The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Information and Introductions > "The Wading Pool" - Questions from the Newly Reformed


"The Wading Pool" - Questions from the Newly Reformed Forum where those new to the Reformed faith may ask questions on Reformed doctrine and practice. This is not a place to begin a thread to forward a theological position but is designed to answer questions of those who might be intimidated to start a thread in another forum. Any user may post a question but only elders and those with special permissions may respond.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 10:26 AM
coramdeo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 301
Thanks: 118
Thanked 64 Times in 42 Posts
FV

Would someone please give me a concise definition of "Federal Vision" an it's origin, etc. I was trying to follow some of the current discussion to obtain an idea...but now I have a headache!
__________________
Gregg
East Texas
Member Heritage Baptist Church
"I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way
be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so
that now, as always, Christ will be exalted in my
life." Phil 1:20
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 10:34 AM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 979
Thanked 2,416 Times in 835 Posts
Here is my introduction, part 1, and part 2. Then Scott Clark has an excellent introductory blog post on it as well.
__________________
Rev. Lane Keister
Teaching Elder, PCA, North Dakota (working out of bounds in a CRC and an RCA church)
http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com
http://brahmsgreenglove.blogspot.com
http://accenttranslation.blogspot.com
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
A.J. (04-20-2009), Blueridge Believer (04-20-2009), Ex Nihilo (04-20-2009), In His Grip (04-20-2009), Knoxienne (04-22-2009), Scottish Lass (04-20-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 10:54 AM
coramdeo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 301
Thanks: 118
Thanked 64 Times in 42 Posts
Thanks

Thank you, that was helpful. No wonder it gave me a headache!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 10:56 AM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 979
Thanked 2,416 Times in 835 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by coramdeo View Post
Thank you, that was helpful. No wonder it gave me a headache!
You should feel encouraged by being in good company. It has given countless migraines to the top theologians in the Reformed world!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (04-22-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 10:59 AM
coramdeo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 301
Thanks: 118
Thanked 64 Times in 42 Posts
question

So why the name "Federal Vision" ? I did not get a connection of the topic as explained and the name.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:02 AM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 979
Thanked 2,416 Times in 835 Posts
Literally, they mean that it is a new way of looking ("vision") at the covenant ("federal"). It is not really new, of course, as Klaas Schilder propounded these views before ("alles of niks": all or nothing; what is true of one member of the covenant is true of all, an undifferentiated covenant membership that included benefits normally ascribed only to the elect).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
Marrow Man (04-22-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:11 AM
coramdeo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 301
Thanks: 118
Thanked 64 Times in 42 Posts
thanks again- defined

thanks again. i guess I could have know that had I first gone to one of my favorite sires- The online Etymological Dictionary.com
1645, as a theological term, from L. foedus "covenant, league" (gen. foederis), related to fides "faith" (see faith). Meaning "pertaining to a treaty" (1660) led to political sense of "state formed by agreement among independent states" (1707), from phrases like federal union "union based on a treaty," popularized by formation of U.S.A. 1776-1787. Federation is first attested 1721, from L.L. foederationem, from L. foederare "league together." Federalism (1793) was coined by Burke. Federalist "member or supporter of the Federal party in U.S. politics" is from 1787. Fed slang for "officer of the FBI" is from 1916.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 06:10 PM
R. Scott Clark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,007
Thanks: 13
Thanked 750 Times in 265 Posts
The federal visionists gave themselves the name. In so doing they implied that theirs was the truly "federal" theology because of their approach to the nature of the covenant of grace.

Here are some resources on this topic:

Westminster Seminary California clark

After the "Tuning In" essay you might want to read the booklet on Covenant, Baptism, and Election
The Bookstore at WSC: Baptism, Election, & the Covenant of Grace by Clark, R. Scott

and then CJPM:
The Bookstore at WSC: Covenant, Justification and Pastoral Ministry by Clark, R. Scott

Best,

rsc
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to R. Scott Clark For This Useful Post:
AThornquist (04-21-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 12:03 AM
mvdm's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DeMotte, Indiana
Posts: 378
Thanks: 46
Thanked 225 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins View Post
Literally, they mean that it is a new way of looking ("vision") at the covenant ("federal"). It is not really new, of course, as Klaas Schilder propounded these views before ("alles of niks": all or nothing; what is true of one member of the covenant is true of all, an undifferentiated covenant membership that included benefits normally ascribed only to the elect).
This is a serious misinterpretation of Schilder. His phrase "alles of niks" refers not to undifferentiated covenant membership, but to the fact that in the covenant, by means of the promises sealed in baptism, God gives everything and demands everything from every baby baptized, or he gives nothing and demands nothing from no baby baptized.
__________________
Mark Van Der Molen
Immanuel URC
DeMotte, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mvdm For This Useful Post:
armourbearer (04-22-2009), Marrow Man (04-22-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 01:07 PM
R. Scott Clark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,007
Thanks: 13
Thanked 750 Times in 265 Posts
MODERATOR'S NOTE:

STOP IT. Further posts like this will simply be deleted. This has nothing to do with content, but rather with the puerile exchange.

Last edited by fredtgreco; 04-23-2009 at 02:25 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 01:19 PM
mvdm's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DeMotte, Indiana
Posts: 378
Thanks: 46
Thanked 225 Times in 110 Posts
MODERATOR'S NOTE:

STOP IT. Further posts like this will simply be deleted. This has nothing to do with content, but rather with the puerile exchange.

Last edited by fredtgreco; 04-23-2009 at 02:26 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 01:58 PM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69