» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 103 | | 32 members and 71 guests | | Backwoods Presbyterian, Blueridge Believer, christabella_warren, ColdSilverMoon, Covenant Joel, EricP, fralo4truth, Jeff_Bartel, jogri17, JTB, LawrenceU, loomster2000, louis_jp, MarieP, MLCOPE2, MMasztal, nasa30, Pastor Mark, PMBrooks, Puritan Sailor, Puritan Scot, rpeters, satz, Theoretical, Timothy William, Titus35, toddpedlar, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-07-2009, 01:59 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
| | | Phil Johnson on the Pornification of the Pulpit | 
03-07-2009, 04:10 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | |
Can anyone give me some quotes to prove that Driscoll is "vulgar"?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2009, 07:55 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Can anyone give me some quotes to prove that Driscoll is "vulgar"? | To be perfectly honest, if I put some of them here, as a former mod I think I would probably deserve to be infracted if not suspended. Some of it is really Tool Shed material IMO.
Let me put it this way--if our mutual friend Eddie E. (who, if you know him very well, you'd agree that he can be rather "edgy" compared to many in our circles and certainly isn't out to impose "Old South" or 1950's mores) believes that he goes way over the line at times and thought that I made good points a few weeks ago when the controversy over the Baptist Press article erupted, that ought to tell you something. (See my post here and the comments.)
Why not listen to the message when you have a chance? It will make it abundantly clear, even though Johnson was quite restrained in what he related.
| 
03-07-2009, 08:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,151
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,454 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum Can anyone give me some quotes to prove that Driscoll is "vulgar"? | To be perfectly honest, if I put some of them here, as a former mod I think I would probably deserve to be infracted if not suspended.
Let me put it this way--if our mutual friend Eddie E. (who, if you know him very well, you'd agree that he can be "edgy" compared to many in our circles) believes that he goes way over the line at times, that ought to tell you something.
Why not listen to the message when you have a chance? It will make it abundantly clear, even though Johnson was quite restrained in what he related. |
Yep, and If I were still a mod I would join in the suspension. Some of his 'sayings' go far beyond the line. And, I am no prude. I've been accused of crossing the line of propriety in the pulpit occasionally and frankly Driscoll has made me blush more than once.
__________________
We shall not adjust our Bible to the age; but before we have done with it, by God's grace, we shall adjust the age to the Bible. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon
Lawrence Underwood, Jr.
Pastor - Providence Family Fellowship / Mobile, Alabama
1644/46 LBC My Blog - Imprimis | | The Following User Says Thank You to LawrenceU For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2009, 08:50 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,837 Times in 1,470 Posts
| | |
Okay, I guess I'll have to listen to a whole file in order to get at the juicy parts, eh?
| 
03-07-2009, 11:05 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: West Lothian
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
| | |
Excellent message highly recommend listening to, reminds me of Ephesians 5:3 must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints.
__________________
Duncan
Elder
Free Church
Scotland
| 
03-07-2009, 11:29 AM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | |
Pergy, pro-sodomy "within the sanctity of marriage" comments are illustrative of Driscoll's vulgarian edginess. Most of us still consider reading-while-waiting to "do our daily business" the only permissible recreation when dealing with the bottom end of the alimentary tract. I, for example, always keep my Weekly Standard handy for reading in the morning.
Hmmmm. As a mod, I hope that was oblique enough to meet the threshold of propriety.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
03-07-2009, 03:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
| | |
I'm very curious to see details of what people consider his vulgar preaching from the pulpit. Feel free to **** any offensive words. Without specifics, it's hard to have a meaningful conversation.
__________________
Alex
Member of Carmel Baptist Church (SBC)
Matthews, NC
| 
03-07-2009, 03:26 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | |
Alex,
Was I too obscure? Don't you think that discussing what I included in my post prior to your comment "inappropriate"? His web site has not only linked to sites noted for salacious content, but engaged in Q&A (with approval) on the "nitty gritty" of what some of us consider pretty gross and immoral, even "within the sanctity of marriage." I have benefited from Discoll's preaching but have not heard enough of it to speak definitively to what he SAYS in the pulpit vs. what he says on his web site. Perhaps there is a distinction here???
In one of my pastorates, we had a very staid physician (still single in her late 50s or early 60s) who was nevertheless frank about biological and medical functions. When asked by an older person in the Sunday school class she was teaching about certain practices common in the gay community, she answered without embarrassment: "God did not design the p**** to go into the rectum."
As to the larger issue here, realize that some of this is not really about what it appears to be about. In other words, Driscoll is a polarizing figure within SBC circles, as much because of his Calvinism as his so-called emergent tendencies. People who take swipes at him and dredge up dumb comments he and his wife offered in response to a "frank" Q&A on their web site about any manner of specific sexual behaviors, are not inaccurate so much as the picture they paint may be untrue. If I say that you have not been arrested for murder . . . yet, that might be a completely "accurate" statement, however it would leave a very untrue impression.
Driscoll is edgy and attempts to reach a younger generation with the Gospel of Jesus Christ along some pretty gutsy Calvinist lines. I am not willing to relegate him to the nether regions for offending my sense of order in worship. However, neither am I willing to give him a pass on discussing (with tacit approval) certain forms of degrading behavior.
A few years ago, John MacArthur confronted him for his reputation as the "cussing preacher." Mark received the rebuke in a godly manner, repented, and corrected his practice. Rather than throwing him off the boat, I would hope that some mature Christian leader in his circle of influence would take him aside and have a frank discussion about the birds and the bees in the pulpit and the pew.
Last edited by DMcFadden; 03-07-2009 at 03:45 PM.
| 
03-07-2009, 03:27 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,504
Thanks: 1,590
Thanked 2,014 Times in 1,113 Posts
| | Moderator ruling.
No; please no one do that. If one is curious ask someone directly via private message or email, and do not post it to a thread, blanked out or not. Quote:
Originally Posted by asc I'm very curious to see details of what people consider his vulgar preaching from the pulpit. Feel free to **** any offensive words. Without specifics, it's hard to have a meaningful conversation. | | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2009, 03:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 198
Thanked 641 Times in 280 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden Alex,
Was I too obscure? Don't you think that discussing what I included in my post prior to your comment "inappropriate"? His web site has not only linked to sites noted for salacious content, but engaged in Q&A (with approval) on the "nitty gritty" of what some of us consider pretty gross and immoral, even "within the sanctity of marriage." | The question that "some of us" need to ask ourselves, then, is whether that belief can properly be deduced from Scripture, or if it comes from some other, non-biblical source. Either one is fine, but the only one we can bind anyone else's conscience by (including Pastor Driscoll's) is Scripture.
| 
03-07-2009, 03:48 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,512
Thanks: 1,769
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,717 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden Alex,
Was I too obscure? Don't you think that discussing what I included in my post prior to your comment "inappropriate"? His web site has not only linked to sites noted for salacious content, but engaged in Q&A (with approval) on the "nitty gritty" of what some of us consider pretty gross and immoral, even "within the sanctity of marriage." | The question that "some of us" need to ask ourselves, then, is whether that belief can properly be deduced from Scripture, or if it comes from some other, non-biblical source. Either one is fine, but the only one we can bind anyone else's conscience by (including Pastor Driscoll's) is Scripture. | Rae, fair enough. But, please catch the edited version of my post to get my fulller feeling on the subject. I evidently was adding while you and Chris were posting.
| 
03-07-2009, 03:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| |
I have only listened to a relatively little bit of Driscoll. I don't know if I happened to hear messages that unfortunately shared inappropriate content simply by coincidence, or perhaps a lot of his material is in fact adult oriented. I don't know. Honestly though, I like the guy! It's just that some of what he has said troubles me to a certain degree. It is one thing to address mature issues in the pulpit; it is another to make unnecessary crude jokes, perhaps for shock value or to "keep the audience interested." | 
03-07-2009, 05:08 PM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| |
We had a guy visit Grace while MacArthur was on sabbatical one time mention something about a conversation heard while "covering his feet." You could have heard a pin drop. Even that was considered inappropriate. Another bragged about his nocturnal prowess, in a round about way - again, silence. If it's in the text, deal with it. But this sort of shock affect and personal gratification is for locker rooms, not heralds of the glorious Gospel of Jesus Christ.
And, yes, Lawrence shocks me quite often.
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| 
03-07-2009, 05:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabee We had a guy visit Grace while MacArthur was on sabbatical one time mention something about a conversation heard while "covering his feet." You could have heard a pin drop. Even that was considered inappropriate. Another bragged about his nocturnal prowess, in a round about way - again, silence. If it's in the text, deal with it. But this sort of shock affect and personal gratification is for locker rooms, not heralds of the glorious Gospel of Jesus Christ.
And, yes, Lawrence shocks me quite often.  | Reminds me of an IFBkad pastor I heard about.
Doesn't Lawrence shock us all?
Read Lawrence's blog after listening to Phil Johnson's sermon. Scroll down to March. I was really hoping Johnson was engaging in some hyperbole.
__________________
Chris Thomas | SBC-Founders | Fairbanks, AK "Whatever the cause, the Calvinists were the only fighting Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up for the Reformation. In England, Scotland, France, Holland, they,... did the work, and but for them the Reformation would have been crushed... If it had not been for Calvinists,... and whatever you like to call them, the Pope and Philip would have won, and we should either be Papists or Socialists." ~ Sir John Skelton | | The Following User Says Thank You to JohnGill For This Useful Post: | | 
03-07-2009, 05:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,574
Thanks: 1,579
Thanked 929 Times in 484 Posts
| | |
I listened to the entire series that has been (slandered) as being "pornographic".
I challeng anyone to produce a quote from the sermons themseves that would be worth bleeping out. I just don't think you can. his link policy may need revision (not my call) but it was clearly identified as to what it was & who it was for.
In the online dust up there has been a conflation of what Pastor Mark himself said & what was in an unrelated website.
I would like to see people simply disagree & dispute his view from scripture rather then use a wink & a nod to communicate an implication.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
| 
03-07-2009, 05:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| |
I don't know which series it is that you are referring to Kevin, but I do know that Phil Johnson mentioned one of the jokes I heard in a Driscoll sermon on YouTube. If you listened to Johnson's message, it was Driscoll's joke from Eccl. 9 in reference to masturbation.  That is just one of many examples. And again, I like Driscoll! However, all of his vulgar "oopsies, my bad" moments in the pulpit need to stop. Please Driscoll, I beg you.
| 
03-07-2009, 06:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 198
Thanked 641 Times in 280 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AThornquist I don't know which series it is that you are referring to Kevin, but I do know that Phil Johnson mentioned one of the jokes I heard in a Driscoll sermon on YouTube. If you listened to Johnson's message, it was Driscoll's joke from Eccl. 9 in reference to masturbation.  That is just one of many examples. And again, I like Driscoll! However, all of his vulgar "oopsies, my bad" moments in the pulpit need to stop. Please Driscoll, I beg you. | That wasn't a joke. He was telling a true story (that happened to be humorous) about the lengths people will go to in order to justify their sin. Is that vulgar?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |