The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Theological Forum

Theological Forum Systematic Theology, Biblical Theology and just plain Theology discussions
Grow in the grace and the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ (2 Pe. 3:18)

» Online Users: 61
10 members and 51 guests
AltogetherLovely, buggy, calvinich, David, Ivan, J. David Kear, JonathanHunt, nicnap
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
View Poll Results: Liquid for communion
wine with alcohol only 47 43.52%
grape juice only 3 2.78%
choice of wine with alcohol or grape juice 58 53.70%
grape juice with trace of wine 0 0%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 05:58 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Liquid to use for communion

This poll I hope is different than the previous poll in 2008. This poll has an option for people to choose either wine or grape juice at the same communion.
__________________
Paul N.
Sovereign Grace Church of Toronto
The lot is cast onto the lap
But every decision comes from the Lord
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 06:24 PM
John Lanier's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 238
Thanks: 75
Thanked 86 Times in 54 Posts
Yeah, I'm not the only one anymore. Someone else voted for wine only. Our church uses grape juice but the leadership believes wine is the proper element and hopes to eventually move in that direction.
__________________
John Lanier
Elder in Training
Reformed Baptist Church
Topeka, KS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 06:27 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,612
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,599
Thanked 1,319 Times in 758 Posts
Is the question which one 'should' be used, or which one 'must' be used?
__________________


http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


"Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 06:51 PM
Richard Tallach's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Perth, Scotland UK
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 259
Thanked 434 Times in 289 Posts
Red wine with alcohol only, unless someone has a good reason for requesting something else for him/herself like red grape juice, non-alcoholic.
__________________
Richard
communicant member, FCoS
Perth, Scotland UK

His Name forever shall endure;
last like the sun it shall:
Men shall be blessed in Him,
and blessed all nations shall Him call (Ps. 72:17)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:13 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Is the question which one 'should' be used, or which one 'must' be used?
I meant "should."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:29 PM
PilgrimPastor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
I'm not saying that wine is not a valid option, if that is preferred. My thought is that since communion symbolizes the blood of Christ and His presence is by faith in the heart of believers, we need not be legalistic about requiring wine. At the same time we probably shouldn't be legalistic about requiring not wine.

This is more practical than theological I guess is what I am saying. There may be younger people in the audience who are better off not being exposed to alcohol; even if it is "sanctified" alcohol. I'm not saying alcohol is inherently a problem, but why have something of questionable value brought into the service?
__________________
"Gentle words, quiet words, are after all, the most powerful words. They are more convincing, more compelling, more prevailing." - Washington Gladden
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:37 PM
AThornquist's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimPastor View Post
why have something of questionable value brought into the service?
Some believe it's simple:
Quote:
Because it's commanded!

Although at this point I agree with you. At my church we see it as symbolism that is done justice whether with wine or grape juice--so we use grape juice as a matter of practicality and because we want to avoid causing any trouble for the recovering alcoholics.
__________________
Andrew Thornquist My Photo Album
Calvinistic Baptist
Ukiah, California
To follow Christ was the best decision God made for me!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:38 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,979
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,106
Thanked 2,645 Times in 1,605 Posts
In a perfect world wine only.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Member Fairmount ARP Church
Pittsburgh, PA


Deo Vindice
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:18 PM
PilgrimPastor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AThornquist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimPastor View Post
why have something of questionable value brought into the service?
Some believe it's simple:
Quote:
Because it's commanded!

Although at this point I agree with you. At my church we see it as symbolism that is done justice whether with wine or grape juice--so we use grape juice as a matter of practicality and because we want to avoid causing any trouble for the recovering alcoholics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
In a perfect world wine only.
I appreciate that very much. Both of your posts combined I think are a well suited explanation of a solid position. In this culture (this being the key idea in my mind) the use of wine can be a problem for some people. Surely the intention of Scripture is not to cause a recovering alcoholic a stumbling block in the celebration of communion.

I suppose a church could offer non-alcoholic drink for such people, but how could that possibly be done discreetly; perhaps in some cases. Thanks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:20 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,979
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,106
Thanked 2,645 Times in 1,605 Posts
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
JonathanHunt (08-20-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:24 PM
Scottish Lass's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,031
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 534 Times in 402 Posts
Ideally, wine only, but I think a session could make an exception for an allergy.
__________________
Anna
Wife of Tim/Marrow Man
Louisville, KY
Member of Midlane Park Presbyterian (Associate Reformed Presbyterian)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:37 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (08-19-2009), Edward (08-19-2009), Jesus is my friend (08-20-2009), KMK (08-19-2009), Pergamum (08-19-2009)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:46 PM
historyb's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
I voted option 3. When I was growing up our church used Welchs grape juice, I have never been able to drink it without thinking about communion
__________________
Doug
Baptist
Hemet, Ca
Old Time Radio Podcast
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:19 PM
PilgrimPastor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on.
I shepherd a Congregational Church which was formerly United Church of Christ. While this congregation has biblical moorings, in Congregational circles such as the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches, the major concern is whether the Pastor believes that the Bible is inspired. We have more immediately pressing concerns in our conferences I am afraid.

Thankfully, these folks left the UCC a handful of years prior to my coming - and want to follow Christ and grow in the knowledge of His word. I love the heritage of the Congregational Church and will stick where I have been called, but the honest biblical shepherd in our churches must be cognizant of where we have been in the last 50 years and mindful of the needs of those whom they serve.

At least in principal, this probably rings true to varying extents for us all.

-----Added 8/19/2009 at 10:19:33 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by historyb View Post
I voted option 3. When I was growing up our church used Welchs grape juice, I have never been able to drink it without thinking about communion
I love Welch's grape juice. I drink it every evening. My wife recently told me that she thinks that I drink it because then I feel like I am taking communion every evening... she's probably right!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:30 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
What about wine without alcohol?
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:39 PM
Reformed Thomist's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward View Post
What about wine without alcohol?
What's the point?
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada

1689'er

http://nathantyler.wordpress.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (08-20-2009)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:48 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,612
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,599
Thanked 1,319 Times in 758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on.
Exactly! Whatever you do, don't mess with the annual Ladies Christmas Brunch or the Memorial Day Garage Sale!!!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (08-19-2009)
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:55 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward View Post
What about wine without alcohol?
What's the point?
Does this mean that if the communion cup has no alcohol, the communion is not valid.

Does communion revolve around the physical element of alcohol or the spiritual element of focusing on Jesus?

Last edited by Paul Nowlan; 08-20-2009 at 06:25 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Nowlan For This Useful Post:
JennyG (08-21-2009)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:56 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward View Post
What about wine without alcohol?
What's the point?
Just trying to find some common ground between the 'wine only' crowd and the 'no alcohol' crowd. And perhaps to show that it really isn't about wine.
'
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 11:00 PM
PilgrimPastor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cuba
Posts: 78
Thanks: 8
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Exactly! Whatever you do, don't mess with the annual Ladies Christmas Brunch or the Memorial Day Garage Sale!!!!!
Did that once, messed with the annual garage sale... didn't bode well for me, but the funny thing was that the very sweet and gentle ladies who were upset had a completely different tune upon my confrentation of their poor attitudes than the song they were singing just prior to my arrival...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 11:02 PM
Jesus is my friend's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: E. Bridgewater MA
Posts: 1,327
Thanks: 726
Thanked 229 Times in 169 Posts
Wow,I was really surprised so many folks went with wine w/alcohol,I was an alcoholic and I dont know what I would do if that were my only option,excellent support for this viewpoint though thanks for the help with understanding this.
__________________
Brian
Grace Bible Church;E.Bridgewater
East Bridgewater MA
http://www.gracebiblehome.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 11:59 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
I certainly believe the Scriptures teach we should be serving wine only in communion, however, it is not the first issue I am going to stake my pastoral life on in a congregation.
Very wise. I would encourage you to think about what your "non-negotiables" are, and what they are not. You don't want to die on every hill (or the wrong hill), but there are hills worth dying on.
I wish you or someone else would post an entire thread on your sentence above, Pastor Fred.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (08-20-2009)
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:02 AM
Wannabee's Avatar
Obi Wan Kenobi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
We wrestled with this Brian, for the very reason you state. But we considered it the exception and that the exception, especially in light of the fact that it's a repercussion of sin, could not drive the rule. Win symbolizes too much to miss out on the blessing and opportunity to proclaim Christ in the communion remembrance. It is celebratory, which continually reminds us of the past, present and future aspects of the observation. Grape juice doesn't carry the same powerful statement. And, of course, Scripture simply states wine. Why bother with changing it?
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org
I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post:
JonathanHunt (08-20-2009), KMK (08-20-2009)
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:09 AM
puritanpilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 627
Thanks: 80
Thanked 230 Times in 112 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward
What about wine without alcohol?

What's the point?
That's what I say about Decaf.
__________________
Aaron Josh Wright
Deerbrook Baptist Church, Humble Tx
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:25 AM
Igor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church.
__________________
Igor
Deacon - Novotushino Baptist Church
Moscow, Russia
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 08:48 AM
PointingToChrist's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 96
Thanks: 16
Thanked 42 Times in 25 Posts
I asked this in the other thread on wine and people have asked it here, but nobody seems to want to step up and answer the question:

Is it invalid and/or sinful to use grape juice/non-alcoholic wine in communion?
__________________
Mitch
Presbyterian Church of Coventry, CT (PCA)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:26 PM
Glenn Ferrell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 799 Times in 284 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PointingToChrist View Post
Is it invalid and/or sinful to use grape juice/non-alcoholic wine in communion?
One must distinguish between “invalid” and “illicit,” the later meaning not authorized or warranted. For example, kneeling at a rail to receive communion does not make it “invalid,” but such practice is “illicit.” To this practice, John Knox objected while serving a congregation in England, and declined appointment as a bishop in the Church of England. Sitting or reclining is the proper posture for receiving the Lord’s Supper.

Wine is the proper element warranted by scripture. Unfermented , unfinished, immature, unprocessed “wine,” or its component grape juice, is not warranted by scripture, but not necessarily invalid.

“Sin” is any lack of conformity to the revealed will of God. All sins are not presumptuous; many are done in ignorance or without forethought or intent to sin. They’re still “sin.” In this life, none of us are without such to a greater or lesser degree.
__________________
Glenn Ferrell
Pastor, Sovereign Redeemer Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Boise, Idaho

http://sovereignredeemer.org

http://www.sermonaudio.com/source_de...formationidaho


Nec Tamen Consumebatur


The duty of magistrates...extends to both tables of the law, ... those laws are absurd which disregard the rights of God, and consult only for men. - Calvin, Institutes, IV:20:9
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post:
PilgrimPastor (08-20-2009)
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:58 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor View Post
Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church.
I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:20 PM
JonathanHunt's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 325
Thanked 530 Times in 296 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor View Post
Years ago I used to attend a Church whish was also attended by American missionaries on a regular basis. In our Baptist Churches we use wine and wine only for the Lord's Supper, but for those missionaries an exception was made and while everybody was served wine they were given grape juice - the pastor refered to "their tradition to abstain from alcohol". To me it was totally unacceptable: if you come as a missionary to another country and work with local congregations, respect and accept THEIR traditions (especially if they are Biblically based), not bring yours. Or just stay home. And if you belive that wine should be used for the Lord's Supper, why make any exceptions like this?
I doubt that the pastor would be served wine in the missionaries' home Church in the US!
That was one of the reasons I left that Church.
I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues?
What is your evidence for such a cutting reply? One secondary issue has been raised. Our brother refers to a number of issues.
__________________
Jonathan Hunt

Elder holding forth the word of life at:
Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:30 PM
Igor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
I wonder which is worse, personally abstaining from wine when in a land of drunkenness, or leaving a church over secondary issues?
Well, for me at that moment it was neither a secondary issue nor the only one. And though I am not sure I would do the same thing now, after many years, I am still sure it was totally wrong for many reasons. Communion, besides other things, symbolizes the unity of believers. I understand that missionaries from the US were kind of VIPs and treated accordingly (nothing wrong with that - they did help a lot), but it does not mean that they should have had the VIP-communion apart from the rest of the congregation.
"I may be wrong, no doubt I am, I generally am wrong, but this is my opinion" (c) Bernard Shaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post:
Glenn Ferrell (08-21-2009), Pergamum (08-20-2009)
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:42 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
Igor,

I am not decided as to the right or wrong of your action.

I give no judgment, but I do want to give an alternative perspective and give the possibility that equal or greater fault COULD (but maybe not) been yours. The elements, being a secondary issue, are much less of an issue than your willfull walking away from this church (i.e. divisiveness).

Were there other reasons as well for you leaving this church? You make it appear that the element of the Lord's Supper (wine or grape juice) was THE deciding factor, which appears troublesome.



Also,

I would love to hear your thoughts on these teetotalling missionaries, the reasons for their actions and how they interacted with local Russions. Did they try to make grape juice the norm or did they merely abstain from wine (i.e, where they disruptive and did they try to dominate, or did they fit in as much as their own peculiar convictions allowed). Was there VIP status resented by the locals, and did the missionaries encourage or discourage this status (i.e. were they trying to cultivate this status or trying to dissuade others from viewing them this way?)

How can these missionaries better bless the Russians? What lessons can you give us about Western missionaries from your experience and how can their practice become better?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
PointingToChrist (08-20-2009)
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 02:24 PM
Igor's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 297
Thanks: 214
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
I give no judgment, but I do want to give an alternative perspective and give the possibility that equal or greater fault COULD (but maybe not) been yours. The elements, being a secondary issue, are much less of an issue than your willfull walking away from this church (i.e. divisiveness).

Were there other reasons as well for you leaving this church? You make it appear that the element of the Lord's Supper (wine or grape juice) was THE deciding factor, which appears troublesome.
Well, again, for me it WAS important. And you are right, this became the deciding factor. I believed the pastor was totally wrong and violated the Scripture, showing favoritism (James, 2) - we discussed the issue in his study later. I am not insisting it was the only right thing for me to do, but my conscience was hurt, I just could not stay there any longer.
We are now in good terms with the pastor and never remember that issue.

Quote:
I would love to hear your thoughts on these teetotalling missionaries, the reasons for their actions and how they interacted with local Russions. Did they try to make grape juice the norm or did they merely abstain from wine (i.e, where they disruptive and did they try to dominate, or did they fit in as much as their own peculiar convictions allowed). Was there VIP status resented by the locals, and did the missionaries encourage or discourage this status (i.e. were they trying to cultivate this status or trying to dissuade others from viewing them this way?)
It was so many years ago, I can hardly remember the details. I was not very well familiar with those particular missionaries (I had joined that Church a few months before), but what I do know is that they did not try to dominate and impose their convictions on the congregation. And I do not remember their encouraging that "VIP-status" (though it was sometimes the case with others). As far as I know they only asked the pastor to give them grape juice because they abstained from wine and were not used to it. And I believe it was their big mistake. As well as the pastor's. I cannot think of anybody else who was also offended but me. But I was.

Quote:
How can these missionaries better bless the Russians? What lessons can you give us about Western missionaries from your experience and how can their practice become better?
Oh, it will be off topic here, still I will try very briefly. First, a missionary must know the culture, the history, the language, and the traditions of the country, even become the part of the culture (avoiding sinful habits, of course) - otherwise he will remain an alien to locals and will never be trusted and respected. Then, he must regard the local Christians and remember he is here to help, not to lord it, even if he is a sponsor. It does not mean he should conform to legalistic prejudices, foolish traditions, and all, but he should be very considerate. Nothing hurts more than disrespect.
To be a missionary is a calling, it is a great sacrifice, not just a short trip to an exotic country.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Igor For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (08-20-2009)
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 02:37 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
Thanks Igor.

Your responses were a blessing to me. I would love to hear more from you about your perspectives as a Russian believer, especially when it comes to western missionaries and mission practices.

As iron, help sharpen me brother. God bless.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:
Igor (08-20-2009)
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:13 PM
Reformed Thomist's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Nowlan View Post
Does this mean that if the communion cup has no alcohol, the communion is not valid.?
It is probably valid -- the partaker in good faith may receive all of the spiritual benefits of the Sacrament -- but I am inclined to think that it is probably not licit.

We should be more concerned with Christ's wish than with whether something does the job.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post:
yeutter (08-20-2009)
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:17 PM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,125
Thanks: 495
Thanked 2,302 Times in 845 Posts
I think wine is preferable... but please... use good wine.
__________________
Ben
Chaplain, US Army
Ft. Riley, KS
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:21 PM
Reformed Thomist's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 585
Thanks: 228
Thanked 217 Times in 121 Posts
And if you must use grape juice... please... don't use this:

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:45 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 357
Thanks: 19
Thanked 106 Times in 59 Posts
If the element Christ used in the institution of the Lord's supper was wine, we have no more authority to change it than we do to change the element of baptism to apple juice.
__________________
Robert Truelove
Pastor
Christ Reformed Church
Lawrenceville, GA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Robert Truelove For This Useful Post:
Igor (08-20-2009)
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 07:09 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Truelove View Post
If the element Christ used in the institution of the Lord's supper was wine, we have no more authority to change it than we do to change the element of baptism to apple juice.

So, what do you tell a person suffering from an alcohol allergy?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 07:45 PM
DonP's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 338
Thanked 410 Times in 280 Posts
Same thing you tell a person with a grape juice allergy.

Also don't forget all of you wine only folks, to be consistent and not hypocritical, you have to use whole grain bread too, none of that modern altered bleached white flour stuff.
That was not used in the Bible.

So if the actual substance matters, we should use common table wine of a similar alcohol content made naturally without preservatives or fermentation additives.

And a nice homemade whole grain bread.

I happen to agree all of this would be preferable.
But is it vital to the honorable celebration of the Supper?
__________________
DonP
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009, 09:38 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ferrell View Post

Wine is the proper element warranted by scripture. Unfermented , unfinished, immature, unprocessed “wine,” or its component grape juice, is not warranted by scripture, but not necessarily invalid.
Unprocessed? Don't you mean processed? They make the wine, then they take the alcohol out. Ariel: The World's Best Non-alcoholic Wines
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69