» Site Navigation | | | |  | | 
08-14-2009, 09:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: santa rosa, CA
Posts: 758
Thanks: 95
Thanked 53 Times in 38 Posts
| | | Should we use wine during the Lord's Supper if 15% of members are in recovery
This may have been fleshed out else where...if so please point me in the right direction. This may be a better fit in another forum...
Our church supports an alcohol and drug recovery program which makes up about 15% of church membership. Our church gives the option of wine or grape juice on the same tray. It is known that those in recovery struggle when the elements are passed around.
Our session is in discussion on this, but would you:
1. Keep wine as an option based on Biblical command
or
2. Use only grape juice as an option to keep those from struggling that are members.
__________________
Matthew Morales (Husband to Rachel)
Redeemer Presbyterian Church (Santa Rosa, CA)
"...But this is the one to whom I will look: he who is humble and contrite in spirit and trembles at my word." Isaiah 66:2b (ESV)
"Judge not the Lord by feeble sense, But trust Him for his grace;
Behind a frowning providence He hides a smiling face"-William Cowper
| 
08-14-2009, 09:55 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | |
Option 1.
I am not convinced that a thimble full of wine actually causes anyone to stumble. That seems to be taken for granted these days but I am unaware of any scientific (or biblical for that matter) evidence. I am willing to be convinced otherwise, however.
| | The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post: | Blueridge Believer (08-18-2009), Brian Withnell (08-14-2009), Christusregnat (08-15-2009), dudley (08-14-2009), Glenn Ferrell (08-17-2009), Hamalas (08-14-2009), Igor (08-20-2009), OPC'n (08-16-2009), PointyHaired Calvinist (08-15-2009), Presbyterian Deacon (08-19-2009), Romans922 (08-24-2009), Southern Twang (08-18-2009), Wannabee (08-15-2009) | 
08-14-2009, 09:57 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 1,027
Thanks: 244
Thanked 257 Times in 163 Posts
| | |
I'm not sure it's a matter of choice but more a matter of authority. By what authority should we change the elements of the Lord's Supper?
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Michael Turner For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 626
Thanked 676 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Turner I'm not sure it's a matter of choice but more a matter of authority. By what authority should we change the elements of the Lord's Supper? | What's the minimum percentage of alcohol allowed by scripture?
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Edward For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | |
100% of your membership is in recovery from the dominion of sin. If wine is a problem for some before the Lord's table, then abstaining from it is wise- until they learn that it is the heart of man, and not dumb objects, that are the root of sin.
Theognome
__________________
Bill Cunningham
Covenant Reformed Church, URC
Kansas City
There are three kinds of people- those who can count, and those who can't.
| | The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | Anton Bruckner (08-17-2009), Augusta (08-21-2009), Beth Ellen Nagle (08-17-2009), Brian Withnell (08-14-2009), Curt (08-15-2009), dudley (08-14-2009), Fly Caster (08-24-2009), gene_mingo (08-14-2009), Honor (08-15-2009), PointyHaired Calvinist (08-15-2009), Romans922 (08-24-2009), sastark (08-14-2009), Scottish Lass (08-15-2009), ubermadchen (08-17-2009), Wannabee (08-15-2009) | 
08-14-2009, 10:16 PM
|  | whippersnapper | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 2,744
Thanks: 1,465
Thanked 539 Times in 328 Posts
| | |
Use the wine, as Scripture commands.
__________________
Ben Franks
I attend: Ketoctin Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
in Purcellville, Virginia
I'm a member of: Heartland Community Church (PCA)
in Wichita, Kansas
I blog here (along with my Dad): http://rrfranks.blogspot.com/
And I'm a student here: www.phc.edu "Remember the speeches we have spoken so often over our mead, when we raised boast on the bench, heroes in the hall, about hard fighting. Now may the man who is bold prove that he is."-Aelfwine at the Battle of Maldon | | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hamalas For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: 373
Thanked 708 Times in 346 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome 100% of your membership is in recovery from the dominion of sin. If wine is a problem for some before the Lord's table, then abstaining from it is wise- until they learn that it is the heart of man, and not dumb objects, that are the root of sin.
Theognome | I wholeheartedly agree. I would rather give the third option, the table is to be all wine, and those that are in recovery need to practice self control. We are all in recovery of one kind or another. Should the churches with 15% of the people in recovery from sexual sin separate the men from the women so as not to tempt those who are susceptible (which might be everyone but eunuchs and the very old)?
While it might be more difficult for a person that is particularly susceptible to drunkenness to have a small sip of wine during the table, it might be worse for them to not partake of the LS because the elements are not as commanded. The RPW takes precedence over weakness, and the LS is a means of grace in which those that are having problems with self-control might gain strength. If 15% need extra help, then perhaps they should stay after the service for 6 to 8 hours with those who are strong to wait until the minimal amount of alcohol is metabolized so they no longer have any physical excuse for sin.
Remember, alcohol is not sin in itself, so this is not the same thing as flee the adulterous woman. If someone is truly recovered, they will not need to flee alcohol, they will exercise self-control in the midst of it.
__________________
Brian Withnell
Deacon, OPC
Leesburg, Virginia
You cannot train for war in the midst of a battle. Prepare before the battle starts; if the battle is long and hard, you will wish you had.
| | The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Brian Withnell For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: lakewood, nj 08701
Posts: 473
Thanks: 384
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
| | Wine is the bilical command
My presbyterian congregation celebrates The Lords Supper on the first Sunday of each month during both our worship services. We serve wine and grapjuice. I take the inner cups filled with wine however there are a small number in our congration who take the thimble cup from the outer rim where there is a few thimbles of grape juice.  But I think as most on this forum that wine is the bilical command.
Dudley
__________________
In faith,
Dudley
May we all be Sons of the Reformation and continue to proclaim what it means to be Reformed Protestant Christians!
| 
08-14-2009, 10:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Winter Haven, FL
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 573
Thanked 107 Times in 76 Posts
| | |
Were there no alcoholics in the New Testament that converted?
__________________
Richard W. Roldan "Ricky"
Member and Teacher of Iglesia Presbiteriana Reformada Berea (PCA)
Winter Haven, FL./ Under Care of the Southwest Presb.(PCA) "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,...” Jesus " I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel," Paul | | The Following User Says Thank You to Roldan For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Roldan Were there no alcoholics in the New Testament that converted? | During the time the NT was written, drunkards were called 'sinners', and sinners were constantly being converted. Modern humanism calls it 'Alcoholism', and that it is a disease- thus sin is not involved. So no, there were no alcoholics converted in the NT.
Theognome
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 10:52 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
| | |
Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 11:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup? | Unrelated issues, actually. The use of grape juice didn't even exist until Dr. Welch first pasteurized the stuff in the late 19th century. Even then, it didn't catch on in evangelical circles until the Temperance Movement took hold of the Church. Simply put, the whole use of grape juice at the LS is, in it's most basic argument, that drunkeness isn't a sin- it's a disease; and that is a bold-face denial of the Word of God.
Theognome
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
08-14-2009, 11:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: 373
Thanked 708 Times in 346 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup? | Pergy,
I appreciate the thought, and while I don't think "we" should allow variance in the bread (if you look at my responses, it is not my decision to make, it is the elders that make it) even those that argued the bread could be leavened, the almost universal position was that wine ought to be used as it is commanded.
| 
08-14-2009, 11:13 PM
|  | whippersnapper | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 2,744
Thanks: 1,465
Thanked 539 Times in 328 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup? | Correct me if I'm wrong, but variance in the bread is still basically bread. We're not talking about using a different brand of wine, we're talking about not using wine at all! Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. (If you disagree just try to serve wine to the kids in the nursery and tell all those angry parents that it's just a different kind of grape juice!  ) That is clearly unbiblical, and as Theognome pointed out, a very recent innovation.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hamalas For This Useful Post: | Igor (08-20-2009), KMK (08-15-2009) | 
08-15-2009, 12:25 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | 
Our church had a wonderful dinner tonight with a visiting missionary. A family in our church who makes wine brought me a bottle with a custom label. Quote: | Preacher's Reserve Valentine's Creek
For the Totally Depraved, Unconditionally Elect sinner who
by Limited Atonement was drawn by Irresistible Grace in the
Perseverance of the Saints.
AMEN |
Back to the topic - We discussed that when we went to wine. Problems with alcohol are a repercussion of sin and do not dictate the normal practices of the church of Christ. They have to deal with the repercussions of their sin and overcome them. Therefore, we do not cater to them. If we did then we would have to cater to everyone in some manner.
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 12:27 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup? | Correct me if I'm wrong, but variance in the bread is still basically bread. We're not talking about using a different brand of wine, we're talking about not using wine at all! Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. (If you disagree just try to serve wine to the kids in the nursery and tell all those angry parents that it's just a different kind of grape juice!  ) That is clearly unbiblical, and as Theognome pointed out, a very recent innovation. | Can we dilute the wine then with water? We are not changing it to juice, but only adding water to it? This seems akin to the differences in using varying kinds of bread. It's still wine, just extra-weak.
| 
08-15-2009, 12:30 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee 
Our church had a wonderful dinner tonight with a visiting missionary. A family in our church who makes wine brought me a bottle with a custom label. Quote: | Preacher's Reserve Valentine's Creek
For the Totally Depraved, Unconditionally Elect sinner who
by Limited Atonement was drawn by Irresistible Grace in the
Perseverance of the Saints.
AMEN |
Back to the topic - We discussed that when we went to wine. Problems with alcohol are a repercussion of sin and do not dictate the normal practices of the church of Christ. They have to deal with the repercussions of their sin and overcome them. Therefore, we do not cater to them. If we did then we would have to cater to everyone in some manner. | I am in the minority in that I don't think we should necessarily 'avoid' temptation anyway. James says, "Blessed is the man that 'endureth' temptation."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 12:31 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Didn't we just have a thread on the bread of the Lord's Supper. If we allow variance in bread, why not in the cup? | Correct me if I'm wrong, but variance in the bread is still basically bread. We're not talking about using a different brand of wine, we're talking about not using wine at all! Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. (If you disagree just try to serve wine to the kids in the nursery and tell all those angry parents that it's just a different kind of grape juice!  ) That is clearly unbiblical, and as Theognome pointed out, a very recent innovation. | Can we dilute the wine then with water? We are not changing it to juice, but only adding water to it? This seems akin to the differences in using varying kinds of bread. It's still wine, just extra-weak. | What is the benefit of it being 'weak'?
| 
08-15-2009, 02:20 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,399
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,834 Times in 1,468 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas
Correct me if I'm wrong, but variance in the bread is still basically bread. We're not talking about using a different brand of wine, we're talking about not using wine at all! Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. (If you disagree just try to serve wine to the kids in the nursery and tell all those angry parents that it's just a different kind of grape juice!  ) That is clearly unbiblical, and as Theognome pointed out, a very recent innovation. | Can we dilute the wine then with water? We are not changing it to juice, but only adding water to it? This seems akin to the differences in using varying kinds of bread. It's still wine, just extra-weak. | What is the benefit of it being 'weak'? | What is the benefit of it being strong?
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 10:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. | Could you define for me the moment the juice of squeezed grapes (grape juice) becomes wine? Is it when there is .001% alcohol?
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 10:51 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum
Can we dilute the wine then with water? We are not changing it to juice, but only adding water to it? This seems akin to the differences in using varying kinds of bread. It's still wine, just extra-weak. | What is the benefit of it being 'weak'? | What is the benefit of it being strong? | You said you wanted to dilute the wine with water. Why go to the extra effort to change the wine before it is served?
| 
08-15-2009, 10:52 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. | Could you define for me the moment the juice of squeezed grapes (grape juice) becomes wine? Is it when there is .001% alcohol? | When it has the ability to make you drunk?
| 
08-15-2009, 10:56 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. | Could you define for me the moment the juice of squeezed grapes (grape juice) becomes wine? Is it when there is .001% alcohol? | When it has the ability to make you drunk? | Ok.
| 
08-15-2009, 11:06 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Parkville, MD
Posts: 627
Thanks: 167
Thanked 275 Times in 144 Posts
| | |
Couple of points here. I remember when I was a kid whenever my dad would go "on the wagon" if he had one drop of alcohol it would cause him to stumble, so I am tempted to make a knee-jerk statement here: if the lack of alcohol in the "wine" doesn't cause it to be improperly used in communion (I don't know whether it does or not) then perhaps it's best to just use grape juice. In his case, the love of alcohol was perceived as a disease, but really there were other issues going on. The alcohol brought him great comfort and that's what he really wanted - so in his case, there was a repentance issue, not just of the sin of overindulgence but of idolatry.
There were others in this thread who asked when wine becomes wine. I have read (and cannot locate a supporting link) that wine back in ancient times was frequently watered down and could have been much weaker than what we have now. I have also heard that it was useful because while water could be stagnant and foul, wine, due to the alcohol, was less likely to make one sick. I am sure someone here can confirm or disprove that.
__________________
Rich Brown
Deacon/Webmaster Aisquith PCA
Parkville, MD
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Webservant For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 11:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,469
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,140 Posts
| | Quote: |
Just as it is harmful to drink wine alone or water alone, whereas mixing wine with water makes a more pleasant drink that increases delight, so a skillfully composed story delights the ears of those who read the work. Let this, then, be the end.
| From 2 Maccabees 15, written about 150 years BC, Rich.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 11:11 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 263
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
| | |
Should they use bread if 15% are obese due to carb addiction? -----Added 8/15/2009 at 11:11:27 EST-----
cap locks on.... sorry
| | The Following User Says Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 11:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 176
Thanks: 24
Thanked 82 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
I was an alcoholic for 15 years before converted and called to the ministry. I drink wine during the LS and have a glass during meals sometimes and a beer at the game. Alcoholism is sin, not a disease. If someone is struggling with a bit of wine during the Lords Supper, when his focus should be on Christ and his finished work, then there are clearly other issues that need to be focused on with this brother or sister.
__________________
Alan
Seminarian, RTS Jackson, MS
OPC
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bookmeister For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 11:43 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 626
Thanked 676 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamalas Grape juice is not a variant of wine it is something totally different. | Could you define for me the moment the juice of squeezed grapes (grape juice) becomes wine? Is it when there is .001% alcohol? | When it has the ability to make you drunk? | Thanks. I had asked essentially the same question up at post 4, and hadn't gotten an answer from the AWOs (Alcoholic Wine Onlys).
So the stronger the wine, the better? Thunderbird or Mad Dog 2020 is better than a lower alcohol version?
| 
08-15-2009, 12:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
option 2, we need to stop being so legalistic.
Causing brothers to stumble over some secondary issue is nuts.
__________________ Lee Johnston
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Paisley, Scotland Ephesians 1:4-5
"In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will."
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LeeJUk For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 01:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Montana
Posts: 3,775
Thanks: 2,613
Thanked 984 Times in 537 Posts
| | |
Although its entirely possible that wine only is the best way to serve the Lord's Supper, I do think it could be profitable for proponents of that approach to exercise charity towards their struggling brothers or sisters. Alcoholism is a sin, but its also an addiction and is really hard to kick (as are many sins). I'm not saying we shouldn't have wine, but too often I've seen a blustering, "Well, just get over it" approach to individuals who struggle with resisting addiction when coming to the Lord's Table.
As to those who say that a thimble full of wine doesn't tempt an alcoholic - You're quite fortunate that you've never experienced a consuming addiction. Alcoholism runs in my family, and I've seen my uncles and grandfather struggle horribly with resisting drinking to excess. If they attended churches where wine was served, I'm quite certain that they would not take the LS - or perhaps only take the bread.
__________________
Kathleen M
nondenominational
Montana
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Montanablue For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 01:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: DeMotte, Indiana
Posts: 378
Thanks: 46
Thanked 225 Times in 110 Posts
| | |
Our church places wine in the outer ring of the tray, and grape juice in the middle rings. Thus, the congregants can choose which they take when it is passed.
I'm not sure this is the right solution either, since it has the "flavor" of consumerism and individualism, leaving it to each individual to decide.
Thoughts on this practice?
__________________
Mark Van Der Molen
Immanuel URC
DeMotte, Indiana
| 
08-15-2009, 01:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,306
Thanks: 922
Thanked 1,262 Times in 676 Posts
| | |
I believe that wine and unleavened bread should be used for the Lord's Supper, but I do struggle over the issue with using wine it comes to alcoholics.
I lost a good friend due to health complications brought on by years of alcohol abuse. My friend did not become a believer until he was well into his 40s and he died at 50. The damage was done. Prior to his conversion, he was drinking almost more than he was eating, and trying to break that habit was extremely difficult. One sip of wine at communion literally did send him back to the alcohol.
In short, my friend finally was able to quit drinking and managed to stay sober for months. At the end of that time, he was put in the hospital to have surgery to correct some of the damage brought on by drinking. The doctor's told him that if he started to drink again, it would kill him. One of the first things he did after spending 3 months in the hospital was to go back to church. He was so glad to be back with believers and to participate in the Lord's supper, he drank the wine. He didn't think a little sip of wine would make that much difference. It did. He started drinking again. Although the return to drink didn't last long, and he completely repented, the damage was done, and he died within a couple of months.
I know that personal experience makes no difference when it comes to a discussion of right and wrong. I also know that my friend's case is extreme in more ways than I have described here, and his story can not be used as a blanket reason for using grape juice instead of wine.
Do we deny a person like that the privilege of participating in the Lord's Table because we think they are too weak? Aren't we all too weak? Isn't that why we go to the table in the first place? We do it to call to mind our sinfulness and to joyfully remember and thank God for His forgiveness. What would have been correct thing for my friend to do? Abstain from the commandment of the Lord to participate? Or should he have trusted the Lord to keep him from falling into sin? Was he willing sinning by taking a sip of wine at the Lord's Table? He certainly had demonstrated a repentant heart when he approached the table; he'd been off the wine for months.
I realized I haven't answered any of the questions in the original post, but I felt I should share what goes on in my mind when the topic comes up.
__________________ J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27 Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/ | | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JBaldwin For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 01:29 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Could you define for me the moment the juice of squeezed grapes (grape juice) becomes wine? Is it when there is .001% alcohol?
When it has the ability to make you drunk?
| "When it has the ability to make you drunk" is no definition at all. I drink so little that I start to feel an effect after a ridiculously small amount -- others need a vat.
__________________ JennyG
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Fife, Scotland | 
08-15-2009, 01:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,565
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 422 Times in 231 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mvdm Our church places wine in the outer ring of the tray, and grape juice in the middle rings. Thus, the congregants can choose which they take when it is passed.
I'm not sure this is the right solution either, since it has the "flavor" of consumerism and individualism, leaving it to each individual to decide.
Thoughts on this practice? | To the OP: Has anyone in recovery asked for a non alcoholic option? Or do they just quietly leave during the LS? Another consideration for the Wine Only folks: There are also people who are medically unable to drink ANY alcohol (certain anti seizure meds or anyone on Antabuse will have complications if they consume wine or any alcohol). Or there may be a church member or guest who is on parole and who cannot have ANY alcohol as a condition of their parole. So the practice your church use will allow these folks to take the Lord's Supper.
__________________ Quote:
Gail
Grand Rapids, MI
Affiliation: Under construction
| | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to calgal For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 01:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 626
Thanked 676 Times in 440 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mvdm Our church places wine in the outer ring of the tray, and grape juice in the middle rings. Thus, the congregants can choose which they take when it is passed.
I'm not sure this is the right solution either, since it has the "flavor" of consumerism and individualism, leaving it to each individual to decide.
Thoughts on this practice? | I think you have well identified the issue raised by doing this, but my personal leanings presently are toward such a practice.
| 
08-15-2009, 02:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,469
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,140 Posts
| | Quote: |
"When it has the ability to make you drunk" is no definition at all. I drink so little that I start to feel an effect after a ridiculously small amount -- others need a vat.
| Jenny that's the idea. To feel an effect.
PS, wasn't it a fellow Scotsman who said you should quit when your can no longer feel your teeth?
| 
08-15-2009, 03:19 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV Quote: |
"When it has the ability to make you drunk" is no definition at all. I drink so little that I start to feel an effect after a ridiculously small amount -- others need a vat.
| Jenny that's the idea. To feel an effect.
PS, wasn't it a fellow Scotsman who said you should quit when your can no longer feel your teeth? | I have no idea who said that, Tim! It sounds the sort of thing a Scot might say.
But what was your point? I don't think I understand.
| 
08-15-2009, 04:07 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
| | |
Alcohol is a major stumbling block for many people.
I have seen a grown man cry before communion because he feared any amount of alcohol.
Would God be displeased if a church elder used grape juice in order to prevent a weaker brother from stumbling?
If you serve 20 reformed alcoholics wine, are you certain that none of them will stumble?
What about people who can't tolerate any alcohol at all because of allergy? Are they in jeopardy because they can't "properly" partake in the Lord's Supper?
Is the attitude towards communion more important than the actual alcohol content of the wine?
__________________
Paul N.
Sovereign Grace Church of Toronto
The lot is cast onto the lap
But every decision comes from the Lord
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paul Nowlan For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 04:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 198
Thanked 637 Times in 278 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookmeister I was an alcoholic for 15 years before converted and called to the ministry. I drink wine during the LS and have a glass during meals sometimes and a beer at the game. Alcoholism is sin, not a disease. If someone is struggling with a bit of wine during the Lords Supper, when his focus should be on Christ and his finished work, then there are clearly other issues that need to be focused on with this brother or sister. | Why can't it be both? Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal Quote:
Originally Posted by mvdm Our church places wine in the outer ring of the tray, and grape juice in the middle rings. Thus, the congregants can choose which they take when it is passed.
I'm not sure this is the right solution either, since it has the "flavor" of consumerism and individualism, leaving it to each individual to decide.
Thoughts on this practice? | To the OP: Has anyone in recovery asked for a non alcoholic option? Or do they just quietly leave during the LS? Another consideration for the Wine Only folks: There are also people who are medically unable to drink ANY alcohol (certain anti seizure meds or anyone on Antabuse will have complications if they consume wine or any alcohol). Or there may be a church member or guest who is on parole and who cannot have ANY alcohol as a condition of their parole. So the practice your church use will allow these folks to take the Lord's Supper.  | I'm not the OP, but our policy (after we switched to wine) was that we would only do wine until and unless someone asked us to make grape juice available again. That eventually did happen, and we had both grape juice and wine available for a time. That member moved away due to work some time afterward, and it wasn't long before we switched back to wine only.
Your questions regarding the medical inability to have alcohol are interesting. There's an application for the bread there as well (for instance, those with wheat allergies).
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post: | | 
08-15-2009, 05:12 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,519
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,501 Times in 1,412 Posts
| | |
While I think we want to follow the Scriptures in the use of the physical elements, I believe we also have to be aware of making the physical elements paramount.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |