» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 85 | | 31 members and 54 guests | | Anton Bruckner, APuritansMind, CaseyBessette, ChristianTrader, CovenantalBaptist, Craig, Devin, Don, Ex Nihilo, Grymir, JM, Josh G, kvanlaan, lenflack, Leslie, Marrow Man, panta dokimazete, py3ak, reformed trucker, Seb, Solus Christus, Southern Presbyterian, Tabmke | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
04-25-2008, 08:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 3,224
Thanks: 880
Thanked 371 Times in 288 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie So the (conservative) American Presbyterian churches are not Reformed? | Not on the Church/State issue. | My American denomination adheres to the Establishment Principle.  | Mine too.
__________________ ~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn "Is this not a brand plucked from the fire? - Zechariah 3:2 | 
04-25-2008, 08:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot My American denomination adheres to the Establishment Principle.  | I don't mean any disrespect when I ask this: But what does it matter if hold such a view when your denomination isn't the established church?
__________________ Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC West Suburbs of Chicago My Blog: Paradise Regained
"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
| 
04-25-2008, 09:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 22,378
Thanks: 2,030
Thanked 2,698 Times in 1,606 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot My American denomination adheres to the Establishment Principle.  | I don't mean any disrespect when I ask this: But what does it matter if hold such a view when your denomination isn't the established church? | A witness to the truth, grounded upon God's Word, always matters.
The same question could be directed to any witness to any particular subject where God's Word testifies to the duties of ecclesiastical or civil authority which are, in reality, lacking or deficient. If God requires it, it is better to testify to that truth, according to our place and station, then leave this doctrine, which is part of the whole counsel of God, left unsaid or actively opposed.
Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him. (Heb. 2.8)
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
Last edited by VirginiaHuguenot; 04-25-2008 at 09:26 PM.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VirginiaHuguenot For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 09:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 134
Thanked 170 Times in 107 Posts
| |
Amen, brother. I entirely agree with your response. Probably I didn't form my question properly. Anyway, I don't want to hijack the thread.
__________________ Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC West Suburbs of Chicago My Blog: Paradise Regained
"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46
| | The Following User Says Thank You to CaseyBessette For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 09:24 PM
|  | McFadderator Minimizing | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,374
Thanks: 914
Thanked 1,467 Times in 856 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua
Is the burden of proof on me to pull all the historical documents to show that they did not call themselves Reformed?  | I have already indicated that I'm fine with the term "confessional" baptist and that I agree with Scott's differentiation. However, it is not difficult to see where the confusion comes from as the following quotes come from the Encyclopedia of the Reformed Faith.
By the way, does John Gerstner count as a Truly Reformed guy? This was his take on baptist theologian, Strong . . . Quote:
A Baptist leader, Strong was also that tradition’s most celebrated American theologian . . . Strong wrote what may be the most erudite Reformed Systematic theology ever written enriched greatly by his love for, acquaintance with, and participation in contemporary poetry, The Great Poets and Their Theology (1897). His deep influence on Carl Henry, one of the leading Baptist advocates of the Reformed faith today, is quite evident. JOHN H. GERSTNER
McKim, D. K., & Wright, D. F. (1992). Encyclopedia of the Reformed faith (1st ed.) (359). Louisville, Ky.; Edinburgh: Westminster/John Knox Press; Saint Andrew Press.
| And, in a discussion of revivalism . . . Quote:
At the same time, emphases on providence and predestination have led many Reformed leaders to resist revivalism. As a result of Reformed ambiguity, many Baptists actually moved out of Reformed theology. Communions other than those of the Reformed family have supported revivalism most fervently.
McKim, D. K., & Wright, D. F. (1992). Encyclopedia of the Reformed faith (1st ed.) (325). Louisville, Ky.; Edinburgh: Westminster/John Knox Press; Saint Andrew Press.
| And, when discussing "Calvinism in America" . . . Quote: The Puritan and Scotch–Irish forms of Calvinism were organized into Congregational, Presbyterian, and Baptist churches. The Dutch Reformed, German Reformed, and other immigrant groups also established American churches during the eighteenth century.
McKim, D. K., & Wright, D. F. (1992). Encyclopedia of the Reformed faith (1st ed.) (50). Louisville, Ky.; Edinburgh: Westminster/John Knox Press; Saint Andrew Press.
| These were all different articles by different scholars, all of them Reformed, writing in the Encyclopedia of Reformed Theology. Hey, guys. Don't beat up us baptists too badly when your own reference books make the same "mistakes."
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Last edited by DMcFadden; 04-25-2008 at 10:04 PM.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 09:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,417
Thanks: 881
Thanked 1,079 Times in 592 Posts
| | |
A few questions and comments:
Is John Owen reformed? Wasn't we a congregationalist?
Who has the right to give us a sliding scale of who is more reformed than others?
Isn't it a prerogative of every group to define themselves as they wish. Presbies may sniffle and moan but if baptists want the category "reformed" in front of their names to identify themselves with the 1689 confession, then the reformed cannot stop them and should stop their whining.
Last time I checked there was no little copyright symbol above the name reformed.
Finally, given the company of those that call themselves "reformed" to include many groups that are grossly deviant in doctrine (whole groups falling away into apostasy), being a baptist who calls himself reformed or calvinisitic puts me in a lot better company.
P.S. Particular Baptist is a brand that is currently being used by many who trace their lineage from the anabaptist tradition. Therefore, this label, too, does not fit, for those that desire a modified WCF and are happy with the 1689. The term Sovereign grace baptist also is sometimes associated with more of a Fundyist and anti-confessional stance and so is not an adequate label. I prefer to simply call myself calvinistic and baptistic.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
04-25-2008, 09:46 PM
|  | McFadderator Minimizing | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,374
Thanks: 914
Thanked 1,467 Times in 856 Posts
| |
Earlier in this thread, I suggested Calvinis tic Baptist as an appropriate title, even though Reformed is not. Later on, I found Blueridge Baptist's idea to be the best: "confessional baptist."
Interestingly though, Spurgeon (a baptist) had no problem with all of these terms. Quote: |
Nay, we that are called reformed, are not one whit behind them in all manner of wickedness.
| One of his greatest pieces was "A Defense of Calvinism," certainly thinking he was speaking ab out his own view. Quote: |
“Salvation is of the Lord.” That is just an epitome of Calvinism; it is the sum and substance of it. If anyone should ask me what I mean by a Calvinist, I should reply, “He is one who says, Salvation is of the Lord.” I cannot find in Scripture any other doctrine than this. It is the essence of the Bible. “He only is my rock and my salvation” . . . What is the heresy of Rome, but the addition of something to the perfect merits of Jesus Christ—the bringing in of the works of the flesh, to assist in our justification? And what is the heresy of Arminianism but the addition of something to the work of the Redeemer? Every heresy, if brought to the touchstone, will discover itself here . . . I have my own private opinion that there is no such thing as preaching Christ and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else. Heritage of great evangelical teaching : Featuring the best of Martin Luther, John Wesley, Dwight L. Moody, C.H. Spurgeon and others. 1997, c1996. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
|
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
04-25-2008, 10:02 PM
|  | McFadderator Minimizing | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 4,374
Thanks: 914
Thanked 1,467 Times in 856 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum P.S. Particular Baptist is a brand that is currently being used by many who trace their lineage from the anabaptist tradition. | Pergy,
Really? I have never heard the term used other than to describe Reformational baptists (you know the ones tracing to Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli) AGAINST the anabaptists. In church history it was used to differentiate the Calvinistic baptists who believed in a "particular redemption" (the larger group) from the Arminian ones (the smaller group).
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
04-25-2008, 10:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,636
Thanks: 1,317
Thanked 685 Times in 493 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum A few questions and comments:
Is John Owen reformed? Wasn't we a congregationalist?
Who has the right to give us a sliding scale of who is more reformed than others?
Isn't it a prerogative of every group to define themselves as they wish. Presbies may sniffle and moan but if baptists want the category "reformed" in front of their names to identify themselves with the 1689 confession, then the reformed cannot stop them and should stop their whining.
Last time I checked there was no little copyright symbol above the name reformed.
Finally, given the company of those that call themselves "reformed" to include many groups that are grossly deviant in doctrine (whole groups falling away into apostasy), being a baptist who calls himself reformed or calvinisitic puts me in a lot better company.
P.S. Particular Baptist is a brand that is currently being used by many who trace their lineage from the anabaptist tradition. Therefore, this label, too, does not fit, for those that desire a modified WCF and are happy with the 1689. The term Sovereign grace baptist also is sometimes associated with more of a Fundyist and anti-confessional stance and so is not an adequate label. I prefer to simply call myself calvinistic and baptistic. | I have heard others use the term "Historic Baptist" but that can be problematic as well because some will associate it with Landmarkism.
__________________
Chris
OPC member
Now attending Grace Community Baptist Church
Mandeville, LA
"Faith alone saves, but it is a faith that works." - S. Lewis Johnson
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pilgrim For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 10:26 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: St.James ,NY
Posts: 716
Thanks: 226
Thanked 133 Times in 92 Posts
| | | "reformed"
I enjoy using the term Reformed Baptist in conversation with people who ask what I believe. Everyone has heard of Baptist churches. When I say "reformed" They almost always respond with- What do you mean reformed baptist? This tells me that unlike most of the brethren in here ,the person who inquires about the adjective reformed , does not know the difference between , a Baptist, Presbyterian,Christian Reformed ,etc.
So I use it as an opportunity to explain that in general that believer's in these churches are generally more earnest in their desire to search out the truth of scripture.
I then in some way speak to the doctrines of grace. I try to make a simple yet clear explanation of the saving work of Christ.
I point out that I can fellowship with any believer who is saved by the blood of Christ, that we are brother's, even if we might differ on some of what we understand from scripture.
In linking to the term "reformed" I have always tried to lengthen the cord,and strengthen the stakes. What I mean by that is, I like some of what Luther wrote, but I am not Lutheran . Why are we not all Lutherans?
I like what I have read about some of the Scottish Covenanter's in the book Fair Sunshine, Why are we not all Scottish Covenanter's?
Many of my books are written By Presbyterian's. Indeed I am eternally grateful to God that he has used many different living stones, with different levels of maturity to help me learn more about the word of our God.
So in general ,in public, I am not meeting that many persons who make as fine a distinction as some of you brother's are want to do.
If I can plant a seed in someone's mind that God will allow to grow I will rejoice with the angels for that person if and when God gives new life to them.
I would not have a problem with linking a new convert with most of the men in here, because I know that you are in the word,and serious about the command to make disciples. If you are teaching something that needs correction, I am confident that the Spirit of God is able to correct and guide His Sheep, despite some of our failings as we have this treasure in earthen vessels.
__________________
Anthony D'Arienzo
Sunday School Teacher
Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
Medford, N.Y.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Iconoclast For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 10:51 PM
|  | Bubba | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 6,582
Thanks: 703
Thanked 454 Times in 368 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie The term Calvinist - as it is used today - refers to someone who holds to the five points, hence, there are numerous books called the five points of Calvinism. | Calvin wrote in the Institutes about a lot more than just soteriology (the "five points") -- I wonder if he'd appreciate his name being limited to represent only that.  | I'm not sure he would appreciate his name being used at all for "labels", but point well taken.
__________________ Ivan Schoen, Pastor * Maranatha Baptist Church * Poplar Grove, Illinois USA www.maranatha-sbc.org/ One of the most important discoveries I have ever made is this truth: God is most glorified in me when I am most satisfied in him. This is the motor that drives my ministry as a pastor. It affects everything I do. --- Dr. John Piper | 
04-25-2008, 10:56 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,529
Thanks: 815
Thanked 748 Times in 471 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyBessette Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie The term Calvinist - as it is used today - refers to someone who holds to the five points, hence, there are numerous books called the five points of Calvinism. | Calvin wrote in the Institutes about a lot more than just soteriology (the "five points") -- I wonder if he'd appreciate his name being limited to represent only that.  | I'm not sure he would appreciate his name being used at all for "labels", but point well taken. | Luther also was amazed that anyone would attach his name to the Church, referring to himself as a Pig if I remember correctly.
| 
04-25-2008, 11:06 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 4,796
Thanks: 577
Thanked 2,180 Times in 863 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast Why are we not all Scottish Covenanter's? | That would be because we're not Scottish. And yet there is no reason why we should not all wholeheartedly embrace the principles taught in the covenants seeing as they are the very principles taught by the Bible.
__________________
Yours sincerely,
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post: | | 
04-25-2008, 11:07 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,183
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 1,967 Times in 996 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast Why are we not all Scottish Covenanter's? | That would be because we're not Scottish. | | 
04-25-2008, 11:11 PM
|  | Bubba | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 6,582
Thanks: 703
Thanked 454 Times in 368 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast Why are we not all Scottish Covenanter's? | That would be because we're not Scottish. |  | I haven't figured out the Keeling side of my family tree, whether they are Irish or English, but I don't think they came from Scotland.
__________________ Ivan Schoen, Pastor * Maranatha Baptist Church * Poplar Grove, Illinois USA www.maranatha-sbc.org/ One of the most important discoveries I have ever made is this truth: God is most glorified in me when I am most satisfied in him. This is the motor that drives my ministry as a pastor. It affects everything I do. --- Dr. John Piper | 
04-26-2008, 02:39 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 224
Thanks: 17
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Scott Clark | Historically, there were two group of Reformers: the Magisterial Reformers and the Radical Reformers. The Magisterial Reformers comprised of the Lutherans, Presbyterians, Calvinists and Baptists. The Radical Reformers comprised of the Anabaptists and the Moravian Brethren.
R. Scott, why do you feel only the Presbyterians should have a stake on the term, "Reformed," when historically, Presbyterians were just one of many?
__________________
Will Shin
Rockville, MD
| 
04-26-2008, 04:04 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,417
Thanks: 881
Thanked 1,079 Times in 592 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden ![]() | | |