» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 72 | | 16 members and 56 guests | | Christusregnat, danmpem, Davidius, JDWiseman, Mayflower, Nebrexan, Puritan Sailor, Reformed Christian, Reformingstudent, RTaron, Southern Presbyterian, Theoretical, Timothy William | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
02-21-2008, 07:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | | Does God Love Everyone? As Calvinists, this question isn't one we generally struggle with. But for the unbeliever or non-Calvinist, it is. Here's a short youtube video that deals with the question in an uncompromisingly bold, and biblically faithful way. Does God Love Everyone?
__________________
Stephen
Reformer, SBC
Faith Defenders
Anaheim, CA
[URL="http://biblicalthought.com"]biblicalthought.com[/URL]
"Resolved, never to give over, nor in the least to slacken, my fight with my corruptions, however unsuccessful I may be." --Jonathan Edwards, The Resolutions, #56
| 
02-21-2008, 11:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 407
Thanks: 123
Thanked 56 Times in 44 Posts
| | Thanks for the link Stephen,
What a great video - and full of classic Dr. Bob attitude.
I'm a huge fan of Dr. Bob and his ministry. I always like his direct and to-the-point way of teaching.
His messages were instrumental to my early steps into the Reformed Faith. I just started listening to his series on Romans. I'm glad see he's been busy lately.
__________________
Steve Butts - Former SBC-er
Three Forms of Unity - Bradenton CRC - Bradenton, Florida (A conservative member in a conservative congregation) "It is a good thing God chose me before I was born, because he surely would not have afterwards." — C.H. Spurgeon | 
02-21-2008, 11:08 PM
|  | I pity the fool! (who says in his heart "There is no God") | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Broad Top, Pa.
Posts: 7,164
Thanks: 22
Thanked 94 Times in 70 Posts
| | | Yes, I too greatly enjoyed that video! | 
02-22-2008, 12:10 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 104
Thanked 208 Times in 135 Posts
| | | It's marvelously refreshing on multiple levels to hear such a clear, uncompromising stating of Biblical fact, not the least of which is how it absolutely feeds the FV's theological theories into the shredder.
He's also dead-on that it's preferable to be an avowed atheist such as my eldest son (prayers for him would be appreciated when you read this) than a faux-believer such as my Episcopalian mother (prayer also requested!), who thinks the ECUSA is doing just fine, sees no particular value in Scripture ("that was then...this is now!"), has been a regular attendee at her church for decades, yet is no more a Christian than the aforementioned son.
I have far more hope for him ("One thing I know is I'll never be is a Christian") than for her ("Of course we're not all good...we haven't finished evolving yet"), though naturally I pray earnestly for them both.
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood. The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Last edited by Gryphonette; 02-22-2008 at 12:11 AM.
Reason: Fix omission.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Gryphonette For This Useful Post: | | 
02-22-2008, 12:16 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,284
Thanks: 305
Thanked 154 Times in 111 Posts
| | Quote: |
He's also dead-on that it's preferable to be an avowed atheist such as my eldest son (prayers for him would be appreciated when you read this) than a faux-believer...
| funny you should post this - a discussion group I attend had as one of the potential topics - "What religion would you be if there were no Christianity?"
I am prepared to answer that I would be an atheist, because I have examined all other religions and found them to be so inconsistent as to be un-followable. | 
02-22-2008, 12:41 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Leduc, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,666
Thanks: 113
Thanked 356 Times in 184 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette it absolutely feeds the FV's theological theories into the shredder | How so?
__________________
Rev. Daniel Kok
Pastor of Grace Reformed Church (URCNA)
Leduc, Alberta CANADA Church Blog
"there is no creature, either in heaven or on earth, who loves us more than Jesus Christ" Belgic Confession, Article 26
| 
02-22-2008, 01:16 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 104
Thanked 208 Times in 135 Posts
| | | The "two people" aspect, which is wholly Biblical yet smudged by the FV with its insistence that simply being baptized makes one a "child of God", along with its teaching that Christ's death "purchased blessings" for the "non-elect covenant member." (AAPC Position Paper on Baptism, etc.: "8. God has decreed from the foundation of the world all that comes to pass, including who would be saved and lost for all eternity. Included in His decree, however, is that some persons, not destined for final salvation, will be drawn to Christ and His people only for a time. These, for a season, enjoy real blessings, purchased for them by Christ's cross and applied to them by the Holy Spirit through Word and Sacrament.") | 
02-22-2008, 01:19 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 3,844
Thanks: 597
Thanked 478 Times in 310 Posts
| | | Thanks for posting this! I sent it to my unbelieving classmate.
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics This may explain the old adage about Baptists being Methodists with shoes, and Presbyterians being Baptists who can read. To round out the adage, Lutherans might qualify as Presbyterians who drink to excess, and Episcopalians as Lutherans who know when to say when. - D.G. Hart
| 
02-22-2008, 01:43 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | | Davidius, that's cool. The fact that it's on youtube also helps because you can embed it into myspace, blogs, etc. Keep us posted, let us know how he responds (your unbelieving friend). | 
02-22-2008, 08:29 AM
|  | The Odd Mod(erator) | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 5,382
Thanks: 166
Thanked 831 Times in 386 Posts
| | I like Dr. Morey a LOT! My only two complaints about him are 1, he's a dispensationalist and 2, his hair is just too dark. If someone can prove THAT color isn't out of a bottle then I apologize. Hey, I got my standards.  Not color! | 
02-22-2008, 08:41 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 407
Thanks: 123
Thanked 56 Times in 44 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I like Dr. Morey a LOT! [...] he's a dispensationalist [...] | Aw man! I keep forgetting about that part of him. Other than that (and his hair dye), wouldn't you agree that he's usually spot-on?
Last edited by Seb; 02-22-2008 at 12:33 PM.
| 
02-22-2008, 09:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Uttar Pradesh, North India
Posts: 354
Thanks: 49
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
| | | I am new to Dr. Bob teachings.
I enjoyed watching His arguements, Oh how serious is the man!!!!!
"God is the measure of all things". I agree.
Thanks for the link.
__________________
<Raj>
Church Planting/Community devolepment
U.P. and U.A. States, North India
No other Name except Jesus (Acts 4:12) http://groaningcreation.blog.com | 
02-22-2008, 11:15 AM
| | "The Brain" | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Green Valley, AZ
Posts: 332
Thanks: 10
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | Hello JD, Quote:
"What religion would you be if there were no Christianity?"
I am prepared to answer that I would be an atheist, because I have examined all other religions and found them to be so inconsistent as to be un-followable.
| I know this is off topic and a little pedantic (forgive me - I am just having a little fun), but in what sense is atheism consistent? At one time in history there was no Christianity. My guess is that we would affirm (along with Paul and Jesus) that Judiaism had something going for it prior to Christianity coming on the scene. Wouldn't being a Jew be better than being an atheist? Also, have you really examined all other religions? I have not.  Plus, even if there is no Christianity, all of reality declares the existence of God. As such, atheism is not more rational than theistic positions.
I will now go and duck.
Brian
P.S. God loves the world.
__________________
Brian Bosse
Faith Community Church
Tucson, Arizona Scientiam Dei
Last edited by Brian Bosse; 02-22-2008 at 12:14 PM.
| 
02-22-2008, 12:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 540
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bosse Hello JD, Quote:
"What religion would you be if there were no Christianity?"
I am prepared to answer that I would be an atheist, because I have examined all other religions and found them to be so inconsistent as to be un-followable.
| I know this is off topic and a little pedantic (forgive me - I am just ahving a little fun), but in what sense is atheism consistent? At one time in history there was no Christianity. My guess is that we would affirm (along with Paul and Jesus) that Judiaism had something going for it prior to Christianity coming on the seen. Wouldn't being a Jew be better than being an atheist? Also, have you really examined all other religions? I have not.  Plus, even if there is no Christianity, all of reality declares the existence of God. As such, atheism is stupid.
I will now go and duck.
Brian
P.S. God loves the world. | If there were no Christianity, I might have to be an Arminian. Or was that an Animist? Oh, nevermind. The point is moot. | 
02-22-2008, 01:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: State of Franklin
Posts: 1,876
Thanks: 110
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by biblicalthought As Calvinists, this question isn't one we generally struggle with. But for the unbeliever or non-Calvinist, it is. Here's a short youtube video that deals with the question in an uncompromisingly bold, and biblically faithful way. Does God Love Everyone? | Very good. And very clearly reasoned from Scripture. Too bad he got the "rationalist" wrong at the beginning. No rationalist would say "Well I think so!" in answer to the question. He would reason it clearly and deductively from what he considers true premises.
The rationalist would say: If it ain't deductive, you don't know it. And he would have a well reasoned answer to the question - and laugh at anyone who said "well I think so" as being ir-rational.
Dr. Bob used clear deductive thinking to say "No, God does not love everyone". His true premise was God's Word is true. His clear deduction was if Scripture says God does not love someone, then God does not love everyone. So Dr. Bob, God bless him, is a Christian rationalist. He should take care not to undermine the "reason" which underlies his reasoning.
__________________
R. Anthony Coletti
Midway Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Jonesborough, TN
[i]et venite et arguite me dicit Dominus[/i]
| 
02-25-2008, 04:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I like Dr. Morey a LOT! My only two complaints about him are 1, he's a dispensationalist and 2, his hair is just too dark. If someone can prove THAT color isn't out of a bottle then I apologize. Hey, I got my standards.  Not color! | (Buzzer sound!)
He's not a dispensationalist. Not by the furthest stretch of the imagination (within Reformed circles that is) can Morey be confused for a dispensationalist. You may have a point with the bottle, but I got to step up and defend my pastor for all things theological. | 
02-25-2008, 05:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Civbert Quote:
Originally Posted by biblicalthought As Calvinists, this question isn't one we generally struggle with. But for the unbeliever or non-Calvinist, it is. Here's a short youtube video that deals with the question in an uncompromisingly bold, and biblically faithful way. Does God Love Everyone? | Very good. And very clearly reasoned from Scripture. Too bad he got the "rationalist" wrong at the beginning. No rationalist would say "Well I think so!" in answer to the question. He would reason it clearly and deductively from what he considers true premises.
The rationalist would say: If it ain't deductive, you don't know it. And he would have a well reasoned answer to the question - and laugh at anyone who said "well I think so" as being ir-rational.
Dr. Bob used clear deductive thinking to say "No, God does not love everyone". His true premise was God's Word is true. His clear deduction was if Scripture says God does not love someone, then God does not love everyone. So Dr. Bob, God bless him, is a Christian rationalist. He should take care not to undermine the "reason" which underlies his reasoning. | When he's referring to reason, he means "R"eason. Since he is a primary objector to Natural Theology, his main thrust is to get people to look to Scripture rather than feelings, faith, experience, or reason - as the Origin of truth, justice, morals, meaning, and beauty. He's lumping all of humanism together and contrasting it with "biblicism," or "exegetical theology." This is to defend Revealed Theology and get Christians shaken up to the point that they throw out their JP Moreland, Craig, Geisler, et al, books, and ask: what does God have to say about...
He's not a rationalist. He frequently reminds us young guys studying under him that reason is a handmaiden to revelation. In fact, perhaps playing off of Luther's famous saying on reason (she's a whore), he once said "When reason is the handmaiden to revelation, she's a good little girl. But when she gets out on that street corner and acts as the Origin of theology..." and the rest can't be said here (maybe over some beers - or at a men's retreat)!  | 
02-25-2008, 05:43 AM
|  | The Odd Mod(erator) | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 5,382
Thanks: 166
Thanked 831 Times in 386 Posts
| | Stephen,
I am only too happy to be wrong. Perhaps I'm confused. Is he pre-trib, pre-millennial? Is that what I'm thinking of? I used to listen to his radio program and I thought I remembered him speaking of the rapture and how all Israel would be saved.
I like Dr. Morey and I want his theology to be as perfect as the rest of us.  | 
02-25-2008, 08:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 782
Thanks: 120
Thanked 148 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I like Dr. Morey and I want his theology to be as perfect as the rest of us.  |  | 
02-25-2008, 08:48 AM
|  | The Odd Mod(erator) | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 5,382
Thanks: 166
Thanked 831 Times in 386 Posts
| | That was tongue in cheek Joe. See the little winky guy at the end. However, do remember that, generally speaking: For the fundamentalist, your behavior is never good enough and for the reformed, your theology in never good enough.  <----winky guy again. Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I like Dr. Morey and I want his theology to be as perfect as the rest of us.  |  | | 
02-25-2008, 09:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault Stephen,
I am only too happy to be wrong. Perhaps I'm confused. Is he pre-trib, pre-millennial? Is that what I'm thinking of? I used to listen to his radio program and I thought I remembered him speaking of the rapture and how all Israel would be saved.
I like Dr. Morey and I want his theology to be as perfect as the rest of us.  | Bob, maybe you tuned in while he was explaining disp.
I can assure you that he isn't and never was.
I have a book that he wrote back in the 1970's that makes amil-sounding arguments. Given that he was fresh out of Westminster at that time - it fits! So lets go celebrate! He ain't!  | 
02-25-2008, 09:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 782
Thanks: 120
Thanked 148 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault That was tongue in cheek Joe. See the little winky guy at the end. However, do remember that, generally speaking: For the fundamentalist, your behavior is never good enough and for the reformed, your theology in never good enough.  <----winky guy again. Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I like Dr. Morey and I want his theology to be as perfect as the rest of us.  | | | | |