» Site Navigation | | | | |
View Poll Results: Liquid for communion | |
wine with alcohol only
|    | 47 | 43.52% | |
grape juice only
|    | 3 | 2.78% | |
choice of wine with alcohol or grape juice
|    | 58 | 53.70% | |
grape juice with trace of wine
|    | 0 | 0% |  | | 
08-19-2009, 05:58 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
| | | Liquid to use for communion
This poll I hope is different than the previous poll in 2008. This poll has an option for people to choose either wine or grape juice at the same communion.
__________________
Paul N.
Sovereign Grace Church of Toronto
The lot is cast onto the lap
But every decision comes from the Lord
| 
08-19-2009, 06:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 238
Thanks: 75
Thanked 86 Times in 54 Posts
| | |
Yeah, I'm not the only one anymore. Someone else voted for wine only. Our church uses grape juice but the leadership believes wine is the proper element and hopes to eventually move in that direction.
__________________ John Lanier Elder in Training
Reformed Baptist Church
Topeka, KS | 
08-19-2009, 06:27 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 3,599
Thanked 1,319 Times in 758 Posts
| | |
Is the question which one 'should' be used, or which one 'must' be used?
| 
08-19-2009, 06:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Perth, Scotland UK
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 259
Thanked 434 Times in 289 Posts
| | |
Red wine with alcohol only, unless someone has a good reason for requesting something else for him/herself like red grape juice, non-alcoholic.
__________________
Richard
communicant member, FCoS
Perth, Scotland UK
His Name forever shall endure;
last like the sun it shall:
Men shall be blessed in Him,
and blessed all nations shall Him call (Ps. 72:17)
| 
08-19-2009, 08:13 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Is the question which one 'should' be used, or which one 'must' be used? | I meant "should."
| 
08-19-2009, 08:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
| |
I'm not saying that wine is not a valid option, if that is preferred. My thought is that since communion symbolizes the blood of Christ and His presence is by faith in the heart of believers, we need not be legalistic about requiring wine. At the same time we probably shouldn't be legalistic about requiring not wine.
This is more practical than theological I guess is what I am saying. There may be younger people in the audience who are better off not being exposed to alcohol; even if it is "sanctified" alcohol. I'm not saying alcohol is inherently a problem, but why have something of questionable value brought into the service?
__________________
"Gentle words, quiet words, are after all, the most powerful words. They are more convincing, more compelling, more prevailing." - Washington Gladden
| 
08-19-2009, 08:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimPastor why have something of questionable value brought into the service? | Some believe it's simple:
Although at this point I agree with you. At my church we see it as symbolism that is done justice whether with wine or grape juice--so we use grape juice as a matter of practicality and because we want to avoid causing any trouble for the recovering alcoholics.
| 
08-19-2009, 08:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,979
Thanks: 5,106
Thanked 2,645 Times in 1,605 Posts
| | |
In a perfect world wine only.
| 
08-19-2009, 09:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AThornquist Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimPastor why have something of questionable value brought into the service? | Some believe it's simple:
Although at this point I agree with you. At my church we see it as symbolism that is done justice whether with wine or grape juice--so we use grape juice as a matter of practicality and because we want to avoid causing any trouble for the recovering alcoholics. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian In a perfect world wine only. | I appreciate that very much. Both of your posts combined I think are a well suited explanation of a solid position. In this culture (this being the key idea in my mind) the use of wine can be a problem for some people. Surely the intention of Scripture is not to cause a recovering alcoholic a stumbling block in the celebration of communion.
I suppose a church could offer non-alcoholic drink for such people, but how could that possibly be done discreetly; perhaps in some cases. Thanks.
| 
08-19-2009, 09:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,979
Thanks: 5,106
Thanked 2,645 Times in 1,605 Posts
| | |
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
08-19-2009, 09:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,031
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 534 Times in 402 Posts
| | |
Ideally, wine only, but I think a session could make an exception for an allergy.
| 
08-19-2009, 09:37 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation. | Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
08-19-2009, 09:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
| |
I voted option 3. When I was growing up our church used Welchs grape juice, I have never been able to drink it without thinking about communion | 
08-19-2009, 10:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation. | Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on. | I shepherd a Congregational Church which was formerly United Church of Christ. While this congregation has biblical moorings, in Congregational circles such as the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches, the major concern is whether the Pastor believes that the Bible is inspired.  We have more immediately pressing concerns in our conferences I am afraid.
Thankfully, these folks left the UCC a handful of years prior to my coming - and want to follow Christ and grow in the knowledge of His word. I love the heritage of the Congregational Church and will stick where I have been called, but the honest biblical shepherd in our churches must be cognizant of where we have been in the last 50 years and mindful of the needs of those whom they serve.
At least in principal, this probably rings true to varying extents for us all. -----Added 8/19/2009 at 10:19:33 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by historyb I voted option 3. When I was growing up our church used Welchs grape juice, I have never been able to drink it without thinking about communion  | I love Welch's grape juice. I drink it every evening. My wife recently told me that she thinks that I drink it because then I feel like I am taking communion every evening... she's probably right! | 
08-19-2009, 10:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
| | |
What about wine without alcohol?
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| 
08-19-2009, 10:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward What about wine without alcohol? | What's the point?
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | | The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post: | | 
08-19-2009, 10:48 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,612
Thanks: 3,599
Thanked 1,319 Times in 758 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation. | Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on. | Exactly! Whatever you do, don't mess with the annual Ladies Christmas Brunch or the Memorial Day Garage Sale!!!!!
| | The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post: | | 
08-19-2009, 10:55 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward What about wine without alcohol? | What's the point? | Does this mean that if the communion cup has no alcohol, the communion is not valid.
Does communion revolve around the physical element of alcohol or the spiritual element of focusing on Jesus?
Last edited by Paul Nowlan; 08-20-2009 at 06:25 PM.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Nowlan For This Useful Post: | | 
08-19-2009, 10:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward What about wine without alcohol? | What's the point? | Just trying to find some common ground between the 'wine only' crowd and the 'no alcohol' crowd. And perhaps to show that it really isn't about wine.
'
| 
08-19-2009, 11:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Exactly! Whatever you do, don't mess with the annual Ladies Christmas Brunch or the Memorial Day Garage Sale!!!!! | Did that once, messed with the annual garage sale... didn't bode well for me, but the funny thing was that the very sweet and gentle ladies who were upset had a completely different tune upon my confrentation of their poor attitudes than the song they were singing just prior to my arrival... | 
08-19-2009, 11:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: E. Bridgewater MA
Posts: 1,327
Thanks: 726
Thanked 229 Times in 169 Posts
| | |
Wow,I was really surprised so many folks went with wine w/alcohol,I was an alcoholic and I dont know what I would do if that were my only option,excellent support for this viewpoint though thanks for the help with understanding this.
| 
08-19-2009, 11:59 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation. | Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on. | I wish you or someone else would post an entire thread on your sentence above, Pastor Fred.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 12:02 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
We wrestled with this Brian, for the very reason you state. But we considered it the exception and that the exception, especially in light of the fact that it's a repercussion of sin, could not drive the rule. Win symbolizes too much to miss out on the blessing and opportunity to proclaim Christ in the communion remembrance. It is celebratory, which continually reminds us of the past, present and future aspects of the observation. Grape juice doesn't carry the same powerful statement. And, of course, Scripture simply states wine. Why bother with changing it?
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 12:09 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 627
Thanks: 80
Thanked 230 Times in 112 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward
What about wine without alcohol?
What's the point?
| That's what I say about Decaf.
__________________
Aaron Josh Wright
Deerbrook Baptist Church, Humble Tx
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
| 
08-20-2009, 01:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| | |
Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church.
__________________ Igor
Deacon - Novotushino Baptist Church
Moscow, Russia | 
08-20-2009, 08:48 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 96
Thanks: 16
Thanked 42 Times in 25 Posts
| | |
I asked this in the other thread on wine and people have asked it here, but nobody seems to want to step up and answer the question:
Is it invalid and/or sinful to use grape juice/non-alcoholic wine in communion?
__________________
Mitch
Presbyterian Church of Coventry, CT (PCA)
| 
08-20-2009, 12:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 799 Times in 284 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PointingToChrist Is it invalid and/or sinful to use grape juice/non-alcoholic wine in communion? | One must distinguish between invalid and illicit, the later meaning not authorized or warranted. For example, kneeling at a rail to receive communion does not make it invalid, but such practice is illicit. To this practice, John Knox objected while serving a congregation in England, and declined appointment as a bishop in the Church of England. Sitting or reclining is the proper posture for receiving the Lords Supper.
Wine is the proper element warranted by scripture. Unfermented , unfinished, immature, unprocessed wine, or its component grape juice, is not warranted by scripture, but not necessarily invalid.
Sin is any lack of conformity to the revealed will of God. All sins are not presumptuous; many are done in ignorance or without forethought or intent to sin. Theyre still sin. In this life, none of us are without such to a greater or lesser degree.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 12:58 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church. | I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues?
| 
08-20-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 325
Thanked 530 Times in 296 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church. | I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues? | What is your evidence for such a cutting reply? One secondary issue has been raised. Our brother refers to a number of issues.
__________________ Jonathan Hunt
Elder holding forth the word of life at: Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
| 
08-20-2009, 01:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues? | Well, for me at that moment it was neither a secondary issue nor the only one. And though I am not sure I would do the same thing now, after many years, I am still sure it was totally wrong for many reasons. Communion, besides other things, symbolizes the unity of believers. I understand that missionaries from the US were kind of VIPs and treated accordingly (nothing wrong with that - they did help a lot), but it does not mean that they should have had the VIP-communion apart from the rest of the congregation.
"I may be wrong, no doubt I am, I generally am wrong, but this is my opinion" (c) Bernard Shaw
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 01:42 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | |
Igor,
I am not decided as to the right or wrong of your action.
I give no judgment, but I do want to give an alternative perspective and give the possibility that equal or greater fault COULD (but maybe not) been yours. The elements, being a secondary issue, are much less of an issue than your willfull walking away from this church (i.e. divisiveness).
Were there other reasons as well for you leaving this church? You make it appear that the element of the Lord's Supper (wine or grape juice) was THE deciding factor, which appears troublesome.
Also,
I would love to hear your thoughts on these teetotalling missionaries, the reasons for their actions and how they interacted with local Russions. Did they try to make grape juice the norm or did they merely abstain from wine (i.e, where they disruptive and did they try to dominate, or did they fit in as much as their own peculiar convictions allowed). Was there VIP status resented by the locals, and did the missionaries encourage or discourage this status (i.e. were they trying to cultivate this status or trying to dissuade others from viewing them this way?)
How can these missionaries better bless the Russians? What lessons can you give us about Western missionaries from your experience and how can their practice become better?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 02:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum I give no judgment, but I do want to give an alternative perspective and give the possibility that equal or greater fault COULD (but maybe not) been yours. The elements, being a secondary issue, are much less of an issue than your willfull walking away from this church (i.e. divisiveness).
Were there other reasons as well for you leaving this church? You make it appear that the element of the Lord's Supper (wine or grape juice) was THE deciding factor, which appears troublesome. | Well, again, for me it WAS important. And you are right, this became the deciding factor. I believed the pastor was totally wrong and violated the Scripture, showing favoritism (James, 2) - we discussed the issue in his study later. I am not insisting it was the only right thing for me to do, but my conscience was hurt, I just could not stay there any longer.
We are now in good terms with the pastor and never remember that issue. Quote: |
I would love to hear your thoughts on these teetotalling missionaries, the reasons for their actions and how they interacted with local Russions. Did they try to make grape juice the norm or did they merely abstain from wine (i.e, where they disruptive and did they try to dominate, or did they fit in as much as their own peculiar convictions allowed). Was there VIP status resented by the locals, and did the missionaries encourage or discourage this status (i.e. were they trying to cultivate this status or trying to dissuade others from viewing them this way?)
| It was so many years ago, I can hardly remember the details. I was not very well familiar with those particular missionaries (I had joined that Church a few months before), but what I do know is that they did not try to dominate and impose their convictions on the congregation. And I do not remember their encouraging that "VIP-status" (though it was sometimes the case with others). As far as I know they only asked the pastor to give them grape juice because they abstained from wine and were not used to it. And I believe it was their big mistake. As well as the pastor's. I cannot think of anybody else who was also offended but me. But I was. Quote: |
How can these missionaries better bless the Russians? What lessons can you give us about Western missionaries from your experience and how can their practice become better?
| Oh, it will be off topic here, still I will try very briefly. First, a missionary must know the culture, the history, the language, and the traditions of the country, even become the part of the culture (avoiding sinful habits, of course) - otherwise he will remain an alien to locals and will never be trusted and respected. Then, he must regard the local Christians and remember he is here to help, not to lord it, even if he is a sponsor. It does not mean he should conform to legalistic prejudices, foolish traditions, and all, but he should be very considerate. Nothing hurts more than disrespect.
To be a missionary is a calling, it is a great sacrifice, not just a short trip to an exotic country.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 02:37 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | |
Thanks Igor.
Your responses were a blessing to me. I would love to hear more from you about your perspectives as a Russian believer, especially when it comes to western missionaries and mission practices.
As iron, help sharpen me brother. God bless.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 06:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Nowlan Does this mean that if the communion cup has no alcohol, the communion is not valid.? | It is probably valid -- the partaker in good faith may receive all of the spiritual benefits of the Sacrament -- but I am inclined to think that it is probably not licit.
We should be more concerned with Christ's wish than with whether something does the job.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 06:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,125
Thanks: 495
Thanked 2,302 Times in 845 Posts
| | |
I think wine is preferable... but please... use good wine.
__________________
Ben
Chaplain, US Army
Ft. Riley, KS
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
| 
08-20-2009, 06:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
| |
And if you must use grape juice... please... don't use this: | 
08-20-2009, 06:45 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 357
Thanks: 19
Thanked 106 Times in 59 Posts
| | |
If the element Christ used in the institution of the Lord's supper was wine, we have no more authority to change it than we do to change the element of baptism to apple juice.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Robert Truelove For This Useful Post: | | 
08-20-2009, 07:09 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Truelove If the element Christ used in the institution of the Lord's supper was wine, we have no more authority to change it than we do to change the element of baptism to apple juice. |
So, what do you tell a person suffering from an alcohol allergy?
| 
08-20-2009, 07:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Washington
Posts: 1,565
Thanks: 338
Thanked 410 Times in 280 Posts
| | |
Same thing you tell a person with a grape juice allergy.
Also don't forget all of you wine only folks, to be consistent and not hypocritical, you have to use whole grain bread too, none of that modern altered bleached white flour stuff.
That was not used in the Bible.
So if the actual substance matters, we should use common table wine of a similar alcohol content made naturally without preservatives or fermentation additives.
And a nice homemade whole grain bread.
I happen to agree all of this would be preferable.
But is it vital to the honorable celebration of the Supper?
__________________
DonP
| 
08-20-2009, 09:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ferrell
Wine is the proper element warranted by scripture. Unfermented , unfinished, immature, unprocessed wine, or its component grape juice, is not warranted by scripture, but not necessarily invalid.
| Unprocessed? Don't you mean processed? They make the wine, then they take the alcohol out. Ariel: The World's Best Non-alcoholic Wines |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |