Results 1 to 8 of 8

Theological Forum discuss Arminianism Versus Pelagianism in the Theology forums; I can't quite wrap my head around the difference between the two. Can someone provide a distinction between Arminianism and Pelagianism in layman's language? I ...

  1. #1
    ericfromcowtown's Avatar
    ericfromcowtown is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    937

    Arminianism Versus Pelagianism

    I can't quite wrap my head around the difference between the two. Can someone provide a distinction between Arminianism and Pelagianism in layman's language?

    I recognize that their namesakes were separated by roughly 1000 years, and that Arminianism doesn't seem to go as far towards works righteousness as Palagianism. After that it gets fuzy.

    Moderators: Not sure if this should go into Church History rather than Theology.
    Eric
    PCA
    Calgary, Alberta CANADA

  2. #2
    sastark's Avatar
    sastark is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,188
    Pelagianism is spelled with a "P".

    Seth Stark
    Member, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Springfield, IL (though I live in Decatur, IL)

    (Formerly Ruling Elder, Communion Presbyterian Church (ARP), Irvine, CA)
    M.A. Science and Religion, Biola University
    The Ruling Elder Blog
    LIKE The Ruling Elder on Facebook!

  3. #3
    DMcFadden's Avatar
    DMcFadden is offline. Meum cerebrum nocet
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    9,923
    Historical Arminianism was closer to Calvin than today's version. Even modern Arminians such as Roger Olson say that today's popular Arminianism is little more than rank Pelagianism. So, if you are talking about today's broad evangelicalism, it is often semi-Pelagian if not outright Pelagian. The Arminianism of Mr. Wesley was much less so. It would seem that Charles Grandison Finney mucked up just about everything with his naturalistic interpretation of the use of "means" and the non-supernatural character of evangelism and revival. American revivalism is the unfortunate heir to this bastardization of theology.
    Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
    Atherton Baptist Homes, Alhambra, CA, President/CEO, Retired
    Emmanuel Lutheran Church, LCMS

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

  4. #4
    moral necessity's Avatar
    moral necessity is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,773
    The difference lies in what man is able to do after the fall of Adam. Pelagianism believes that man is still able to and must cooperate with God to accomplish his salvation. True Arminianism believes that God has to first enable man to be able cooperate with Him. God restores the will of man from the fall so that he can then choose to cooperate or not. Therefore, Pelagianism does not believe in total depravity or the need for grace to restore us from such. True Arminianism does believe in total depravity and the need for grace to initiate our restoration from it.
    Last edited by moral necessity; 07-22-2008 at 01:58 PM. Reason: added a thought
    Charles Plauger
    Grace Reformed Church
    Woodstock, VA

  5. #5
    Christusregnat's Avatar
    Christusregnat is offline. Puritanboard Professor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,165
    Eric,

    Pelagian seems man as neutral/good both before and after the fall. Not postively good before the fall, and positively bad after the fall (as Augustinianism). Nor possibly good before the fall, and mostly bad after the fall (as Arminianism).

    To me, that's the basic issue. What was man before the fall, and what has man become because of the fall. However those are answered will lead to the various schools of thought (or the schools of thought lead to the views).

    Cheers,

    Adam




    Quote Originally Posted by ericfromcowtown View Post
    I can't quite wrap my head around the difference between the two. Can someone provide a distinction between Arminianism and Pelagianism in layman's language?

    I recognize that their namesakes were separated by roughly 1000 years, and that Arminianism doesn't seem to go as far towards works righteousness as Palagianism. After that it gets fuzy.

    Moderators: Not sure if this should go into Church History rather than Theology.
    Adam B., Old Dominion, RPCNA

    Ratio immutabilis facit praeceptum immutabile

  6. #6
    Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
    Jimmy the Greek is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,386
    This might help: Theopedia:Order of God's decrees

    It has summary comparisons of Pelagianism, Semi-Pelagianism, Arminianism, etc. derived from B. B. Warfield's Plan of Salvation.
    Jim
    1689 LBCF
    Independent Bible Church
    North Texas, USA

  7. #7
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    22,502
    Blog Entries
    1
    Others have noted some of the distinctions above but a few more observations.

    A Pelagian doesn't see Adam's sin as affecting anyone but himself. In general, a Pelagian believes that a corrupt society causes a man to eventually sin and what he needs is self-discipline to resist sin and to live righteously. Grace is an added help but is not necessary. It is enough to know that God has said: "Do not steal..." and man has the capacity within himself to obey. Consequently, justification is not forensic at all but based upon the actual righteousness of the obedient man. A man is righteous because he lives a pure life - on his own steam.

    Arminianism on the other hand believes that the Fall plunged mankind into sin and that grace is essential for man to obey/believe the Gospel - at least get him to the point of believing. Grace is seen as extending to all men equally as God, in the Gospel, gives all men a measure of grace to overcome resistance to the Gospel but the man must take the final step of belief. That grace of God is necessary and is like a ladder that allows a man to get to the very top with God's help but he must take the final step. The Arminian is unlike the Pelagian in that he didn't climb the ladder (God placed him on the top rung) but in seeing a capacity of a dead man to even stand at the top of the ladder is still like the Pelagian in denying the necessity for regeneration before belief.

    The Arminian will claim that no "work" is being performed because the acceptance of a gift is no work but, in fact, even though they're acknowledging that grace preceded their belief, it will still only a grace they cooperated with and it sees their unregenerated flesh as capable of doing so. What distinguishes the believer from the unbeliever? Not God's grace but man's decision. And because grace can be resisted, this also means that it can be ultimately rejected later on by the believer because he chose himself in and can choose himself out.

    Incidentally, the really sad thing is that most Fundamentalists used to be Arminians but what is becoming more mainstream today is that they are mostly becoming Pelagian.
    Rich
    Ruling Elder, Licentiate, Under Care, Hope of Christ Church (PCA), Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

  8. #8
    DMcFadden's Avatar
    DMcFadden is offline. Meum cerebrum nocet
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    9,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post

    Incidentally, the really sad thing is that most Fundamentalists used to be Arminians but what is becoming more mainstream today is that they are mostly becoming Pelagian.
    EXACTLY! I would listen to the two MP3 programs of White Horse Inn on this subject:

    7/13 - American Pelagianism - White Horse Inn (Dr. Michael Horton) - Broadcast Archives


    7/6 - The Gospel According to Pelagius - White Horse Inn (Dr. Michael Horton) - Broadcast Archives
    Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
    Atherton Baptist Homes, Alhambra, CA, President/CEO, Retired
    Emmanuel Lutheran Church, LCMS

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72