The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Office

Church Office Discussions related to Church Office - Pastors, Elders, Deacons, Doctors, & Evangelists.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 10:49 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Question for PCA Elders and the topic of Female Deacons

Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
__________________
Travis Graham | Member | Christ The King (PCA) | Houston, TX

"The world will bow,
and knees will be broken,
for those who don't know how"
- Woven Hand
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 10:55 AM
greenbaggins's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,023
Thanks: 972
Thanked 2,394 Times in 827 Posts
I am quite sure that the denom will not go in the last named direction. The laying on of hands is explicit in Acts 6. I imagine it could very easily cause a church split. That is what I fear, anyway. I think, though, that the most likely direction is that the BCO will remain unchanged.
__________________
Rev. Lane Keister
Teaching Elder, PCA, North Dakota (working out of bounds in a CRC and an RCA church)
http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com
http://brahmsgreenglove.blogspot.com
http://accenttranslation.blogspot.com
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:42 AM
KenPierce's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot and Steamy Jackson MS
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 120 Times in 56 Posts
Having grown up in the RCA and left it over the necessity of submission to female elders (which is but a symptom of a denial of Biblical authority), female deacons are, to me, a tertiary issue.

But, from recent experience with "our" churches in San Diego and Denver, I fear that much of what is lurking behind the skirted deacons argument is egalitarianism, pure and simple. That is why the existence of female deacons in the ARP and RPCNA does not trouble me. I don't believe the motivation there to have been egalitarian.

So, I am more frightened of the ideas lurking behind, admittedly a slippery slope argument, but nonetheless we ought to be looking at the whole worldview that gives rise to this stuff.
__________________
Kenneth A. Pierce
Senior Minister
Trinity Presbyterian Church (PCA)
5301 Old Canton Rd.
Jackson, MS 39211
(601)977-0774
www.tpcjackson.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to KenPierce For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (06-04-2008), Galatians220 (06-03-2008), Josiah (06-03-2008), Presbyterian Deacon (06-03-2008), Stephen (06-03-2008), Theoretical (06-03-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:54 AM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,101
Thanks: 196
Thanked 632 Times in 275 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis View Post
Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
Pray for unity in our churches, presbyteries, and denomination (even within disagreement on this issue).
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
Online presence: blog | twitter | facebook


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post:
Stephen (06-03-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:07 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis View Post
Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:19 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis View Post
Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
I am just asking 'what if'. Like "I wonder what the world will look like in 2020". I understand the process that needs to take place and never specifically mentioned the GA.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:23 PM
Zenas's Avatar
Snow Miser
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,277
Thanks: 308
Thanked 1,377 Times in 726 Posts
It might not be so great to speculate on what could possibly be a highly controversial and emotional issue for some before anything worth getting exicted over has happened.

__________________
Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo
Deacon
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN

Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
As in obeying the voice of the LORD?
Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice,
And to heed than the fat of rams.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Zenas For This Useful Post:
Josiah (06-03-2008), Stephen (06-03-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:28 PM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,101
Thanks: 196
Thanked 632 Times in 275 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas View Post
It might not be so great to speculate on what could possibly be a highly controversial and emotional issue for some before anything worth getting exicted over has happened.

Unfortunately (?), this speculation is already happening all over the place. Travis just put it in visible print.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:41 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas View Post
It might not be so great to speculate on what could possibly be a highly controversial and emotional issue for some before anything worth getting exicted over has happened.

Unfortunately (?), this speculation is already happening all over the place. Travis just put it in visible print.

No, I am not sure it is happening all over the place. Their may be some that are sympathetic to deaconesses and some congregations have deaconesses (not ordained), but this is not widespread. There is certainly the potential for a problem down the road, but as fallen creatures we are always prone to error. The current issue before the General Assembly is to clarify the position. There are always a few that like to push the envelope but this will always be the case.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 03:42 PM
KenPierce's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot and Steamy Jackson MS
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 120 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis View Post
Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
Stephen, brother, I think you will be shocked (as I was) to find out just how broad the movement in this direction is.

I wish I thought you were right.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 06:52 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
__________________
Sterling Harmon
Presbyterian Church of Coventry (PCA)
Coventry, CT
Deacon
________________

"Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
-- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

"Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
-- Martin Luther, Table Talk

Interim Pulpit Supply of New England

My Facebook

Owner/Administrator @ Reformed Theology Institute
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 06:52 PM
AVT's Avatar
AVT AVT is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 109
Thanks: 25
Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
I'm not an Elder and only have been following this in my denomination. Our Pastor is on the Overtures Committee and is in favor of the study committee but has shown no signs (ever) of wanting to establish women in ecclesiastical authority over men.

The original overtures are to study scripture and report recommendations (which could be changes or no changes). While I may be overly optimistic, I do not anticipate a majority report recommending to ordain women deacons based on Scripture exegesis because at the very best, Scripture is unclear on this. Maybe a divided report, say 5 to 2 with the majority affirming the value of the office of Deacon, ordained, elected, authoritative, worthy of honor, open to men only according to Scripture.

Again, maybe I'm too optimistic but I think it more likely recommendations from a Study Committee would be for Book of Church Order provisions that actually clarify further the Board of Deacons oversight, maintenance with responsibility and authority for mercy ministry in each local church. Maybe even a provision that allows the Board of Deacons to appoint men and women to assist them in mercy ministry. A strengthening and clarification of the office of Deacon and its administrative authority. It is even remotely possible of recommending creation of an "office" of servant widow strictly in accordance with I Timothy 5 (nonordained, under the authority of the Elders and Deacons) with the biblical requirements there (age 60, widow, served well, etc.) for those churches that wish to try that.

Also, I expect virtually unanimous result of ending of this practice of not having the office of Deacon and substituting for it instead, a "commissioned" group of women who take similar vows and perform similar functions.

Even if a majority of the Study Committee were to recommend changes to our Book of Church Order, I do not expect it would be adopted by the General Assembly. Changes to our Book of Church Order would require 2/3 of Presbyteries to ratify changes. I just do not see any signs of that happening or even being remotely likely.

Having said that we need to *pray, pray, pray* for a biblical process and result!
__________________
Arlene
PCA
North Carolina
Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AVT For This Useful Post:
Josiah (06-03-2008), Stephen (06-04-2008)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 07:09 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
Two regular posters, at least, on PB are members of the PCA bills & overtures committee, one of whom is the convenor, which by this time next week, will probably have voted on the issue of whether to propose such a study committee.

__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 07:50 PM
Reepicheep's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 114
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 31 Posts
I'm on the Overtures committee this year. While I personally do not find it necessary to have a study committee on this issue, I suspect I will be in the minority.
__________________
Tony Felich
Pastor, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Overland Park, Kansas
www.redeemer-pca.org
blog: http://reepicheep-ajf.blogspot.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 07:58 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,465
Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,419 Times in 1,385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reepicheep View Post
I'm on the Overtures committee this year. While I personally do not find it necessary to have a study committee on this issue, I suspect I will be in the minority.
Tony,

I'll see you Monday! As someone pointed out, I'm the convener.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:47 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
Meum cerebrum nocet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,406
Thanks: 1,735
Thanked 3,429 Times in 1,682 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Having grown up in the RCA and left it over the necessity of submission to female elders (which is but a symptom of a denial of Biblical authority), female deacons are, to me, a tertiary issue.

But, from recent experience with "our" churches in San Diego and Denver, I fear that much of what is lurking behind the skirted deacons argument is egalitarianism, pure and simple. That is why the existence of female deacons in the ARP and RPCNA does not trouble me. I don't believe the motivation there to have been egalitarian.

So, I am more frightened of the ideas lurking behind, admittedly a slippery slope argument, but nonetheless we ought to be looking at the whole worldview that gives rise to this stuff.
Ken,

That is an incredibly insightful organizational observation. As one who graduated from a school where you cannot even submit a paper for grading now that is not fully "inclusive," and belonged to a denomination that viewed dissent from ordaining women as the unpardonable sin, your insights seem quite sound. The liberals bought into egalitarianism in the 60's/70's. The "progressive evangelicals" got on board in the late 70s/80s. The mainstream evangelicals found common cause in the 80s/90s. It is just about time for the conservative evangelicals and conservative Reformed bodies to start fighting over the issue too. Judging from my friends in the PCA, however, I would be surprised if your assessment of the current strength of this movement is totally accurate. The feminist juggernaut is clearly moving the direction you describe. The only question is where it currently stands in its progress.

[If you want to play a discouraging head counting game, list the mainline seminaries that are not off the chart in their PC gender politics. Then, name ANY "evangelical" seminaries that do not take at least a tentatively pro-women's ordination stand (hint: start with Masters as one of the few who take a firm anti-feminism position). Then, list the Reformed seminaries that do not have some measure of controversy on the subject. Finally, consider the percentage of seminary grads in America that are not reflexively pro-ordination of women.]
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Last edited by DMcFadden; 06-04-2008 at 11:17 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:10 AM
Reepicheep's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 114
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reepicheep View Post
I'm on the Overtures committee this year. While I personally do not find it necessary to have a study committee on this issue, I suspect I will be in the minority.
Tony,

I'll see you Monday! As someone pointed out, I'm the convener.
Fred, I look forward to seeing you my hometown brother! I know you will do a great job as the convener.

We may be the only former Buffalo Catholics ordained in the PCA?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 10:11 AM
KenPierce's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot and Steamy Jackson MS
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 120 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Having grown up in the RCA and left it over the necessity of submission to female elders (which is but a symptom of a denial of Biblical authority), female deacons are, to me, a tertiary issue.

But, from recent experience with "our" churches in San Diego and Denver, I fear that much of what is lurking behind the skirted deacons argument is egalitarianism, pure and simple. That is why the existence of female deacons in the ARP and RPCNA does not trouble me. I don't believe the motivation there to have been egalitarian.

So, I am more frightened of the ideas lurking behind, admittedly a slippery slope argument, but nonetheless we ought to be looking at the whole worldview that gives rise to this stuff.
Ken,

That is an incredibly insightful organizational observation. As one who graduated from a school where you cannot even submit a paper for grading now that is not fully "inclusive," and belonged to a denomination that viewed dissent from ordaining women as the unpardonable sin, your insights seem quite sound. The liberals bought into egalitarianism in the 60's/70's. The "progressive evangelicals" got on board in the late 70s/80s. The mainstream evangelicals found common cause in the 80s/90s. It is just about time for the conservative evangelicals and conservative Reformed bodies to start fighting over the issue too. Judging from my friends in the PCA, however, I would be surprised if your assessment of the current strength of this movement is totally accurate. The feminist juggernaut is clearly moving the direction you describe. The only question is where it currently stands in its progress.

[If you want to play a discouraging head counting game, list the mainline seminaries that are not off the chart in their PC gender politics. Then, name ANY "evangelical" seminaries that do not take at least a tentatively pro-women's ordination stand (hint: start with Masters). Then, list the Reformed seminaries that do not have some measure of controversy on the subject. Finally, consider the percentage of seminary grads in America that are not reflexively pro-ordination of women.]
Aw, shucks, thanks! :-)

I am a glass-half-empty type of guy, and this is one issue I would love to be wrong about.

I guess I have just dealt too much with the guys in the PCA echelons of power, and the new progressive wing of big churches, (and the Bayly brothers good blog) to think that this is almost inevitable, and will happen at light speed.

For one thing, it is getting ever more impressive and vocal advocates. Witness the Carolyn CUSTIS James, the wife of the president of RTS-O, and Reggie Kidd, the much beloved NT prof there.

Even RTS and Covenant allow women in the MDiv program. Why? Methinks the lurking motivation is $$$.

So, let's pray that, in a week and a half, I come back from Dallas, hat in hand, and say, "Brother Dennis, you are right; I was wrong. Forgive me!!"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to KenPierce For This Useful Post:
Josiah (06-04-2008)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 10:16 AM
Joshua's Avatar
CurmudgeonlyAdmeanstrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,177
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 2,842
Thanked 5,883 Times in 2,500 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Even RTS and Covenant allow women in the MDiv program.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 10:56 AM
DavidinKnoxville's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 76
Thanks: 20
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Me being ....Kind of:

Quote:
Even RTS and Covenant allow women in the MDiv program. Why? Methinks the lurking motivation is $$$.

So, let's pray that, in a week and a half, I come back from Dallas, hat in hand, and say, "Brother Dennis, you are right; I was wrong. Forgive me!!"

Which is one of the reasons that Christian education should be free.
__________________
David E Yoder II
Deacon, serving at Covenant Presbyterian Church in Oak Ridge, TN (PCA)
Living in Knoxville, TN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:04 PM
Josiah's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 2,075
Thanks: 1,493
Thanked 154 Times in 95 Posts
Quote:
Even RTS and Covenant allow women in the MDiv program. Why? Methinks the lurking motivation is $$$.


These are excellent seminarys. Why would they need to offer the MDiv program to women? Is it really that profitable for them to do?
__________________
Josiah Lovett
Member of
Trinity OPC
Bothell WA
Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Westminster Standards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:04 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
Meum cerebrum nocet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,406
Thanks: 1,735
Thanked 3,429 Times in 1,682 Posts
After a couple of the posts about women in seminary, I am feeling guilty. Full disclosure: while my wife holds several college and seminary degrees (including a D.Min.), she did not seek ordination (even though our mainlline denomination at the time ordains women) mainly because she is a complementarian and does not approve of women in that role. Her rueful comment on the spate of women seeking senior pastoral positions is that they are mostly a group of angry women, with problems with the men in their lives (esp. their fathers), who have horrible attitudes toward the church. She just shakes her head and says: "Paul was right."

Last edited by DMcFadden; 06-04-2008 at 12:53 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:04 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,465
Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,419 Times in 1,385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reepicheep View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reepicheep View Post
I'm on the Overtures committee this year. While I personally do not find it necessary to have a study committee on this issue, I suspect I will be in the minority.
Tony,

I'll see you Monday! As someone pointed out, I'm the convener.
Fred, I look forward to seeing you my hometown brother! I know you will do a great job as the convener.

We may be the only former Buffalo Catholics ordained in the PCA?
I think that is right. Funny how God works!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:09 PM
KenPierce's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot and Steamy Jackson MS
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 120 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
After a couple of the posts about women in seminary, I am feeling guilty. Full disclosure: while my wife holds several college and seminary degrees (including a D.Min.), she did not seek ordination (even though our mainlline denomination at the time ordains women) mainly because she is a complementarian and does not approve of women in that role. Her rueful comment on the spate of women seeking senior pastoral positions is that they are mostly a group of angry women, with problems with the men in their lives (esp. their fathers), who have horrible attitudes toward the church. She just shakes her head and says: "Paul was right."
My wife is also a seminary (CE) grad, and I am grateful she is. But, she is also the strongest complementarian I know. She has been insulted by a prominent PCA minister who said, "Our women are tired of being just housewives and mothers."

That, dear brethren, is where we are headed. Women tired of their Biblical roles, and the men that enable them.

Last edited by DMcFadden; 06-04-2008 at 12:59 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:11 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,797
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,023
Thanked 2,581 Times in 1,572 Posts
The men who enable them by not being men.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div
Licentiate Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church

Member: Fairmount ARP Church Pittsburgh, PA
Attending: Looking for a Reformed church in North Central WV
Preaching: Nov. 8 Belington Presbyterian & Beverly Presbyterian PC(USA) Churches

Deo Vindice
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
KenPierce (06-04-2008), Stephen (06-04-2008)
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:25 PM
Josiah's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 2,075
Thanks: 1,493
Thanked 154 Times in 95 Posts
Quote:
She has been insulted by a prominent PCA minister who said, "Our women are tired of being just housewives and mothers."
I havnt heard this type of hurtful rhetoric since I left the Assemblies of God church . Perhaps this is just a restless minority in the PCA that needs to give serious thought to jumping over to the EPC?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Josiah For This Useful Post:
Stephen (06-04-2008)
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:26 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
Two regular posters, at least, on PB are members of the PCA bills & overtures committee, one of whom is the convenor, which by this time next week, will probably have voted on the issue of whether to propose such a study committee.

I am on the overtures committee also, and that is the task of the OC to vote for or against a study committee. The OC could still vote against the study committee. Noone knows what will come out of the OC, so it is premature to say. It is certainly an issue that is on the minds of many, but we must be praying that the Lord will give the OC wisdom. I certainly need wisdom.

Last edited by Stephen; 06-04-2008 at 01:15 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:28 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,797
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,023
Thanked 2,581 Times in 1,572 Posts
for the OC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:47 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis View Post
Out of curiosity, for those that are elders in the PCA (both teaching and ruling, I guess), what will you do if the PCA were to approve the ordination of female deacons? Or, if they were to say that deacons are no longer to be ordained, but only commissioned and can include both males and females?
Are you assuming that the PCA is going to decide for the ordination of deaconesses? There is no move in that direction of which I am aware. There are two overtures before the PCA General Assembly to form a study committee to further explore the issue of deaconesses. The study committee would be required to make a recommendation to the GA before any decision is made. The study committee would still have to do its work and could even decide that deaconesses are not Biblical. I think it is premature to wonder what elders will do until a decision is made whether to form a study committee or not.
Stephen, brother, I think you will be shocked (as I was) to find out just how broad the movement in this direction is.

I wish I thought you were right.
No, brother, I will not be shocked because nothing surprises me, especially when it comes to the PCA. Granted there are a number of congregations that may have strong leanings toward egalitarianism, but I do not think that is the general consenses. Some may genuinely believe that there is a need for women in diaconal work, but not all of them would advocate the ordination of women, especially giving them ecclesiastical authority. I don't believe that there is a strong united front in the PCA for the ordination of women. That is not to say there is not a minority that have leanings in that direction. I understand that some elders coming from groups like the RCA or the PCUSA may have greater concerns, but it is my opinion that we do not have the same situation in the PCA. There is always the slippery slope because of the feminized culture, but we have to respond to the issue and not simply ignore it.

Last edited by Stephen; 06-04-2008 at 01:18 PM. Reason: misspelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:50 PM
KenPierce's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hot and Steamy Jackson MS
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 120 Times in 56 Posts
Stephen,

I think we agree in principle, and we will have to see the outcome. I pray you are right.

But, remember, one of the most profitable things Rushdoony ever said was that history is not made by majorities but by minorities who act on their convictions (paraphrase). That is a sword that, sadly, cuts both ways.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:59 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Having grown up in the RCA and left it over the necessity of submission to female elders (which is but a symptom of a denial of Biblical authority), female deacons are, to me, a tertiary issue.

But, from recent experience with "our" churches in San Diego and Denver, I fear that much of what is lurking behind the skirted deacons argument is egalitarianism, pure and simple. That is why the existence of female deacons in the ARP and RPCNA does not trouble me. I don't believe the motivation there to have been egalitarian.

So, I am more frightened of the ideas lurking behind, admittedly a slippery slope argument, but nonetheless we ought to be looking at the whole worldview that gives rise to this stuff.
Ken,

That is an incredibly insightful organizational observation. As one who graduated from a school where you cannot even submit a paper for grading now that is not fully "inclusive," and belonged to a denomination that viewed dissent from ordaining women as the unpardonable sin, your insights seem quite sound. The liberals bought into egalitarianism in the 60's/70's. The "progressive evangelicals" got on board in the late 70s/80s. The mainstream evangelicals found common cause in the 80s/90s. It is just about time for the conservative evangelicals and conservative Reformed bodies to start fighting over the issue too. Judging from my friends in the PCA, however, I would be surprised if your assessment of the current strength of this movement is totally accurate. The feminist juggernaut is clearly moving the direction you describe. The only question is where it currently stands in its progress.

[If you want to play a discouraging head counting game, list the mainline seminaries that are not off the chart in their PC gender politics. Then, name ANY "evangelical" seminaries that do not take at least a tentatively pro-women's ordination stand (hint: start with Masters). Then, list the Reformed seminaries that do not have some measure of controversy on the subject. Finally, consider the percentage of seminary grads in America that are not reflexively pro-ordination of women.]
Aw, shucks, thanks! :-)

I am a glass-half-empty type of guy, and this is one issue I would love to be wrong about.

I guess I have just dealt too much with the guys in the PCA echelons of power, and the new progressive wing of big churches, (and the Bayly brothers good blog) to think that this is almost inevitable, and will happen at light speed.

For one thing, it is getting ever more impressive and vocal advocates. Witness the Carolyn CUSTIS James, the wife of the president of RTS-O, and Reggie Kidd, the much beloved NT prof there.

Even RTS and Covenant allow women in the MDiv program. Why? Methinks the lurking motivation is $$$.

So, let's pray that, in a week and a half, I come back from Dallas, hat in hand, and say, "Brother Dennis, you are right; I was wrong. Forgive me!!"
Ken, I was not aware that RTS and Covenant allowed women in the MDiv program. Nothing coming from RTS-Orlando would surprise me. I do not brush shoulders with PCA ecclesiastical executives, so I would not know about that. I do not know of any in my circles that would advocate the ordination of women, but I do know some that favor deaconesses, which are two different issues. I do agree with Dennis, but if I am wrong too, I will be happy to take you to dinner at General Assembly. If you are a teetoter I will refrain and drink tea,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:04 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
The men who enable them by not being men.


Amen, preach it brother. There I go again with my latent charismatic overtones. Women will naturally take the lead because men have abrogated their responsibilites. Do not get me started on this issue.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:12 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
After a couple of the posts about women in seminary, I am feeling guilty. Full disclosure: while my wife holds several college and seminary degrees (including a D.Min.), she did not seek ordination (even though our mainlline denomination at the time ordains women) mainly because she is a complementarian and does not approve of women in that role. Her rueful comment on the spate of women seeking senior pastoral positions is that they are mostly a group of angry women, with problems with the men in their lives (esp. their fathers), who have horrible attitudes toward the church. She just shakes her head and says: "Paul was right."
My wife is also a seminary (CE) grad, and I am grateful she is. But, she is also the strongest complementarian I know. She has been insulted by a prominent PCA minister who said, "Our women are tired of being just housewives and mothers."

That, dear brethren, is where we are headed. Women tired of their Biblical roles, and the men that enable them.
I hope you rebuked your fellow elder for making such an absurd comment.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:22 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
Stephen,

I think we agree in principle, and we will have to see the outcome. I pray you are right.

But, remember, one of the most profitable things Rushdoony ever said was that history is not made by majorities but by minorities who act on their convictions (paraphrase). That is a sword that, sadly, cuts both ways.

Oh, brother what a man for you to quote considering he was a theonomist That is a true but sad quote to consider. You may be right after all on the direction of the PCA, but I still believe that there are enough strong elders who will take the lead. I have had more concern about the direction of the PCA in other areas, but I will stick with this topic, or I may get arrested.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:34 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,519
Thanks: 135
Thanked 531 Times in 243 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Can I have some popcorn?
__________________
Rev. Andrew J. Barnes
Husband of Dena
Father of Oliver
Master of Bruce
Pastor of Tchula Presbyterian Church

What can I say, I like blogs!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:52 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Can I have some popcorn?


Would you like butter and salt on that, sir?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:56 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,472
Thanks: 1,652
Thanked 1,063 Times in 689 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Can I have some popcorn?
There's plenty to go around.

Here, , have some.
__________________
James Helbert, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 01:59 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,519
Thanks: 135
Thanked 531 Times in 243 Posts
I would enjoy the butter and salt.

Maybe I need to take my wife to a well deserved date/movie tonight....popcorn is sounding good.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 02:13 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Can I have some popcorn?
There's plenty to go around.

Here, , have some.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 02:14 PM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
I would enjoy the butter and salt.

Maybe I need to take my wife to a well deserved date/movie tonight....popcorn is sounding good.
Yes, that would be a nice evening.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69