 » Site Navigation | | | | » Online Users: 103 | | 38 members and 65 guests | | Andres, austinww, Bad Organist, Beoga, calgal, calvinich, Chippy, David, greenbaggins, jlynn, jogri17, Karnes, KMK, KS_Presby, MarieP, mossy, mshingler, Puritan Sailor, Puritan Scot, PuritanCovenanter, Re4mdant, refbaptdude, Reformed Thomist, Rev. Todd Ruddell, Rich Koster, StainlessThroughGrace, Susanna, Timothy William, TimV, tlharvey7, ubermadchen, William Price | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
04-24-2009, 06:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,568
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | | Pacific NW Presbytery Complaint against Leithart Shot Down
|
04-24-2009, 08:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,564
Thanks: 1,572
Thanked 927 Times in 483 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922  |
???
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
|
04-24-2009, 08:53 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 1,840 Times in 1,091 Posts
| | |
I'm generally aware this is about "federal vision" serious error.
The link says the SJC (Standing Judicial Commission) of the PNWP (Pacific Northwest Presbytery) declined to hear the minority report.
Can anyone clarify this? Isn't the SJC a commission of General Assembly, not connected with a presbytery?
Or was this an appeal back to the Presbytery itself to hear the minority report as a complaint that was expected to have been declined (since the Presbytery majority originally cleared the majority report)? In that case, going to the SJC might be a next step?
__________________
Scott
PCA
North Carolina
"Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 |
04-25-2009, 12:28 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,568
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
The SJC of the PNWP is a commission the PNWP made. Not part of the GA. The GA has its own SJC. This was a complaint back to presbytery against the majority report which was adopted. The next step if taken would be to send a complaint to the SJC of the GA.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Romans922 For This Useful Post: | |
04-25-2009, 12:36 AM
|  | whippersnapper | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 2,740
Thanks: 1,461
Thanked 539 Times in 328 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 | Second the motion! 
__________________
Ben Franks
I attend: Ketoctin Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
in Purcellville, Virginia
I'm a member of: Heartland Community Church (PCA)
in Wichita, Kansas
I blog here (along with my Dad): http://rrfranks.blogspot.com/
And I'm a student here: www.phc.edu "Remember the speeches we have spoken so often over our mead, when we raised boast on the bench, heroes in the hall, about hard fighting. Now may the man who is bold prove that he is."-Aelfwine at the Battle of Maldon |
04-25-2009, 03:29 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 The SJC of the PNWP is a commission the PNWP made. Not part of the GA. The GA has its own SJC. This was a complaint back to presbytery against the majority report which was adopted. The next step if taken would be to send a complaint to the SJC of the GA. | I believe the next step would actually be to appeal the decision to the GA who would then hear and rule on the same complaint (BCO 42).
__________________
Brian Eschen
Ruling Elder, PCA
Pleasanton, California
| | The Following User Says Thank You to brianeschen For This Useful Post: | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
|
