The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > Baptism > Paedo-Baptism Answers

Paedo-Baptism Answers A place where only paedobaptists may answer questions posed to clarify the Confessional understanding of the Sacrament of Baptism.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:38 PM
Unashamed 116's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ft Rucker Al
Posts: 586
Thanks: 58
Thanked 184 Times in 117 Posts
About Baptism

I have always held to the credo-baptism view but am open to paedo-baptism if it has strong Biblical evidence. Unfortunately I have never really had the time to look into the issue my self or talk with any one. If you are from either "side" could you please state any Scriptural evidence and support for your views?
__________________
Joseph F Scibbe
Chaplain Assistant
Chapel of Wings Ft Rucker Al
Ephesians 1:4-7, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, Romans 12:1-2
Titus 2:2 - But you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.

http://twitter.com/just_joe_scibbe
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:48 PM
Berean's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Monticello, IA
Posts: 6,156
Thanks: 3,627
Thanked 833 Times in 701 Posts
__________________
Norm
IA PCA

In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will. Ephesians 1:4-5
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:56 PM
Blueridge Believer's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RADFORD VA.
Posts: 5,088
Thanks: 1,306
Thanked 1,583 Times in 688 Posts
If you can work this series of messages into your schedule you will come away with a good understanding of the paedo postion even if you don't agree:
SermonAudio.com - Orthodox Presbyterian Church Franklin Sq
__________________
Psa 55:16 As for me, I will call upon God; and the LORD shall save me.
Psa 55:17 Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear my voice.
James Farley
Husband of Melissa and father of Ann.
Members of Redeemer Church ARP, Blacksburg Va.
http://www.redeemerblacksburg.org/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:21 PM
Unashamed 116's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ft Rucker Al
Posts: 586
Thanks: 58
Thanked 184 Times in 117 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueridge Believer View Post
If you can work this series of messages into your schedule you will come away with a good understanding of the paedo postion even if you don't agree:
SermonAudio.com - Orthodox Presbyterian Church Franklin Sq

Well I will listen to them as I get time. I am very limited in my internet access but excited to hear what you have to say.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:58 PM
reformedminister's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 298
Thanks: 28
Thanked 153 Times in 81 Posts
I used to be on your side of the fence concerning baptism. You must ask yourself which position can be most supported with Scripture. The main teaching to support paedo baptism is it's connection with Old Testament circumcision, which was the sign of the covenant, and required of all males starting from eight days old (Genesis 17:11-12). The New Testament sign of the covenant is baptism (Colossians 2:11-12). Also, in the New Testament entire households were baptized (Acts 16:15, 33). Look up the word household in the Greek and you will discover that it would include small children.
__________________
Rev. Andy Eppard
Associate Minister
First Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Springfield, MO
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:13 PM
DonP's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 338
Thanked 410 Times in 280 Posts
First be sure you understand the covenants well. As a baptist I didn't.

The church, believers are Israel.

not all of Israel is Israel is because some of spiritual Israel is Gentiles.

So all Israel shall be saved this is by the ingathering of all the elect of al nations.

Gentiles are graft into Israel. The Jews who were broken off branches can be graft back into Israel as well.

Israel is used more than one way in the NT. So is Jew, House of Israel, etc.
Israel was a type. There were physical temporal promises to the ethnic Jews and there were promises to the spiritual or elect Israel. Rom 9.
A Jew is not one who is one outwardly, but one who is one inwardly.
So the promises were not just to ethnic Jews but to those who are JEws by faith, elect. Heirs of Abraham from all nations. Heirs by faith not be ethnicity.


1 7:13-14 What on earth can this possibly mean unless there is a visible external covenant or holiness, being in Israel as an unconverted child was the same as being in the church as a child. We are all called the Children of God, People of God, My People etc. and yet not all are in the invisible covenant or C of Grace,

If there was a sign given to children of believers in the OT then what is the sign in the NT of being in the visible covenant.

There are lots of articles online and threads on this here that have all the facts one needs to see that if there had been a change such that the promise was no longer to believers and their seed, that the mothers would have had an outcry saying how can this be a better covenant if my children are not included any more.

Read the NT as if you were a Jew or a Gentile familiar with Judaism and it was teaching you.
What would you think?

Check out, as for me and my household we will serve the Lord.
Regardless of whether the others believe God works through heads of households. So when a head believes the whole family was circumcised in the OT and in the NT the whole family was baptized.

They receive the benefits of being in the visible covenant. What profit is their being a JEw??? Same as being a child in the covenant today. Check the passage to see what the benefits are.

There is no short proof text, but there is plenty of info thoughout the scriptures if you take the time to study all these things.
__________________
DonP
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:16 PM
Herald's Avatar
No posts for you!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,961
Thanks: 2,004
Thanked 3,304 Times in 1,660 Posts
Since you are seeking paedo answers, I am moving this to the paedo answers forum.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Reformed Baptist
Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Visit my BLOG Theology for the Rest of Us
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69