» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 116 | | 33 members and 83 guests | | ADKing, asc, austinww, Beoga, Chippy, ChristianHedonist, ChristianTrader, DMcFadden, gene_mingo, greenbaggins, Grillsy, Hamalas, Jack K, jambo, JoyFullMom, Lincolnshire Paul, MMasztal, mossy, NateLanning, Puritan Scot, SolaGratia, Soonerborn, Southern Presbyterian, Theoretical, Titus35, toddpedlar, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: Which Grammar Should I Use? | |
Allen P. Ross
|    | 1 | 33.33% | |
Page H. Kelley
|    | 2 | 66.67% |  | 
03-23-2009, 03:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | | Teaching & Learning Biblical Hebrew
I have been remiss in keeping up with my Hebrew (mostly because I did poorly in the class) and am in the process of refreshing my ability to use Hebrew. I have two Hebrew Grammar books at my disposal and am trying to figure out which one to use. Both works teach inductively.
The first is by Allen P. Ross called Introducing Biblical Hebrew
Second is by Page Kelley called Biblical Hebrew: An Introductory Grammar
If you have any advice as to which one I should use let me know.
Blessings and Thanks! -----Added 3/23/2009 at 03:30:53 EST----- | 
03-23-2009, 03:56 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
Benjamin,
I am not familiar with either of those; but, I would suggest making use of Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar as a good reference. It's freely available in pdf online. It's compact, and yet accurate and useful. Edit
The above will not be useful by itself if you are looking for a "lesson book;" but it will serve as a useful supplement to one (and, of course, will be useful forever afterwards, as well)
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
03-23-2009, 04:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 196
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 37 Posts
| | |
We used Ross at WTS Dallas. It was useful for me. I am not familiar with Kelley so I can't say.
__________________
Kenneth Kneip
Member @ New St. Peter's PC (PCA), Dallas TX
Pastoral Intern @ New Covenant PC (PCA), Dallas TX
M. Div. student @ Redeemer Seminary, Dallas TX
| 
03-23-2009, 07:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,061
Thanks: 452
Thanked 869 Times in 397 Posts
| | |
Benjamin,
I would recommend that you look into picking up a copy of Mark Futato's grammar. I studied Hebrew at two seminaries, and have looked over other grammars beside, and have found that Futato's layout, presentation of concepts, practice exercises, and the like make it a very accessible volume either for an intro or a brush up.
I would toss Gesenius as a refresher option if you found that you struggled with Hebrew to begin with.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon Soli Deo Gloria | 
03-23-2009, 07:48 PM
|  | Reformed Dane | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Breum, Denmark
Posts: 6,341
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 1,013 Times in 735 Posts
| | |
I have the one with Van Pelt
"Basics of Biblical Hebrew"
| 
03-23-2009, 08:00 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
| | |
If one is turning to a grammar for the second time it is usually because the strictly grammatical approach hasn't worked, so I would suggest trying something more inductive, like Biblical Hebrew by Kittel, Hoffer, and Wright. If it all starts making sense fairly quickly then it won't take long to work through the whole book. It is also helpful in building up a familiarity with the language to take time at least once a week in consecutively working through an Old Testament text in the original with the help of a good commentary or two. Ruth is usually considered the best place to start.
__________________
Yours sincerely,
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post: | | 
03-23-2009, 08:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer If one is turning to a grammar for the second time it is usually because the strictly grammatical approach hasn't worked, so I would suggest trying something more inductive, like Biblical Hebrew by Kittel, Hoffer, and Wright. If it all starts making sense fairly quickly then it won't take long to work through the whole book. It is also helpful in building up a familiarity with the language to take time at least once a week in consecutively working through an Old Testament text in the original with the help of a good commentary or two. Ruth is usually considered the best place to start. | I'm working through KHW's book now. Great stuff.
Theognome
__________________
Bill Cunningham
Covenant Reformed Church, URC
Kansas City
There are three kinds of people- those who can count, and those who can't.
| 
03-23-2009, 09:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,646
Thanks: 609
Thanked 925 Times in 709 Posts
| |
There is an excellent little book called:
A Beginner's Handbook to Biblical Hebrew by John H. Marks and Virgil M. Rodgers. It is out of print (I believe), but there are copies available on Amazon HERE
This book combines an inductive and deductive method to approaching the study of the language. Contains complete paradigms and other valuable study helps.
| 
03-23-2009, 10:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Deerfield, Illinois
Posts: 94
Thanks: 7
Thanked 48 Times in 35 Posts
| | |
Backwoods Presbyterian,
Both of these grammars are good. I used Ross when I was in undergrad. However, you do need to recognize that Ross has some drawbacks, imparticular the number of exercises per chapter. There are, quite simply, too few. Kelly is better in that regard, but, then again, Kelly also has been accused of overloading students with too much information all at once.
Also, some have suggested using Gesenius as a reference grammar. I have no objection. However, you also need to realize that Gesenius is badly outdated, and some of the things in Gesenius have been overturned by later finds, as well as the fact that many things from later finds have illuminated our understanding of the language that is not found in Gesenius. For example, when Gesenius was written we did not have Ugaritic, and we had a very limited corpus of Old Aramaic inscriptions. Also, our knowledge of Akkadian has grown as well. I would suggest supplementing these books with either Jouon-Muraoka, or Van Der Merwe.
God Bless,
Adam
__________________
Adam
Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Deerfield, Illinois
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Student
| 
03-23-2009, 10:58 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 530
Thanks: 73
Thanked 94 Times in 71 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I have been remiss in keeping up with my Hebrew (mostly because I did poorly in the class) and am in the process of refreshing my ability to use Hebrew. I have two Hebrew Grammar books at my disposal and am trying to figure out which one to use. Both works teach inductively.
The first is by Allen P. Ross called Introducing Biblical Hebrew
Second is by Page Kelley called Biblical Hebrew: An Introductory Grammar
If you have any advice as to which one I should use let me know.
Blessings and Thanks! -----Added 3/23/2009 at 03:30:53 EST-----  | I've had some Greek (Homeric and classical) but not koine. If I applied myself to Greek studies I could probably become proficient in a reasonable amount of time but Hebrew looks like a whole different world. How many people here despaired at the thought of learning Hebrew?
__________________
Zack Flummerfelt
Evangel Presbyterian (PCA), layman
Wichita, KS
As of September 12, 2009 I am married to dear Jlynn!! | 
03-23-2009, 11:29 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Deerfield, Illinois
Posts: 94
Thanks: 7
Thanked 48 Times in 35 Posts
| |
KS_Presby, Quote: |
I've had some Greek (Homeric and classical) but not koine. If I applied myself to Greek studies I could probably become proficient in a reasonable amount of time but Hebrew looks like a whole different world. How many people here despaired at the thought of learning Hebrew?
| I *loved* learning Hebrew. There were times, expecially in the third semester of undergrad in which it was tough, but, other than that, it has grown to be my favorite language.
Interestingly enough, I struggled in Greek. The New Testament wasn't bad [except for Luke/Acts, Peter, and Hebrews], but, when we got to the more difficult Greek texts such as Josephus and Plato, I was toast. The weird thing is, though, I loved Latin, and am doing ok in Akkadian, which many people say is harder than Greek.
God Bless,
Adam
| 
03-23-2009, 11:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 174
Thanks: 24
Thanked 82 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
I am at RTS Jackson studying under Miles Van Pelt and I have to say not only is his grammar in a league by itself, so is his teaching. I would not use any other grammar. The workbook that goes with it is full of excercises and the graded reader that would constitute a third semester of Hebrew is fantastic as well.
__________________
Alan
Seminarian, RTS Jackson, MS
OPC
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Bookmeister For This Useful Post: | | 
03-24-2009, 02:33 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,356
Thanks: 262
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer If one is turning to a grammar for the second time it is usually because the strictly grammatical approach hasn't worked, so I would suggest trying something more inductive, like Biblical Hebrew by Kittel, Hoffer, and Wright. If it all starts making sense fairly quickly then it won't take long to work through the whole book. It is also helpful in building up a familiarity with the language to take time at least once a week in consecutively working through an Old Testament text in the original with the help of a good commentary or two. Ruth is usually considered the best place to start. | This is what I used on my second attempt at Hebrew. Of course, during my first attempt I was working full time, going to seminary full time, and was married with two kids!
Factors aside, I liked round two a lot better than round one. Plus Dr. Murray's Hebrew course, which is free online, I believe (or I could mail you the DVD), follows this book to the T. Good stuff.
| 
03-24-2009, 04:27 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Earth and Heaven
Posts: 925
Thanks: 125
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookmeister I am at RTS Jackson studying under Miles Van Pelt and I have to say not only is his grammar in a league by itself, so is his teaching. I would not use any other grammar. The workbook that goes with it is full of excercises and the graded reader that would constitute a third semester of Hebrew is fantastic as well. |  Miles Van Pelt is awesome! Are class is also using his grammar, I also have the lectures of the grammar on my itunes... those lectures are worth the $80. I have listened to them many times over... I also find this to be of great help; Online Hebrew
Shalom-
__________________
Scott Shahan
Member of First Evangelical Free Church, EFCA firstfreesf.org
Sioux Falls, SD
Better is the sin which humbles me, than that duty which makes me proud.
Thomas Watson
| 
03-24-2009, 10:34 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 278
Thanks: 102
Thanked 112 Times in 57 Posts
| |
[quote=Scott Shahan;579167] Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookmeister  Miles Van Pelt is awesome! Are class is also using his grammar, I also have the lectures of the grammar on my itunes... those lectures are worth the $80. I have listened to them many times over... | The lectures you bought - are they still available for purchase? If so, where?
__________________
Rob S.
New Creation RPC
Kitchener, ON
| 
03-24-2009, 01:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Earth and Heaven
Posts: 925
Thanks: 125
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
| |
[quote=uberkermit;579343] Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Shahan Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookmeister  Miles Van Pelt is awesome! Are class is also using his grammar, I also have the lectures of the grammar on my itunes... those lectures are worth the $80. I have listened to them many times over... | The lectures you bought - are they still available for purchase? If so, where? | Here ya go, http://www.basicsofbiblicalhebrew.com/ | | The Following User Says Thank You to Scott Shahan For This Useful Post: | | 
03-24-2009, 01:40 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | |
OK, cool, van Pelt says "waw" not "vav." That's a plus (since I learned the former).
| 
03-24-2009, 01:58 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 530
Thanks: 73
Thanked 94 Times in 71 Posts
| |
[quote=Scott Shahan;579519] Quote:
Originally Posted by uberkermit |
I dunno man. I've got to have the visual element. I wish they sold videos.
| 
03-24-2009, 02:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Earth and Heaven
Posts: 925
Thanks: 125
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
| |
[quote=KS_Presby;579540] Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Shahan Quote:
Originally Posted by uberkermit |
I dunno man. I've got to have the visual element. I wish they sold videos. | There are videos on Utunes of a free hebrew class from concordia... those are really helpful. there are like 30 classroom lectures to watch. You'll love em. | 
03-24-2009, 02:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
| |
The Free Church of Scotland Continuing Seminary offers a free online Hebrew Course using KHW. Online Hebrew | | The Following User Says Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post: | | 
03-24-2009, 02:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Earth and Heaven
Posts: 925
Thanks: 125
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
| |
The one question to ask always is, "Why is the Dagesh there?" | 
03-24-2009, 02:34 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Shahan There are videos on Utunes of a free hebrew class from concordia... those are really helpful. there are like 30 classroom lectures to watch. You'll love em.  | Do have a link? I did a search and could not find it.
| 
03-24-2009, 02:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Earth and Heaven
Posts: 925
Thanks: 125
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Shahan There are videos on Utunes of a free hebrew class from concordia... those are really helpful. there are like 30 classroom lectures to watch. You'll love em.  | Do have a link? I did a search and could not find it. | Go to the Itunes store, then go to itunesU, then go to "languages" and you will see the Concordia Seminary Hebrew class. there is no link to give but those directions will get you there.. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Scott Shahan For This Useful Post: | | 
03-24-2009, 08:26 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by nleshelman Factors aside, I liked round two a lot better than round one. Plus Dr. Murray's Hebrew course, which is free online, I believe (or I could mail you the DVD), follows this book to the T. Good stuff. | Thankyou; it will be very useful to direct someone to a free course to help in going through the book.
| 
03-25-2009, 01:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 174
Thanks: 24
Thanked 82 Times in 42 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man OK, cool, van Pelt says "waw" not "vav." That's a plus (since I learned the former). | He also says "Exegetical underwear" and "That'll save your bacon." | 
03-25-2009, 07:40 AM
|  | Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,161
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 1,422 Times in 1,062 Posts
| | |
Wow! Page Kelley. You never know when these Southern Baptists are going to pop up!
__________________ Ivan R. Schoen, B.A., M.A., M.L.I.S.
Pastor of Maranatha Baptist Church (SBC)
Poplar Grove, IL, USA http://maranatha-sbc.org | 
03-25-2009, 08:35 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 627
Thanks: 80
Thanked 230 Times in 112 Posts
| | Quote: |
Wow! Page Kelley. You never know when these Southern Baptists are going to pop up!
|
__________________
Aaron Josh Wright
Deerbrook Baptist Church, Humble Tx
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
| 
03-25-2009, 09:22 AM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| |
Are you confusing Page Kelley with Paige Patterson? Or are Southern Baptists in the habit of naming men "Page/Paige"? | 
03-25-2009, 09:48 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
No Page Kelley taught at SBTS. So your second assumption is correct. Though I think the "Page" (cf: Shirley Guthrie, Lorianne Boettner, etc...) thing must be more common down South. For instance my youngest daughter if she was going to be a boy would have been named Shelby (after Shelby Foote of course). Which I am told is a girl's name.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
03-25-2009, 10:15 AM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian No Page Kelley taught at SBTS. So your second assumption is correct. Though I think the "Page" (cf: Shirley Guthrie, Lorianne Boettner, etc...) thing must be more common down South. For instance my youngest daughter if she was going to be a boy would have been named Shelby (after Shelby Foote of course). Which I am told is a girl's name. | What about Meredith Kline?
Seriously, Shelby is a popular name, I think, in certain areas of Tennessee. It's a well known last name, so sometimes men will carry that as a family name being passed down. I guess it's a way to do so on the matriarchal line.
| 
03-25-2009, 12:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrow Man Seriously, Shelby is a popular name, I think, in certain areas of Tennessee. | Isaac Shelby was the first and fifth governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post: | | 
03-25-2009, 12:15 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | |
Everything is Shelby in Tennessee as well -- there's a Shelby County, a Shelbyville, etc.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |