» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
04-28-2008, 09:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Utah
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 219
Thanked 204 Times in 137 Posts
| | | Qualifications for Overseers I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads. Quote: |
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
| My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye?
__________________
John J.
Member Christ Prebyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah www.christpres.net | 
04-28-2008, 09:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 751
Thanks: 164
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
| | Years ago, when I was a RE in the Colleyville, TX, PCA church, we had a Godly deacon who came under conviction that "husband of one wife" meant he had to be married, and was a lifelong bachelor, and nothing we could say dissuaded him. He resigned from the deaconate, and as I recall, he was one of our best ones. A year or so later, he died of a brain tumor. Bless his memory.
Since Paul had legal training, I don't know why he didn't say, "He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children, if any, submissive."
But years ago, I realized that the Holy Spirit has done a lot of things without checking with me on them.  | 
04-28-2008, 09:16 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,421
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,255 Times in 667 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office? | No. | 
04-28-2008, 09:18 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 11,137
Thanks: 713
Thanked 1,913 Times in 906 Posts
| | | No. The qualification relates to how well he manages those that are in his household. It's inclusive of the most important things one would want to evaluate if a man had them in his household. I've seen others that read the qualities that a man's wife should exhibit as evidence that only married men can be Elders. This is a surface reading of the text. The text does not require that a man be married and have children, the qualifications relate to how well he manages it when he is married and has children.
__________________
Rich
Okinawa, Japan SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
04-28-2008, 09:19 PM
|  | Bubba | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5,243
Thanks: 440
Thanked 203 Times in 163 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office? | No. | Agreed.
__________________ Ivan Schoen, Pastor Maranatha Baptist Church
Poplar Grove, Illinois USA http://maranatha-sbc.org/ Husband to Nancy
Father to Sherril, Sarah, Kathryn
Grandfather to Phillip Faith is the refusal to panic. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
| 
04-28-2008, 09:22 PM
|  | PCA Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads. Quote: |
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
| My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ.
__________________ Fredrick T. Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
04-28-2008, 09:27 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 11,137
Thanks: 713
Thanked 1,913 Times in 906 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads. Quote: |
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
| My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ. | Think?
Fred, Fred,
You should be asking how I feel about it. | 
04-28-2008, 09:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Utah
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 219
Thanked 204 Times in 137 Posts
| | Quote:
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ.
|  Well said. | 
04-28-2008, 09:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 796
Thanked 383 Times in 265 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads.
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ. | Think?
Fred, Fred,
You should be asking how I feel about it. |  | 
04-28-2008, 09:43 PM
|  | PCA Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads.
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ. | Think?
Fred, Fred,
You should be asking how I feel about it. | Quick, Quick! EMOTE!! | 
04-29-2008, 12:29 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,285
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 617 Times in 437 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads. Quote: |
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
| My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ. | This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children."
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA "There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll Click to get: Board Rules--Signature Requirements--Suggestions? | 
04-29-2008, 12:35 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,421
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,255 Times in 667 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick I have a question regarding overseers.
1 Timothy 3:4 reads.
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.
What think ye? | Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.
Neither could Christ. | This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children." | Indeed. It's precisely a misunderstanding of the office of Pastor. They are to minister the Word of God and Shepherd the Flock. They do these things not by virtue of their experiences, but by the truth found in the Word of God. | | The Following User Says Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
04-29-2008, 12:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 10
Thanked 92 Times in 62 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children." | I've heard that same argument used many times against the Roman priesthood.
Was Paul an elder, or was elder an automatic subclass of apostle?
__________________
Tom Albrecht
Member, Covenant URCNA, New Holland, PA.
"I'm not a famous man. I'm just a simple country doctor with horse sense."
| 
04-29-2008, 12:40 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,285
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 617 Times in 437 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children." | I've heard that same argument used many times against the Roman priesthood.
Was Paul an elder, or was elder an automatic subclass of apostle? | I haven't seen it argued recently but I think the usual argument asserts that Jesus and Paul were not ordinary church officers. But in one of his epistles IIRC Peter (who was married) refers to himself as an elder. | 
04-29-2008, 01:37 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,055
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 314 Times in 183 Posts
| | Quote: |
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
| An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.
I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children.
__________________ | 
04-29-2008, 10:43 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 10
Thanked 92 Times in 62 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote: |
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
| An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.
I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children. | Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship" would be appropriate to demonstrate ability in this area? Remember, the key in Paul’s requirements is concrete demonstration of the ability to evoke godly submission. Household submission is important and unique and parallels to a degree the submission found in the church. | 
04-29-2008, 10:48 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: N.E. Iowa
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 52
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
Think?
Fred, Fred,
You should be asking how I feel about it. |  if i had a penny...... 
__________________
How often have you wondered why Christ should set His heart upon such a one as you! --Octavius Winslow
Lon Wadkins (Jesup, Iowa)
New Covenant Fellowship, OPC
Independence, Iowa
| 
04-29-2008, 11:08 AM
|  | PCA Pastor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote: |
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
| An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.
I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children. | Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship" would be appropriate to demonstrate ability in this area? Remember, the key in Paul’s requirements is concrete demonstration of the ability to evoke godly submission. Household submission is important and unique and parallels to a degree the submission found in the church. | The same kind of godly submission that our Lord evoked in others. | 
04-29-2008, 11:52 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,055
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 314 Times in 183 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht
Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship&quo
| | |