» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 115 | | 34 members and 81 guests | | ADKing, asc, austinww, bconway52, Casey, Chippy, ChristianHedonist, ChristianTrader, DMcFadden, gene_mingo, greenbaggins, Grillsy, Hamalas, Honor, Jack K, jambo, jpfrench81, KSon, Lincolnshire Paul, MMasztal, NateLanning, Puritan Scot, SolaGratia, Soonerborn, Southern Presbyterian, Susanna, Titus35, Wayne, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-21-2009, 12:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 36
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
| | | God's direct communication in modern era
I apologize that this is a question that is not purely theological- but it is mostly. I am not "newly reformed" but as Im only 17 I am new to the true depths of its waters, rather than just the label.
My girlfriend attends a very charismatic, what I often label (though not to her face), heretical church. There is little theology to be found. However, she loves God and is one of the most faithful people I know.
She often talks about God directly "talking to her." And it is often about very petty things- such as, "God told me to bring bobby pins today, and in the bathroom this girl asked me for bobby pins. Isnt God so cool?" I usually nod along, but my stomach always squirms a bit. I recognize that God can communicate with anyone if he truly wants, of course, but could this truly be valid?
I ask her how shes certain that its God, and she affirms that she has no doubt that it is indeed him. Is this a subject worth breaching? I am slowly attempting to reform her, but I would like to have some sort of irrefutable theological argument, if possible.
Thanks in advance for any advice. And btw, I have looked over this forum for a while and it seems excellent, everything I could hope for. I look forward to contributing in the future.
__________________
Luke
PCA
Orlando, FL
| 
03-21-2009, 12:35 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,055
Thanks: 979
Thanked 2,422 Times in 837 Posts
| | |
One could benefit from looking at the Pneumatology forum, where you can find plenty of answers. The main argument, however, is that tongues and other direct forms of communication were foundational with the apostles. After the canon was completed, no other source was necessary for the regulation of faith and life. The Holy Spirit always uses means now: Word, Sacrament, prayer, and fellowship.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post: | | 
03-21-2009, 12:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 36
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
| | |
Thanks, Greenbaggins (Interesting name lol). That is a good point.
I did look in the Pneumatology forum before posting (after looking up the definition of the word- again, new. lol).
My quandry is that she is so certain... meh. Twould be nice if there werent certain limitations when speaking in a relationship.
Lamentations abound...
| 
03-21-2009, 12:44 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,518
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,501 Times in 1,412 Posts
| |
Just was working on this quote in my preparation for Sunday school: Quote: | “He that would utterly separate the Spirit from the Word had as good burn his Bible” (John Owen, Works III.192)
|
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |