» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 130 | | 36 members and 94 guests | | austinww, Berean, CaseyBessette, CNJ, dissidentcynic, DMcFadden, gene_mingo, Gloria, Grillsy, JTB, Megan Mozart, Michael Turner, Montanablue, Nathan Riese, nwbingham, Piano Hero, Reformed Thomist, Rich Koster, Romans922, Scottish Lass, SolaScriptura, Soonerborn, Spriles, steven-nemes, TaylorWest, TimV, uberkermit, Wanderer, wfl3, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
07-10-2009, 03:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 1,349
Thanks: 520
Thanked 301 Times in 194 Posts
| | | Is salvation individualized?
Its been said so many times, "if you were the only man on earth, Jesus would have died for you." Obviously this statement is chocked full of error but outside of that, as I was explaining to a newer Christian the doctrine of the atonement, it became fascinating to me as I was trying myself to piece together a succinct statement. That which I was pondering, and forgive the questions lucidness as I am having trouble articulating it, is such:
Did the atonement take place for individuals alone or did it take place more from a corporate position, meaning, Christs death was for the church? Does this make sense?
As I was explaining this to this individual, it seemed to make sense that Christs death was for the elect only in that He died exclusively for His church, therefore eliminating the personal element that is so frequently quoted in this age. By personal element, I mean, he died for all so that we may, on an individual basis, come to Him. I hope thats clear enough
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Michael Doyle For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 03:08 PM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,806
Thanks: 1,979
Thanked 3,187 Times in 1,611 Posts
| | |
Michael, the atonement has a corporate aspect (the church) and a individual component. I used to believe that Christ died to take back this world from Satan; but I now find that view erroneous. Even though Satan is the "prince of the power and the air", his dominion is lesser dominion than that of God (one kingdom, not two). While Christ died for His church, that occurs one-by-one as each member of the church is regenerated and comes to faith.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 03:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 173
Thanks: 31
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
| |
I would just throw this into the mix, regarding a speech by the head of the "Episcopal Church": Bishop: Focus on personal salvation is 'heresy', 'idolatry' - Faith & Reason
Needless to say, although baptized as an Anglican, I left that "church" more than 10 years ago because I couldn't take it any more.
__________________
Jim
Elder
First Presbyterian Church of Honolulu
at Ko'olau (PCUSA)
Honolulu, Hawaii http://www.fpchawaii.org/ "And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for My strength is made perfect in weakness." II Corinthians 12:9
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Hawaiian Puritan For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 03:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 481
Thanks: 216
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Doyle Its been said so many times, "if you were the only man on earth, Jesus would have died for you." Obviously this statement is chocked full of error but outside of that, as I was explaining to a newer Christian the doctrine of the atonement, it became fascinating to me as I was trying myself to piece together a succinct statement. That which I was pondering, and forgive the questions lucidness as I am having trouble articulating it, is such:
Did the atonement take place for individuals alone or did it take place more from a corporate position, meaning, Christs death was for the church? Does this make sense?
As I was explaining this to this individual, it seemed to make sense that Christs death was for the elect only in that He died exclusively for His church, therefore eliminating the personal element that is so frequently quoted in this age. By personal element, I mean, he died for all so that we may, on an individual basis, come to Him. I hope thats clear enough | Hi Michael,
I believe Christ's atonement and death was substitutional. He died in my stead. He paid my death sentence which I deserved due to my sins. He redeemed me from judgment and punishment in Hell by taking upon Himself God's wrath against my sins. And included, were the deaths of all those the Father gave Him to save; the elect; which corporately make up His Church.
It was all very personal; for I believe I, and every member of His spiritual body (church) was loved and individually named, even before the foundation of the world. (Ephesians 1:3-5; Revelation 20:15)
__________________
Ronda Rush
Church of the Redeemer
Independent Reformed
California
" . . .It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.'" Matthew 4:4 | | The Following User Says Thank You to TeachingTulip For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 03:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,068
Thanks: 404
Thanked 420 Times in 277 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Doyle Its been said so many times, "if you were the only man on earth, Jesus would have died for you." Obviously this statement is chocked full of error but outside of that, as I was explaining to a newer Christian the doctrine of the atonement, it became fascinating to me as I was trying myself to piece together a succinct statement. That which I was pondering, and forgive the questions lucidness as I am having trouble articulating it, is such:
Did the atonement take place for individuals alone or did it take place more from a corporate position, meaning, Christs death was for the church? Does this make sense?
As I was explaining this to this individual, it seemed to make sense that Christs death was for the elect only in that He died exclusively for His church, therefore eliminating the personal element that is so frequently quoted in this age. By personal element, I mean, he died for all so that we may, on an individual basis, come to Him. I hope thats clear enough | Paul was able to say "He gave Himself for me" Gal 2:20
__________________
Bob, elder, RBC Louisville. 1689 LBCF "... Of such also, or of those who make a credible profession of being such, all those particular churches consist, which constitute our Lord's visible kingdom. ... Consequently, all the subjects of His government must have spiritual dispositions, , and yield spiritual obedience- obedience proceeding from an enlightened understanding, an awakened conscience, and a renewed heart."- Abraham Booth 1788 | | The Following User Says Thank You to rbcbob For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 05:15 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,370
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 1,849 Times in 1,019 Posts
| | |
That quote is often attributed to St. Augustine.
* If you were the only person on earth, Christ would have still suffered and died for you.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to PuritanCovenanter For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 06:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 61
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
| | |
I will go along with the consensus that Christ's death was for the church, but I also believe it to be in a very intimate and personal way in the sense that you are an elect. As we all know, not of your own accord, but of the Father's will we are elect and we are only humble and thankful for the kindness of the Father to save such ill deserving sinners such as you and me, but you were still chosen as an elect individual to be adopted into the family which means to an extent Christ died for you in specific, and also at large for the church.
Does that make sense?
__________________
Jakob (But you can call me Jake if you like)
Pastor in Training
Reformed Baptist
Missouri
| | The Following User Says Thank You to SoliDeoGloria For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 06:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 1,349
Thanks: 520
Thanked 301 Times in 194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter That quote is often attributed to St. Augustine.
* If you were the only person on earth, Christ would have still suffered and died for you. | I was not aware of that.
Excellent points here and nothing I could argue against. I hope my question at least makes sense because as I consider the corporate aspect of the atonement it seems to really bring to light the specificity of Christs atonement for sin.
| 
07-10-2009, 06:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 543
Thanks: 205
Thanked 200 Times in 115 Posts
| | |
The corporate aspect of the Atonement is a corollary of the individual aspect (and vice-versa), insofar as each of the elect (individual Christians) make up the Elect (the Christian Church). To say that Christ died for individuals is to say that Christ died for the group that is made up of those died-for individuals.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | 
07-10-2009, 06:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Perth, Scotland UK
Posts: 1,212
Thanks: 225
Thanked 406 Times in 270 Posts
| | |
What is the quote supposed to mean? That the speaker knows that the person he is speaking to is elect? If someone is the last person on earth they should be encouraged to believe and they will be saved.
Typology isn't enough to prove a doctrine, but the High Priest who was a type of Christ went into the Most Holy Place once a year with the blood of atonement. On his breastplate were the names of the twelve tribes of Israel.
In a similar way Christ went into heaven with His blood for named individuals that were laid on His human soul by His divine nature.
Particular atonement is for particular people.
__________________
Richard
communicant member, FCoS
Perth, Scotland UK
His Name forever shall endure;
last like the sun it shall:
Men shall be blessed in Him,
and blessed all nations shall Him call (Ps. 72:17)
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Tallach For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 06:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 1,349
Thanks: 520
Thanked 301 Times in 194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Tallach What is the quote supposed to mean? That the speaker knows that the person he is speaking to is elect? If someone is the last person on earth they should be encouraged to believe and they will be saved.
Typology isn't enough to prove a doctrine, but the High Priest who was a type of Christ went into the Most Holy Place once a year with the blood of atonement. On his breastplate were the names of the twelve tribes of Israel.
In a similar way Christ went into heaven with His blood for named individuals that were laid on His human soul by His divine nature.
Particular atonement is for particular people. | Fair enough and sounds good to me
| 
07-10-2009, 07:01 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 481
Thanks: 216
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Tallach What is the quote supposed to mean? That the speaker knows that the person he is speaking to is elect? If someone is the last person on earth they should be encouraged to believe and they will be saved.
Typology isn't enough to prove a doctrine, but the High Priest who was a type of Christ went into the Most Holy Place once a year with the blood of atonement. On his breastplate were the names of the twelve tribes of Israel.
In a similar way Christ went into heaven with His blood for named individuals that were laid on His human soul by His divine nature.
Particular atonement is for particular people. | Yes, and if election is God naming individuals in Christ, and Christ's atonement was particular ("limited" to those elect), then so is reprobation individual and particular in nature, which counters the Arminian argument that Romans 9:13 speaks of nations, not the individuals named: Jacob and Esau.
Last edited by TeachingTulip; 07-10-2009 at 07:09 PM.
Reason: Link to another PB thread
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TeachingTulip For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2009, 09:09 PM
| | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: St.James ,NY
Posts: 1,271
Thanks: 568
Thanked 226 Times in 155 Posts
| | |
While salvation is individual and personal,it is always with a view to us being members of The body of Christ the church corporately, members in particular 1cor12:12-18 . god has placed the members in the body as it pleases Him.
Each member has come to Mt.Zion the Heavenly Jerusalem.
Hebrews 12:22-24.
When Saul attacked individual church members Jesus asked him why he persecuted Him.
Sanctification has apersonal aspect as well as a Corporate aspect,ie, all of the One Anothering passages, love one another, admonish one another, pray for one another,encorage one another etc.
These things cannot take place apart from individual new birth. anything less than new birth is fleahly and hypocritical.
__________________
Anthony D'Arienzo
Sunday School Teacher
Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
Medford, N.Y.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |