» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 119 | | 43 members and 76 guests | | austinww, bisonrancher, Blueridge Believer, Bookmeister, Brad, brianeschen, Chaplainintraining, Chippy, Damaged Goods, David, Dwimble, Eoghan, gene_mingo, glorifyinggodinwv, Hebrew Student, J. David Kear, KMK, Knight, KSon, Lincolnshire Paul, markkoller, NateLanning, Puritan Sailor, Re4mdant, Reformed Thomist, Rich Coffeen, satz, Southern Presbyterian, tabrooks, timmopussycat, TimV, TrueConvert, Von Stroh | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
11-05-2009, 07:27 PM
|  | Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,170
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 1,423 Times in 1,063 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lanier Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lanier
Herein lies the problem because if we look at the definition of synergism Synergism: "In theol., the doctrine that there are two efficient agents in [that are necessary as precursors for] regeneration, namely the human will and the divine Spirit, which, in the strict sense of the term, cooperate." In this view, faith precedes new birth (or regeneration)."
If one claims Christ alone can save they are by definition not a synergist.  | Here's the problem: you are lumping everyone in this catergory. Again, you are wrong. In the SBC, you must take every individual pastor and each individual church into account.
From your statement you are saying that I am a synergist. I am not. |
Ivan,
I apologize if I gave that impression. In one of my earlier posts I said:
"I couldn't with a good conscience remain as a pastor in the SBC. Others have made other decisions. Those are my thoughts. No offense to the Founders men on this board."
I apologize if I have lumped those who do not believe these things in with those who do. I did not intend to offend you in any way. I should have possibly chosen my words in other posts more carefully. | Thank you. Apology accepted.
__________________ Ivan R. Schoen, B.A., M.A., M.L.I.S.
Pastor of Maranatha Baptist Church (SBC)
Poplar Grove, IL, USA http://maranatha-sbc.org | | The Following User Says Thank You to Ivan For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 08:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | |
Ivan, what is your perspective on my questions? You were one of the people in particular that I wanted to hear from.
| 
11-06-2009, 12:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Fredericktown, MO
Posts: 151
Thanks: 45
Thanked 41 Times in 27 Posts
| | |
Fellow PBer's,
Is there anyway to agree that the prophet Isaiah's words will bring this argument under a little more biblical light as he stated "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. " Isa 55:8-9?
I was saved while attending a SBC church and have served as deacon in the SBC for 15 plus years, and I never saw the likes of the Arminainism spoken of here. Yes over the years the SBC has fallen into the seeker sensitive gospel lite, and this is one reason why I have left the SBC, but I still believe the SBC proclaims salvation in Christ alone and not by works. This argument has been around for almost 500 years now and no one has proven to me the correct answer except God Almighty through Isaiah. His ways are not ours. We should denounce salvation by works boldly but also be careful not to lump those in who may not evangelize in the same way we prefer. We must be careful to point a finger at a brother in Christ and claim heresy when God tells us we won't always understand all His ways.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to SolaSaint For This Useful Post: | | 
11-06-2009, 10:06 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Valera, Texas
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
| | |
Well, throw rocks at SBC if you wish, but before I was saved the ONLY ones who ever shared the gospel with me were Southern Baptist. I've never had anyone from the reformed persuasion knock on my door or even at act like they were interested in knowing if I knew Christ. I know there are those that do, but SBCers reach people with the gospel, which IS the power of God unto salvation (hmmmm, that's in the Bible I think). They don't to try make people Calvinist or any other "ist." Calvinism is not the the power of God unto salvation.
When I was saved, I didn't know election/Calvinism from a hole in the ground, yet I was a follower of Christ. I learned of my election later, yet I was still just as saved.
__________________
Ralph
Pastor
Valera Baptist Church
Valera, Texas
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to busdriver72 For This Useful Post: | | 
11-06-2009, 10:46 AM
|  | Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,170
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 1,423 Times in 1,063 Posts
| | |
Andrew, I've been a Southern Baptist since I was almost 16 years old. I attended a Sunday School of the same Southern Baptist Church prior to that. I've broaden my perspective considerably since than. I've been in contact with many Christians from many different denominations, not all that I agree with. Still, I look for ways to interact with them.
Almost the same could be said within the SBC. There are some SBC churches that are very much like the ones that have been portrayed in a negative light here. There are some who are more Calvinistic than many Presbyterian churches.
I'm not interested in finding out how different I am than other Christians. I want to find out what I have in common. With that I see if I can cooperate and have a relationship with others.
If we want to finely define very jot and tittle and every nook and cranny of every single doctrine to make positively sure that we are in line with every possible subject we will soon find ourselves "enjoying" the company of no one and will be very, very alone.
I choose to find how I can work with others rather than how I can avoid others.
| | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ivan For This Useful Post: | | 
11-06-2009, 11:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | |
I like your perspective, Ivan. Thank you. The questions in my original post were questions that a local pastor asked me. I suggested something very similar to what you said in defense of a local SBC pastor. However, the pastor responded by saying that as a whole the SBC is weak on the gospel because as a whole there is so much semi-Pelagianism. He said there is no good reason to stay connected since that would be like supporting their weak-gospel cause. Thus, it would be best to leave the camp. I didn't have much of an answer. What are your thoughts on that concern?
| 
11-06-2009, 12:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Angleton, Texas
Posts: 88
Thanks: 3
Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
| |
Despite what some individual churches might believe, the SBC's statement of faith, is at the very least a mildly Calvinist document. Notice, that among other things, that they have regeneration preceding rather than resulting from, repentance and faith...
"A. Regeneration, or the new birth, is a work of God's grace whereby believers become new creatures in Christ Jesus. It is a change of heart wrought by the Holy Spirit through conviction of sin, to which the sinner responds in repentance toward God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ."
It also tends towards Covenant theology, rather than dispensationalism.
The fact is, that their doctrine is spot on the money (though rather vague on some points; rightly so, I believe). It is actually impossible to be a full fledged Arminian (or even predominantly) and agree with the BF& M. And you do not kick people out of fellowship because of mild doctrinal disagreements.
Just my
__________________
Damon Rambo
Southern Baptist Convention
Member of Brazosport Baptist Temple, South Texas
Youth Pastor/Evangelist Straight Walk Ministries is my home.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Damon Rambo For This Useful Post: | | 
11-06-2009, 07:21 PM
|  | Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,170
Thanks: 1,467
Thanked 1,423 Times in 1,063 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AThornquist I like your perspective, Ivan. Thank you. The questions in my original post were questions that a local pastor asked me. I suggested something very similar to what you said in defense of a local SBC pastor. However, the pastor responded by saying that as a whole the SBC is weak on the gospel because as a whole there is so much semi-Pelagianism. He said there is no good reason to stay connected since that would be like supporting their weak-gospel cause. Thus, it would be best to leave the camp. I didn't have much of an answer. What are your thoughts on that concern? | Damon's reply covers it well. I'd say, "Don't throw out the baby with the bath wash".
| 
11-06-2009, 09:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Fredericktown, MO
Posts: 151
Thanks: 45
Thanked 41 Times in 27 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by busdriver72 Well, throw rocks at SBC if you wish, but before I was saved the ONLY ones who ever shared the gospel with me were Southern Baptist. I've never had anyone from the reformed persuasion knock on my door or even at act like they were interested in knowing if I knew Christ. I know there are those that do, but SBCers reach people with the gospel, which IS the power of God unto salvation (hmmmm, that's in the Bible I think). They don't to try make people Calvinist or any other "ist." Calvinism is not the the power of God unto salvation.
When I was saved, I didn't know election/Calvinism from a hole in the ground, yet I was a follower of Christ. I learned of my election later, yet I was still just as saved. |
Very well said Ralph. | 
11-06-2009, 10:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,302
Thanks: 373
Thanked 708 Times in 346 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AThornquist I am honestly trying to get a grasp on this issue. Why would any Calvinistic church remain in the SBC? If as a whole the SBC is not firm on the true gospel, why stay within the camp? | I am no longer a Southern Baptist ... used to be a long time ago. While I can see someone leaving, I think leaving a church (or a denomination) is a serious matter that ought to be carefully considered. If a church is part of an association, there is little to nothing that the "denomination" can push on the local congregation from above (almost nothing from what I remember) and so the local church is almost completely autonomous in practice. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought this was one of the key points of congregationalism.)
So then it comes down to what good/harm does it do to stay and what good/harm does it do to leave. I don't see much harm being done no matter what. The denomination seems a toothless lion that has no real bite (again, correct me if I'm wrong, it has been a long time since I was in a SBC church). What good does it do to remain? Might have an overall effect at being salt and light in a dark place. What harm does it do to leave? It removes more of those that know the truth.
__________________
Brian Withnell
Deacon, OPC
Leesburg, Virginia
You cannot train for war in the midst of a battle. Prepare before the battle starts; if the battle is long and hard, you will wish you had.
|  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |