The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Order

Church Order Discussions related to issues of Church Order: administration of the Sacraments, Church discipline, conduct of meetings, and suggested forms.

» Online Users: 95
15 members and 80 guests
Amazing Grace, Backwoods Presbyterian, elnwood, Glenn Ferrell, Gloria, john_Mark, martyrologist, SolaScriptura, Southern Presbyterian, staythecourse
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
View Poll Results: Are You a "Divine Right" or "Best System" Baptist?
Divine Right 2 28.57%
Best System 3 42.86%
Other 2 28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:59 AM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,927
Thanks: 164
Thanked 120 Times in 77 Posts
A Poll for Baptists (Sorry, Presbyterians!)

OK, fellow Baptists: are you a divine right Baptist - meaning that you believe that Baptist is the only system of church government taught in the Scriptures, or are you a best system Baptist - meaning that you believe that Baptist is just the "best system" of church government (of several) taught in the Bible?
__________________
Bob Howes
Framingham, MA

A reoccurring thought:

Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:01 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
OK, fellow Baptists: are you a divine right Baptist - meaning that you believe that Baptist is the only system of church government taught in the Scriptures, or are you a best system Baptist - meaning that you believe that Baptist is just the "best system" of church government (of several) taught in the Bible?
Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:02 AM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:02 AM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,927
Thanks: 164
Thanked 120 Times in 77 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?
Was I THAT obvious?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:03 AM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?
Was I THAT obvious?
Ever so slightly.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:03 AM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,927
Thanks: 164
Thanked 120 Times in 77 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?
Was I THAT obvious?
Ever so slightly.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:11 AM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 6,399
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 688
Thanked 735 Times in 428 Posts
I'm not so sure Baptist is a polity. Elder rule is a polity and that is what I subscribe to.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:13 AM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 6,399
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 688
Thanked 735 Times in 428 Posts
Hey! Why don't we just ask, "Who's better, Baptists or Presbyterians?"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:14 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 46
Thanks: 8
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Baptists (and I really mean Reformed Baptist) are associational, not denominational. But they do have polity just like the Presbyterians. See here for some historical documentation on Baptist polity.
__________________
~Pastor Chris Powell~
Covenant Baptist Church, Toronto
www.covenantbaptistchurch.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:26 AM
PuritanCovenanter's Avatar
Norseman Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,086
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 718
Thanked 631 Times in 387 Posts
Congregational Plural Elder Rule here.

This was a great four views book.

Amazon.com: Who Runs the Church?: 4 Views on...Amazon.com: Who Runs the Church?: 4 Views on...
__________________

R. Martin Snyder

1689erPuritanCovenanter MSN Blog
Harmony Baptist Church (Member)PuritanCovenanter's MySpace Page
"Our object should not be to have scripture on our side but to be on the side of scripture; and however dear any sentiment may have become by being long entertained, so soon as it is seen to be contrary to the Bible, we must be prepared to abandon it without hesitation."William Symington

Click to get:Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:27 AM
victorbravo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,309
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 96
Thanked 575 Times in 341 Posts
So who is going to start a thread for the poor neglected paedobaptist Congregationalists? Alas and avast. . . .
__________________
R.Vic Bottomly
Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Tacoma, WA

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:35 AM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 535
Thanks: 70
Thanked 157 Times in 87 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I'm not so sure Baptist is a polity. Elder rule is a polity and that is what I subscribe to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
Congregational Plural Elder Rule here.
Every Baptist church I know of that has elders is actually not ruled by the elders, but rather "led" by the elders and ruled by the congregation (which is still an improvement over the usual single pastor/staff-deacons-congregation model we see in most Baptist churches).

How is elder rule compatible with the Baptist distinctive of congregational government?
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
not another blog, v2.0



Last edited by raekwon; 04-15-2008 at 12:26 PM. Reason: added quotes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:50 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 714
Thanks: 113
Thanked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Quote:
So who is going to start a thread for the poor neglected paedobaptist Congregationalists? Alas and avast. . . .
What about calvinistic credobaptists who want Presbyterian polity? That's me.

MHO, the Presbyterian polity, with a small amount of latitude, is the only polity permissible in the scriptures.

Can I vote in the Presbyterian poll?
__________________
Jeremy Gage
First Baptist Church
Durham, NC

"No heart can conceive that treasury of mercies which lies in this one privilege, in having liberty and ability to approach unto God at all times, according to his mind and will." - John Owen
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:02 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,318
Thanks: 1,243
Thanked 624 Times in 444 Posts
I thought it was particularly good in allowing the contributors more interaction with each other (with the surrejoinders) than those books normally do.
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA

"There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:04 PM
Grymir's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 172
Thanked 145 Times in 120 Posts
I voted, we Presbyterians will not be ignored.

(See other thread for precedence )
__________________
Timothy Johnson
First United Presbyterian of Moline
PCUSA (Yea, I know)
Theology/Philosophy Sunday School Teacher
Davenport, IA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:21 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
McFadderator Maximus
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 3,352
Thanks: 675
Thanked 984 Times in 600 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grymir View Post
I voted, we Presbyterians will not be ignored.

(See other thread for precedence )


Anyone with El Rushbo as an avatar is in no danger of being ignored!

Baptist polity (I have actually lectured on it in seminary several times as a guest lecturer) is a funny animal. In the ordinances, er . . . ah . . . "sacraments" for you presby folks, baptists spend so much time explaining that it REALLY does NOT mean this, that, or the other thing, that by the time we are done we end up with a doctrine of the "real absence." In our governance, we may be firmly committed to doing what we do, but for reasons that are somewhat epistemically lame. Most baptists, for example, will admit that one can "legitimately" adduce biblical precedent and precept to "support" any of at least three forms of polity.

It you examine the broader historical matrix in which a particular polity became popular, it is not surprising that episcopacy tends to seem obvious to people who live under monarchy, presbyterian government seems clear and compelling to those exposed to a parliamentary system, and congregational polity only surfaces when there are lots of people making "democratic" noises. Perhaps unlike some of my sisters and brothers with other forms, baptists are often willing to allow the role of holy expedience and sanctified pragmaticism in the development of the baptist approach to church government.

Still, nobody is more stubborn than a baptist. So, biblically, there is ONLY one way to do it . . . OUR way (even if we admit that expedience has as much to do with why we do it this way as anything).
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:24 PM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 535
Thanks: 70
Thanked 157 Times in 87 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grymir View Post
I voted, we Presbyterians will not be ignored.

(See other thread for precedence )


Anyone with El Rushbo as an avatar is in no danger of being ignored!
I think that such an avatar might make it a lot easier for one to be ignored, to be honest.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:35 PM
mshingler's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bryan, TX
Posts: 128
Thanks: 40
Thanked 38 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I'm not so sure Baptist is a polity. Elder rule is a polity and that is what I subscribe to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
Congregational Plural Elder Rule here.
Every Baptist church I know of that has elders is actually not ruled by the elders, but rather "led" by the elders and ruled by the congregation (which is still an improvement over the usual single pastor/staff-deacons-congregation model we see in most Baptist churches).

How is elder rule compatible with the Baptist distinctive of congregational government?
The church I pastor (teaching elder might be more applicable) would be an exception. This church recently went from the typical pastor/deacon/congregation Baptist Structure to elder rule.
Is this compatible with the Baptist distinctive of congregationalism? I don't know. On the one hand, the congregation still votes to affirm some decisions, including the appointment of a new elder, although that vote of affirmation is not binding. The elders still have the final authority to make the decisions. On the other hand, I think we are more concerned with being compatible with Scripture than being compatible with Baptist distinctives.
__________________
Mike Shingler
Pastor: Steep Hollow Baptist Church (SBC)
Bryan, TX
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:32 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,095
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 314 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grymir View Post
I voted, we Presbyterians will not be ignored.

(See other thread for precedence )


Anyone with El Rushbo as an avatar is in no danger of being ignored!

Baptist polity (I have actually lectured on it in seminary several times as a guest lecturer) is a funny animal. In the ordinances, er . . . ah . . . "sacraments" for you presby folks, baptists spend so much time explaining that it REALLY does NOT mean this, that, or the other thing, that by the time we are done we end up with a doctrine of the "real absence." In our governance, we may be firmly committed to doing what we do, but for reasons that are somewhat epistemically lame. Most baptists, for example, will admit that one can "legitimately" adduce biblical precedent and precept to "support" any of at least three forms of polity.

It you examine the broader historical matrix in which a particular polity became popular, it is not surprising that episcopacy tends to seem obvious to people who live under monarchy, presbyterian government seems clear and compelling to those exposed to a parliamentary system, and congregational polity only surfaces when there are lots of people making "democratic" noises. Perhaps unlike some of my sisters and brothers with other forms, baptists are often willing to allow the role of holy expedience and sanctified pragmaticism in the development of the baptist approach to church government.

Still, nobody is more stubborn than a baptist. So, biblically, there is ONLY one way to do it . . . OUR way (even if we admit that expedience has as much to do with why we do it this way as anything).
Do you have the audio of any of those lectures in Mp3 format so that you could share them with us, Dennis?
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:44 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 6,399
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 688
Thanked 735 Times in 428 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Jersey Baptist View Post
I'm not so sure Baptist is a polity. Elder rule is a polity and that is what I subscribe to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
Congregational Plural Elder Rule here.
Every Baptist church I know of that has elders is actually not ruled by the elders, but rather "led" by the elders and ruled by the congregation (which is still an improvement over the usual single pastor/staff-deacons-congregation model we see in most Baptist churches).

How is elder rule compatible with the Baptist distinctive of congregational government?
Rae, I can only speak for my church. The elders make all decisions that are theological in nature. The pastor and elder positions are voted on by the congregation. Issues that have to do with budget, or admitting or terminating membership are voted on my the membership. Our elders are very