The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Office

Church Office Discussions related to Church Office - Pastors, Elders, Deacons, Doctors, & Evangelists.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 82
11 members and 71 guests
Davidius, Gryphonette, Mayflower, Puritan Sailor, Reformed Christian, Rev. Todd Ruddell, RTaron, satz, Southern Presbyterian
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:07 PM
Blue Tick's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 219
Thanked 204 Times in 137 Posts
Qualifications for Overseers

I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

Quote:
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
__________________
John J.
Member Christ Prebyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.christpres.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:16 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 751
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 164
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Years ago, when I was a RE in the Colleyville, TX, PCA church, we had a Godly deacon who came under conviction that "husband of one wife" meant he had to be married, and was a lifelong bachelor, and nothing we could say dissuaded him. He resigned from the deaconate, and as I recall, he was one of our best ones. A year or so later, he died of a brain tumor. Bless his memory.

Since Paul had legal training, I don't know why he didn't say, "He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children, if any, submissive."

But years ago, I realized that the Holy Spirit has done a lot of things without checking with me on them.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:16 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,421
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,255 Times in 667 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
No.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)
Board Rules-Signature Requirements-Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:18 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 11,137
Thanks: 713
Thanked 1,913 Times in 906 Posts
No. The qualification relates to how well he manages those that are in his household. It's inclusive of the most important things one would want to evaluate if a man had them in his household. I've seen others that read the qualities that a man's wife should exhibit as evidence that only married men can be Elders. This is a surface reading of the text. The text does not require that a man be married and have children, the qualifications relate to how well he manages it when he is married and has children.
__________________
Rich
Okinawa, Japan

SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion
WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (05-02-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:19 PM
Ivan's Avatar
Bubba
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 5,243
Thanks: 440
Thanked 203 Times in 163 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?
No.
Agreed.
__________________
Ivan Schoen, Pastor
Maranatha Baptist Church
Poplar Grove, Illinois USA

http://maranatha-sbc.org/
Husband to Nancy
Father to Sherril, Sarah, Kathryn
Grandfather to Phillip

Faith is the refusal to panic. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:22 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
PCA Pastor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

Quote:
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
__________________
Fredrick T. Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (05-02-2008)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:27 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 11,137
Thanks: 713
Thanked 1,913 Times in 906 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

Quote:
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
Think?

Fred, Fred,

You should be asking how I feel about it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:30 PM
Blue Tick's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 219
Thanked 204 Times in 137 Posts
Quote:
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
Well said.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:42 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 796
Thanked 383 Times in 265 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
Think?

Fred, Fred,

You should be asking how I feel about it.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church

Student of Theology

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:43 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
PCA Pastor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
Think?

Fred, Fred,

You should be asking how I feel about it.
Quick, Quick! EMOTE!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:29 AM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,285
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 617 Times in 437 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

Quote:
4 He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, 5 for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?
My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children."
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA

"There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll

Click to get: Board Rules--Signature Requirements--Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:35 AM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,421
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,255 Times in 667 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children."
Indeed. It's precisely a misunderstanding of the office of Pastor. They are to minister the Word of God and Shepherd the Flock. They do these things not by virtue of their experiences, but by the truth found in the Word of God.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (05-02-2008)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:38 AM
tcalbrecht's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 10
Thanked 92 Times in 62 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children."
I've heard that same argument used many times against the Roman priesthood.

Was Paul an elder, or was elder an automatic subclass of apostle?
__________________
Tom Albrecht
Member, Covenant URCNA, New Holland, PA.

"I'm not a famous man. I'm just a simple country doctor with horse sense."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:40 AM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,285
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 617 Times in 437 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
This seems simple enough to us but unfortunately there are many who cannot or will not accept it and insist that a man must be married. More commonly you hear the more pragmatic refrain "well how can he relate if he's single and/or doesn't have children."
I've heard that same argument used many times against the Roman priesthood.

Was Paul an elder, or was elder an automatic subclass of apostle?
I haven't seen it argued recently but I think the usual argument asserts that Jesus and Paul were not ordinary church officers. But in one of his epistles IIRC Peter (who was married) refers to himself as an elder.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:37 AM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,055
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 314 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.

I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children.
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:43 AM
tcalbrecht's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 10
Thanked 92 Times in 62 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Quote:
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.

I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children.
Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship" would be appropriate to demonstrate ability in this area? Remember, the key in Paul’s requirements is concrete demonstration of the ability to evoke godly submission. Household submission is important and unique and parallels to a degree the submission found in the church.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:48 AM
lwadkins's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N.E. Iowa
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 52
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post

Think?

Fred, Fred,

You should be asking how I feel about it.

if i had a penny......
__________________
How often have you wondered why Christ should set His heart upon such a one as you! --Octavius Winslow

Lon Wadkins (Jesup, Iowa)
New Covenant Fellowship, OPC
Independence, Iowa
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 11:08 AM
fredtgreco's Avatar
PCA Pastor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 7,426
Thanks: 69
Thanked 712 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Quote:
Tit 1:6,7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God...
An elder must demonstrate that he is above reproach as the steward (house manager) of God. Ordinarily, that would be demonstrated by the stewardship of his wife and children. However, if blamelessness in stewardship could be demonstrated some other way, then that might be acceptable.

I think disqualification based on the lack of children is going to far. That being said, I believe that ordinarily God prepares elders through the stewardship of their wife and children.
Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship" would be appropriate to demonstrate ability in this area? Remember, the key in Paul’s requirements is concrete demonstration of the ability to evoke godly submission. Household submission is important and unique and parallels to a degree the submission found in the church.
The same kind of godly submission that our Lord evoked in others.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 11:52 AM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,055
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 314 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht View Post

Suppose you are sitting on a candidates and credentials committee. What other comparable "stewardship&quo