View Poll Results: To protect the peace and purity of the church, what ought be required for membership?

Voters
42. You may not vote on this poll
  • Profession of faith only (not examined)

    4 9.52%
  • Examined (credible) profession of faith

    29 69.05%
  • Examination by elders, ordinarily in the home

    21 50.00%
  • Public profession of faith (e.g. before the congregation)

    29 69.05%
  • Baptism, previous by evangelical church only

    19 45.24%
  • Baptism, previous by any nominal Christian church (e.g. Roman)

    14 33.33%
  • Member class- weekend only format or only a few classes

    5 11.90%
  • Member class- 5 to 10 class sessions

    5 11.90%
  • Member class- More than 10 class sessions

    6 14.29%
  • Member class AND faith promise to follow with additional doctrine class(es)

    3 7.14%
  • Comprehensive knowledge of church's doctrine standards

    7 16.67%
  • Comprehensive knowlege AND agreement with doctrine standards

    6 14.29%
  • Vow to walk an orderly (obedient) life in Christ

    27 64.29%
  • Vow to submit to government and discipline of the church

    29 69.05%
  • Vow to peaceably study the church's doctrine

    19 45.24%
  • Vote of church leaders (e.g. session) to admit

    16 38.10%
  • Vote of congregation members to admit

    4 9.52%
  • First, renounce by word and deed known disorderly (sin) life pattern

    11 26.19%
  • Personal study/mentoring with church leader(s)

    5 11.90%
  • Vow to support church (prayers, efforts, tithes)

    23 54.76%
  • Other (please describe)

    2 4.76%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: What ought be required for church membership?

  1. #1
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts

    What ought be required for church membership?

    Reformed theology has a "high view" of the visible and invisible church. What ought be required for church membership?

    Thinking biblically, what ought be required (not necessarily what was required of you) to protect the peace and purity of Christ's Church?

    Vote as many as you wish, please read qualifications carefully.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Scott1 For This Useful Post:

    Repre5entYHWH (06-30-2009)

  3. #2
    Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline. The MacDaddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    10,965
    Thanks
    2,840
    Thanked 3,139 Times in 1,611 Posts
    Add:

    --knowledge of secret reformed handshake,

    --trivia quiz about biography of Calvin,

    --A brand on the backside with a capital C

    --physical fitness test involving vigorous Calvin-sthenics

    --Full beard and.or at least 4 kids.

    --Knowing how to flash the Calvy gang symbols.
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post:

    AThornquist (07-02-2009)

  5. #3
    Rich Koster's Avatar
    Rich Koster is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Browns Mills NJ
    Posts
    2,784
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    713
    Thanked 839 Times in 493 Posts
    I voted for the mentoring with leadership selection. Why? Mentoring takes time and people get to know each other and what they believe and how they live out those beliefs. This will help the leadership ascertain if they have a baby, young man/woman or mature man/woman in Christ with them OR a goat (think they're a Cristian but deceived), pig (knows doctrine but their life is no different than the world) or wolf (agenda driven person looking for a following or sent to cause destruction). While no choice above is foolproof on its own, mentoring is a good filter to help maintain purity and unity.
    Rich Koster
    Browns Mills NJ USA
    Member of Covenant Baptist, Lumberton NJ (1689ers)
    http://cbclumberton.wordpress.com/

    The Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
    Romans 7:14-25
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Rich Koster For This Useful Post:

    Scott1 (06-30-2009)

  7. #4
    Timothy William is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,228
    Thanks
    235
    Thanked 258 Times in 174 Posts
    -- 500 posts on PuritanBoard.

    -- Thanked at least 100 times.

    -- Thank others at least 100 times.

    (I selected options 2, 4, 6, 14, 18, 20.)
    T W Hopper
    Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church
    Currently between churches since PRC closed here - attending Crossroads Christian Church.
    Canberra, Australia.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Timothy William For This Useful Post:

    Anton Bruckner (07-02-2009), AThornquist (07-02-2009), Sven (06-30-2009)

  9. #5
    Marrow Man's Avatar
    Marrow Man is offline. Drunk with Powder
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    8,096
    Thanks
    3,187
    Thanked 2,873 Times in 1,425 Posts
    Wow, that's a pretty comprehensive list! Here's what the ARP Form of Gov't says with regard to membership vows:

    Applicants for communicant church membership shall be examined by the session in private with regard to a knowledge of their spiritual need, their faith in Jesus Christ, and their intention to be obedient to Him. The applicants shall give assent to the following or similar questions, by which they enter a solemn covenant with God and His Church:

    (1) Do you acknowledge yourself to be a sinner in the sight of God, justly deserving His displeasure, and without hope save in His love and mercy?
    (2) Do you believe in the L ord Jesus Christ as the Son of God and the Saviour of sinners, and do you receive Him and trust in Him alone for salvation as He is offered in the Gospel?
    (3) Do you believe the Scripture of the Old and New Testaments to be the written Word of God, the only perfect rule of faith and practice?
    (4) Do you now promise, in humble reliance upon the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that you will endeavor to live as becomes the followers of Christ?
    (5) Do you accept the doctrines and principles of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, so far as you understand them, as agreeable to and founded on the
    Word of God?
    (6) Do you promise, with the Lord’s help, to be faithful in the performance of your Christian duties, both in private life and in the work of the Church?
    (7) Do you submit yourself in the spirit of love to the government and discipline of this Church, and seek the peace, purity and prosperity of this congregation so long as you are a member of it?

    Upon affirmative action by the session, applicants shall then be received into communicant membership.
    The session shall not impose additional conditions for membership.
    Tim Phillips
    Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
    Louisville, KY
    Husband of Scottish Lass
    Father of Grace Cameron Phillips
    My Blog: Gairney Bridge
    My Facebook/My Avatar

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

    "Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post:

    Backwoods Presbyterian (06-30-2009), Scott1 (06-30-2009)

  11. #6
    JonathanHunt's Avatar
    JonathanHunt is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cheltenham, UK
    Posts
    2,256
    Thanks
    352
    Thanked 610 Times in 330 Posts
    I would have voted for 'agreement with church statement of faith' rather than 'comprehensive knowledge of church standards etc'.

    I'm looking for agreement with essential doctrine, not understanding of the minutiae of how an AGM is called, or how a deacon is ordained, and so forth.
    Jonathan Hunt

    Elder holding forth the word of life at Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

    My blog
    Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence. -- Thomas Elsworth
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to JonathanHunt For This Useful Post:

    rbcbob (06-30-2009)

  13. #7
    Joshua's Avatar
    Joshua is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    23,873
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    3,350
    Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,004 Posts
    Here are the requirements for membership in the RPCGA:
    1. The prospective member(s) has come to the Session of ________________________________________freely
    and willingly to join in Membership.

    2. Church membership requires that members are to receive instruction from the pastor/session; to read and review
    often the doctrines of the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647), the Westminster Larger Catechism, and the
    Westminster Shorter Catechism, and the current Book of Church Order of the RPCGA, and to abide by them.
    (Membership Vow # 4)

    3. Consistent with Church membership commitments, the prospective member agrees not to pursue legal action by
    the civil courts in dealing with issues that arise in matters of doctrine, practice, or church discipline and agrees
    to pursue all issues through the courts of the RPCGA following its procedures. (Membership Vow # 4)
    a. All church members are required to abide by the courts of the RPCGA in matters of doctrine, practice and church discipline, according to the 4th membership vow.
    b. All ecclesiastical issues are to be brought to the Session first and then to the Presbytery only on appeal
    from the Session, except in the case of excommunication, which is a function of Presbytery.

    c. The prospective member agrees to meet in person with the Session prior to transfer of membership
    unless released from doing so by the Session.

    d. The prospective member is required to come to the Pastor and/or Session if they find a conflict in
    doctrine or practice and communicate in person those issues prior to leaving the church unless released
    from doing so by the Session.

    e. Failure properly to follow the due process of the RPCGA courts, where he/she is not satisfied with the
    judgment of a court, will result in erasure (with censure) if he/she leaves the church as a result of the
    court’s determination, rather than pursuing his/her rights to appeal the determination to the next higher
    court if such leaving is out of accord with the BCO.

    f. Matters pertaining to church discipline are considered private, and as such are not for public
    dissemination by church members.
    4. According to Scripture, commitments of membership include supporting this church by regularly attending its
    worship services unless providentially hindered, and by “bringing all the tithes into the storehouse” (to the
    Local Church) consisting of 10% of all that by which the Lord has prospered him/her, as well as other voluntary
    offerings.

    5. In the handling of all private or personal offenses, the following procedures are to be undertaken according to
    Matthew 18:15-17:
    a. Speaking to the offender(s) privately first.

    b. If a second meeting is necessary, taking one or two witnesses that every word may be established, and
    that it is advisable that one of these other witnesses be a member of session.

    c. If there is still no resolution, bringing the matter to the session of the Church for resolution
    6. The prospective member is required to encourage and support this Church, and fellow members particularly, by
    promoting its unity and fleeing all wicked and divisive practices that would disturb the peace of the Church.

    7. In this Presbyterian system of church government the congregation will only be voting on matters of Church
    Officers (Elders and Deacons).
    a. Concerning other issues of voting (not Elders or Deacons), such voting will only pertain to material
    issues as brought forth by the Pastor and/or Session affecting only the local congregation.

    b. A congregational meeting or vote may be called only by the Session and then only for matters
    pertaining to congregational issues. All such votes are considered as pious advice and not binding upon
    the Session.
    8. The financial issues of this particular congregation are matters that belong to the Session and are reviewed only
    by the Presbytery at the request of the Pastor and/or Session, or a member of the Session.

    9. The prospective member must confess that the Bible, consisting of the Old and New Testaments, in their
    original autographs, is the inspired, infallible, and inerrant Word of God, and its doctrine of salvation to be the
    perfect and only true doctrine of salvation.

    10. No church member is permitted to promote or teach among this congregation any doctrine or practice that is
    contrary to the Westminster Standards or the Book of Church Order.

    11. No individual may, in a meeting of the Church, teach doctrine or practice to anyone, that has not been approved
    by the Session of this church.

    12. The prospective member is required to confess that because of his/her sinfulness, he/she abhors his/her
    sinfulness and humbles himself/herself before God, and that he/she trusts for salvation, not in himself/herself,
    but in the Lord Jesus Christ alone (membership vow #2).

    13. The prospective member is required to acknowledge Jesus Christ as his/her Sovereign Lord, and to promise, in
    reliance on the Grace of God, to serve Him with all that is in him/her, to forsake the world, to mortify the deeds
    of the flesh, and lead a godly life (membership vow #3).

    14. The prospective member is required by Scripture to train up his/her children (if any) to the glory of God and
    ensure that they receive a Christian education, consisting of doing what lies within him/her to enlighten their
    understanding, correct their temper, form their manners and habits, and fit them for their future stations in life,
    according to the counsels and commands of Holy Scripture.

    15. The prospective member agrees to submit, in the Lord, and to adhere to the government of the Reformed
    Presbyterian Church General Assembly and, in case he/she should be found delinquent in doctrine or practice,
    to submit to, heed, and abide by its discipline (membership vow #4)
    Josh
    CCRPC, RPCGA
    Board Rules -Signature Rules

    How absurd a tenet is this, which holdeth that there is some particular worship of God allowed, and not commanded? What new light is this which maketh all our divines to have been in the mist, who have acknowledged no worship of God, but that which God hath commanded? Who ever heard of commanded and allowed worship?
    - George Gillespie
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. #8
    toddpedlar's Avatar
    toddpedlar is offline. Iron Dramatist
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Decorah, IA
    Posts
    6,686
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,649 Times in 1,361 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JonathanHunt View Post
    I would have voted for 'agreement with church statement of faith' rather than 'comprehensive knowledge of church standards etc'.

    I'm looking for agreement with essential doctrine, not understanding of the minutiae of how an AGM is called, or how a deacon is ordained, and so forth.
    AGM?

    Associate GrandMother?
    Articulate Greek Man?
    Assistant Garbage Monitor?
    Argumentative Gossip Machine?
    Todd K. Pedlar
    member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
    My Blog: In Principio Deus
    Podcast I co-host: Covenant Radio
    Streaming Audio by the Co-hosts of Covenant Radio

    "As God did not at first choose you because you were high, He will not now forsake you because you are low."
    John Flavel in Keeping the Heart

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. #9
    Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
    Backwoods Presbyterian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sarver, PA
    Posts
    12,907
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    5,487
    Thanked 2,985 Times in 1,786 Posts
    I voted for 3,4,5,9,11,13,14,15,20.
    Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
    Ruling Elder Fairmount ARP Church
    Pittsburgh, PA


    "I am as happy as perhaps creation can make me. I enjoy all the necessaries and most of the conveniences of life. I have a peaceful study as a refuge from the hurries and noise of the world around me, the venerable dead are waiting in my library to entertain me..." --Samuel Davies

    Deo Vindice
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:

    Scott1 (06-30-2009)

  17. #10
    Joshua's Avatar
    Joshua is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    23,873
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    3,350
    Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,004 Posts
    For "other" I'd give room for an infant of believing parents who are members of the Church.
    Josh
    CCRPC, RPCGA
    Board Rules -Signature Rules

    How absurd a tenet is this, which holdeth that there is some particular worship of God allowed, and not commanded? What new light is this which maketh all our divines to have been in the mist, who have acknowledged no worship of God, but that which God hath commanded? Who ever heard of commanded and allowed worship?
    - George Gillespie
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  18. #11
    Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline. The MacDaddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    10,965
    Thanks
    2,840
    Thanked 3,139 Times in 1,611 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by toddpedlar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonathanHunt View Post
    I would have voted for 'agreement with church statement of faith' rather than 'comprehensive knowledge of church standards etc'.

    I'm looking for agreement with essential doctrine, not understanding of the minutiae of how an AGM is called, or how a deacon is ordained, and so forth.
    AGM?

    Associate GrandMother?
    Articulate Greek Man?
    Assistant Garbage Monitor?
    Argumentative Gossip Machine?

    Aggravating goober muncher

    arthritic gorilla mauler

    affectionate girly man
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  19. #12
    Berean's Avatar
    Berean is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Monticello, IA
    Posts
    6,834
    Thanks
    3,685
    Thanked 1,119 Times in 896 Posts
    Quiz on the PB's "Prominent Personalities"
    Norm
    IA PCA

    "What fools are they who, for a drop of pleasure, drink a sea of wrath." -Thomas Watson
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  20. #13
    Sven's Avatar
    Sven is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Eagan, MN
    Posts
    725
    Thanks
    195
    Thanked 357 Times in 198 Posts
    Other: Be able to speak in a Scottish Accent.
    Other (for PCA only): Agree to never bring up the idea of women deacons.
    Steven J. Carr (Sven)
    http://beholdingthebeauty.blogspot.com/
    Eagan, MN
    PCA
    "Weak is the effort of my heart / And cold my warmest thought / But when I see thee as thou art / I'll praise thee as I ought."--John Newton
    Trophy Wife/Arm Candy: Crystal Ann Children: Steven Jr. and Hannah Grace
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  21. #14
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Item #18

    First, renounce by word and deed known disorderly (sin) life pattern
    By this is meant if the church leaders (e.g. elders) knew that, for example, the person was living in an adulterous relationship at the time they applied for church membership.

    Would that person be accepted for membership as he was, persisting in that pattern, or must he be counseled that he does not have a credible profession of faith, and must change that pattern before being admitted to the visible church.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  22. #15
    smhbbag is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,123
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked 798 Times in 341 Posts
    What is the difference between an examined and unexamined profession of faith? What sort of 'examination' are we talking about?
    Jeremy Gage
    First Baptist Church
    Durham, NC

    "No heart can conceive that treasury of mercies which lies in this one privilege, in having liberty and ability to approach unto God at all times, according to his mind and will." - John Owen
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  23. #16
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smhbbag View Post
    What is the difference between an examined and unexamined profession of faith? What sort of 'examination' are we talking about?
    By "examined" the question means someone evaluates the basis upon which a person says they are a Christian.

    This is as opposed to someone only saying they are a Christian, and being automatically accepted on that basis into membership.

    In many reformed denominations, two church leaders (e.g. elders) would meet with the person and hear their story and try to understand the basis upon which they profess they are Christians. For example someone might say they are a Christian because their parents were, or because they thought they did good things more than bad things, etc.

    And you are aware, Jeremy, 90% of American still say they are "Christians." I think we would all agree that is not possible, given the collective life witness reflected in our nation in this generation. Rather, that we see, in this generation, as in any other the "parable of the sower" being illustrated right before us- a proving out that many who say or think they are Christians have not been, in fact, miraculously changed first by God.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  24. #17
    smhbbag is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,123
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked 798 Times in 341 Posts
    Would it be fair to say this examination operates more on the principle of finding positive evidence to support their claim ("Define your faith and show it to me by what you do"), rather than an investigation looking for something to disqualify them?
    Jeremy Gage
    First Baptist Church
    Durham, NC

    "No heart can conceive that treasury of mercies which lies in this one privilege, in having liberty and ability to approach unto God at all times, according to his mind and will." - John Owen
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  25. #18
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smhbbag View Post
    Would it be fair to say this examination operates more on the principle of finding positive evidence to support their claim ("Define your faith and show it to me by what you do"), rather than an investigation looking for something to disqualify them?
    In practice, this is going to depend on the leadership in your local church.

    The objective would be several, I would think. Two or more elders confirming that there is a credible profession of faith in the person's life.

    I take it you understand this is not an examination of being "good enough" to get in but rather, whether there is credible evidence, confirmed in the mouth of two or three witnesses that God has saved an unworthy person for His Honor and Glory. Also, one can't claim that and persist in an open, known lifestyle pattern of sin. (One of our PCA vows is to walk an orderly (obedient) Christian life- not a perfect one, but not an open one of defiance of God, either).

    Implicitly, that means that the person understands and is relying on the gospel (not a mere notion that they are a Christian or a good person), that they are not in an open pattern of sin (such as "living together" out of wedlock), that they have or will be baptized (and that they understand the basis for that).

    In the PCA at least, there is no doctrinal examination except what is necessary to establish a credible profession of faith (e.g. understands justification by faith in Christ's righteousness alone, even if they don't know that terminology). There may be a bit about baptism. A new member only vows to learn the church's doctrine peaceably.

    There are some reformed denominations that require more examination of the church's confessed doctrine (but that is not the focus of your question as it relates to "examined for a credible profession of faith.")

    If the person is not ready for membership in the visible church, they can be encouraged to further study, mentoring, etc. It's also a time to learn of their needs (which can be relayed back to the Deacons).

    Remember, in the end, reformed theology takes a "high view" of the Church. While it may be common in broadly evangelical circles to think the church is merely a loose association of consenting adults, Scripture teaches a view of some authority in the visible church. Not authority to determine salvation, God alone controls that, but authority by which to govern and discipline.

    It's an institution governed by officers whom He appoints, where we learn to get along, be accountable, and submit to the brethren. Sin will happen, and God will cause scandalous sin to become known. He gives the church some authority, not to determine their salvation, but to discipline it for the peace and purity of His Church, and for His Honor and Glory.

    Oh, that God's people, by His grace would come to understand that they will one day be judged by their behavior. (Yes, even Christian will be "judged"- this life is not a game centered on our egos or thoughts).

    One way it happened for us was two elders visited us at home. They asked us each to share our testimony. They asked a few questions about our baptism, church past, etc. Then, we had a prayer time- I think they prayed for us, and we prayed for them.

    For us, it really was more a warm time of fellowship.
    Last edited by Scott1; 07-02-2009 at 08:35 AM.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Scott1 For This Useful Post:

    smhbbag (07-02-2009)

  27. #19
    Unashamed 116's Avatar
    Unashamed 116 is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ft Rucker Al
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 194 Times in 126 Posts
    I said a confession of faith and baptism. While I think other ideas are good practices for members to adhere to I really think that Acts 2:41 gives us the standard. After this any issues that arise doctrinally or in the lifestyle are to be handled as Church discipline issues.
    Joseph F Scibbe
    Chaplain Assistant
    Chapel of Wings Ft Rucker Al
    Ephesians 1:4-7, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, Romans 12:1-2
    Titus 2:2 - But you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.

    http://twitter.com/just_joe_scibbe
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  28. #20
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 View Post
    I said a confession of faith and baptism. While I think other ideas are good practices for members to adhere to I really think that Acts 2:41 gives us the standard. After this any issues that arise doctrinally or in the lifestyle are to be handled as Church discipline issues.
    Do you mean by that that if God causes scandalous sin to become known beforehand to the church, that a person ought be admitted on basis of profession (saying only they are a Christian) and baptism?

    My question understands "scandalous sin" to be a lifestyle pattern given over to sin that is open and God causes to become known to the church. It's not about incidental sin, but a lifestyle pattern that appears to be that of the ungodly (e.g. living in an adulterous relationship, even though the person may justify that in their own imagination).
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  29. #21
    SolaScriptura's Avatar
    SolaScriptura is offline now. Puritanboard Postgraduate
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Manhattan, KS
    Posts
    4,549
    Thanks
    576
    Thanked 2,586 Times in 968 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
    Add:

    --knowledge of secret reformed handshake,

    --trivia quiz about biography of Calvin,

    --A brand on the backside with a capital C

    --physical fitness test involving vigorous Calvin-sthenics

    --Full beard and.or at least 4 kids.

    --Knowing how to flash the Calvy gang symbols.
    Ben
    Chaplain, US Army
    Ft. Riley, KS
    TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  30. #22
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    The poll has closed.

    There are a lot of different ideas about what biblically ought be required for church membership in order to protect the peace and purity of Christ's Church.

    Combined, about 89% said baptism previous to membership was required, with 33% saying any nominal Christian church baptism was sufficient.

    Large majorities, but not quite overwhelming majorities would require the following (69.5% said these):

    1) Examined (credible) profession of faith
    2) Public profession of faith (e.g. before the congregation)
    3) Vow to submit to government and discipline of the church


    Then slightly less (64.5%) said

    1) Vow to walk an orderly (obedient) life in Christ

    Then there is a big drop, with all the other choices around 54% or less, most below 30%

    About 31% would require either comprehensive knowledge of the church's doctrine standards or both that knowledge and stated agreement with them before one could become a member.

    -----Added 7/2/2009 at 09:30:04 EST-----

    It seems to me the biblical guidance is not real specific or clear about the particulars of church membership. We can't be dogmatic about the particulars and would have to recognize the scriptures tend toward the simplicity of believing, baptizing and walking orderly lives, as befitting their profession:

    It may be too much, because this is not clearly detailed in Scripture, but in the interest of protecting the church, her peace and purity and Christ's reputation, here's my list:

    1) Examined (credible) profession of faith
    2) Examination by elders, ordinarily in the home
    3) Public profession of faith (e.g. before the congregation)
    4) Baptism, previous by evangelical church only
    5) Member class- More than 10 class sessions
    6) Vow to walk an orderly (obedient) life in Christ
    7) Vow to submit to government and discipline of the church
    8) Vow to peaceably study the church's doctrine
    9) Vote of church leaders (e.g. session) to admit
    10) First, renounce by word and deed known disorderly (sin) life pattern
    11) Vow to support church (prayers, efforts, tithes)

    This is the way it mostly happened for me in the PCA, and I'm glad for it.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  31. #23
    Brad's Avatar
    Brad is offline. Puritanboard Postgraduate
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    Posts
    4,003
    Thanks
    1,069
    Thanked 1,392 Times in 835 Posts
    4) Baptism, previous by evangelical church only
    So you would baptise RC's?
    Brad
    Member- Eagle Heights PCA
    Winchester, VA

    Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

    Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  32. #24
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad View Post
    4) Baptism, previous by evangelical church only
    So you would baptise RC's?

    After considering this biblically, I still can't get past the fact that a church that does not officially, at least, hold to the (biblical) gospel does not really have authority to perform a valid baptism. So, yes.

    It seems to me the very object of baptism is salvation. If that (the gospel) is not only not held, but "anathemas" are pronounced upon it, then it would seem the authority of communion is not there.
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  33. #25
    Christian Soldier's Avatar
    Christian Soldier is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
    Add:

    --knowledge of secret reformed handshake,

    --trivia quiz about biography of Calvin,

    --A brand on the backside with a capital C

    --physical fitness test involving vigorous Calvin-sthenics

    --Full beard and.or at least 4 kids.

    --Knowing how to flash the Calvy gang symbols.
    Shane
    1689 LBCF
    Rosemont Baptist Church
    Winston-Salem, NC
    www.rosemontbaptist.com

    "Tis not that I did choose thee, for Lord that could not be. This heart would still refuse thee, hadst thou not chosen me."
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  34. #26
    Edward's Avatar
    Edward is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Plano TX
    Posts
    2,639
    Thanks
    827
    Thanked 887 Times in 592 Posts
    [quote=Scott1;646843]
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad View Post
    It seems to me the very object of baptism is salvation.
    That sounds like it is heading toward baptismal regeneration. It's certainly farther than Westminster goes.
    Edward
    Deacon
    PCA
    Texas
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  35. #27
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    [quote=Edward;646846]
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad View Post
    It seems to me the very object of baptism is salvation.
    That sounds like it is heading toward baptismal regeneration. It's certainly farther than Westminster goes.
    Not at all- the Westminster Divines did a great job of distinguishing between the sign and the "thing signified". It is not baptism regenerating.

    (The context here, Edward, was whether to be a member one had to have baptism by an "evangelical" church beforehand or a merely "nominal" one (which would include Roman). The Roman churches teaches baptismal regeneration and that's not biblical either (along with officially denying the gospel).
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  36. #28
    Edward's Avatar
    Edward is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Plano TX
    Posts
    2,639
    Thanks
    827
    Thanked 887 Times in 592 Posts
    The validity of Roman baptisms has been debated by better men than us.

    PCA Historical Center: Index to the Position Papers of the Presbyterian Church in America

    As to the WCF:

    V. Although it is a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance, yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated, or saved, without it: or, that all that are baptized are undoubtedly regenerated.
    Edward
    Deacon
    PCA
    Texas
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to Edward For This Useful Post:

    Scott1 (07-03-2009)

  38. #29
    Scott1's Avatar
    Scott1 is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    6,000
    Thanks
    2,375
    Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,369 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    The validity of Roman baptisms has been debated by better men than us.

    PCA Historical Center: Index to the Position Papers of the Presbyterian Church in America

    As to the WCF:

    V. Although it is a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance, yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated, or saved, without it: or, that all that are baptized are undoubtedly regenerated.
    Yes, and for those following, the study report is well researched biblically and well written.

    The report was 4 to 1 against the validity of Roman baptisms. What that means is that there was a "majority" report and "minority" report. What that means in our PCA polity is that there is not really an authoritative position on this in our denomination, even though an overwhelming majority on the committee were of one view. (This is a classic example of why a pre-determined divided committee on "women's issues" will not resolve anything or bring clarity in the PCA).

    What this tells me, while I am inclined to believe biblically Roman baptisms are not valid baptisms, there really are two possible biblical views on this.

    Incidentally, I have noted that some influential churches in our denomination take the position that while Roman baptisms are valid and administered but once, would be members who are uncomfortable with that may be "re"-baptized. I'm not necessarily commending that as the biblical practice, only reporting practice.

    You may find helpful previous threads on this topic here on Puritan Board:
    Is Roman Catholic Baptism valid?
    Validity of Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Baptisms (this one had a poll also)
    Scott
    PCA
    North Carolina



    "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
    Hebrews 10:23
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69