» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 87 | | 29 members and 58 guests | | 21st Century Calvinist, Andres, austinww, Casey, CatherineL, ColdSilverMoon, Confessor, Dan, earl40, gene_mingo, Grillsy, Honor, jambo, KMK, Knight, Michael Doyle, Montanablue, PactumServa72, Pergamum, PMBrooks, PuritanCovenanter, Richard Tallach, Romans922, SolaSaint, TimV, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
06-26-2008, 01:57 AM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,815
Thanks: 2,443
Thanked 6,031 Times in 2,446 Posts
| | | Introducing the Credo-Baptism Answers forum
I've created this sub-forum to be a non-debating area for members to ask questions and receive clarification on the confessional understanding of the Ordinance of Baptism from Credo-Bapists only.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
06-26-2008, 03:39 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Hastings, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand
Posts: 137
Thanks: 26
Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis I've created this sub-forum to be a non-debating area for members to ask questions and receive clarification on the confessional understanding of the Ordinance of Baptism from Credo-Bapists only. | As in the Paedobaptist forum, this should read "confessional understanding of the SACRAMENT of Baptism". Reformed Baptists DO hold to a Reformed view of the Sacraments.
__________________
Stephen Smith
Reformed Baptist
New Zealand
| 
06-26-2008, 03:47 AM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,815
Thanks: 2,443
Thanked 6,031 Times in 2,446 Posts
| |
From the London Baptist Confession Quote:
CHAPTER 28; OF BAPTISM AND THE LORD’S SUPPER
Paragraph 1. Baptism and the Lord's Supper are ordinances of positive and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus, the only lawgiver, to be continued in his church to the end of the world.
CHAPTER 29; OF BAPTISM
Paragraph 1. Baptism is an ordinance of the New Testament...
| | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
06-26-2008, 06:02 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,139
Thanks: 325
Thanked 530 Times in 296 Posts
| | |
Rich is quite right. Ordinances, not sacraments, is the wording of the RB confessional position, and there is a difference.
__________________ Jonathan Hunt
Elder holding forth the word of life at: Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
| | The Following User Says Thank You to JonathanHunt For This Useful Post: | | 
06-26-2008, 11:52 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,396
Thanks: 2,681
Thanked 2,831 Times in 1,467 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen L Smith Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis I've created this sub-forum to be a non-debating area for members to ask questions and receive clarification on the confessional understanding of the Ordinance of Baptism from Credo-Bapists only. | As in the Paedobaptist forum, this should read "confessional understanding of the SACRAMENT of Baptism". Reformed Baptists DO hold to a Reformed view of the Sacraments. | Speak for yourself, the language of "ordinance" keeps away from the baggage and mirrors the 1689. I prefer to speak fo ordinances.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
06-26-2008, 09:14 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,559
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,900 Times in 1,044 Posts
| | |
If you are referring to sacraments as in both we don't hold to a paedo view of the sacraments. We are credo. Some Reformed Baptists do hold to a view of the Lord's Supper that is like John Calvin's and not Zwingli's. Confessionally, from what I understand the use of the word ordinance was used in the confession to distance from a Roman Catholic distinction and not the view of Calvin's understanding of the Lord's Table. But I still need to read up on this.
| 
06-26-2008, 09:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 347
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
| | |
This thread is getting so much less attention than the "Introducing the Paedo-baptism Answers forum" thread. They're having a party over there.
__________________
Dan Pemberton
Vacaville, CA
Member, First Baptist Church San Luis Obispo
Formerly ABUSA (We left, so I guess that makes us American Baptists Unleashed!)
| 
06-26-2008, 09:37 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,559
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,900 Times in 1,044 Posts
| | |
Maybe paedo's are cuter.
| 
06-26-2008, 09:39 PM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,931
Thanks: 2,000
Thanked 3,289 Times in 1,651 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter Maybe paedo's are cuter. |
Yep. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
06-26-2008, 09:41 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,559
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,900 Times in 1,044 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter Maybe paedo's are cuter. |
Yep.  | | 
06-26-2008, 10:16 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Québec,Québec; Canada
Posts: 512
Thanks: 5
Thanked 118 Times in 79 Posts
| | |
Question: I can see your viewpoint about needing a credible profession of faith but I don't understand why it must be by immersion. Can you explain by scripture outside of the "baptizo means immersion argument" and also logic is welcomed too for a response.
__________________
J. P. Grigoletti II * Lay-man * Église Réformée du Québec
Québec, Québec Canada * Member: Église Reformée St. Marc http://Grigoletti.blogspot.com - blog
<<There are three things necessary for thee to know, that thou, enjoying this comfort, mayest live and die happily: the first, how great your sins and miseries are; the second, how thou may be delivered from all thy sins and miseries; the third, how thou shall express thy gratitude to God for such deliverance.>>
| 
06-26-2008, 10:18 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,559
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,900 Times in 1,044 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jogri17 Question: I can see your viewpoint about needing a credible profession of faith but I don't understand why it must be by immersion. Can you explain by scripture outside of the "baptizo means immersion argument" and also logic is welcomed too for a response. | Great question. I started a new thread if you don't mind. Immersion question
Thanks
Last edited by PuritanCovenanter; 06-26-2008 at 10:44 PM.
| 
07-19-2008, 02:31 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
| | |
If a paedobaptist starts a thread in this forum, is said paedobaptist the only paedobaptist who may contribute?
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emily
Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
| 
07-19-2008, 05:41 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,815
Thanks: 2,443
Thanked 6,031 Times in 2,446 Posts
| | |
Generally speaking, yes. Some leeway might be (and has been) given but if there are too many "questioners" it could blur the answers that the paedo-baptist is after.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |