace in Christ alone.
Theognome |
I would only die on the hill of something that is absolutely crucial to the Gospel. While several of those I hold dear, I don't consider any of them to be absolute essentials of the faith. |
I don't think I would die on any of those hills, and I even disagree with some of them  However, there are some that I am quite convinced of and currently do not see how I could be convinced otherwise. If that's what you mean, then there would be quite a few.
__________________ Mark Maney
Edmonton Chinese Baptist Church
Master of Theological Studies
Master of Arts (Cross Cultural)
Trinity Western University, ACTS Seminaries
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | 
02-26-2009, 02:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
What is meant by "Continuism (Charismatic Gifts)"? That Charismatic gifts (like speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing, etc.) continue?
Personally, for me, I would die on (at least I hope I would) any hill that Scripture is very clear on. I'm going to think about what that means, and then vote.
| 
02-26-2009, 02:50 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 What is meant by "Continuism (Charismatic Gifts)"? That Charismatic gifts (like speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing, etc.) continue?
Personally, for me, I would die on (at least I hope I would) any hill that Scripture is very clear on. I'm going to think about what that means, and then vote. | yes, that is what that means.
So, would you really die for secondary issues?
| 
02-26-2009, 02:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington
Posts: 6,898
Thanks: 2,580
Thanked 999 Times in 630 Posts
| |
I picked the same as Jessica. You go girl! I will die on the hill next ya.
__________________ Traci
Lynnwood OPC "I have taken all my good deeds, and all my bad deeds, and cast them through each other in a heap before the Lord, and fled from both, and betaken myself to the Lord Jesus Christ, and in him I have sweet peace."--David Dickson | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Augusta For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 02:51 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,911
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,702 Times in 745 Posts
| |
Why must a certain doctrine be, in itself, "essential" to the gospel for it to be the place where we draw the line? For instance, it is no sign of disrespect to or a doubting the sound profession of my baptist brothers to say that I would go down upon that hill to preserve the purity of the church. I love them strongly, and believe just as strongly that such is an error and the church ought to be guarded against such error, though indeed the gospel itself can still stand.
Note what Vermigli said in his dedicatory preface affixed to his Dialogue on the Two Natures of Christ, dedicated to John Jewel. The following is with regards to the ubiquitarian controversy: Quote:
Accordingly, for the sake of that most holy devotion which burns so brightly with the greatest zeal for God's pure worship, do not allow these unsound teachings (I say nothing harsher), to spread or to wander about freely in your churches.
....
Every single one of us who worships Christ with a pure and sound faith should strive with hands and feet that the vineyard of the Lord should at last be purged of filth, thorns, thistles, and snakes so that it can produce rightful, sweet, and bountiful fruit for its owner...Hence it is necessary for you, along with the others who by God's choice command and steer the same ship of the church, to remain watchful lest Christ's inheritance be subverted by some new sort of error.
| He surely did not consider the Lutheran ubiquitarian teachings to be essential to the gospel (he refused to call the teachings anything more than "unsound"); nor would he impugn the profession of Lutherans who held such a doctrine, but surely could love such as his brethren. But this did not mean that such was a teaching at which the line was not to be drawn: it was to be fought back boldly, lest by its thorn and thistle the pure fruit of God's church be squelched.
I mean, we're the PuritanBoard. I doubt anyone would argue that vestments are essential to the gospel, but they certainly staked it all on that hill; nor do I think they were foolish to do so.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 03:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 What is meant by "Continuism (Charismatic Gifts)"? That Charismatic gifts (like speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing, etc.) continue?
Personally, for me, I would die on (at least I hope I would) any hill that Scripture is very clear on. I'm going to think about what that means, and then vote. | yes, that is what that means.
So, would you really die for secondary issues? | If someone was asking me if I believed a secondary issue (any one you pick it) that is clearly scriptural, and if I answered wrongly they'd kill me or if they told me to answer wrongly and if I don't that they'd kill me. Then I would answer always rightly. I'd rather be honest than live this earthly life.
Is this not what you mean by, "what hill would you die on?" I'd die on anything Scripture says because it is God's Word.
| 
02-26-2009, 03:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ManleyBeasley I'm not sure how some picked predestination and not perseverance. | For me the latter is assumed in the prior.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
| 
02-26-2009, 04:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| |
Predestination - Ephesians 1 (clear in Scripture throughout) I would die for this
Everlasting Punishment of the Wicked - Everlasting Punishment/destruction (Mt. 26, 1 Thess.) I would die for this and live eternally 
Non-Continuism - Scripture has ceased, this is clear, I would die for this
Continuism - this cannot be true, Scripture has ceased
Confessionism (your creed) - A Confession is man-made, I would not die for this, although i would fight
Infant Baptism - Gen. 17, Acts 2 - clear to me  I would die for this
Believers Baptism (only) - Seems children were baptized in Scripture and throughout church history, this cannot be true (no offense to baptists, I wouldn't hold this over their heads, but I would die for it)
Ecclesiology - (this is too broad, I don't know what is being said here)
Church Government - Church where head is Christ, ruled by elders, 1 Timothy, Titus, Acts 6 - I would die for this truth
Once saved always saved - This has to do with salvation, if God has saved you, He will never leave you nor forsake you.
| 
02-26-2009, 04:31 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 27
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
| | |
Predestination - gets at the heart of the gospel... but I might reword it to something like "By Grace alone". The whole "Here I stand I can do no other" theme... Luther was willing to die for it.
Eternal Punishment - I voted for this... but I know strong "reformed" brothers who lean toward annihilationism... But this idea is pretty central to the idea of just punishment for sin...
Perseverence of the Saints - That's the power of God to save! I'll die here
__________________
Rob G.
Under care, OPC (currently an associate member at a PCA church)
Pittsburgh, PA For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.- 1 Cor. 1:18
| 
02-26-2009, 04:36 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
so... who are you and what are you who will die for a form of church government and ecclesiology?
| 
02-26-2009, 04:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: St Albans, WV
Posts: 54
Thanks: 29
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
| | |
1 Corinthians 15:3
15:3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures,..."
Would lose a job over predestination...I've seen too many non-productive discussions with the other issues....interesting poll, though! thanks
__________________
Jim-Bob...The Hillbilly Hebrew. Shalom, Y'all!
| 
02-26-2009, 04:38 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,911
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,702 Times in 745 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 so... who are you and what are you who will die for a form of church government and ecclesiology? | They seem like some cool cats, and I think I like them (whoever they are).
| 
02-26-2009, 04:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | |
I selected predestination, eternal punishment of the wicked, and perseverance of the saints (if that's what you mean by OSAS).
I believe those things are much more essential to unity than the other options, and I quite frankly am not that concerned about orthodox infant baptizers, believer's baptizers, different forms of church government, continuationism vs. cessationism, etc. I believe what I believe, but if people have different perspectives that they truly believe are taught in Scripture (see the baptism debate), I truly support them! Same with charismatic gifts, etc. All I want is Christ glorified above all things; less critical issues should be debated and considered among His body, but I'm not too concerned about it. This is why I would be more than willing to attend a good Presby church even though I am Reformed Baptist. I support their infant baptism if they believe Scripture teaches it; however, in my own family, I would not let it be done.
I am pretty inclusive and geared toward unity if it's among true believers that want to honor our Lord. | 
02-26-2009, 04:51 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| |
ESV Onlyism, the only hill worth fighting for.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Zenas For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 05:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | |
I am almost with you, Andrew, but it's got to be a VeggieTales edition. Until then, I cannot stomach fellowship with you!
| 
02-26-2009, 05:04 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| | |
VeggieTales are an abomination.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Zenas For This Useful Post: | | 
02-26-2009, 05:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas ESV Onlyism, the only hill worth fighting for.
| Maybe it won’t be long for us to be called to that martyrdom,
to stand for the right to have the Bible and Preach the Bible!
| 
02-26-2009, 05:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas VeggieTales are an abomination. | I just knew you were a heretic.
| 
02-26-2009, 05:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 349
Thanked 191 Times in 133 Posts
| | |
__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000
| 
02-26-2009, 05:49 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| | |
By grace alone
through faith alone
in Christ alone.
Thats my hill.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| 
02-26-2009, 05:52 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,140 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | |
I'm conflicted. Are your options of "infant baptism" and "believers baptism" mutually exclusive of one another?
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | 
02-26-2009, 05:55 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua I'm conflicted. Are your options of "infant baptism" and "believers baptism" mutually exclusive of one another? | Yes, I would be assuming the traditional incompatibility and hostility of earlier days. you know the days before being outnumbered by common enemies caused baptists and presbyterian calvinists to walk to gether, the days when baptists would be drowned in lakes for their stance and when some baptists would take up swords... |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |