» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 104 | | 32 members and 72 guests | | 21st Century Calvinist, alb1, Andres, asc, Ask Mr. Religion, Casey, dudley, dyarashus, glorifyinggodinwv, Jake, Jim Peet, jpfrench81, jwithnell, Karnes, Knight, MMasztal, PuritanCovenanter, Raj, Rangerus, Richard Tallach, Scottish Lass, SolaSaint, SolaScriptura, TaylorOtwell, timmopussycat, ubermadchen | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | | 
11-05-2009, 03:22 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | | Redeemer NYC: Officer Nominations --> Deaconesses!!!
The following is a public email sent to every Redeemer NYC member from Tim Keller (I will comment on said email): Quote:
From: Tim Keller [mailto: _______@redeemer.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 ____ PM
To: (Redeemer's members)
Subject: November is Officer Nomination Month
November 2, 2009
Dear Redeemer Member:
As you probably know, November is Redeemer’s officer nomination month. Once a year members have the privilege and opportunity to recommend other members for the offices of elder, deacon and deaconess.
| So what is being said here is that Redeemer believes that there is an OFFICE of deaconess. Note please that all offices in the Confession and BCO and Scripturally are ordained 'positions'. Quote: |
As we enter an exciting chapter in our ministry in NYC through the RENEW Campaign, there are more opportunities to serve than ever before. Identifying new leaders within our congregation has always been a priority at Redeemer, and we need your help to find members who have the right gifts and experience to serve on the Session and the Diaconate.
| So not only are deaconesses described as leaders in the church in this paragraph, but also that deaconesses are on the Diaconate. Quote: |
There are 49 men and women currently serving on the Diaconate and 20 men serving on the Session as ruling elders. These men and women have been elected by the congregation and have gone through theological and practical training to master the skills and the information necessary for these positions.
| Again, women being described as being part of the Diaconate. Interesting that the Diaconate is placed prior to the Session...? Quote:
Elders are men who serve on the Session and provide spiritual and administrative leadership to the congregation through oversight of Redeemer ministries, leaders, and members. 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:6-9.
The primary work of the Diaconate is practical deeds of mercy. Deacons and deaconesses (deeks) [sic] minister to those in our church family who find themselves in distress, crisis or emergency situations caused by illness, job loss, long-term unemployment, or other immediate physical, material, spiritual or emotional needs. Deeks also assist elders with membership interviews, and deaconesses provide input and support to elders working on complicated shepherding situations. Acts 6:1-4 and 1 Timothy 3:8-13.
| So women who are on the diaconate as deaconesses have to fulfill these Scriptural commands that are set for deacons? Interesting... Quote:
Your faithful giving to the Mercy Fund over the years enables the Diaconate to care for our congregants during this economic recession. In addition to nominating deek candidates, you can help this ministry by encouraging congregants facing hardship to call the Diaconate Helpline – 212-726-1334.
Accepted nominees will begin training in January of 2010. We are looking for men and women who are members of Redeemer and willing to co-labor with us in these ministries. Please read the description and qualifications of the offices of elder, deacon and deaconess on this pdf or online.
Please prayerfully consider your elder, deacon and deaconess nominations and place a nomination form, with your signature, in the offering basket at any service during the month of November or mail/fax to:
Redeemer Presbyterian Church
Jenny Chang, Diaconate Director
1359 Broadway, 4th floor
New York, NY 10018
Fax 646-572-0020
You may also submit a nomination online.
May God give you discernment as you consider those who may be qualified to serve in these vital roles.
Sincerely,
Dr. Timothy J. Keller
Senior Pastor
| This is again very interesting, a woman as the head of the Diaconate (Deacons and Deaconesses).
| 
11-05-2009, 05:10 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: 76148
Posts: 248
Thanks: 97
Thanked 92 Times in 48 Posts
| |
Yes, Tim Keller and Ligon Duncan gave their cases for this in August of 2008 (regarding the PCA policy).
Tim Keller was on the side arguing FOR deaconesses. You can read his case for it and Ligon Duncan's case for keeping it as is in the "By Faith Magazine" (a PCA Magazine) links below: 
The Case for Our Current Policy on Female Deacons by Ligon Duncan 
The Case for Commissioning (Not Ordaining) Deaconesses by Tim Keller
After those articles were written they debated it at the 2009 PCA General Assembly in June: Keller vs. Duncan Debate: Women Diaconate MP3
It is a good debate and both Keller & Duncan were very gracious and firm on their stance.
Last edited by jason d; 11-05-2009 at 05:13 AM.
Reason: fix date reference
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jason d For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 07:37 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 1,900
Thanked 1,836 Times in 1,088 Posts
| |
Jason,
You may find helpful one of the recent threads on this topic.
There is a lot of background that may be helpful in understanding this. Office of Deacon... Time for Reformation?
It's not a mere case of some people being "for" and some "against" 'deaconess'.
The issue for us in the PCA is that our doctrine, our polity, our vows and our Book of Church Order do not have the system the esteemed Pastor from New York is advocating and practicing at his church.
It has become clear that there is a willful violation of our constitution (PCA), vows and polity going on while there is this "debate."
It has come to the point that complaints have been filed and process is underway as we speak. Complaint filed against PCA Metro NY Presbytery (Deaconesses)
(The complaints detail practices that violate our constitution and the vows officers take before God that they receive and will uphold)
It might be helpful to understand it this way. If someone is arrested for going 100mph in a 65mph speed zone, the one charged with speeding would not call for a study committee on the nature of and compliance with speed limits. The issue would be only whether he was, in fact speeding, and then the sentence.
Here, we have a local church practice (in a confessional church) that:
1) has created an office that does not exist in our polity (this is a usurpation of power),
2) refused to lay hands in ordination on deacons (men) duly called by God to serve,
3) represented in the recent past that the office of deacon is only a synonym for "servant" (but is now switching on that),
4) changing the wording of vows in the Book of Church Order to accommodate their invention
and many other violations. In effect, they have eliminated the I Timothy 3 authoritative office of deacon (men only) and substituted "commissioning" a group of mostly women to do the same or a similar function while denying, apparently up until the email posted in this thread, that 'deaconess' was an office.
This is denying men their right to ordination, as reflection of their call, and the congregation of their governance. It is a violation of the vows of elders who receive the polity of their denomination, which reflects its confessed understanding of Scripture.
PCA derives from scripture its understanding of the governance of the particular church:
Governance by I Timothy 3 and Titus I elders and deacons, with unordained men and women assisting them, and under their oversight.
Specifically, the men who are called, examined, and confirmed by each congregation as deacon:
1) oversee property stewardship
2) oversee mercy ministry
3) develop a "spirit of liberality" in the congregation
Unordained men and women assist them, without usurping title or oversight, and without the high process of qualification required for the men whom God appoints to govern in this way through His office of Deacon.
That's why this is so serious. We need to pray, in fear and trembling, for repentance, for the peace and purity of Christ's church, and fidelity to holy vows made before a holy God.
__________________ Scott
PCA
North Carolina "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)"
Hebrews 10:23 | | The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Scott1 For This Useful Post: | Andres (11-05-2009), AThornquist (11-05-2009), Berean (11-06-2009), Brian Withnell (11-06-2009), Fly Caster (11-05-2009), gene_mingo (11-05-2009), Hamalas (11-05-2009), he beholds (11-05-2009), jason d (11-06-2009), JBaldwin (11-06-2009), Josiah (11-05-2009), Scottish Lass (11-05-2009), SRoper (11-05-2009), WarrenInSC (11-05-2009) | 
11-05-2009, 07:59 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Montana
Posts: 3,739
Thanks: 2,594
Thanked 978 Times in 532 Posts
| | |
This email just seems like a reflection of Redeemer's diaconate policy - which we're all familiar with having talked about it...often. It doesn't seem like there's been any change.
__________________
Kathleen M
nondenominational
Montana
| 
11-05-2009, 08:12 AM
|  | Iron Dramatist | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 6,251
Thanks: 247
Thanked 2,367 Times in 1,238 Posts
| | |
Andrew, you really shouldn't be at all surprised by this (if you are, even a bit). Nothing in this letter indicates that anything has changed about the way Redeemer deals with deaconnesses. They are fully equivalent to the male deacons, and Keller is simply doing what he has been doing. They believe that they are in line with the BCO because of they technicalities of how they "commission" their "deeks" (interesting that ultimately they must give the same name to each because of the tiresome nature of saying 'deacons and deaconnesses' - he seems not to want to just call the women 'deacons' even thought that is exactly what they are at Redeemer). Those who can see it see that the emporer has no clothing... however, I'm sure nothing will come of this or any other church who puts women into the role that is reserved for men according to Scripture.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 08:15 AM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,412 Times in 741 Posts
| | |
It appears Keller is speaking out of both sides of his mouth, i.e. it's an office, for which there is no other process but ordination for, but they don't ordain them.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| 
11-05-2009, 08:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 288
Thanks: 110
Thanked 149 Times in 54 Posts
| | |
This is very disturbing, but as I am hearing, it has been a long-time problem. I really do not get it and I really do not get how a man (Keller) can actually live with himself. That session ought to be ashamed of their behavior.
__________________ William F. Hill, Jr. Immanuel Presbyterian Church, (PCA)
Norfolk, Va. "It is not enough for you to come and sit in a pew and have the sound of a man's voice in your ears, but your soul must be at work"(Burroughs, Gospel Worship, 150). | 
11-05-2009, 08:34 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,462
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | |
The joke is as much the PCA as Keller. Specifically the PCA is a joke for ignoring being publically mocked from within.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 08:36 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
I am not surprised by any of this. The whole thing just seems to be contradictory to Scripture and the Standards. As well as their term 'deeks', shows a lack of reverence for the office that the Lord Himself created, as well as the Word of God.
| 
11-05-2009, 08:42 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 1,900
Thanked 1,836 Times in 1,088 Posts
| | |
The significant point of the post here is that now, they are calling 'deaconess' an office, officially, after having denied that it was, that they were treating it as such.
Before, the public argumentation was either:
1) deacon is not an office (because it is merely a "servant" or "helper")
or
2) deacon is an office but
deaconess is not
Now, they are saying, officially, deaconess is an office.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scott1 For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 08:57 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 1,900
Thanked 1,836 Times in 1,088 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jason d | Think about the way this is presented here for a moment.
If the current "policy" (setting aside the fact the constitution is more than policy) is not commissioning 'deaconess' as the titling here assumes,
how is it the church is justified in violating the "policy"?
In the debate, it's set up almost as if we are both following this policy, but we are asking you to consider a change in our policy.
Rather, it is we are violating the "policy" right now, and although we claimed in the debate deaconess is not an office, in our emails to church members we ARE claiming it is an office.
The issues here go beyond what is being presented publically and involve the particular behavior... and the vows.
We know God does not take vows lightly. My prayer is that will be realized by all involved- for the peace and purity of His church.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Scott1 For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 08:58 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,462
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | |
But look at the mentality he's creating! Good, educated people who say "It's true that our church constitution says deacons have to be ordained, but it also says if it's impossible to ordain deacons, the elders have to do the job of deacons. The word "impossible" was inserted for the benefit of people like us. It would be impossible for us to follow the constitution since it would make some people feel bad, therefore we don't have to follow the constitution".
You see that argument in the same form elsewhere from people Keller's influenced. "The divines didn't say one day out of seven in a normal week has 24 hours. And they COULD have. Therefore it is perfectly confessional to say a day in Genesis doesn't mean a day".
No one cares if the ARP allows deaconesses. Not really. It's the trickiness; the sly, cynical twisting of the constitution that bothers people. One thing about the OPC. They would have sorted this out long ago.
There's no reason to re-hash all the old arguments we've been through here on this subject. I would like though, one more time, to point out to those who HAVEN'T been on the receiving end of a Session that's hiding behind Keller's rebellion that you have no idea how far this attitude has taken churches WAY further than female deacons.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 09:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,252
Thanks: 155
Thanked 555 Times in 339 Posts
| | |
What's really sad is what's behind the issue of "deaconess." It's the question, "Did God really say _________?" Are we really not suppose to eat from that tree? Are deacons really suppose to be the husband of one wife?
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jwithnell For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 09:09 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,115
Thanks: 493
Thanked 2,299 Times in 844 Posts
| | |
Can someone PLEASE explain to me how a man can go on the public record in so many venues blatantly opposing our standards on this point and yet NEVER be brought on trial?
His brazen defiance is grating. The utter inaction on the part of the courts of my church is really disheartening.
__________________
Ben
Chaplain, US Army
Ft. Riley, KS
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SolaScriptura For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 09:14 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: va
Posts: 6,231
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,483 Times in 888 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanablue This email just seems like a reflection of Redeemer's diaconate policy - which we're all familiar with having talked about it...often. It doesn't seem like there's been any change. | But I expected there to be a change, after the GA. I don't know why I expected this. I just assumed that since it was determined that it was against the BCO, that Redeemer would change its position or leave the PCA. Quote:
Originally Posted by jwithnell What's really sad is what's behind the issue of "deaconess." It's the question, "Did God really say _________?" Are we really not suppose to eat from that tree? Are deacons really suppose to be the husband of one wife? | I disagree. I think there is a case to be made for women deaconesses. I personally am not buying it, but we can't deny that it can be made. For example, the RPCNA is a very conservative, Reformed, godly denomination, and they have ORDAINED women deaconesses. I don't see their position as being "Did God really say _________?" Though I am sure that they could indeed be wrong about things. (I think they are wrong about hymns being false worship, for instance.)
What I think is wrong about Redeemer is their "Did the BCO really say _________?"
__________________ Shalom, jessi PCA
Steelers fan exiled to Virginia “Whatever your heart clings to and confides in, that is really your God.” Martin Luther | | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to he beholds For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 10:11 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 262
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by he beholds Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanablue This email just seems like a reflection of Redeemer's diaconate policy - which we're all familiar with having talked about it...often. It doesn't seem like there's been any change. | But I expected there to be a change, after the GA. I don't know why I expected this. I just assumed that since it was determined that it was against the BCO, that Redeemer would change its position or leave the PCA. Quote:
Originally Posted by jwithnell What's really sad is what's behind the issue of "deaconess." It's the question, "Did God really say _________?" Are we really not suppose to eat from that tree? Are deacons really suppose to be the husband of one wife? | I disagree. I think there is a case to be made for women deaconesses. I personally am not buying it, but we can't deny that it can be made. For example, the RPCNA is a very conservative, Reformed, godly denomination, and they have ORDAINED women deaconesses. I don't see their position as being "Did God really say _________?" Though I am sure that they could indeed be wrong about things. (I think they are wrong about hymns being false worship, for instance.)
What I think is wrong about Redeemer is their "Did the BCO really say _________?" | Both the ARP and the RPCNA have had women deacons for well over 100 years.
I also disagree with the practice, but I have had to study the issue before being ordained in the RP Church- and although I disagree- the case for women deacons is an exegetical one- not a 'did God say' one. Those who uphold the position do so because they believe THAT IT IS WHAT THE BIBLE TEACHES.
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 10:15 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
Just as a historical note the ARP has only had deaconesses since 1968.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 10:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,462
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | Quote: |
Those who uphold the position do so because they believe THAT IT IS WHAT THE BIBLE TEACHES.
| Which is totally irrelevant to the point. One purpose of any constitution is to protect people from having to re-invent the wheel every time something comes up. The traffic cop isn't given discretion to ignore posted speed limits, whether or not those speed limits are proper. The speed limit has to be changed by duly constituted authority before he can write a speeding ticket for someone going 25 in a 30 MPH stretch of road.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 10:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 262
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV Quote: |
Those who uphold the position do so because they believe THAT IT IS WHAT THE BIBLE TEACHES.
| Which is totally irrelevant to the point. One purpose of any constitution is to protect people from having to re-invent the wheel every time something comes up. The traffic cop isn't given discretion to ignore posted speed limits, whether or not those speed limits are proper. The speed limit has to be changed by duly constituted authority before he can write a speeding ticket for someone going 25 in a 30 MPH stretch of road. | Tim, I mean in the RPCNA- the people who uphold the denomination's position do so because they believe that this what the Bible teaches.
Ben, right. I forgot that. The RPCNA is 1888.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 11:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
| | |
Okay, so many PCA people keep saying "why won't the PCA order discipline!?"
Is there something ordinary PCA people can do to let the PCA authorities know that discipline is necessary?
Or, as I can only imagine, that's already taken place and nothing happened then either?
__________________
Nathan Riese
Under Care, PCA
Trinity Presbyterian Church, Aledo, Illinois
Current student at MBBC
Future student of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary www.gpts.edu | 
11-05-2009, 12:18 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,407
Thanks: 2,898
Thanked 6,129 Times in 2,588 Posts
| | Offending Post Removed: If you want to take it up with the offender, please PM or email him, etc.  The PB will not be the place to malign ministers by going so far as to cast doubts (without credible cause and evidence) on their self-expressed good intentions or on their status as Christians. Be firm in your biblical opposition, but , please, take responsibility and place the best construction on a man's intents, actions, and words.
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
Don't understand why so many people are throwing stones at this man over the last few days and especially on such a secondary and non-essential issue.
People need to keep in mind that our interpretations of scripture are fallible, instead of defending them as if it's the doctrine of the trinity.
Theres more interpretations than just ours you know, and credible evidence for both from the scriptures.
__________________ Lee Johnston
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Paisley, Scotland Ephesians 1:4-5
"In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to LeeJUk For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Grayson, Kentucky
Posts: 950
Thanks: 497
Thanked 184 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
I'll echo the question asked before. How can someone who so blatantly and publicly goes against the PCA's standards not have been disciplined by now?
I have a feeling the OPC would have sorted this out long ago if confronted with the same issue.
__________________ Willie Grills
Trinity Presbyterian Church
OPC
Huntington, WV | | The Following User Says Thank You to Grillsy For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Grillsy I'll echo the question asked before. How can someone who so blatantly and publicly goes against the PCA's standards not have been disciplined by now?
I have a feeling the OPC would have sorted this out long ago if confronted with the same issue. |
1) the scriptures teach we are to have unity over secondary issues
2) No one side has monopoly on biblical interpreation.
3) So you want to get this man or his church disciplined over a secondary issue, even when such a great work has been done and is continuing to be done in the gospel and building up of saints in that church?
It's at this point I get really angry, because you take one small bit of doctrine YOU don't agree with and you completely disregard all the great points about this man's ministry and doctrine and alll the fruit and you instead exalt this one thing, as if he's now a damnable heretic or someone to be kept at arms length.
I say with all reverence, God help us all, if we put as much effort into sharing the gospel or battling real heretics as we do our brothers in christ over small points like this, then the church of Jesus Christ would be in a lot better shape.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to LeeJUk For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Grayson, Kentucky
Posts: 950
Thanks: 497
Thanked 184 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk Quote:
Originally Posted by Grillsy I'll echo the question asked before. How can someone who so blatantly and publicly goes against the PCA's standards not have been disciplined by now?
I have a feeling the OPC would have sorted this out long ago if confronted with the same issue. |
1) the scriptures teach we are to have unity over secondary issues
2) No one side has monopoly on biblical interpreation.
3) So you want to get this man or his church disciplined over a secondary issue, even when such a great work has been done and is continuing to be done in the gospel and building up of saints in that church?
It's at this point I get really angry, because you take one small bit of doctrine YOU don't agree with and you completely disregard all the great points about this man's ministry and doctrine and alll the fruit and you instead exalt this one thing, as if he's now a damnable heretic or someone to be kept at arms length.
I say with all reverence, God help us all, if we put as much effort into sharing the gospel or battling real heretics as we do our brothers in christ over small points like this, then the church of Jesus Christ would be in a lot better shape. | This is man is openly disobeying the position (i.e. confession and BCO) of his denomination. Ministers are not permitted to teach contrary to what they have sworn to teach. This is more than an issue about deaconesses it is also an issue of rebellion.
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Grillsy For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
So What if he's disobeying the official position of a denomination, your right its an issue of rebellion, Tim Keller doesnt want to rebel against God's word and so that means he must rebel against the denomination because obviously for him, he believes God says that it's OK. Sure I value the westminster confession of faith, but if my interpretation of scripture differs from it on a point, then I've got 2 options either
1) Please the denomination
2) Go with what I think God says in his word
So if we claim to be going on scripture alone, should the man say...well I dont care what I think God's word teaches, I'll just be comfortable and conform to the "official" position.
Are we Roman Catholics now?
| 
11-05-2009, 12:41 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,698 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
Lee, I think we all certainly appreciate your concern for charitable dealings concerning the non-fundamentals of the faith. It should be noted, however, that this deaconesses issue is not one of "disagreeing over doctrine." It's a matter of public practice and honesty in following the practices of the PCA's BCO. In accordance with the Book of Order, there is (unless it is *impossible* to do so) to be an ordained diaconate in the church, which naturally consists only of men: Redeemer has gone around this, and does not have an ordained diaconate, but an "unordained diaconate" so that it can include both men and women; all the while, saying that they are in accord with the BCO. This has caused strife and contention, and the proper thing would be to submit and bring practice into accord with the church.
So, this is not a matter of what people believe; it is a matter of public order. No one is saying Mr. Keller must *believe* anything about women deacons one way or the other; but ecclesiastically, the church needs to be walk in accordance with the BCO for the sake of peace and unity and honesty.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:42 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,412 Times in 741 Posts
| | |
Lee has a point in that people take their case too far: I don't think anyone can call Keller a damned heretic.
However, you can't dismiss the blatant fact he is disobeying the position of the denomination he is ordained in. That's an actionable offense, so far as my intuition tells me without a knowledge of the PCA BCO. He is in open defiance and he seems to be using backdoor methods and ad hoc definitions to effectuate his purposes and subvert the positions of the PCA. He should either amend his stance and teachings, or avail himself of another denomination that is amenable to that teaching.
Don't throw the baby out with the bath water though, he is a useful teacher in other areas.
| | The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Zenas For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:43 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,698 Times in 743 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk
So if we claim to be going on scripture alone, should the man say...well I dont care what I think God's word teaches, I'll just be comfortable and conform to the "official" position.
Are we Roman Catholics now? | Again, no. That's not the issue here. No one is saying what Mr. Keller or the other elders of the church must believe; nor would (or even *could*) ordaining deacons (and not deaconesses) go against conscience or force him to do something he thinks is unBiblical.
| 
11-05-2009, 12:47 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,539
Thanks: 1,651
Thanked 1,893 Times in 1,039 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk Quote:
Originally Posted by Grillsy I'll echo the question asked before. How can someone who so blatantly and publicly goes against the PCA's standards not have been disciplined by now?
I have a feeling the OPC would have sorted this out long ago if confronted with the same issue. |
1) the scriptures teach we are to have unity over secondary issues
2) No one side has monopoly on biblical interpreation.
3) So you want to get this man or his church disciplined over a secondary issue, even when such a great work has been done and is continuing to be done in the gospel and building up of saints in that church?
It's at this point I get really angry, because you take one small bit of doctrine YOU don't agree with and you completely disregard all the great points about this man's ministry and doctrine and alll the fruit and you instead exalt this one thing, as if he's now a damnable heretic or someone to be kept at arms length.
I say with all reverence, God help us all, if we put as much effort into sharing the gospel or battling real heretics as we do our brothers in christ over small points like this, then the church of Jesus Christ would be in a lot better shape. | Lee,
Some consider ordination to be a primary matter and not a secondary issue. This man is trying to turn his congregation against the said standards of belief in this denomination concerning ordination. That is not necessarily a secondary issue. In doing this his congregation is acting outside of the set boundaries of order and policies of ordination in this denomination. Some fear that this might be a small stepping stone to get to where other confessional churches have ended up. For example look at the PCUSA. They ordained Senior Women Pastors now.
If Pastor Keller has issues with the denominations BCO then maybe he ought to consider moving his ordination to one that ordains women deacons. That would be best for unity sake in my opinion. He is not promoting unity in my opinion which is something I do believe he took a vow to perform.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PuritanCovenanter For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 12:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Grayson, Kentucky
Posts: 950
Thanks: 497
Thanked 184 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk
So if we claim to be going on scripture alone, should the man say...well I dont care what I think God's word teaches, I'll just be comfortable and conform to the "official" position.
Are we Roman Catholics now? | Again, no. That's not the issue here. No one is saying what Mr. Keller or the other elders of the church must believe; nor would (or even *could*) ordaining deacons (and not deaconesses) go against conscience or force him to do something he thinks is unBiblical. | Thanks for the backup Paul and Martin. You've said it better than I attempted to before.
I resent LeeJUk's accusations that I have somewhere called Keller a heretic (which I have not) and yet I am now pseudo-labled a Roman Catholic. Not very consistent.
| 
11-05-2009, 01:06 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
Sorry Grillsy for the way that read,
I was not accusing you of calling him a heretic and I said Are we Roman Catholics, not YOU because it seems that a lot of people here are saying he must conform to the Denomination or the BCO.
Well thats fine seems that everyone wants the denomination to be happy and everyone to be nice and uniform. In my opinion whats happening here is that tradition has become more important than scripture and I'm not gonna win any hearts and minds of the PCA so I'll leave it, pointless to go on.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to LeeJUk For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Posts: 262
Thanks: 73
Thanked 83 Times in 57 Posts
| |
Correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not familiar with the PCA BCO), but this seems like a false dilemma to me: Quote:
1) Please the denomination
2) Go with what I think God says in his word
| Aren't there procedures to amend the BCO through the GA or committees, etc.?
If Pastor Keller feels that strongly about women deacons, then it would make sense to pursue the proper, PCA recognized, channels to amend the offending practice. Just perusing the PCA BCO, it seems like they amend it on an almost annual basis.
__________________
Carl Gobelman
Long Grove Community Church (Evangelical)
Vernon Hills, IL
Blog: http://newcreationperson.wordpress.com
"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to carlgobelman For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:09 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,407
Thanks: 2,898
Thanked 6,129 Times in 2,588 Posts
| | |
Imagine that, a denomination that expects its ministers to actually believe, obey, and uphold denominational standards.
| | The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 1,305
Thanks: 366
Thanked 381 Times in 243 Posts
| | |
It is not only the PCA which has such issues. They do, however, have a tendency to overlook the "faults" of their stars. Consider St. Andrews Chapel re: the Second Commandment.
| 
11-05-2009, 01:12 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,407
Thanks: 2,898
Thanked 6,129 Times in 2,588 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt It is not only the PCA which has such issues. They do, however, have a tendency to overlook the "faults" of their stars. Consider St. Andrews Chapel re: the Second Commandment. | St. Andrews Chapel, if you're speaking of Sproul's church, is not a Presbyterian church. It's independent of any denomination. R.C. himself is PCA, but not the church.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:14 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,698 Times in 743 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk Sorry Grillsy for the way that read,
I was not accusing you of calling him a heretic and I said Are we Roman Catholics, not YOU because it seems that a lot of people here are saying he must conform to the Denomination or the BCO.
Well thats fine seems that everyone wants the denomination to be happy and everyone to be nice and uniform. In my opinion whats happening here is that tradition has become more important than scripture and I'm not gonna win any hearts and minds of the PCA so I'll leave it, pointless to go on. | Lee, it's okay to leave the topic, but I must say that you're still wholly misunderstanding what's going on here. At root, this has nothing to do with tradition; it has nothing to do with scripture; it has nothing to do with doctrines, beliefs, teachings, dogmas, etc. It has do with honesty and integrity.
Here's why: The officers of the church have standards of practice as to how the public order of the church will work; they have sworn to conform to these standards. However, this is not happening; and not only is this not happening, the parties in question are saying, "Hey, we're doing everything just rightly in accord with the BCO." So the issue isn't at all over what they believe; or even really what they're doing: it's about integrity. If he wants to have women deacons allowed in the churches -- okay. In his integrity, he needs to admit that such is not the current acceptable practice, and go through the proper channels and procedures to attempt to allow such a practice. It's like sneaking a cookie from the cookie jar as your mother catches you doing it; telling her you're not really *taking* the cookie, you're just "taking" the cookie; and that this is how the cookie jar has worked all along.
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,061
Thanks: 452
Thanked 869 Times in 397 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SolaScriptura Can someone PLEASE explain to me how a man can go on the public record in so many venues blatantly opposing our standards on this point and yet NEVER be brought on trial?
His brazen defiance is grating. The utter inaction on the part of the courts of my church is really disheartening. | I agree, Ben. It makes a mockery out of Presbyterianism, and certainly creates some degree of resentment among "lesser" ministers who realize that they could never get away with the same, even if they hold the same convictions, because they do not have the popularity of a minister such as Keller to provide themselves with a defense of sorts that comes with the denomination's desire to avoid the public backlash that would result if the case were to be prosecuted.
It strikes me a bit like the Leithart case out here when he went on public record admitting verbally and in print that he disagrees with a number of the 2007 GA points against FV teaching, and yet at his trial most of the presbyters just shrugged their shoulders and gave him a pass. The main defense made for him by Rayburn could just as easily be made by defenders of Keller - that if we prosecute something like this we will lose our popularity, our publishing houses will lose money, we will become an irrelevant denomination in the public eye, and would be seen as the dreaded 'TRs' promoting a dead orthodoxy.
A house cannot remain healthy if discipline is continually disallowed, and the same goes for a denomination. It follows the same principle of elders being able to keep their home in order if we want to see healthy and orderly churches.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon Soli Deo Gloria | | The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Archlute For This Useful Post: | | 
11-05-2009, 01:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 4,115
Thanks: 493
Thanked 2,299 Times in 844 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute A house cannot remain healthy if discipline is continually disallowed, and the same goes for a denomination. It follows the same principle of elders being able to keep their home in order if we want to see healthy and orderly churches. | I know... man, can you imagine the chaos that would ensue in my house if I had as loose a grip on my family as the church courts of the PCA apparently do with her TEs? | 
11-05-2009, 01:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,826
Thanks: 1,701
Thanked 1,498 Times in 841 Posts
| | Quote: |
I know... man, can you imagine the chaos that would ensue in my house if I had as loose a grip on my family as the church courts of the PCA apparently do with her TEs?
| Precisely. And the discipline in your home comes out of love for your children and concern over their souls. Where's the love here? It would be better shown in carrying out the discipline called for in the BCO than in turning a blind eye.
__________________
Kevin, husband of a truly angelic woman, and father to ten.
Zion United Reformed Church of Sheffield
Ontario, Canada
| | The Following User Says Thank You to kvanlaan For This Useful Post: | |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |