The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Order

Church Order Discussions related to issues of Church Order: administration of the Sacraments, Church discipline, conduct of meetings, and suggested forms.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:57 AM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Volunteer Background Checks

I was not sure where this would go, but I will try here. I have a question about volunteer background checks. We are about (in one month) to move into our new building, and with that, anticipating new(er) members. We are considering implementing a very simple criminal background check (like the $10 per check kind). The idea would be to search (pretty much) just for felony convictions, especially crimes related to minors.

Anyway, I would be interested if anyone knows if there church has such a background check policy or not (and what the approximate size of the church is). I would also like to know if you do not, whether that was a conscious decision, or whether it is just something that has not yet been on the radar.

This information will be a big help to me, so thanks in advance.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:01 AM
Albatross's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 131
Thanks: 12
Thanked 26 Times in 17 Posts
Our church is working to implement background checks as well. We have roughly 400 members.
__________________
David
PCA
Bartlett, TN

Who am I, O Lord God, and what is my house,
that you have brought me thus far?
2 Samuel 7:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:28 AM
OPC'n's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Blog Entries: 8
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
I think it's a wonderful idea! Our church is very, very small so we don't do it yet.
__________________
sarah
WI
OPC
My Pastor's Sermons: Mark Jenkins...he's awesome!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:33 AM
ericfromcowtown's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 492
Thanks: 201
Thanked 139 Times in 84 Posts
I know that our church (130 people) is implementing background checks etc... There may be different legal issues up here in Canada (or maybe not), but I believe that we are largely being pushed to implement something formal by our insurance company.
__________________
Eric
Woodgreen Presbyterian (PCA)
Calgary, Alberta CANADA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:34 AM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,120
Thanks: 495
Thanked 2,302 Times in 845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Anyway, I would be interested if anyone knows if there church has such a background check policy or not (and what the approximate size of the church is). I would also like to know if you do not, whether that was a conscious decision, or whether it is just something that has not yet been on the radar.

This information will be a big help to me, so thanks in advance.
Fred -

The mid-size (250 attendees) EFCA church at which I was an intern had a background check for anyone wanting to work with children/youth. In addition, the Baptist church at which I was a member prior to becoming a Presbyterian also had that type of policy in place.

I think it is a good idea. I think that in the event that something should happen and if someone tries to file a lawsuit, I think that having a policy like that in place would go a long way towards demonstrating that you did all you could to prevent it. (And I'm not just talking about demonstrating that to a court... but perhaps more importantly, to the community who will certainly hear about the situation through the all-too-eager-to-find-fault-with-churches media.)
__________________
Ben
Chaplain, US Army
Ft. Riley, KS
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:35 AM
LawrenceU's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,454 Posts
At the past three churches I was at we did. One was small about 50 the others were larger, around 200. In my opinion if you are going to have any sort of time where children will be away from their parents and supervised by other adults background checks are imperative. You would be sadly surprised at how many people will fail the check for legitimate reasons.

As I began to study this it became apparent that pedophiles target churches, especially smaller churches. They know that usually there are not enough people willing to work in the nursery, children's groups, etc. And, they know that a smaller church is more likely to not do background checks. Just check with your insurer's loss control department. They will back up what I said.

This is one pragmatic reason for family integrated ministry.
As we
__________________
We shall not adjust our Bible to the age; but before we have done with it, by God's grace, we shall adjust the age to the Bible. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon

Lawrence Underwood, Jr.
Pastor - Providence Family Fellowship / Mobile, Alabama
1644/46 LBC
My Blog - Imprimis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LawrenceU For This Useful Post:
LadyFlynt (02-27-2009), OPC'n (02-27-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:50 AM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Let me add one piece of information - would the answer be the same if there was a strict policy of requiring two adults in the room at all times?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:52 AM
LawrenceU's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,454 Posts
Yes. No exceptions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:02 AM
Kevin's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,573
Thanks: 1,579
Thanked 927 Times in 483 Posts
I was in a church that adopted that policy with great controversy.

The opposition to the policy ws that we aught not to allow the state (in this case the RCMP) have any say on the qualifications for a person to hold office or serve the church.

The issue was being pushed by insurance companies.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Kevin For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (02-27-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:05 AM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,828
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,449
Thanked 6,035 Times in 2,448 Posts
Fred,

I'm not sure a background check for every person that does nursery is necessary and I think that the goal you're trying to achieve is good but I'm going to offer some random thoughts on what I've seen. I know you're very prudent in how you address a situation. Please don't interpret what follows as theaching you anything that I think you know but just observations in general to any reader.

The Pastor in my parent Church (Doug Kittredge) made a good observation that children are one of those things that stops the mouths of fools so to speak. In other words, unbelieving people are confronted with the testimony of God's handiwork at the birth of a child and many go to Church (or go back to Church) for the first time at the birth of their kids. Doug considers (and I agree) a good nursery as an incredibly important aspect of a Church that wants to reach the lost.

Parents want a safe, clean, and organized place to drop off their children. I have personally witnessed people who leave a Church and not come back because people were late for nursery or it seemed chaotic. Barring whatever our convictions about having our children with us during worship, the Church ought to be a place where people can grow in their own convictions regarding this. Parents of small children naturally are concerned that the place they put their kids is very clean and well organized and the impression is that "...we know what we're doing, we're safe, and your child will be well cared for and not get sick here...."

A few things that I have seen that are very sound:

1. I think it ought to be something that many people throughout the congregation are encouraged to participate in. After all, I've vowed to build up the smallest to the oldest in my congregation. I think having husbands and wives signed up together for a particular Sunday is a good thing.

2. Having a large across the board mix of couples that are trustworthy in the same room mitigates any kind of desire on the person coming in to have them produce paperwork that demonstrates they've had a criminal background check. There's sort of a built in trust established that you can tell that it's not just one man or one woman watching the kids but a few couples that are involved and they're friendly, responsible types.

3. A numbering system is a good thing. Have log with the kids name and parents and then pin a number on the child and give the number to the parents. Some Churches will even have a system that will flash the number in case there's a problem so the parents have the added benefit of knowing that they can be quietly contacted. Also, the parent knows they can't just have somebody come take their kid unless the number shows up.

4. Have a checklist for the volunteers who do the job. We do it in the military where you stand duty for the first time and you have to know that you have to accomplish certain things. In one Church, after you're done, you have a detailed process of washing each and every toy in a bleach/water mixture and putting them in the dish rack. Mom and Dad know that kids won't get sick from dirty toys.

I think all of the above put together ameliorates the need for background checks. I think encouraging families to participate in the caring of the youth is a good thing and, for reasons of prudence, you wouldn't want to have to institute a policy of background checks for every family that watches kids.
__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:
Knoxienne (02-27-2009), LadyFlynt (02-27-2009), turmeric (02-27-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:08 AM
LawrenceU's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,454 Posts
Edit: Not a reply to Rich's post. A reply to the detractors in Kevin's.

We had people who made the same argument. IMHO it is as lame as lame can be. The state is making no decision. It is offering information to which the church deserves access. The church can decide to ignore the information given. I have known of one case where the happened. The man involved had been found guilty of statutory rape as an 18 year old. It had been consensual sex with a minor girl before his conversion. He was in his forties with a consistent faithful walk behind him.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LawrenceU For This Useful Post:
brianeschen (02-27-2009), Kevin (02-27-2009), whitway (02-27-2009)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:17 AM
larryjf's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,928
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 133
Thanked 595 Times in 356 Posts
We have about 100 members in our church.
We do full background checks on anyone who works with youth. Other than that we don't check backgrounds.

Most counties have resources online where you can enter a person's name and see their criminal record for free. Normally it's the Clerk of Courts or the County Clerk website. Others have a county website that links to a searchable database of criminal records.
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
Christian ritual costs nothing and is worth nothing. True Christian religion costs all that we have and is worth everything.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:04 PM
VictorBravo's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,315
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,857 Times in 967 Posts
One observation based upon a case I defended last year. Make sure of two things, (1) that if the background check reveals something bad, that your chuch has a procedure in place in advance to deal with how to handle it, and (2) consider implementing a relatively thorough check and consult with your insurer.

The case I had was not a Reformed Church, but rather was a fairly liberal Lutheran church with a female pastor. Their insurer required background checks for people who worked with children, but they only required a minimal county-level search going back 3 years.

After a number of years, the insurer required a state-wide check going back 10 years. It turned out that one of the Sunday School teachers (he had been in this position for 2 years) was convicted of misdemeanor indecent exposure to children in a neighboring county about 4 years before he became a Sunday School teacher.

The pastor, justifiable concerned, dealt with it on an ad hoc basis by privately asking him to relinquish his membership in the church instead of simply removing him from the position. He put up a fight, so the pastor called a congregational meeting, telling the entire congregation what the issue was and stating that she was not going to allow a sex offender to be teaching children.

So, a defamation lawsuit followed, alleging all sorts of emotional distress, damage to business reputation, etc.

In the end, I was able to dismiss the case on the grounds that the government cannot interfere with a church decision regarding its members, but it was difficult. It would have been much better if the church had followed its own constitution and book of order in dealing with this. The end result would have been the same: removal of the teacher and dismissal from membership (because he was unrepentant over lying about his past), but it would have been much easier to keep out of court.
__________________
Raymond Victor Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VictorBravo For This Useful Post:
LadyFlynt (02-27-2009), Scottish Lass (02-27-2009)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:22 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,302
Thanks: 685
Thanked 363 Times in 207 Posts
My small (75 or so members) ARP church requires a background check for anyone working in the nursery/children's Sunday School. My wife had to do it. The church paid for it. It really didn't affect us at all, and although I have no reason to worry about anyone in the congregation, I suppose it could put some people (especially those new to the church who may not know the ladies working in the nursery) at ease. I don't see how that could be a bad thing.

I believe, but someone more knowledgeable than myself could correct me if I'm wrong, that a background check like the one at my church is standard procedure at all ARP congregations.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 12:54 PM
Kevin's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,573
Thanks: 1,579
Thanked 927 Times in 483 Posts
In my expirience Seth it is not SOP in the ARP or any other denom. It is however a growing issue.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:06 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,302
Thanks: 685
Thanked 363 Times in 207 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
In my expirience Seth it is not SOP in the ARP or any other denom. It is however a growing issue.
Perhaps it is just the Presbytery of which my congregation is a member? I know it was more than just our local congregation's policy.

But, thank you.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:32 PM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
My Church of 100 folks automatically does this for all folks planning on working in the Nursery but now that I'm thinking of it I believe it is required by the State. In either case I believe it to be common sense to do so these days.
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:38 PM
Scottish Lass's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,031
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 534 Times in 402 Posts
It's not standard policy in the MVP of the ARP, nor Second Presbytery unless very recently revised. I've taught SS and kept nursery in both presbyteries without a check.
__________________
Anna
Wife of Tim/Marrow Man
Louisville, KY
Member of Midlane Park Presbyterian (Associate Reformed Presbyterian)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:45 PM
Knoxienne's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 969 Times in 581 Posts
I don't like this at all. Too much Big Brother for me.

My opinion of Sunday School and Nursery (among other traditional programs in the Church) is another topic altogether.
__________________
Toni Cunningham, Wife of Bill (Theognome)
Parkwoods OPC, Overland Park KS


"Vice is a monster of so frightful mien, As, to be hated, needs but to be seen; Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face, We first endure, then pity, then embrace." ~ Alexander Pope
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:11 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,814
Thanks: 889
Thanked 1,063 Times in 704 Posts
fred

Our church does background checks on anyone who works at or volunteers at the church...but they don't do them on people who do not volunteer.

But all volunteers at our church are required to take a course (Covenant Care) that discusses child safety and protection issues---at the end of the course they sign a form agreeing to a background check..
__________________
Bobbi Clark
Covenant Member
Pinewood Pres. (PCA) Middleburg

When I kept Silent, My bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Psalm 32:3

Last edited by BJClark; 02-27-2009 at 04:34 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:20 PM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 179
Thanked 615 Times in 356 Posts
Paedophiles do target churches and even if there is a two adult per room policy this is at best an aspiration which over time will not be kept on every possible occasion.

It is heartbreaking when this sort of thing happens and the damage it does is beyond measure. We are Calvinists, we know how dark mans heart is.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."

Last edited by Hippo; 02-27-2009 at 04:44 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post:
brianeschen (02-27-2009)
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:43 PM
JonathanHunt's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 325
Thanked 530 Times in 296 Posts
We background check everyone involved in ministry with vulnerable people, whether that is child or adult ministry.
__________________
Jonathan Hunt

Elder holding forth the word of life at:
Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:46 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,828
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,449
Thanked 6,035 Times in 2,448 Posts
I offered my post as a point of view and am not going to tell a Church that ought not conduce background checks but I think folks need to realize they give up something when they do this. They ought to weigh in the balance what the pros/cons of that decision is.

I would imagine, for instance, that there are probably States that require that childcare workers be certified with CPR. A child could choke or go into cardiac arrest too and the Church might be liable under those situations.

Again, I don't want to ever tell somebody: "Don't worry about the liability..." but folks ought not think that a background check has no problems inherent in itself. It's not going to catch all the potential problems.

Also, as I noted above, there is something to be said about making childcare a "Covenantal responsibility" and I appreciated being a part of a Church were every couple could volunteer for nursery duty one schedule. It gives others a break and the ability to participate in worship more often. If a Church was to make background checks policy then everybody who joined would also get the "...and, by the way, we do background checks...." It's just not a cut and dry "It's better to do them than not" and folks should weigh their options.

There are ways to be responsible about the process that shows due diligence and care than assuming that the magic bullet of a background check will solve it. In fact, the background check might give false confidence so one doesn't think about other ways to provide confidence that childcare is safe and friendly.

When I was growing up it was enough to know that a teenage girl was a responsible kid. Now, in certain places, you have to get CPR qualified to do it. Is the situation better? I guess on one level but part of me wearies of a society that "professionalizes" everything.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 04:53 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
Meum cerebrum nocet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,508
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
Our Baptist congregation of 450 avg. attn. rquires background checks on workers with children and youth.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 05:11 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountain Lake Park, MD
Posts: 1,103
Thanks: 366
Thanked 284 Times in 197 Posts
I guess I'm just shocked by this. It saddens me that, in today's world, we even have to do this "background check thing." But, what else are big churches to do....and churches who don't have enough volunteers that they know really well as christians to help out? I, for one, as a parent, do not let my children to be left in the nursery unless I personally know the person I'm leaving them with, or unless someone who I personally know and trust knows the person I'm leaving them with. I keep my children with me during the service, and I go outside of the meeting with them if they cry or are the least bit disruptive. I don't intend to judge those who do differently, and who are okay with doing otherwise, but this is just my preference. As a provider and a protector, I just have certain stipulations within my own conscience, I suppose. To me, if I took a suitcase to church filled with a million dollars, I would think of it the same way. Would I just drop it off in another room for 2 hours with people who are strangers to me, to have them watch over it, and be comforted with the idea that they have had criminal background checks done on them? I wonder how many really would do differently if they were leaving that much money with strangers instead of their children. But, if I were a church leader, I guess I could see the necessity for it, as many lawsuits are had for nearly any reason at all. IMO, however, if I leave my children with someone who I don't know enough to fully trust them with my kids, then it's my fault, not the church's, if something tragic happens. I would want someone to sue me for passing off my responsibility of husbandry onto some church leader who was in charge of selecting the helpers for a nursery. That's how I tend to view if for myself at this time.

Blessings!
__________________
Charles Plauger
Member/Grace Reformed Church
Oakland, MD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 05:29 PM
VictorBravo's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,315
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,857 Times in 967 Posts
BTW, despite my recommendations regarding background checks above, I should have stated that our church does not do background checks as such. (If you ignore the extreme vigilance of our deacons).

We don't think it is necessary because we are fairly small, only mothers of the infants or long-time members who are mothers are allowed in the nursery, and we don't have youth programs anyway. There are always at least two mothers with the youngest at all times. The other youths are in the assembly.

But, bigger churches have different issues, I'm sure.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 05:32 PM
jambo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisburn, Northern Ireland, UK
Posts: 763
Thanks: 179
Thanked 402 Times in 225 Posts
We have this system here in the UK which is aimed at those working with children and vulnerable people. I find it a complete pain. Children need to be protected, church leadership/volunteers etc must be transparant and the church must be seen to be doing things properly and legally. However I find things have gone from one extreme to the other. It is a bit Orwellian and an example of the state trying to influence the church. It is true that if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear but I was watching a recent TV documentry about innocent people who have the same names as offenders being denied jobs because of it.
__________________
Stuart
Elder, Lambeg Baptist, Northern Ireland, UK

In Him the fulness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form and in Him you are complete (Col 2.9-10)

The Christian is a person who makes it easy for others to believe in God. (RM M'Cheyne)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 06:13 PM
Herald's Avatar
Uncommon Denominator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,941
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,295 Times in 1,654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
I was not sure where this would go, but I will try here. I have a question about volunteer background checks. We are about (in one month) to move into our new building, and with that, anticipating new(er) members. We are considering implementing a very simple criminal background check (like the $10 per check kind). The idea would be to search (pretty much) just for felony convictions, especially crimes related to minors.

Anyway, I would be interested if anyone knows if there church has such a background check policy or not (and what the approximate size of the church is). I would also like to know if you do not, whether that was a conscious decision, or whether it is just something that has not yet been on the radar.

This information will be a big help to me, so thanks in advance.
We perform a background check for childrens workers only. It is not required for membership. Personally, I would not join a church if a background check was required solely for membership.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Reformed Baptist
Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Visit my BLOG Theology for the Rest of Us
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 06:47 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
I was not sure where this would go, but I will try here. I have a question about volunteer background checks. We are about (in one month) to move into our new building, and with that, anticipating new(er) members. We are considering implementing a very simple criminal background check (like the $10 per check kind). The idea would be to search (pretty much) just for felony convictions, especially crimes related to minors.

Anyway, I would be interested if anyone knows if there church has such a background check policy or not (and what the approximate size of the church is). I would also like to know if you do not, whether that was a conscious decision, or whether it is just something that has not yet been on the radar.

This information will be a big help to me, so thanks in advance.

We perform a background check for childrens workers only. It is not required for membership. Personally, I would not join a church if a background check was required solely for membership.

Let me clarify in case I have been misunderstood: the question is regarding background checks for those members who volunteer to work with youth. There would be no check for membership, and no check if the person was not working with children/youth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 06:53 PM
Herald's Avatar
Uncommon Denominator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,941
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,295 Times in 1,654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
I was not sure where this would go, but I will try here. I have a question about volunteer background checks. We are about (in one month) to move into our new building, and with that, anticipating new(er) members. We are considering implementing a very simple criminal background check (like the $10 per check kind). The idea would be to search (pretty much) just for felony convictions, especially crimes related to minors.

Anyway, I would be interested if anyone knows if there church has such a background check policy or not (and what the approximate size of the church is). I would also like to know if you do not, whether that was a conscious decision, or whether it is just something that has not yet been on the radar.

This information will be a big help to me, so thanks in advance.

We perform a background check for childrens workers only. It is not required for membership. Personally, I would not join a church if a background check was required solely for membership.

Let me clarify in case I have been misunderstood: the question is regarding background checks for those members who volunteer to work with youth. There would be no check for membership, and no check if the person was not working with children/youth.
Gotcha. I misread your post. Sorry 'bout dat.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:03 PM
SemperEruditio's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montgomery Village, MD
Posts: 836
Thanks: 396
Thanked 319 Times in 154 Posts
Our church will. They have the policy in place and anyone involved with children will be required to have one done. My previous non-denominational church tried it and it was met with friction. There were a number of ex-convicts but their issue was one of privacy. None had any charges which dealt with children but they felt once their past was revealed they would be treated differently...and they were.
__________________
Frank
Under Care
P.C.A.
Maryland
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to SemperEruditio For This Useful Post:
moral necessity (02-27-2009)
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:52 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,038
Thanks: 626
Thanked 682 Times in 444 Posts
Yes, for officer candidates and anyone who is volunteering to work with children. The list may be larger; those are the only categories with which I am familiar.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:27 PM
Brad's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 3,178
Thanks: 749
Thanked 1,048 Times in 628 Posts
Hmmm. I see the point of objections based on the involvement of the state, and I see the need from the possiblity of litigation. Would a background check through a private provider solve that problem? I know they're out there. It is a sad state of affairs that we've come to this, but come to this we have.
__________________
Brad
Member- Eagle Heights PCA
Winchester, VA

Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:51 PM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,120
Thanks: 495
Thanked 2,302 Times in 845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Let me clarify in case I have been misunderstood: the question is regarding background checks for those members who volunteer to work with youth. There would be no check for membership, and no check if the person was not working with children/youth.
Awwww, man! I was hoping you were going to do a background check - and possibly a credit check - on all potential members as part of the process to determine if they are good enough to "make the team."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:02 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,814
Thanks: 889
Thanked 1,063 Times in 704 Posts
Well, I also know from experience just because a person has a background check done it doesn't really mean anything.

I know of an instance in a church where someone was a volunteer with the youth, had a background check done, nothing was found, the reason being is they just hadn't been caught--it was found out later they were molesting their own child..they hadn't touched any other children..but that didn't matter..so yes, sometimes, the background checks can be misleading..and give a false sense of security..

But at the same time, it has also been a deterrent for others when they know they will do a back ground check..we had someone come in to apply for a position at our church, and when they were told we do back ground checks they left..they went to a different church and applied--and hired, they didn't do a back ground check..someone who went to the church recognized the person as someone who had been on the news a few months earlier..for molesting children at a local daycare (the former daycare had been closed down, and the person was out of jail on bond)

Last edited by BJClark; 02-27-2009 at 10:27 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:15 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,400
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,836 Times in 1,469 Posts
Wow, I guess I am naive. This is the first time I have ever heard of background checks for any sort of church service.

Is this the norm? What percentage of churches do this?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:28 PM
VictorBravo's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,315
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,857 Times in 967 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Wow, I guess I am naive. This is the first time I have ever heard of background checks for any sort of church service.

Is this the norm? What percentage of churches do this?
I'd be willing to guess that most churches that have significant liability insurance policies do it, because insurance companies hate defending these kind of cases.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to VictorBravo For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (02-27-2009)
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:52 PM
sans nom's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: wandering around
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 155
Thanked 315 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Paedophiles do target churches and even if there is a two adult per room policy this is at best an aspiration which over time will not be kept on every possible occasion.
I agree completely.

Our current church does not require checks for nursery workers; previous churches (mid sized) have required the checks. We do require the workers to be members, or in some cases the teenage children of members.

Optimally, I would see all members who work with children or youth, including the pastor(s), have a full background check. Other ideas posted above are nice, but the check is necessary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJClark
I know of an instance in a church where someone was a volunteer with the youth, had a background check done, nothing was found, the reason being is they just hadn't been caught..
This is why other safeguards need to be in place:

*More than one person
*married members working together
*rotating
*video cameras
*signing children in/out
__________________
Matt
Reformed Baptist
Christ Community Church
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:04 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,400
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,836 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Wow, I guess I am naive. This is the first time I have ever heard of background checks for any sort of church service.

Is this the norm? What percentage of churches do this?
I'd be willing to guess that most churches that have significant liability insurance policies do it, because insurance companies hate defending these kind of cases.
WOw! How many churches have liability insurance?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:10 PM
VictorBravo's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,315
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,857 Times in 967 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Wow, I guess I am naive. This is the first time I have ever heard of background checks for any sort of church service.

Is this the norm? What percentage of churches do this?
I'd be willing to guess that most churches that have significant liability insurance policies do it, because insurance companies hate defending these kind of cases.
WOw! How many churches have liability insurance?
It is not unusual at all, these days. Someone slips in the parking lot, spills coffee on a visitor, or, worse (Catholic dioceses are going bankrupt in some places--they were self-insured). If you have a "program" inviting the public to participate, your church is exposed as well.

When I started practicing law about 17 years ago, you could still raise a church immunity defense. That's pretty much gone in most states. (I think--at least it is gone in the west).

Our firm has had more than 6 church lawsuits come in last year. They are targets.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to VictorBravo For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (02-27-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69