Closed Thread
Results 1 to 34 of 34

Thread: Reformed Liturgys and EP

  1. #1
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts

    Reformed Liturgys and EP

    I have a collection of Reformed Liturgys (Luther's, Bucer, Calvin's, Mittleburg etc) and it struck me that in Bucer's and Calvin's they sand more than just psalms including the decalogue, creed, lord's prayer and the magnificat.

    How does this impact upon the case for exclusive psalmody?
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    Davidius is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,933
    Thanks
    884
    Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    I have a collection of Reformed Liturgys (Luther's, Bucer, Calvin's, Mittleburg etc) and it struck me that in Bucer's and Calvin's they sand more than just psalms including the decalogue, creed, lord's prayer and the magnificat.

    How does this impact upon the case for exclusive psalmody?
    I don't hold to EP because Calvin or Bucer may or may not have. It doesn't sound like this would really impact the case. Recently I listened to a debate between Ivan Foster and Angus Stewart in which the former spent all of his time making the point that Calvin had the singing of the Decalogue and Apostle's Creed, etc. in his liturgy. Mr. Stewart's argument was focused almost entirely on the testimony of scripture. It's available here. When Stewart pointed that out, Foster just became angry (he was rather rude throughout the entire exchange).

    Historical arguments have their place but they certainly don't make or break doctrines.
    Davidius
    Husband of Emily
    Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
    Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    I have read a quote that Calvin changed over from singing the Decalogue to reciting them later in Geneva...

    I believe that Lord's Prayer and Creed was also recited..

    He did allow for New Testament Canticles to be sung.. "The Magnificicat" – Luke 1:46-55, "Benedictus" Luke 1:68-79, "Gloria in Excelsis Deo" (Luke 2:14), "Nunc Dimittis" (Luke 2:29-39). But even allowing them they would still be inspired new testament (so-called) songs and would not break the EP argument.

    I would hold that they are not songs, so are not to be sung but Calvin believed that they were New Testament Psalms that was inspired and so was to be sung...

    It is still not a straw to break the camels back..

    Michael
    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    I have a collection of Reformed Liturgys (Luther's, Bucer, Calvin's, Mittleburg etc) and it struck me that in Bucer's and Calvin's they sand more than just psalms including the decalogue, creed, lord's prayer and the magnificat.

    How does this impact upon the case for exclusive psalmody?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. #4
    KMK's Avatar
    KMK
    KMK is offline. Rot a Redom
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wrightwood, CA
    Posts
    9,409
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    3,869
    Thanked 1,534 Times in 882 Posts
    Isn't it true that Calvin would only sing the Magnificat while bowling with friends on Sunday afternoons?


    http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


    "Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  5. #5
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    Also Luther was not Exclusive Psalmody, though was a big fan of singing of the Psalms..

    Alot of his Hymns were paraphrases of the Psalms, badly done at that, but never the less Psalm Paraphrases.... A Mighty Fortress is our God is a Paraphrase of Psalm 46. Personally I prefer the Psalm 46 to the Tune of the Luthers Hymn over his words anyday.....

    Michael

    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    I have a collection of Reformed Liturgys (Luther's, Bucer, Calvin's, Mittleburg etc) and it struck me that in Bucer's and Calvin's they sand more than just psalms including the decalogue, creed, lord's prayer and the magnificat.

    How does this impact upon the case for exclusive psalmody?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. #6
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    Calvin would die before bowling on the Sabbath....

    Quote Originally Posted by KMK View Post
    Isn't it true that Calvin would only sing the Magnificat while bowling with friends on Sunday afternoons?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  7. #7
    Davidius is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,933
    Thanks
    884
    Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thunaer View Post
    A Mighty Fortress is our God is a Paraphrase of Psalm 46. Personally I prefer the Psalm 46 to the Tune of the Luthers Hymn over his words anyday.....
    I find Psalm paraphrases to be particularly silly. If you're going to use a Psalm for paraphrasing why not just sing God's word as it is? It seems like trying to have your cake and eat it too. What if I paraphrased 1 Peter and read that during worship?
    Davidius
    Husband of Emily
    Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
    Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  8. #8
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts


    Like I said, I prefer the real Deal, not the fake McCoy... Paraphrasing is sorta like the The Living Bible... just gross...

    Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaCalvinist View Post
    I find Psalm paraphrases to be particularly silly. If you're going to use a Psalm for paraphrasing why not just sing God's word as it is? It seems like trying to have your cake and eat it too. What if I paraphrased 1 Peter and read that during worship?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. #9
    KMK's Avatar
    KMK
    KMK is offline. Rot a Redom
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wrightwood, CA
    Posts
    9,409
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    3,869
    Thanked 1,534 Times in 882 Posts
    Which Bible version must be used when singing Psalms?


    http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


    "Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  10. #10
    Davidius is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,933
    Thanks
    884
    Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KMK View Post
    Which Bible version must be used when singing Psalms?
    Anything that's not a paraphrased translation.
    Davidius
    Husband of Emily
    Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
    Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. #11
    panta dokimazete is offline. Puritanboard Postgraduate
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,689
    Thanks
    700
    Thanked 420 Times in 309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KMK View Post
    Which Bible version must be used when singing Psalms?

    Why, the Hebrew one, of course!
    -JD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. #12
    NaphtaliPress's Avatar
    NaphtaliPress is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13,450
    Blog Entries
    20
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,266 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KMK View Post
    Which Bible version must be used when singing Psalms?
    A faithful translation suitable for singing.
    Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
    Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
    Westminster Letter Press
    The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
    The Blue Banner Archive

    The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. #13
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
    A faithful translation suitable for singing.
    One reason why I love the Psalms sung according in Anglican plainsong...it is the AV being sung (almost, I think it is infact the Bishops' but they do not differ very much at all save the odd word here and there).
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. #14
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaCalvinist View Post
    I don't hold to EP because Calvin or Bucer may or may not have.
    Not saying you do brother however if our spiritual fathers saw it was fully in accordance with Scripture and the RPW to sing Psalms plus then does that not suggest we need be careful how we interpret the RPW?

    Why not sing the Magnificat, Benedictus and Nunc dimittis?
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. #15
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    I have heard this argument against EP, but it fails..

    There is a BIG difference between a Translation out of the original tongues and Paraphrasing..

    Granted there has been some Paraphrasing of the Psalters in the past, but most Psalters today are a wonderful translation out of the original tongues... The book of Psalms for Singing, and the Trinity Psalter not paraphrasing but translations....

    But even if the psalter was a paraphrased or even a badly translation of the psalms, that is still not reason enough to not do EP. Our command is to "Sing Psalms" not improve the Psalms... So if we find a lacking translation of the Psalter then make it better then throw it out for Human composed Songs.

    Michael


    Quote Originally Posted by KMK View Post
    Which Bible version must be used when singing Psalms?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  16. #16
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thunaer View Post
    would not break the EP argument.
    Are they then a part of the Book of Psalms?
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  17. #17
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    There is a debate of whether they are songs that are meant to be sung or are prayers and just recited praise.

    Some say that they are Hymn fragments, but nothing in the passage leads us to believe that... It fact many of them are said to be spoken or prayed....

    Like I said earlier, even if one can prove they are songs to be sung, they are still inspired by the Holy Spirit and so would fall under EP of only singing Divinely Written Songs (Psalms). But I disagree with those who call them Hymn Fragments, and instead believe them to be prayers or spoken praise.... Not meant to be sung....

    Michael

    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    Why not sing the Magnificat, Benedictus and Nunc dimittis?
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  18. #18
    NaphtaliPress's Avatar
    NaphtaliPress is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13,450
    Blog Entries
    20
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,266 Posts
    There are basically three positions, Inspired praise, Inspired praise but only from the Book of Psalms, and of course the position taken that praise can be from inspired or uninspired material.
    Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
    Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
    Westminster Letter Press
    The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
    The Blue Banner Archive

    The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  19. #19
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
    There are basically three positions, Inspired praise, Inspired praise but only from the Book of Psalms
    What are the arguments pro and contra these views? Articles will be fine although I have a large number of pro-EP articles/books
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  20. #20
    Davidius is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,933
    Thanks
    884
    Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    What are the arguments pro and contra these views? Articles will be fine although I have a large number of pro-EP articles/books
    Many proponents of EP use the "inspiredness" of the Psalms as an argument to sing them. This doesn't prove EP but is only an argument for one of the other categories Chris mentioned: Inspired Praise. The real issue of the RPW is about authorization, not inspiration, and EPers should understand that. The RPW teaches that what God has commanded (authorized) is acceptable. Therefore, singing the "Magnificat" (which was actually spoken by Mary, not sung), would be an infringement of EP.

    That said, I'm not aware of the arguments for Inspired Praise but not Exclusive Psalmody. One may be the appearance of certain compositions such as the (first) Song of Moses.
    Davidius
    Husband of Emily
    Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
    Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  21. #21
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts


    Thats what I said already....



    Michael


    Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaCalvinist View Post
    Therefore, singing the "Magnificat" (which was actually spoken by Mary, not sung), would be an infringement of EP.
    \
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  22. #22
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaCalvinist View Post
    The real issue of the RPW is about authorization, not inspiration, and EPers should understand that. The RPW teaches that what God has commanded (authorized) is acceptable.
    Personally I adhere to EP and would only recite the Magnificat, Benedictus and Nunc dimittis. I just found it strange that other Reformed men did not adhere to the EP.

    http://www.the-highway.com/exclusive...ody_Morey.html

    http://www.trinityfoundation.org/PDF...vePsalmody.pdf
    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  23. #23
    Coram Deo is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denton, Maryland America
    Posts
    1,779
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
    I would say that Calvin believe in EP with other Inspired Songs from Scripture... not just any inspired text, nor other uninspired works but inspired songs from scripture that is not included in the book of Psalms..

    Again the argument over the Lukan Passages would be Sung or Spoken.. I would say Spoken...

    As for other songs, where I disagree with Calvin would be that God through the Holy Spirit gave us a Psalter to Sing from. To Sing Psalms.. Not those others temporary Inspired Songs.. If God wanted us to sing them he would have included them in the Psalter, but since he has not we have not command to sing them....

    Michael

    Quote Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
    Personally I adhere to EP and would only recite the Magnificat, Benedictus and Nunc dimittis. I just found it strange that other Reformed men did not adhere to the EP.

    http://www.the-highway.com/exclusive...ody_Morey.html

    http://www.trinityfoundation.org/PDF...vePsalmody.pdf
    Michael Daniels
    Reformed, RPCNA
    Denton, Maryland

    [i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

    [SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  24. #24
    Kaalvenist's Avatar
    Kaalvenist is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, NY
    Posts
    525
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 69 Times in 33 Posts
    This is funny... I almost wrote a blog post about the issue of "psalms only" vs. "inspired songs only" just yesterday. I still might.

    Mr. Foster was rather disingenuous throughout that debate. It is a big difference between inspired songs only, or the Psalter with a few select hymns; and his church's practice of having a full hymnal. (I'd also like to examine the question of Thomas Manton's views on the subject sometime, which he likewise skewered and misrepresented; but that would have to occupy a separate discussion.)

    Three different Dutch Reformed denominations of which I am aware follow this practice, or something similar to it.

    1. The Netherlands Reformed Churches still use the Church Order of Dordt, and follow Article 69: "In the Churches only the 150 Psalms of David, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Twelve Articles of the Faith, the Song of Mary, that of Zacharias, and that of Simeon shall be sung. It is left to the individual Churches whether or not to use the hymn, 'Oh God! who art our Father.' All other hymns are to be excluded from the Churches, and in those places where some have already been introduced, they are to be removed by the most suitable means."

    2. The Protestant Reformed Churches have changed it to, "In the churches only the 150 Psalms of David, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Twelve Articles of Faith, the Songs of Mary, Zacharias, and Simeon, the Morning and Evening Hymns, and the Hymn of Prayer before the sermon shall be sung."

    3. The Free Reformed Churches have, "In the worship services only the metrical version of the 150 Psalms (contained in the Psalter published through Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1965 edition and the Dutch Psalms, 1773 edition) and the 9 hymns composed of portions of Scripture, which have been approved by Synod, shall be sung. The approval of Synod shall be required before any other hymns composed of portions of Scripture shall be used in the worship services."

    But it is noteworthy that individuals from the Protestant Reformed Churches have recently arisen as defenders of exclusive psalmody (Mr. Stewart among them); and that a young lady at my church back in Colorado Springs was raised in a Free Reformed Church, and they only sang from the Psalms, never from the few Scripture songs in the back of the Psalter; and that Joel Beeke of the Netherlands Reformed said in Semper Reformanda several years ago that they do not sing the Apostle's Creed or that other Dutch hymn (and that his Reformation Heritage Publications carries works specifically arguing for exclusive psalmody). There is a great deal of overlap between the two positions; and although I disagree with having any songs other than the Psalms sung in public worship, I have more essential agreement with them than with a church that uses Trinity Hymnal or something worse. It is a world of difference between a church that uses a hymnal primarily composed of man-made hymns, and a church whose songbook is "The Psalter," which happens to have a few non-Psalter material in the back of the book, which may or may not get sung.

    That having been said, I would argue against the position, because,

    1. We have neither precept nor example from Holy Scripture for the singing of any of those pieces in public worship.

    2. Several of them are recognized to have not been songs, and there is question as to whether the "Songs" of Mary, Simeon, and Zacharias were actually songs; which would overthrow their appointment for singing God's praise in public worship.

    3. For what purpose were the Psalms put together into a single book, but to constitute the full, complete, perfect hymnbook of God's people? The fact that certain songs appear outside of the Psalter which were also included in it, and that other songs appear outside the Psalter which were not included in it, demonstrates that these songs were selected for the purpose of singing God's praise in corporate worship to the end of time, while the others were not.
    Sean P.M. McDonald
    Communicant Member of Lisbon Reformed Presbyterian Church, Lisbon, NY
    Infantryman (SGT), 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, NY
    Husband to Laura, father to Olivia
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Lex praescribit, evangelium inscribit." (The law prescribes, the gospel inscribes.)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  25. #25
    AV1611 is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
    1. The Netherlands Reformed Churches still use the Church Order of Dordt, and follow Article 69: "In the Churches only the 150 Psalms of David, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Twelve Articles of the Faith, the Song of Mary, that of Zacharias, and that of Simeon shall be sung. It is left to the individual Churches whether or not to use the hymn, 'Oh God! who art our Father.' All other hymns are to be excluded from the Churches, and in those places where some have already been introduced, they are to be removed by the most suitable means."

    2. The Protestant Reformed Churches have changed it to, "In the churches only the 150 Psalms of David, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Twelve Articles of Faith, the Songs of Mary, Zacharias, and Simeon, the Morning and Evening Hymns, and the Hymn of Prayer before the sermon shall be sung."
    I was not aware of this.

    Richard
    CofE
    UK
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  26. #26
    Puritan Sailor's Avatar
    Puritan Sailor is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Lisbon, NY
    Posts
    6,127
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked 733 Times in 351 Posts
    Even the Church of Scotland, after adopting the Westminster Confession, still permitted the Lord's Prayer to be sung, And soon after also sanctioned a minister named Simpson to write new hymns for use in worship. Doesn't sound EP to me.
    Patrick
    MDiv, RTS Jackson
    Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY

    "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks.
    "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  27. #27
    KMK's Avatar
    KMK
    KMK is offline. Rot a Redom
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wrightwood, CA
    Posts
    9,409
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    3,869
    Thanked 1,534 Times in 882 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thunaer View Post
    I have heard this argument against EP, but it fails..
    Who said I was arguing? I just asked a simple question! Which version is viewed as suitable for singing? Who decides?


    http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


    "Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  28. #28
    armourbearer's Avatar
    armourbearer is offline. Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    7,903
    Thanks
    979
    Thanked 6,108 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor View Post
    Even the Church of Scotland, after adopting the Westminster Confession, still permitted the Lord's Prayer to be sung, And soon after also sanctioned a minister named Simpson to write new hymns for use in worship. Doesn't sound EP to me.
    I'm sure there are some facts mixed up somewhere in this statement, but it will take a fair amount of sifting to find them.
    Yours sincerely,


    "Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  29. #29
    Dieter Schneider's Avatar
    Dieter Schneider is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    588
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    N Needham (see under Audio) addresses this issue, see http://www.calvinismonline.blogspot.com/
    Alternatively read his book (2000 Years of Christ's Power, pt. 3, 228ff.)
    Independent Reformed Baptist Church (NE England, nr. Durham)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  30. #30
    JM's Avatar
    JM
    JM is offline. Puritanboard Postgraduate
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,042
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 867 Times in 500 Posts
    From the link RJS posted above:

    The Reformers and the Puritans who established this principle and fought for it, never understood it to mean the exclusion of uninspired hymns from church worship.

    1. Did not Calvin include uninspired hymns in the Geneva Psalter? Yes.
    2. Did not the first Scottish, English and Dutch Psalters include uninspired hymns? Yes.
    3. Did not the Puritans who developed this principle actively engage in the writing of hymns (Baxter, Henry, Bunyan, etc.) and publish them (Owen)? Yes.
    4. Even the great lights of the Evangelical Awakening were not opposed in principle to the singing of uninspired hymns in the services, (Whitefield, Romaine, Wesley, Toplady, Williams, etc.).

    If the very framers and the greatest expounders of the regulative principle never derived exclusive psalmody from the regulative principle, this casts suspicion that the present use of the principle for exclusive psalmody is based upon a misunderstanding of the principle itself.
    This misunderstanding arises out of a confusion between the essence of the act of worship and the circumstances attending worship. Dr. J.I. Packer has pointed out this distinction as being fundamental to the Puritan concept of the regulative principle of worship.

    1. Scripture alone tells what make up the essence of worship. God has revealed to his people that there is to be (1) a gathering together for (2) the preaching and teaching of the Word, (3) the administration of the sacraments, (4) church discipline, (5) prayers, (6) singing. (7) fellowship, and (8) collection of offerings. The Romanists sought to add the Veneration of the Saints worship of Mary, masses for dead, adoration of images, auricular confession, penance, candles, rosaries, etc. The Reformers and Puritans refused to add any of these things to the essence of worship. Nothing is to be added except it be a rule of Scripture. This is the clear teaching of Chapter XXI in the Westminster Confession of Faith.

    2. On the other hand, the circumstances of worship are a matter of Christian liberty and practicality. The early churches met in the temple and in synagogues until driven out by the Jews. Then the home was the place of the churches until the congregations grew too large, then they had to go into the fields to worship. When Christianity was legalized, believers built places of worship. The design of the building, the presence of pews and organs, even the clothing of the minister belongs to the ‘circumstances of worship. The vestment controversy of Owen’s day was not over the issue of whether or not a minister could wear vestments but whether or not the minister must wear vestments as part of the essence of worship.

    Whether or not you have musical instruments accompanying your singing, or whether you sing the Psalms or uninspired hymns are issues belonging to the circumstances of worship.
    Church History

    Some exclusive psalmists have claimed that their position was held by the early church, the best fathers, the Reformers, the Puritans, and the leaders of the Evangelical Awakening. Some have even claimed Charles Spurgeon! But an examination of Spurgeon s “Our Hymnal” forever removes this claim.

    We are warranted to ask, What is needed as evidence to demonstrate that someone in the past embraced and practiced exclusive psalmody?

    1. There must be existing literature in which the person states that he believes that only the Psalms may be sung in public worship and thus he is opposed in principle to the introduction of any uninspired hymns

    2. Thus evidence for exclusive psalmody cannot be drawn from:

    a. Those whose practice it was to sing only the Psalms but who stated that they were not opposed in principle to the use of uninspired hymns in the worship service. (William Romaine and others like him practiced exclusive psalmody but declared that they were not opposed in principle to the use of uninspired hymns in the worship service.)

    b. Those who included uninspired hymns in their psalters which were used in public worship. It is not enough to say that Calvin “virtually’’ or “practically” included only Psalms in the Geneva Psalter. Neither the Synod of Dort nor the Westminster Confession can be used as evidence for exclusive psalmody. The Synod of Dort and the framers of the W.C.F. knew that the psalters of the Reformed churches in Holland, France, Switzerland, England, Scotland all included uninspired hymns to be used in the worship service. To find just one uninspired hymn included in a psalter is enough evidence to demonstrate that the framers of that psalter were not exclusive psalmists.

    With these things in mind, let us give a brief survey of church history in order to see the historical evidence.
    JM - Baptist - Canada - Feileadh Mor

    O wondrous love! To bleed and die,
    To bear the cross and shame,
    That guilty sinners, such as I,
    Might plead Thy gracious name!

    Approach, My Soul, the Mercy Seat by John Newton
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  31. #31
    NaphtaliPress's Avatar
    NaphtaliPress is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13,450
    Blog Entries
    20
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,266 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JM View Post
    From the link RJS posted above:
    ...
    2. Did not the first Scottish, English and Dutch Psalters include uninspired hymns? Yes.
    I cannot speak to the Dutch or English but on the Scottish practice if one hasn't interacted with the work of David Hay Fleming from 120 years ago where he disputes Bonar's contentions along the same lines, they have not done their homework.
    David Hay Fleming, “The Hymnology of the Reformation,” Original Secession Magazine (January-June and September 1884); repr.in An Anthology of Presbyterian & Reformed Literature 4 (1991) 223–246.
    Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
    Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
    Westminster Letter Press
    The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
    The Blue Banner Archive

    The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  32. #32
    JM's Avatar
    JM
    JM is offline. Puritanboard Postgraduate
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,042
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 867 Times in 500 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
    I cannot speak to the Dutch or English but on the Scottish practice if one hasn't interacted with the work of David Hay Fleming from 120 years ago where he disputes Bonar's contentions along the same lines, they have not done their homework.
    David Hay Fleming, “The Hymnology of the Reformation,” Original Secession Magazine (January-June and September 1884); repr.in An Anthology of Presbyterian & Reformed Literature 4 (1991) 223–246.

    Thank you, I guess for now we'll have to deal with what we have access to.

    Peace.
    JM - Baptist - Canada - Feileadh Mor

    O wondrous love! To bleed and die,
    To bear the cross and shame,
    That guilty sinners, such as I,
    Might plead Thy gracious name!

    Approach, My Soul, the Mercy Seat by John Newton
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  33. #33
    armourbearer's Avatar
    armourbearer is offline. Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    7,903
    Thanks
    979
    Thanked 6,108 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Well noted Chris. It should be pointed out that the reformation Bibles contained the Apocrypha, but such an inclusion does not entail the Apocrypha was accepted as divine Scripture and read as such in public worship. Clearly the mere inclusion of uninspired hymns in a Psalter requires additional information as to how such compositions were to be used.
    Yours sincerely,


    "Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  34. #34
    NaphtaliPress's Avatar
    NaphtaliPress is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13,450
    Blog Entries
    20
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,266 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by armourbearer View Post
    Well noted Chris. It should be pointed out that the reformation Bibles contained the Apocrypha, but such an inclusion does not entail the Apocrypha was accepted as divine Scripture and read as such in public worship. Clearly the mere inclusion of uninspired hymns in a Psalter requires additional information as to how such compositions were to be used.
    Great point Matthew.

    Quote Originally Posted by JM View Post
    Thank you, I guess for now we'll have to deal with what we have access to.

    Peace.
    Well, I guess I need to reprint some David Hay Fleming. He demonstrates IMO that it was mainly the printers who took it upon themselves to add the occasional hymn to their psalters and that it was not the practice to use this material in public worship. He also adduces a Scottish theologian who died in 1627, Robert Boyd, to support the contention the Scottish practice at the time did not include singing uninspired compositions, for which he argued. This was at the height of the time Scotland lay under the burden of the Articles of Perth, so if even at that time they were not sung, it is pretty clear uninspired song did not come into the public worship of Scotland until the mid to late 18th century, and was not common or pervasive till almost a century later (for some dates for various introduction points, see articles under "Hymnology, Scottish," "Paraphrases," "Psalms, Psalter," etc. in the Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology; see also David Lachman's entry on "Fleming, David Hay," where he writes, "His early literary endeavours, which included contributions to the Watchword and the Original Secession Magazine, exhibited much of the precision which characterized his work as a whole. ... Andrew Lang described Fleming's scholarship as 'remarkable for accuracy, judicious treatment, and research,' a judgment endorsed by the University of St Andrews, which conferred an LLD on him in 1898.").
    Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
    Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
    Westminster Letter Press
    The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
    The Blue Banner Archive

    The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69