The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Order

Church Order Discussions related to issues of Church Order: administration of the Sacraments, Church discipline, conduct of meetings, and suggested forms.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 72
17 members and 55 guests
A guy, Ask Mr. Religion, Beoga, christabella_warren, dyarashus, KMK, Megan Mozart, Rev. Todd Ruddell, Richard King, Simply_Nikki, T.A.G., walkwithgod, Zenas
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 08:49 PM
LAYMAN JOE's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 843
Thanks: 150
Thanked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Communion tokens

here
Did not know this. I wanted to pass on the information.
__________________
Joe
Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte
SC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to LAYMAN JOE For This Useful Post:
E Nomine (05-05-2009)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 08:52 PM
Skyler's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
I've heard about communion tokens. From a Curt Daniels lecture in the 75-hour series on Calvinism.

He covers almost everything.
__________________
Jonathan
Audio Engineer
Reformed Anabaptist
Ohio

Moroni's magical glasses of proper interpretation:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 08:55 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,505
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,075 Times in 698 Posts
Is this a question of pro or con or just for informational purposes?
__________________
James Helbert, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 08:57 PM
Rich Koster's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
Interesting that lead was used.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA
Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:05 PM
LAYMAN JOE's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 843
Thanks: 150
Thanked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Is this a question of pro or con or just for informational purposes?
I was passing on the info. Discuss all you want brethren.

I do wonder why they used tokens instead of just informing the folks they were admitted to the table. I just came across the information so I have not thought much about it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:10 PM
Skyler's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
Presumably it was because they didn't want to risk someone "sneaking" past without having actually been approved, requiring each person to turn over their token--though why someone couldn't just borrow/steal someone else's, I'm not sure.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:11 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Presumably it was because they didn't want to risk someone "sneaking" past without having actually been approved, requiring each person to turn over their token--though why someone couldn't just borrow/steal someone else's, I'm not sure.
Or create counterfeits.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:17 PM
Skyler's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Presumably it was because they didn't want to risk someone "sneaking" past without having actually been approved, requiring each person to turn over their token--though why someone couldn't just borrow/steal someone else's, I'm not sure.
Or create counterfeits.
Presumably that would be too much effort for such a person to go to, merely to attend a sacrament at the local church.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:23 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,505
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,075 Times in 698 Posts
It seems to me that this is going a far bit beyond Scripture. Guarding the table is needful and Paul instructed that this be done by admonishment. He did not say, "Mint ye tokens for the admittance to the table." [or two token, if you will]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
Quickened (05-05-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:29 PM
armourbearer's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
I do wonder why they used tokens instead of just informing the folks they were admitted to the table.
In the Scottish communion season many people would come from other districts and the communions were attended by large numbers which did not allow for careful personal attention; hence the use of the token in admitting people to the table. They indicate the conscientious concern of the Session to oversee the communion, and obviously required the people to use the tokens with discretion.
__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:
Abd_Yesua_alMasih (05-04-2009), Chippy (05-03-2009), Glenn Ferrell (05-05-2009), Hamalas (05-03-2009), jaybird0827 (05-04-2009), Josiah (05-03-2009), LAYMAN JOE (05-03-2009), Marrow Man (05-04-2009), Skyler (05-03-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:38 PM
chbrooking's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 783
Thanks: 248
Thanked 393 Times in 179 Posts
I actually appreciate the impetus behind them. I don't think it would work today, nor would I want to see it implemented. But I believe it is incumbent on the pastor(s) to protect others from eating and drinking judgment on themselves. And yet I also believe it would be wrong to deny to the table one of Christ's sheep who could worthily partake. So I've often been perplexed about how the table ought to be properly fenced. Though we (pastors/elders) try to get around to any visitors prior to the service, someone could slip through, particularly if they arrive late. So we fence with a verbal warning/exhortation. But ultimately that leaves it to the conscience of the individual whether or not he or she will partake. I've often wondered whether or not that is sufficient protection on my part.

I know that if someone counterfeited a token , I'd be in the clear. But am I in the clear with just a warning? I honestly don't know. Like I said. I'm not in favor of the tokens, but I appreciate the idea behind them ... very much actually.

These tokens certainly would explain less frequent celebrations of the Lord's Supper. Can you imagine having to get around to everyone personally each week or even month?!?!
__________________
Clark Brooking
Pastor
Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Clarksville, MD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:40 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Presumably it was because they didn't want to risk someone "sneaking" past without having actually been approved, requiring each person to turn over their token--though why someone couldn't just borrow/steal someone else's, I'm not sure.
Or create counterfeits.
Presumably that would be too much effort for such a person to go to, merely to attend a sacrament at the local church.
It was a joke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:49 PM
Skyler's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 248
Thanked 453 Times in 308 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post

Or create counterfeits.
Presumably that would be too much effort for such a person to go to, merely to attend a sacrament at the local church.
It was a joke.
I was uncertain owing to the lack of a smiley in your post. Therefore, I answered seriously, so as not to risk laughing at a serious post.

However, with your permission, I will now laugh at you:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 09:57 PM
21st Century Calvinist's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 692
Thanks: 76
Thanked 242 Times in 154 Posts
Pastor Matthew has hit the nail on the head with the history of communion tokens. The Session would issue their own members with a token and they would hand it in at the service they visited.
They are still used by some Presbyterian churches in Scotland to this day. Usually at the Saturday preparatory service after the service has ended all intending communicants will be asked to remain for a few minutes. The Session will be constituted, there will be prayer made for those who come to the Table on the following morning and the Pastor will distribute to each person a token as they leave. At the communion service as we take our seats an elder will be present to receive the token.
Now supposing you turn up on Sunday morning with no token, you will be given one at the door.
Personally, I don't think it has any value in our current situation. However, some people receive benefit from it and I am sure that is why it continues in some congregations. The original situation where people travel to other congregations Communion has more or less passed, and besides the crowds aren't so great.
Some larger congregations in the Free Church of Scotland will issue membership cards to their own members and an elder will visit prior to communion. The card will be handed back in at some point in the communion service, either in the offering plate or to an elder at the door. I think the Church of Scotland also does this.
A number of congregations will have in addition to the Communion season, Communion services where no preparatory services have taken place. On these occasions neither tokens or cards will be used.
__________________
Donnie MacLeod
Crossroads Presbyterian Fellowship (PCA), Maplewood, MO
MDiv Student Covenant Theological Seminary

You filled my heart with greater joy
than others may have found
As they rejoiced at harvest time,
when grain and wine abound.Ps 4:7, Sing Psalms 2003
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to 21st Century Calvinist For This Useful Post:
LAYMAN JOE (05-03-2009)
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 10:16 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
This seems to me to go way beyond 1 Cor. 11:27-32.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 10:48 PM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Not always lead and pewter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Interesting that lead was used.
It was not always lead that was used. I have brass, bronze, aluminum, and unidentified white metal Communion tokens in addition to lead and pewter. I have Church of Scotland, assorted Presbyterian, a few Congregational and even a couple of Scottish Episcopal Church Communion tokens.
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI

Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to yeutter For This Useful Post:
Rich Koster (05-04-2009)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 11:24 PM
ewenlin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,501
Thanks: 452
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
I think it was called "Fencing the Table" as coined by the Scottish who abided by it...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong

still, interesting..
__________________
Ewen
1689 LBCF
Assemblies of God Bible College
Singapore
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 11:34 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewenlin View Post
I think it was called "Fencing the Table" as coined by the Scottish who abided by it...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong

still, interesting..
I can understand "fencing the table" by giving a strong warning from 1 Cor. 11:28. But I find no biblical or confessional warrant for examining a person each time before communion and issuing them a metal token.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
he beholds (05-04-2009), Quickened (05-05-2009)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2009, 11:50 PM
ewenlin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,501
Thanks: 452
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
I think what they did was to issue the tokens on a prior service to those who are members to be used at the communion the next day.. I'm trying to find the info for this still =(

There are factors that they had to deal with probably at that time which warrent-ed such practices? I stand to be corrected...

Ewen
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 12:10 AM
Rangerus's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 349
Thanked 191 Times in 133 Posts
I clicked on the home page link and found this gem. Bible Gum "One to Chew, One to Share."

__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 12:30 AM
Abd_Yesua_alMasih's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 171
Thanked 205 Times in 81 Posts
I am thinking of the modern equivalent being a plastic membership card that could be swiped on a computer inside the door which would bring up all your communion history and any flagged reasons why the elders think you should not take it etc... with a complex sign up form with lots of boxes and "refer to question 22a" splashed throughout.
__________________
Fraser,
Trinity Reformed Baptist Church
Hamilton, New Zealand.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Abd_Yesua_alMasih For This Useful Post:
he beholds (05-04-2009)
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 01:04 AM
ewenlin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,501
Thanks: 452
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
hahaha wouldn't that be the day... =p
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:37 AM
chbrooking's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 783
Thanks: 248
Thanked 393 Times in 179 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
I can understand "fencing the table" by giving a strong warning from 1 Cor. 11:28. But I find no biblical or confessional warrant for examining a person each time before communion and issuing them a metal token.
I think the same warrant would be the warrant behind examining them at all. For one thing, it's fulfilling the positive side of the 6th commandment. The shepherds are to protect the sheep. Bear in mind that you don't have to be an unbeliever to unworthily partake.

I'm NOT arguing for the tokens. Just throwing my at your post.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:50 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
I think the same warrant would be the warrant behind examining them at all. For one thing, it's fulfilling the positive side of the 6th commandment. The shepherds are to protect the sheep. Bear in mind that you don't have to be an unbeliever to unworthily partake.
If this is a 6th commandment issue and under the requirement of a shepherd protecting the sheep (both solemn responsibilities), would you say that a pastor is to personally examine each communicant prior to each celebration of the Lord's supper?

The clearest statement in the Scriptures to this matter says this examination (and responsibility) is the responsibility of the communicant (1 Cor. 11:28 - ἑαυτον).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
Berean (05-05-2009), he beholds (05-04-2009), Quickened (05-05-2009)
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:32 AM
Gesetveemet's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UPSTATE, NY
Posts: 328
Thanks: 137
Thanked 109 Times in 63 Posts
Smile

Quote:
It was John Calvin who first saw the usefulness of tokens in such a system. He wrote, “Each person should receive tokens of lead for those of his household who were instructed; and the strangers who might come, on giving testimony of their faith, should also receive tokens, and those who had none should not be admitted to the tables”.
Presbyterian Church Communion Tokens


Quote:
“Calvin therefore implemented the use of the table token in 1560. . .”
“Called to Confess” by Cornels Harinck






Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
__________________

______________________________

William, N.R.C., New York
______________________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:46 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post
Quote:
It was John Calvin who first saw the usefulness of tokens in such a system. He wrote, “Each person should receive tokens of lead for those of his household who were instructed; and the strangers who might come, on giving testimony of their faith, should also receive tokens, and those who had none should not be admitted to the tables”.
This is not directed at you Gesetveemet, but at the linked page.

This is one of my pet peeves: why go to the trouble of quoting Calvin and not cite the source? I like to collect quotes and snippets, but refuse to use them unless there is a way to check the original.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
Gesetveemet (05-04-2009)
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:59 AM
Gesetveemet's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UPSTATE, NY
Posts: 328
Thanks: 137
Thanked 109 Times in 63 Posts
I searched for the source before I posted but could not find it either. The bottom quote is supplied with the book reference.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post


Quote:
“Calvin therefore implemented the use of the table token in 1560. . .”
“Called to Confess” by Cornels Harinck

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 09:03 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post
I searched for the source before I posted but could not find it either. The bottom quote is supplied with the book reference.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post


Quote:
“Calvin therefore implemented the use of the table token in 1560. . .”
“Called to Confess” by Cornels Harinck

I wonder if Harinck cites the source.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 09:09 AM
Gesetveemet's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UPSTATE, NY
Posts: 328
Thanks: 137
Thanked 109 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:

I wonder if Harinck cites the source.
Negative
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 09:14 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post
Quote:

I wonder if Harinck cites the source.
Negative


I guess I could say:

Quote:
It was John Calvin who first saw the usefulness of helium over hydrogen in filling balloons. “Hydrogen explodeth much, but helium is peaceful”. Calvin therefore implemented the use of helium in 1560.


I am making fun not of tokens, etc. but of the lack of references in a quote.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 09:37 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: scotland
Posts: 13
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
From "Scotch Communion Services"by Rev William Milroy.(1881)
"After the benediction (after saturday morning service)the members of the Session are requested by the pastor to come forward in front of the pulpit, the Session is formally constituted by prayer, and "tokens" of admission to the Lord's table are distributed to intending Communicants.The use of tokens dates back to the first Reformation, and serves quietly to secure the exclusion of the unworthy....."
It is still the normal practice in the Free Church (continuing )The Free Church, and the Free Presbyterian Church , and probably in some ,at least of the Church of Scotland
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 10:03 AM
HanleyBri's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Denville
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 32 Times in 6 Posts
the use of communion tokens

The first suggestion for tokens used in fencing the table came from John Calvin and Peter Viret to the Council of Geneva on the 30th January 1560. The first use of tokens in Scotland was in St. Andrews on the 2nd May 1588. The use of tokens has a reformed history within the Presbyterian church.

Scottish and early America Presbyterian also practiced the use of communion tokens to facilitate the fencing of the Lord's table. The elders would hand out the tokens at a prior service to those deemed adequately preparted. Upon coming to the Lord's Table the tokens were collected before sitting at the table.

The use of tokens, from "The Code: The Book of Government
and Order of the RPC of Ireland";

==========QUOTE========================
9.10. The Lord's Supper shall be observed at least twice a
year. The Session in each congregation shall determine how
often the ordinance shall be observed and shall administer it
in a constituted capacity.

9.11. Public intimation of the date for observance of the
Lord's Supper shall be made in advance. Preparation
services shall be held at convenient times.
Intending communicants shall be furnished with tokens.
Session, acting on its previous judgement of the fitness of
each applicant, shall distribute the tokens [emphasis mine],
and many grant permission to visiting believers whose
profession and practice are known to them, to partake of the
Lord's Supper.

9.12. On the day on which the ordinance is to be observed,
after an appropriate sermon:-

(1) the Session shall be called forward;
(2) the minister shall read the scriptural authority for
observance of the sacrament, e.g. 1 Corinthians 11:23-28;
(3) the minister shall "Fence the Table" from an
appropriate portion of Scripture, and read the Terms of
Membership; solemn words of warning shall be spoken to
intending communicants urging them to careful self-
examination and deep searching of heard lest they should ear
and drink unworthily and so sin against "the body and blood
of the Lord"; words of loving invitation and encouragement
shall be given to those who are conscious of their sinfulness,
are truly repentant, place their trust on the atonement and
intercession of Jesus Christ, love Him as their Saviour, desire
to commemorate His death and pledge themselves anew to
His service;
(4) when the communicants have taken their places at
the Table and the tokens have been collected [ emphasis
mine], the minister shall take the bread and give thanks after
the example of Jesus Christ, and shall proceed to break the
bread and distribute the bread and wine as symbols of the
body and blood of Jesus Christ;
(5) a suitable address should be given to the
communicants while seated at the Table.

9.13. A Service of Thanksgiving should be held at a
convenient time following the observance of the Lord's
Supper, during which the minister may review the services
connected with the observance of the ordinance and deliver
such concluding appeals and exhortations as may appear
suitable.

9.14. In special circumstances, the Session may administer
the Lord's Supper in the home but there shall be public
intimation beforehand, and the administration shall be
preceded by the preaching of the Word.

-----An American Presbyterian Paper Token------

__________________
Brian M. Hanley, RE
Grace Presbyterian Church
Parsippany, New Jersey
a congregation of the WPCUS

Last edited by HanleyBri; 05-04-2009 at 10:11 AM. Reason: Added Pics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 10:16 AM
Marrow Man's Avatar
Drunk with Powder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,101
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,442 Times in 1,223 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewenlin View Post
I think it was called "Fencing the Table" as coined by the Scottish who abided by it...
Was that an intentional or unintentional pun?
__________________
Tim Phillips
Pastor, Midlane Park Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Louisville, KY
Husband of Scottish Lass
My Blog: Gairney Bridge
My Facebook/My Avatar

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

"Wherever the gospel is preached, it is as if God Himself came into the midst of us." ~ John Calvin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:20 PM
Rich Koster's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Interesting that lead was used.
It was not always lead that was used. I have brass, bronze, aluminum, and unidentified white metal Communion tokens in addition to lead and pewter. I have Church of Scotland, assorted Presbyterian, a few Congregational and even a couple of Scottish Episcopal Church Communion tokens.
I thank you for more info. It may seem weird, but I enjoy looking at old Church articles. Are you a collector or did a family member hand this collection down to you?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:15 AM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Interesting that lead was used.
It was not always lead that was used. I have brass, bronze, aluminum, and unidentified white metal Communion tokens in addition to lead and pewter. I have Church of Scotland, assorted Presbyterian, a few Congregational and even a couple of Scottish Episcopal Church Communion tokens.
I thank you for more info. It may seem weird, but I enjoy looking at old Church articles. Are you a collector or did a family member hand this collection down to you?
I am a collector. I did not inherit them. I am a German American. We Germans did not go in for communion tokens much. I have a couple of hundred. I always have some for sale if somone needs one for Sabbath School instruction or some other purpose.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:20 AM
Glenn Ferrell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
I own several Scottish communion tokens. They are still used by the Glasgow congregation of which my wife was a member when she lived in Scotland.

I am often bothered by the failure to fence the Lord’s table in American Presbyterian congregations. In a smaller congregation, the elders should know all the members personally and make an effort to speak with visitors. We do at SRPC. However, the pastor and elders have an obligation to guard the table, for the protection of both illicit communicants and the congregation.
__________________
Glenn Ferrell
Pastor, Sovereign Redeemer Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Boise, Idaho

http://sovereignredeemer.org

http://www.sermonaudio.com/source_de...formationidaho


Nec Tamen Consumebatur


The duty of magistrates...extends to both tables of the law, ... those laws are absurd which disregard the rights of God, and consult only for men. - Calvin, Institutes, IV:20:9
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Glenn Ferrell For This Useful Post:
LAYMAN JOE (05-05-2009)
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:29 AM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
I agree, fencing the table is something which should be done. How it is done is not the issue. In the early eastern liturgies there would be a portion of the service which included the reading of scripture and the singing of psalms, then before the recitation of the creed, the sub deacon would cry out, "the doors, the doors." At that time all the catechumans and those under suspension would leave. It was only then that the communion liturgy would begin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:33 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter View Post
I agree, fencing the table is something which should be done. How it is done is not the issue. In the early eastern liturgies there would be a portion of the service which included the reading of scripture and the singing of psalms, then before the recitation of the creed, the sub deacon would cry out, "the doors, the doors." At that time all the catechumans and those under suspension would leave. It was only then that the communion liturgy would begin
Sounds like for them 1 Cor. 11:28 wasn't enough.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:42 AM
Glenn Ferrell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
My wife shared with me what it was like at the service the night before communion in her Glasgow Free Church Continuing congregation. At some point, those who were to receive their communion tokens were asked to remain while the others left. She spoke of the pain of seeing those leave who were not to be included in the next day’s communion. But, then she realized this was nothing compared to the separation to occur at the great white throne judgment.

-----Added 5/5/2009 at 12:42:23 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Sounds like for them 1 Cor. 11:28 wasn't enough.
1 Cor. 11:29-30-
For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
-is sufficient reason to go beyond self examination. Elders are given authority to bind and loose.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:46 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
I'm sure glad I don't need a lead token to get into heaven.

-----Added 5/5/2009 at 12:46:49 EST-----

Elders are given authority (where?) to bind and loose (what?).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69