» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 84 | | 15 members and 69 guests | | buggy, gene_mingo, JM, JoeRe4mer, JoyFullMom, jpfrench81, Piano Hero, Raj, rescuedbyLove, Sonny, tdowns, Theoretical, TimV, Turtle | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-19-2009, 01:57 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Ft Rucker Al
Posts: 586
Thanks: 58
Thanked 184 Times in 117 Posts
| | | Non Roman view of John 6:51
I have had RC apologists explain theer view of the LS with John 6:51. How does one go about refuting that idea that the bread really becomes Jesus flesh in regard to this passage?
__________________
Joseph F Scibbe
Chaplain Assistant
Chapel of Wings Ft Rucker Al
Ephesians 1:4-7, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, Romans 12:1-2
Titus 2:2 - But you, teach what accords with sound doctrine. http://twitter.com/just_joe_scibbe | 
08-19-2009, 02:02 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,606
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 1,318 Times in 758 Posts
| | |
The verse does not say the bread 'becomes' Jesus' body, it says that it already is. Their argument would be a great deal stronger if Jesus actually said, "This bread 'becomes' My body." Or, if He had said, "This which was in the past bread, is now My body."
How can that substance which He just identified as bread, also 'be' His body?
| 
08-19-2009, 02:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Leduc, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,608
Thanks: 252
Thanked 952 Times in 496 Posts
| | |
Right. Is Jesus now (i.e. at the moment he spoke these words) the living 'bread' as in true, physical bread before the institution of the Lord's Supper? (i.e. the consecration of the host)
Different passage, same principle: As Calvin points out, no one says that Christ was a rock in the most literal sense of being a rock (1 Corinthians 10:4). If this is so, why is it not the same with the Lord's Supper? (1 Corinthians 10:16; 11:24)
__________________
Rev. Daniel Kok
Pastor of Grace Reformed Church (URCNA)
Leduc, Alberta CANADA
"What sort of pledge and how great is this of love towards us! Christ lives for us not for himself!"
John Calvin, Commentary on the Hebrews (7:25)
| 
08-19-2009, 02:22 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,139 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | |
Nor is Jesus a Door.
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | 
08-19-2009, 02:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 137
Thanks: 21
Thanked 70 Times in 34 Posts
| | |
I would say that the meaning of the passage is set out at the beginning, where the Lord says that whoever comes to him and believes in him partakes of the bread of life (v.35). It is not meant literally that we eat his flesh. As Augustine said, "for to believe on him is to eat the living bread. He that believes, eats."
Likewise in v.47 the Lord says, "whoever believes has eternal life" and in v.54 he says, "whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life". The two statements are parallel and mean the same thing. He is the bread of life, as he is also the light, the temple, the living water, the vine. All of these are metaphors.
__________________
Louis DiBiase
Louisville, KY
| 
08-19-2009, 02:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: South Africa
Posts: 444
Thanks: 122
Thanked 199 Times in 99 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 I have had RC apologists explain theer view of the LS with John 6:51. How does one go about refuting that idea that the bread really becomes Jesus flesh in regard to this passage? | Unless both participants in such a discussion have a thorough understanding of Aristotle, such a discussion will be pointless and a waste of time better spent. And I mean more than a cursory apparent understanding of terms, I mean thorough understandings of Aristotelianism.
__________________
Paul
No denomination, affiliated with FIEC
"Deliver me from worldly dispositions, for I am born from above and destined for glory" - Valley of Vision
"They think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation" - Peter
| 
08-19-2009, 06:42 PM
|  | Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,190
Thanks: 74
Thanked 3,365 Times in 1,190 Posts
| | |
The context of Jesus' statements is not the Lord's Supper. We are a year or two from that event. Jn.6:4 says it was Passover season, so what was on people's religious mind? The whole Exodus experience.
But rather than focusing on Passover itself, a pre-Exodus or precipitating event for Exodus (which is the more in view on the occasion of the Last Supper), Jesus focuses on the wilderness (which approximates the desolate setting of his and the 5000). Instead of the passover bread, Jesus points to the manna.
Rome does exegetical gymnastics to force all this multivalent typology together into one message that supports their sacramentology. But the logic is so interconnected, if you reject a single piece of it as "wishful thinking" the whole thing collapses.
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | | The Following User Says Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |