» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 118 | | 45 members and 73 guests | | ADKing, alb1, AltogetherLovely, Andres, austinww, Bad Organist, Bookmeister, ChristianTrader, coramdeo, dannyhyde, dgordonwood, ericfromcowtown, Fly Caster, fralo4truth, Glenn Ferrell, Hamalas, Hippo, jawyman, JennyG, Knight, KSon, LawrenceU, louis_jp, Mayflower, MMasztal, Montanablue, Nathan Riese, nicnap, ooguyx, Pastor Mark, Puritan Sailor, SemperEruditio, Simply_Nikki, Skyler, smhbbag, Southern Twang, steadfast7, tlharvey7, Tripel, VictorBravo, Virginia Marine, Von Stroh | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
02-04-2009, 11:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,566
Thanks: 1,518
Thanked 422 Times in 231 Posts
| | | Legalism vs following the Lord
This is a breakaway question from the Sabbatarian thread of Brad's. To avoid going down a rabbit trail, I started a new thread. My question is this: At what point does observing the Sabbath go from obedience to God to legalism? I have seen some disturbing behaviors chalked up to being "Sabbatarian." FWIW, I have seen the extremes (had an uncle who was paid to turn on the lights for a neighbor every Saturday) and the really amazing mental gymnastics needed for a guy in a black hat to carry housekeys with him (Eruv is a word to google to explain the mechanics of this "law").
The second question I have is if there is a point where following the law becomes a sort of idol. I do not ask either question to start a flame war but to understand a little better where the Sabbatarians are coming from.
Thanks!
__________________ Quote:
Gail
Grand Rapids, MI
Affiliation: Under construction
| | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to calgal For This Useful Post: | | 
02-04-2009, 11:16 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,446
Thanks: 2,923
Thanked 6,160 Times in 2,595 Posts
| | |
Legalism: Trying to gain merit before God by keeping the Law.
Legalism: requiring more of people than God requires.
Neither definition fits into the command that the Law of God as found in the Ten Commandments are to be fully pursued and kept to the best of the Christian's ability. That is by no means "legalism." The "following of the law" is only idol because of a man's heart and not because of the Law.
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | | The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | Augusta (02-05-2009), Backwoods Presbyterian (02-04-2009), Iakobos_1071 (02-05-2009), Kevin (02-04-2009), KMK (02-05-2009), Marrow Man (02-05-2009), nicnap (02-05-2009), rescuedbyLove (02-05-2009), Rev. Todd Ruddell (02-06-2009), Scottish Lass (02-04-2009), Southern Presbyterian (02-04-2009), Theognome (02-04-2009), YXU (02-05-2009) | 
02-04-2009, 11:21 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,318
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,857 Times in 967 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal This is a breakaway question from the Sabbatarian thread of Brad's. To avoid going down a rabbit trail, I started a new thread. My question is this: At what point does observing the Sabbath go from obedience to God to legalism? I have seen some disturbing behaviors chalked up to being "Sabbatarian." FWIW, I have seen the extremes (had an uncle who was paid to turn on the lights for a neighbor every Saturday) and the really amazing mental gymnastics needed for a guy in a black hat to carry housekeys with him (Eruv is a word to google to explain the mechanics of this "law").
The second question I have is if there is a point where following the law becomes a sort of idol. I do not ask either question to start a flame war but to understand a little better where the Sabbatarians are coming from.
Thanks! | I know others will give better answers, but I think a good place to start is to consider your focus. A humble and paltry analogy:
Driving down the road, you see fog lines and a ditch. You know what they are for. They are to warn you to stay on the road.
But when you drive, do you stare at the fog lines? They are practically screaming "don't cross me!"
No, you know they are there, but your focus is on where you are going.
Whenever I'm convicted about breaking a law of God, I have two choices: (1)focus completely on avoiding breaking that law, and thereby ignore God, or (2) focus on my God to direct me away from those deadly transgressions, pray for him to renew and change my sinful desire to break them, and follow him yet again.
| | The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to VictorBravo For This Useful Post: | | 
02-04-2009, 11:30 PM
|  | The Closer | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,507
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,076 Times in 699 Posts
| |
People rightly equate a list of "dos" and "don'ts" with legalism. When I was wrestling with this issue I had much trouble compiling a non-legalistic list is "dos" and "don'ts". There is no "rest" in such a system. Rather I settled on a two question "test", if you will. 1) Could I effectively do this task/activity on another day? 2) How does this activity help to focus my family and I on God and His glory? My grade on this test is often D-, but I find that it does bring things into sharper focus. | | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Southern Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
02-04-2009, 11:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian People rightly equate a list of "dos" and "don'ts" with legalism. When I was wrestling with this issue I had much trouble compiling a non-legalistic list is "dos" and "don'ts". There is no "rest" in such a system. Rather I settled on a two question "test", if you will. 1) Could I effectively do this task/activity on another day? 2) How does this activity help to focus my family and I on God and His glory? My grade on this test is often D-, but I find that it does bring things into sharper focus.  | I use a similar system, as stated in another thread. And I must admit you have a better GPA that I do.
Theognome
__________________
Bill Cunningham
Covenant Reformed Church, URC
Kansas City
There are three kinds of people- those who can count, and those who can't.
| 
02-04-2009, 11:36 PM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
Joshua,
It's not really quite that simple. Part of the problem with the term "Sabbatarian" is that all of us believe in the Sabbath. For some of us Christ is our Sabbath and we worship day in and day out with this in our hearts. Sunday is not set aside for worship, because every day is a day of worship. Sunday is set aside for gathering for worship. So we would perceive ourselves as observing the Sabbath continually as a shadow of our eternal Sabbath. In such a case, if someone comes along and tells me I'm grievously sinning against God because I played darts with my brothers after church then I'm going to be baffled. It simply makes no sense to me, and comes across as an imposition on Scripture, rather than any sort of obedience.
I do not propose this as an argument. Hopefully I can simply add some clarity to what seems to be, in many cases, one imposing motive and thought on another's understanding. Those who adhere to resting on Sundays don't seem to understand that those who don't may have just as much, or more, veneration for the Sabbath as they do because it's seen so closely tied to Christ. It's simply that their understanding of the Sabbath is different. So the finger pointing at those who don't consider the Lord's Day as the Sabbath appears to be legalistic from their point of view; probably no more so that the Lord's Day = Sabbath proponents consider their counterparts to be licentious.
There is room for mutual respect if mutual understanding is gained. And, I can assure you, neither side is more, or less, convinced that they are correct than the other.
Blessings,
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| | The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
02-04-2009, 11:44 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,446
Thanks: 2,923
Thanked 6,160 Times in 2,595 Posts
| | |
That's fine, Pastor. She asked about legalism, so I gave a definition. I am happy to "side" with the Confession without condemning non-Sabbatarians to hell. I was a member of a non-Sabbatarian Baptist church for almost four years and I dearly love those shepherds and sheep there. What I have trouble with is the "P-Bomb" and "Legalism" epithets thrown around that have no ground in the truth, nor in the two major Confessions of this board, and yet are oft directed toward those of us who are Confessional according to the Historical and Original Intent of said Confessions.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
02-04-2009, 11:45 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
| | |
I have to confess that I am confused by the (common) argument that "Christ is my Sabbath."
No one, that I am aware of, would desire to do away with the 6th commandment or the 9th, and yet Scripture explicitly states that "Jesus is the Life" and "Jesus is the Truth."
I'm not trying to be cute or snide - really. And that is hard to get across in writing. But Christ is the fullfilment of the whole Law, isn't He? (For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes. Rom 10:4) And yet we would not abrogate the other nine commandments, would we?
I find this an interesting phenomena in modern Christianity.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | Augusta (02-05-2009), Backwoods Presbyterian (02-04-2009), CDM (02-05-2009), ColdSilverMoon (02-05-2009), Grace Alone (02-05-2009), KMK (02-05-2009), LawrenceU (02-05-2009), Marrow Man (02-05-2009), NateLanning (02-05-2009), nicnap (02-05-2009), Rev. Todd Ruddell (02-06-2009), Scott1 (02-05-2009), Semper Fidelis (02-05-2009), Southern Presbyterian (02-04-2009), SRoper (02-05-2009) | 
02-04-2009, 11:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | |
I think some find "Sabbath-keepers" unbalanced...ok, I think some are unbalanced. All during the week, they can watch garbage on tv or movies which even secular analyst state sways people's thinking into the culture which tv promotes and yet all of the sudden Sunday comes around and all's good! No tv or movie watching, no rock and roll which some people's taste is astounding to me, plus no jogging, no this no that. It's as though Sabbath-keepers are trying to make up for all the garbage in their lives on Sunday. Sundays are the only day which they won't allow the world to touch, but on the other days they soak it all in. That is my frustration. I'm not perfect either. I do things I shouldn't but I don't think we should call them ok. I'm not trying to sound self-righteous or condemn anyone here...really I'm not. This is just a valid frustration I see for others and for myself. Whenever I point to Scripture which tells us to set our minds on things above and not on things of this earth, people are quick to throw it out in order to protect their tv and movie and inappropriate music. They say those things are Christian liberties. Please don't take this as anger or anything like that...I just wonder where the balance is in all of us. | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OPC'n For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 12:18 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,513
Thanks: 1,591
Thanked 2,016 Times in 1,115 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sjonee ...I just wonder where the balance is in all of us. | Probably in Heaven. Or maybe Puritanism?  Seriously, the same guys who get bashed as Pharisees on their Christian Sabbatarianism where pretty stout on the garbage in garbage out stuff too.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 12:19 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | |
I'm stepping out of this wading-pool ... starting to feel like a hot-tub.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
| 
02-05-2009, 12:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield I'm stepping out of this wading-pool ... starting to feel like a hot-tub. | Hot tubs are quite neeto. Enjoy your hot tub with a nice glass of sherry and a bikini clad lass of God's choosing. It's a blast!
theognome
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 12:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Theognome Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield I'm stepping out of this wading-pool ... starting to feel like a hot-tub. | Hot tubs are quite neeto. Enjoy your hot tub with a nice glass of sherry and a bikini clad lass of God's choosing. It's a blast!
theognome |
But the wading-pool is not for hot-tubbing. Too many kids.
| 
02-05-2009, 12:34 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 349
Thanked 191 Times in 133 Posts
| |
This is just me personally talking, but aside from gathering to worship on the Sabbath, Sunday's are very busy days. (Morning Worship, Bible Class, Class Social, Bible Class, and finally Evening Worship). Hardly a true day of rest by some definitions. Therefore, when I can, I often try to use Saturdays as a Sabbath Preparation day whereas; I rest, meditate, and commune with God as much as possible. (Assuming the honey-do list isn't too lengthy  )
__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000
| 
02-05-2009, 12:39 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Quote:
Originally Posted by sjonee ...I just wonder where the balance is in all of us. | Probably in Heaven. Or maybe Puritanism?  Seriously, the same guys who get bashed as Pharisees on their Christian Sabbatarianism where pretty stout on the garbage in garbage out stuff too. | I agree! Calvin would be wagging his finger at many of us (including me) on what we do during the week. Quote: |
Certainly, the letter of imperfect law gives rise to the justifications of many actions and positions that do not reflect God's deepest intent. Jesus himself spoke of divorce in such a way, indicating that while it may in fact be allowed by the law's letter, it was yet an abomination in God's sight and had not been intended by God from the beginning. "We observe precisely this dichotomy between God's original intent and the lesser 'allowances' that human sin and human law have made inevitable, even sometimes necessary, in a multitude of institutions and human ethical dilemmas,...Whenever justification is one's objective, it is not difficult to find ample basis for such no matter what one's position. The politics of your nation, and the fundamental principle of what you call the right of states, may well validate the institution of slavery according to your Constitution and the law of your land. That is not for me to say one way or another, especially as I am a mere observer to your unique constitutional system. In like manner, the Bible itself would seem to justify and validate opposing sides of many issues, divorce and slavery certainly among them. However, I would ask in all seriousness and sincerity, are there higher considerations to be weighed? And what, I would ask further, is the highest such consideration of all?...So then for the true Christian individual---seeking not his own will but God's will, seeking not mere justification for a position according to human reasoning or constitutional analysis, but seeking God's highest original intent, seeking not what a law may allow but what it may intend at its foundation---the question becomes, not a matter of what may be justified, even allowed in Scripture or allowed by your Constitution or by law...but what is right?"
| Michael Phillips, Dream of Freedom | 
02-05-2009, 01:13 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| |
The bikini clad lass is only appropriate if she is your wife, no matter what day of the week. Who's Sherry?
You're right, Fred. Nobody wants to do away with any of the commandments. That's part of the misunderstanding. Scripture does make it clear that Christ is our rest. Quote:
Hebrews 4:9-11
9There remains therefore a [Sabbath] rest for the people of God. 10For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His.
11Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience.
| Christ also made it clear that obedience was a matter of the heart, not strictly the action. The action reveals the heart, in many cases. But I can certainly murder in my heart while professing love with my lips, and even actions. What does obedience to the Sabbath look like for the Christian? Honestly, if one is truly going to say that the Sabbath transfers to Sunday then their servants and animals cannot work either. That's the law, with no exceptions. Servants would include anyone doing work for you.
Christ was the Lord of the Sabbath, not placed under it. Also, the Sabbath was a provision FOR man, not a master over him. This sets it aside from the other commandments, which are all restrictive except for the commandment with a promise. It is a positive command, fulfilled in Christ and sustained in Christ as our head.
I'm not trying to debate the issue here, only add clarity. As Joshua pointed out, there can be a lack of grace in this discussion. Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua What I have trouble with is the "P-Bomb" and "Legalism" epithets thrown around that have no ground in the truth, nor in the two major Confessions of this board, and yet are oft directed toward those of us who are Confessional according to the Historical and Original Intent of said Confessions. | That's a little loaded, but perhaps we need to deal with this. The two major confessions are quite clear in regard to their position on the Sabbath. Since this board recognizes these two confessions as accurate in their understanding of Scripture, perhaps any discussions contrary to their understanding of the Sabbath should end. Even though I disagree with the understanding, such action might be helpful. Then, when someone shares that they have done something on a Sunday that transgresses the WCF understanding of the Sabbath, rather than having those who adhere to a Sunday Sabbath point a finger and call them "Sabbath breakers," the person could quietly be told that this is not permitted on this board and the post can be edited, or deleted. In such a case the one who does not observe Sunday as the Sabbath will perceive no need to defend themselves, rendering such discussions unnecessary. I, for one, am not sure where the line is drawn on this and wish to respect the board oversight. But when told one is sinning against God when they disagree that their action is sin there is a perceived need to defend one's position.
I am not being facetious or sarcastic in this. And, honestly, I think it would be a nightmare to maintain. But I suppose it would be consistent and avoid the problems inherent in the different understanding of the Sabbath.
By the way, I didn't think it was hot in here. From my perspective, this has been a good and amiable conversation.
| 
02-05-2009, 05:23 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,878
Thanks: 1,909
Thanked 1,851 Times in 1,097 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sjonee I think some find "Sabbath-keepers" unbalanced...ok, I think some are unbalanced. All during the week, they can watch garbage on tv or movies which even secular analyst state sways people's thinking into the culture which tv promotes and yet all of the sudden Sunday comes around and all's good! No tv or movie watching, no rock and roll which some people's taste is astounding to me, plus no jogging, no this no that. It's as though Sabbath-keepers are trying to make up for all the garbage in their lives on Sunday. Sundays are the only day which they won't allow the world to touch, but on the other days they soak it all in. That is my frustration. I'm not perfect either. I do things I shouldn't but I don't think we should call them ok. I'm not trying to sound self-righteous or condemn anyone here...really I'm not. This is just a valid frustration I see for others and for myself. Whenever I point to Scripture which tells us to set our minds on things above and not on things of this earth, people are quick to throw it out in order to protect their tv and movie and inappropriate music. They say those things are Christian liberties. Please don't take this as anger or anything like that...I just wonder where the balance is in all of us. | This is a big topic and we have to carefully understand this. What you are reacting to is hypocrisy. Very few things can disgust more than that.
But let's look at this carefully. Feeding on "bad" television, music of the pop culture may be sin in-and-of itself (e.g. provoking one to violence, intemperance, sexual immorality, scandal, rumor, etc.). It stands on it's own terms.
Keeping the fourth commandment stands on its own terms also. Yes, the hipocrisy can disgust, but it is still better to be obedient in one area and disobedient in others rather than disobedient in all areas.
Breaking "bad" patterns is actually one of the things keeping the forth commandment helps us to do. By focusing on worship, it replaces the chasing after self-gratification that is our tendency as fallen human beings.
Keeping the fourth commandment is difficult- impossible to even try without God's grace. It continually confronts us with our sin, and it is inconvenient. But once one tries, in good faith, by asking God's grace to keep it- God is faithful- it can become a blessing. -----Added 2/5/2009 at 05:23:57 EST-----
Really, its not about "balance." It's about doing what is commanded, and not requiring what is not commanded. It's about bringing the whole of life under the obedience of Christ, which involves using the Ten Commandments, all of them, including the Forth one, as a rule for life. Easy to say, hard to do. But God's grace is sufficient, we need ask continually for grace and repentance.
__________________ Scott
PCA
North Carolina "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 | 
02-05-2009, 06:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Isle of Lewis, Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 125
Thanks: 51
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by sjonee I think some find "Sabbath-keepers" unbalanced...ok, I think some are unbalanced. All during the week, they can watch garbage on tv or movies which even secular analyst state sways people's thinking into the culture which tv promotes and yet all of the sudden Sunday comes around and all's good! No tv or movie watching, no rock and roll which some people's taste is astounding to me, plus no jogging, no this no that. It's as though Sabbath-keepers are trying to make up for all the garbage in their lives on Sunday. Sundays are the only day which they won't allow the world to touch, but on the other days they soak it all in. That is my frustration. I'm not perfect either. I do things I shouldn't but I don't think we should call them ok. I'm not trying to sound self-righteous or condemn anyone here...really I'm not. This is just a valid frustration I see for others and for myself. Whenever I point to Scripture which tells us to set our minds on things above and not on things of this earth, people are quick to throw it out in order to protect their tv and movie and inappropriate music. They say those things are Christian liberties. Please don't take this as anger or anything like that...I just wonder where the balance is in all of us. | I, on the Sabbath ever since the day I was Born again do not switch the tv on, radio unless it is to listen to a sermon, do not even leave the house unless it is to go to worship. These things are done purely because of the commandment to remember the Sabbath & keep it holy. It is done in obedience to God, for no other reason and I continually pray that He would lessen my worldliness on the other six days. I am disobedient in my life in many aspects but through the grace of God things will change bit by bit. There is no day more treasured and blessed to my soul than the Sabbath and I truly believe without the obedience to the fourth commandment many Christians are missing out on much of God's rich blessing no matter how much they try and justify it.
Your brother in the Lord Jesus Christ
David
__________________ David
Stornoway Free Church (Continuing)
Isle of Lewis, Scotland
Last edited by David FCC; 02-05-2009 at 06:31 AM.
Reason: addition
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to David FCC For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 06:49 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 672
Thanked 849 Times in 397 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Legalism: Trying to gain merit before God by keeping the Law.
Legalism: requiring more of people than God requires.
Neither definition fits into the command that the Law of God as found in the Ten Commandments are to be fully pursued and kept to the best of the Christian's ability. That is by no means "legalism." The "following of the law" is only idol because of a man's heart and not because of the Law. | I think these are good definitions, Josh.
As legalism pertains to the 4th commandment, I think it springs from a focus on the letter of the law rather than the ultimate intent, which is to obey, honor, and serve our Lord on His day. Those who get caught up in following a tedious list of activities (or non-activities) focus on those actions rather than on God. We should cease from our normal employments and recreations on the Lord's Day, but the particulars of that are fleshed out somewhat differently in different people. We can all agree that working (other than out of need or mercy) is sinful, as is recreation that leads to the neglect of restful worshipping the Lord. But beyond that I don't think we can draw definite standards that apply to every single Christian. Attempts to do so often, IMO, lead down the path of legalism...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ColdSilverMoon For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 07:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,878
Thanks: 1,909
Thanked 1,851 Times in 1,097 Posts
| | |
It is helpful to understand that Christ perfectly kept "the law"- all of it, ceremonial, civil and moral. It is His sinlessness that made Him the "perfect" sacrifice that once and for all paid for our sins.
Christ obeyed all the ceremonial law (including those aspects called "sabbaths" or that were observed in connection with The Sabbath Day). Because of that, He fulfilled it in His sacrifice and now we don't have to keep that (the ceremonial).
So, that's true freedom. Freedom from all that ceremonial regulation.
Not freedom from the moral law with its applications to thought, word, and deed. Christ would no more do that (abrogate God's moral law for His creatures) than "free" us from obeying God.
But He did free us from all those ceremonial aspects by completing their purpose in His atonement. Faith in that, Christ's righteousness, is what justifies us. If we misunderstand that, we misapprehend grace.
So, it might be "legalism" to approach God on the basis of our moral obedience (e.g. do's and don'ts) rather than on the basis of faith in Christ's righteousness alone.
It might also be called that to add to God's Word with requirements that are not in there. We have no right, as the Reformers say, to burden men's conscience with things that are not in Scripture.
The Pharisees, as recorded in Scripture, did both of these things while at the same time demanding others follow them, in effect, rather than God. Now, that's "legalism."
The problem is (from our standpoint as human being fallen in sin, with a remnant of the old nature abiding) is that God does command us to come apart from our ordinary routines of work and entertaining ourselves and seeking all that goes with that in order to focus on worshipping Him.
As with all other obedience, there is wisdom and blessing and grace provided by Him to do what we cannot do in our own strength- perfectly obey our God. And that, for a whole day- one day in seven to be remembered until He returns!
(a marvellous thing to consider, study and meditate on on the Lord's Day).
| 
02-05-2009, 07:52 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco I have to confess that I am confused by the (common) argument that "Christ is my Sabbath." |
However, I am not familiar with any "argument" for this position--just the mantra over and over again. I've been asking what does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean around this board for years to no avail. Since I'm at it I'll try again: What does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean? I don't need to hear "I rest in Christ" because I'll ask you what that means too. I would very much like to hear the doctrine spelled out. Maybe a book recommendation? | 
02-05-2009, 07:53 AM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,299 Times in 1,656 Posts
| | Quote: |
At what point does observing the Sabbath go from obedience to God to legalism?
| Gail, I want to attempt to answer the above question. Quote: |
Romans 10:3-4 3 For not knowing about God's righteousness and seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves to the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
| Keeping the sabbath, even strict observance, is not legalism. Losing focus of Christ is.
Unlike the unbelieving Jews, all true born again believers have the imputed righteousness of Christ (Rom. 3:22). It's for this reason that Paul wrote a stinging rebuttal about going back to the Law in Galatians 3. The danger that an improper view of the sabbath can create is that keeping the sabbath is either A) a reflection of our personal piety ~or~ B) a method of achieving God's favor. Believers can fall into this trap. Hence, the reason for Paul's rebuttal in Galatians.
The sabbath is a rest for the Christian. That the day is consecrated (made holy) for worship, meditation, fellowship and acts of mercy is not a consignment to spiritual obligation. Consecrating the sabbath should be the pinnacle of joy for a believer! If I may be so trite, we should approach the sabbath with a joy that rivals our preparation and expectation for vacation. We will be meeting with God, and His people on the Lord's Day. The saint who observes the sabbath is dining sumptuously, instead of existing on meager fare. When the sabbath is approached in this manner, there is no room for legalism.
I hope this helps.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 08:01 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mangum Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco I have to confess that I am confused by the (common) argument that "Christ is my Sabbath." |  However, I am not familiar with any "argument" of this position--just the one-line mantra over and over again. I've been asking what does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean around this board for years to no avail. Since I'm at it I'll try again: What does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean? I don't need to hear "I rest in Christ" because I'll ask you what that means too. I would very much like to hear the doctrine spelled out. Maybe a book recommendation?  | I gave a short answer above. But I find this a little baffling in light of the fact that many who observe Sundays as the Sabbath use the same terminology. Here's a quote from an article defending Sunday Sabbath observation. Quote:
Christ is our Sabbath rest! We are sinful and fall short of God’s glory. Outside of Christ, the law of God can only condemn us. It is a heavy yoke we cannot bear (Acts 15:10). And so Christ graciously calls us to Himself to rest in Him:
“Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light” (Matthew 11:28–30).
The book of Hebrews also points us to Christ as our Sabbath rest. Throughout this book the writer of Hebrews demonstrates the superiority of Christ and the New Covenant over the types and shadows of the Old Covenant. Chapter 1 begins:
God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, having become so much better than the angels, as He has by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they (Hebrews 1:1–4).
In contrast to the priests of the Old Testament, whose work was never finished, who could never sit down—Christ, “when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on High.” We see this theme throughout the book:
Now this is the main point of the things we are saying: We have such a High Priest, who is seated at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens (Hebrews 8:1).
But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool (Hebrews 10:12–13).
Looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God (Hebrews 12:2).
Christ completed His works of righteousness and redemption. He declared on the cross “It is finished” and has now sat down at the right hand of the Most High.
Hebrews 4 draws an interesting parallel between God’s rest after His work at creation and Christ’s rest after His work of redemption. This passage calls us to heed the gospel that we might enter God’s rest. It warns us not to miss the rest that God has provided for us Christ, as so many did in the Old Testament because of disobedience and hardness of heart. Verse 10 points us to Christ’s finished work:
For He who has entered His rest has Himself also ceased from His works as God did from His (Hebrews 4:10).
This is the rest we need. We cannot rest in the unfinished and unholy works of our hands. We must rest in the finished work of Christ for our salvation. And so in the next verse the writer of Hebrews exhorts us:
Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience (Hebrews 4:11).
Christ is our Sabbath. He is the rest we need! We must rest in Him! But this brings us to our fourth question. Founders Ministries | Christ and the Sabbath | | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 08:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee Quote:
Originally Posted by mangum Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco I have to confess that I am confused by the (common) argument that "Christ is my Sabbath." |  However, I am not familiar with any "argument" of this position--just the one-line mantra over and over again. I've been asking what does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean around this board for years to no avail. Since I'm at it I'll try again: What does "Christ is my Sabbath" mean? I don't need to hear "I rest in Christ" because I'll ask you what that means too. I would very much like to hear the doctrine spelled out. Maybe a book recommendation?  | I gave a short answer above. But I find this a little baffling in light of the fact that many who observe Sundays as the Sabbath use the same terminology. Here's a quote from an article defending Sunday Sabbath observation. | Of course we [Sabbatarians] use this same language, I don't see how this is relevant. When a non-Sabbatarian answers "Christ is my Sabbath" to the question "How do you understand the 4th commandment" I need to know what on earth he is talking about. I see "Christ is my Sabbath" referring to salvation from your quote.
But how does this relate to the 4th commandment? How is "Christ is my Sabbath" keeping the Sabbath holy? Are you saying because Christ kept the Sabbath holy, fulfilling it in a sense, you are not bound to do so? Or, reading your earlier post, are you saying that Christ, being exalted at the right hand of God, is in a sense maintaining the 4th commandment and us being in Christ we are keeping the Sabbath holy?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to CDM For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 08:35 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 617
Thanked 1,916 Times in 851 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee The bikini clad lass is only appropriate if she is your wife, no matter what day of the week. Who's Sherry?
| Of course she's the wife- hence 'of God's choosing'. Sherry is a very small lass that can fit into a glass, of course.
Theognome
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Theognome For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 08:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
| | | Wsc q. 57
For reference, WSC Q. 57:
Q. Which is the fourth commandment?
A. The fourth commandment is, Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
| 
02-05-2009, 09:05 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
Chris,
I think you're observations are on the right track. Both of my posts were made in light of post 6, which I think rounds off the picture. Of course I don't expect you to agree with the position. But hopefully that helps with understanding.
To help clarify the challenge, those of us who don't observe Sunday as the Sabbath do not consider the arguments that Sunday became the Sabbath as tenable. The church gathered and worshiped together on Sundays in celebration of the resurrection. Argumentation from there on is extra-biblical. Also, the nature of obeying the observance of a day appears antithetical to the New Covenant. The New Covenant changes the heart, conforming one ever more into the image of Christ. A Sabbath day observation appears to make a rule that bypasses the heart. Other than the OT commandment, there is no morality inherent in keeping the Sabbath on Sundays (note that I did NOT say "in keeping the Sabbath" period). And there are dangers inherent in the legalistic tendencies that can arise from Sabbatarian observation. Most notably are probably the ire that is aroused against non-Sabbatarians and the reality that many see Sunday as THE day they must worship, but fail to walk in worship throughout the week.
So, yes, my rest is in Christ. My rest is in salvation. My rest is in the comfort of the promises of God. All is fulfilled in Christ and considered finished before it ever began. I can rest in all of this, worshiping every day, knowing that my righteousness is in Christ and His fulfillment of all that God requires for my sin. He requires that I walk in a manner worth of His calling, with a heart embracing and emulating His character, not merely in word or deed, but in spirit and truth. I can add nothing, for anything I attempt to add actually takes aware from His glorious work. And this very rest, is God's Sabbath rest.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 09:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
| | |
Joe, I do agree with you that far.
But, myself I don’t think we must choose one or the other.
Understanding Christ as our Rest, our Sabbath OR Keeping the 4th Commandment in the Lord’s day.
I simply don’t see that dichotomy in the New Testament. We need both!
I am so thankful to the Dutch influence in my life that goes back to 1989, but many Christians in Holland simply don’t cook on Sundays because of the 4th Commandment and this particular passage. Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whosoever doeth work therein shall be put to death. Ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day. Exodus 35:2-3
Do we Christians cook, barbecue or use our ovens on Sunday? And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation. And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him. And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp. And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses. Numbers 15:32-36
I can only understand these passages in the light of the Law being a Tutor, a Teacher pointing, leading to Christ. Gal3:24
In a sense the most terrible consequence of disobedience of Sabbath keeping, on top of being disobedience to God’s given Law, was to misunderstand salvation by Grace alone through Faith alone.
Righteousness by Faith alone, was the inner substance of the Abrahamic Covenant, even the Galatians, who heard the Gospel, were in danger to misunderstand the Covenant of Grace. -----Added 2/5/2009 at 09:51:18 EST-----
(repeating my other post)
So I don’t honestly see any contradiction between keeping the holiness of the Sabbath, by not working in the Lord’s day and dedicate it to Worship the Lord with His Church,
As these are Commandments we can clearly understand from the narrative of Creation, the Law and the Apostolic writings,
While simultaneously seeing and trusting the Lord Jesus as our Sabbath, being the Lord the one Who gives us rest. For we which have believed do enter into rest (…)
For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all His works. Hebrews 4:3-4
Being His fulfilled vicarious work for our salvation truly complete , and one we don’t dare to add anything of ourselves, we can therefore rest in absolute faith on the Great Salvation our Lord accomplished for us. To Him be the Glory. What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
(Shall we then disobey the Law?) God forbid Romans 6:1-2
If we obey both the 4th Commandment and look to Jesus as the One who fulfilled all the Law for our sake, we will be free from both antinomianism and legalism, as we will better and better understand that the Gospel is not about Don’ts or Do’s but a once and for all DONE It is finished | | The Following User Says Thank You to discipulo For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 09:53 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
Thanks César,
I don't see a dichotomy either. I can't tell you how much we are in agreement here, except for the idea that the Sabbath is Sunday and is to be observed as in the OT (without the ceremony, of course). Take that aspect out of your statements and we're saying the same thing. One side says it is sin to not observe Sunday as the Sabbath. The other says that there is no such law in the New Covenant, having been fulfilled and maintained in Christ. There appears to be a very real sense in which both see a denial of Christ in the other's perspective.
Your comments are refreshing though, for you seem to see where some of us are in regard to the Sabbath.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 10:07 AM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,835
Thanks: 2,454
Thanked 6,035 Times in 2,448 Posts
| |  Let's keep this thread on the track of what legalism is/isn't.
In the main, you have to be cautious here.
I think Josh's quick definition is very helpful.
The reason why this is tricky is because just as the immature can become legalists by looking at rules as an end to themselves, some immature people can look at behavior alone and try to conclude whether legalism is occuring or not.
You can observe two people with scrupulous Sabbath habits (or any other habit for that reason) and cannot tell by the mere presence of scrupulous behavior that legalism is the root of the behavior.
I've given a pretty consistent percentage of my income for a number of years. I started out with a legalistic motivation but didn't throw the baby (habit) out with the bathwater (legalism). In other words, Jesus didn't tell the Pharisees to stop being scrupulous about the Law altogether but to change their whole attitude about what they were about. Of course, nothing is more offensive to a self-righteous person than to be told that you're fundamentally unrighteous and that your habits don't repair that problem.
People that concern me are often not those that are overly scrupulous about the Law because they recognize the sin within themselves but those that are not scrupulous at all these days because they don't seem to recognize any sin. There's not only a lack of concern for the Law which prevents them from ever becoming legalists but there's a lack of concern for the Law that makes them oblivious to God's character altogether.
I don't know how a converted soul cannot be confronted by their own sin pretty regularly and not be frightened by it and recognize their regular need not only for the Gospel but for some sort of way to mortify the man of flesh within that they desire to put to death. The third use of the Law is intended toward that end.
But the third use of the Law cannot be strictly prescriptive or immitative. It really needs the Communion of the Saints. The Book of Hebrews really underlines the sense of the community of the faith that are intended to spur one another on and consider how none of us may be found to be unbelieving. I believe it should always be in that context that we put on the training wheels of the Law as it continually causes us to grow in our mature understanding of God and His character. We need the mature around us to tell us when we're being a bit too rigid or even when we're being slothful.
Unfortunately, we often detach the Law and Wisdom literature from this community and our application of aphorisms and other good ideas tends toward various extremes that, if we were in/among a community of the faith, we would be much less likely to err. Thus, in my view, the boundary between legalism and following the Lord (or even being slothful) is best maintained not as an individual activity but as an activity within the Body itself.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 10:10 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Bordentown, NJ, 08505
Posts: 944
Thanks: 227
Thanked 609 Times in 295 Posts
| |
discipulo, excellent post.
"I simply don’t see that dichotomy in the New Testament. We need both!"
Amen.
My 12 year old daughter came home from a SS class and asked me if daddy was sinning every sunday because we light a fire in the wood stove. One of the girls in the class asked if it was OK to light a fire if you are cold and the teacher said no, it is work.
I've played phone tag with the teacher twice and have yet to catch up with her, but all I can say about legalism is that the minute you start telling kids that their parents are sinning, on particulars not clearly articulated in scripture, I think you are keeping the law.
I find it hard to believe the early Presbyterians let their kids freeze in the winter
__________________
Lynnie
PCA
Central NJ
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lynnie For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 10:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,843
Thanks: 1,710
Thanked 1,501 Times in 843 Posts
| | |
Just a quick comment here in regards to the comments of our Scots brother in Stornoway:
I see so often comments on how "well, I can do this/that/the other as it is an issue of Christian liberty and there is no biblical ordinance against it, etc." My question is: OK, so you can do it, but why would you want to? God has given you a day of rest and the implications are that it is to spend the day in worship and meditation - this is a command and a gift! Why do we strain against this gift and kick against the pricks in trying to push the envelope? I don't get it. We don't revel in being given one entire day in seven read/sing/listen to His word. Instead, we look for loopholes so we can enjoy ourselves as we see fit.
PS - this is not to say that you shouldn't start a fire in the stove. Your husband probably opens the cutlery drawer to get out utensils for breakfast, too. That's just as unnecessary and just as much "work".
__________________
Kevin, husband of a truly angelic woman, and father to ten.
Zion United Reformed Church of Sheffield
Ontario, Canada
| 
02-05-2009, 10:36 AM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,835
Thanks: 2,454
Thanked 6,035 Times in 2,448 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnie My 12 year old daughter came home from a SS class and asked me if daddy was sinning every sunday because we light a fire in the wood stove. One of the girls in the class asked if it was OK to light a fire if you are cold and the teacher said no, it is work. | This, to me, is a view of the law that amounts to "don't touch that hot stove because you'll get burned."
My hand isn't burned, so therefore I'm OK.
It seems good to us that we have all the things we can/cannot do but, in the end, we forget that the Sabbath is to be a delight.
A good way was suggested earlier. If we are training ourselves to delight in a rest of the Lord and contemplation of Him then some techniques may aid in that initially but, if at the end of our "training", we simply learn to fear certain behavior and can never articulate the "why" of the behavior beyond the reason "it's just sin", then it's sort of like a twenty year old kid that still needs wiping lessons from his Mommy.
| 
02-05-2009, 10:41 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 240
Thanked 510 Times in 311 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by David FCC
I, on the Sabbath ever since the day I was Born again do not switch the tv on, radio unless it is to listen to a sermon, do not even leave the house unless it is to go to worship. These things are done purely because of the commandment to remember the Sabbath & keep it holy. It is done in obedience to God, for no other reason and I continually pray that He would lessen my worldliness on the other six days. | Is it "worldly" to leave the house for reasons other than worship?
__________________
Daniel
PCA
Memphis, TN
| 
02-05-2009, 10:43 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
I realized something today as I pondered this, and Kevin's comment underscores what I was thinking. From the perspective of almost every Sabbatarian I have ever met, I observe the Sabbath. I set it aside for worship, fellowship, family and other activities that help me focus on Christ. As I noted before, this begins Monday and culminates on Sunday. But from Saturday night on my focus is purposely on Sunday's worship. I don't watch football (this year's Super Bowl was an exception). Sometimes, in our fellowship, we'll play a game of ball, or horseshoes, darts or even cards. Sometimes there is something that just needs attention (car, repair around house, ox in ditch, etc.). But most of the time we simply relish in the blessings God has provided and focus on Him throughout the day. This is not because I perceive anything compelling me to in Scripture, but because I am able to do so as a gift from God. I want to. So, any discussions regarding "loopholes" really are irrelevant. I would give up little to nothing to observe Sunday as the Sabbath. Furthermore, as a pastor, it would be much more convenient for me to be convinced of the Sabbath position because I could "enforce" such a belief in our church in the pursuit of greater faithfulness and holiness; something that is regularly on the mind of a shepherd. There is a very real sense in which I wish the Sabbath was on Sunday because I tire of seeing people so apathetic toward God.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Wannabee For This Useful Post: | | 
02-05-2009, 10:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Isle of Lewis, Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 125
Thanks: 51
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripel Quote:
Originally Posted by David FCC
I, on the Sabbath ever since the day I was Born again do not switch the tv on, radio unless it is to listen to a sermon, do not even leave the house unless it is to go to worship. These things are done purely because of the commandment to remember the Sabbath & keep it holy. It is done in obedience to God, for no other reason and I continually pray that He would lessen my worldliness on the other six days. | Is it "worldly" to leave the house for reasons other than worship? | I think we both know that you are taking two separate sentences twisting them together and making a single one. The worldliness I speak of for the other six days has nothing whatsoever to do with leaving the house. | 
02-05-2009, 10:54 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 240
Thanked 510 Times in 311 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by David FCC I think we both know that you are taking two separate sentences twisting them together and making a single one. The worldliness I speak of for the other six days has nothing whatsoever to do with leaving the house.  | If it appeared that way, I apologize, but that was not my intent. My intent is to have you define "worldliness". I'm asking if you consider the activities you avoid on Sunday to be "worldly".
| 
02-05-2009, 10:55 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| |
Piper has an interesting article on this. What does it mean practically to keep the Sabbath holy? :: Desiring God Christian Resource Library
I found it interesting that he does consider Sunday as the Christian Sabbath, but refuses to place rules on the day outside of how he leads his family. I agree with how he approaches Sundays. The TV thing is a non-issue for us because it's probably not on more than 10 hours a month, and often much of that is for Bible studies and preparation. Perhaps this article will add clarity.
| 
02-05-2009, 11:13 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Isle of Lewis, Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 125
Thanks: 51
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripel Quote:
Originally Posted by David FCC I think we both know that you are taking two separate sentences twisting them together and making a single one. The worldliness I speak of for the other six days has nothing whatsoever to do with leaving the house.  | If it appeared that way, I apologize, but that was not my intent. My intent is to have you define "worldliness". I'm asking if you consider the activities you avoid on Sunday to be "worldly". | I certainly try and avoid worldly activity of any sort on the Sabbath, TV & Radio certainly are avoided. Any form of recreation that is for my own pleasure I see as being wrong on the Sabbath yet not wrong on other days.
There are many examples of what I feel convicted over which may differ from others but we will be convicted over differing things so who am I to say what is right or wrong. What I am saying though is that we are commanded to do something on a particular day and I believe this generation are extremely disobedient with regard to it. Hope this clears up my position on the matter.
David
| 
02-05-2009, 11:31 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 240
Thanked 510 Times in 311 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by David FCC I certainly try and avoid worldly activity of any sort on the Sabbath, TV & Radio certainly are avoided. Any form of recreation that is for my own pleasure I see as being wrong on the Sabbath yet not wrong on other days. | Thanks for the response. I guess I have a hard time defining what is worldly. I guess some people would define it as being anything that isn't focused on God, but I'm don't buy that. I would disagree with you (and the WCF) about recreation on the Sabbath. For example, on a nice Sunday afternoon, my wife and I will gather our children and dog and go for a long walk. We enjoy each others company and we have casual conversation. We don't talk about Scripture or the character of God. We talk about the week to come. It is very much "recreation" and very much appropriate for Sunday. We rarely get to do that at other times in the week.
|  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |