The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Office

Church Office Discussions related to Church Office - Pastors, Elders, Deacons, Doctors, & Evangelists.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 04:38 PM
Scott's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 10
Thanked 33 Times in 18 Posts
PCA Overture on Deaconesses

PCA Overture on Deaconesses
__________________
Scott Roberts
Ruling Elder, Lakeside Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Southlake, Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:07 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 665
Thanked 342 Times in 197 Posts
As someone who recently began attending an Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (and love it!) this is very interesting. Thanks for the head's up.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:07 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 665
Thanked 342 Times in 197 Posts
Oh, and look at that, my 1,000th post.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:16 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
Meum cerebrum nocet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,408
Thanks: 1,735
Thanked 3,429 Times in 1,682 Posts
Congrats, Seth!

(Any Biola Betty's in your future?)
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:36 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 665
Thanked 342 Times in 197 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Congrats, Seth!

(Any Biola Betty's in your future?)
Sorry, what's a "Biola Betty"?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:41 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,971
Thanks: 655
Thanked 791 Times in 375 Posts
My church (PCA) views it as a service role. Hence we have deaconesses. It will be interesting to see the GA's view on this...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:43 PM
ModernPuritan?'s Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 460
Thanks: 76
Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts
allowing a deaconess in the church that would be interesting.. they obviously could not be elders and such. but there are a few female deacons mentioned in the NT. So let them deal with things like visitation, food ministries,- things that wifes would do more naturally or something along those lines
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:45 PM
ModernPuritan?'s Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 460
Thanks: 76
Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
My church (PCA) views it as a service role. Hence we have deaconesses. It will be interesting to see the GA's view on this...
its something ive never seen- what do they do specifically thats different from what the men do?..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:48 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,519
Thanks: 135
Thanked 531 Times in 243 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott View Post
Um, What is really interesting about this is that not only has Philadelphia Presbytery overtured the PCA GA, but so has Western Canada Presbytery on the same issue. The only difference is that Philadelphia has an added clause that Western Canada does not and that is, "whose members are representative of various positions within the PCA".
__________________
Rev. Andrew J. Barnes
Husband of Dena
Father of Oliver
Master of Bruce
Pastor of Tchula Presbyterian Church

What can I say, I like blogs!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:50 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,971
Thanks: 655
Thanked 791 Times in 375 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernPuritan? View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
My church (PCA) views it as a service role. Hence we have deaconesses. It will be interesting to see the GA's view on this...
its something ive never seen- what do they do specifically thats different from what the men do?..
Nothing, at least as far as I can see. Here's a description:

Diaconate - redeemer.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:55 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Congrats, Seth!

(Any Biola Betty's in your future?)
Sorry, what's a "Biola Betty"?
I think he wants to know whether you have a girlfriend.
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emily
Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:04 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 665
Thanked 342 Times in 197 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Congrats, Seth!

(Any Biola Betty's in your future?)
Sorry, what's a "Biola Betty"?
I think he wants to know whether you have a girlfriend.
I certainly hope I don't! My wife might have a thing or two to say about that!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:05 PM
TimV's Avatar
Puritanboard Botanist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,352
Thanks: 1,833
Thanked 2,351 Times in 1,115 Posts
Practically speaking it wouldn't make much difference in the PCA. Churches like Keller's and several others make statements like this:

Quote:
Within the class of elder are the two orders of teaching elders and ruling elders. The elders jointly have the government and spiritual oversight of the Church, including teaching. Only those elders who are specially gifted, called and trained by God to preach may serve as teaching elders. The office of deacon is not one of rule, but rather of service both to the physical and spiritual needs of the people. In accord with Scripture, these offices are open to men only.
On the question of deacons, the Presbyterian tradition has not spoken, nor does it still speak, with one voice on the question of women in diaconal ministry, or on the question of whether deacons should be spoken of as "ordained." However, at Church of the Redeemer, we affirm that women may serve in diaconal ministry, and particularly, that women are Scripturally permitted to serve as deacons. In principle, we believe that our denomination, the PCA, should change its current position delineated in the Book of Church Order, and open up the ordained office of deacon to women as well as to men. However, at present, in submission to the PCA Book of Church Order – until the PCA changes its position on this issue – we will not officially ordain women to the office of deacon at church of the Redeemer. We will, however, select, train, and commission both men and women to serve as deacons in an “un-ordained” capacity at Church of the Redeemer. (For a complete treatment of this subject, see “Diaconal Ministry at Church of the Redeemer,” by the council of elders.
Women and Ministry
and

Quote:
The Diaconate, a group of men and women nominated and elected into the office by the Redeemer members, exists to express in practical ways Christ's command to all believers to love our neighbor as ourselves. We offer help to those in crisis or challenging situations by assessing their needs and working together to find solutions.
So they are saying "We can't allow women Deacons because the PCA doesn't allow it. So in the mean time, we allow women Deacons". And unless things have changed, the current head of their Diaconate is a woman, who took the place of the last leader, who was a woman.

The PCA where I still have my membership goes even further, with "unordained" Deacons that are Baptist and Arminian. The problem will probably come at the Denominational level when someone points out to these guys that all Deacons have to be ordained. The BCO doesn't allow for a third officer, so they'll eventually have to plug the loophole that so many people are climbing through.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:14 PM
kvanlaan's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,703
Thanks: 1,631
Thanked 1,432 Times in 820 Posts
Quote:
Hence we have deaconesses.
Are they formally ordained (laying of hands) or simply titled 'deaconess' for their role of service?
__________________
Kevin, husband of a truly angelic woman, and father to ten.
Zion United Reformed Church of Sheffield
Ontario, Canada
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:17 PM
DMcFadden's Avatar
Meum cerebrum nocet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,408
Thanks: 1,735
Thanked 3,429 Times in 1,682 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark View Post

Sorry, what's a "Biola Betty"?
I think he wants to know whether you have a girlfriend.
I certainly hope I don't! My wife might have a thing or two to say about that!


Just being funny. Students at my college used to speak of students at your college as Biola Bob's and Betty's. It was quaint and anachronistic even "back in the day."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:23 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,971
Thanks: 655
Thanked 791 Times in 375 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvanlaan View Post
Quote:
Hence we have deaconesses.
Are they formally ordained (laying of hands) or simply titled 'deaconess' for their role of service?
Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to ColdSilverMoon For This Useful Post:
kvanlaan (04-11-2008)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:24 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 665
Thanked 342 Times in 197 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sastark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post

I think he wants to know whether you have a girlfriend.
I certainly hope I don't! My wife might have a thing or two to say about that!


Just being funny. Students at my college used to speak of students at your college as Biola Bob's and Betty's. It was quaint and anachronistic even "back in the day."

No problem. I figured that's what you meant, but didn't want to jump to any conclusions.

Last edited by sastark; 04-14-2008 at 11:20 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:49 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,519
Thanks: 135
Thanked 531 Times in 243 Posts
Yes this is for all PCA churches, but one thing you must realize about "study committees" in the PCA is that whatever report is produced by the study committee is not lawfully binding on anyone, it rather is to be viewed as "Pastoral Advice".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:03 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
Quote:
Overture 9 recommends that General Assembly “erect a study committee on deaconesses” to determine whether the election of women to the office of deacon is contrary to the Book of Church Order (BCO).
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO
__________________
Sterling Harmon
Presbyterian Church of Coventry (PCA)
Coventry, CT
Deacon
________________

"Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
-- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

"Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
-- Martin Luther, Table Talk

Interim Pulpit Supply of New England

My Facebook

Owner/Administrator @ Reformed Theology Institute
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:36 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,472
Thanks: 1,652
Thanked 1,063 Times in 689 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO
And there is the rub. Why would the study committee not study the question in relation to Scripture rather than the BOC?
__________________
James Helbert, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:46 PM
TimV's Avatar
Puritanboard Botanist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,352
Thanks: 1,833
Thanked 2,351 Times in 1,115 Posts
Quote:
And there is the rub. Why would the study committee not study the question in relation to Scripture rather than the BOC?
They have to do both. For purposes of (among other things) not always re-inventing the wheel, the BCO itself says that while not inspired it is to be considered authoritative.

Quote:
Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
Whether or not Deaconesses are Scriptural or not, the above is really a word game. The BCO requires all Deacons to be ordained, so someone unordained can't be a Deacon. According to the BCO you can't use that word for unordained people, and the only reason people do is to sneak around the BCO. According to these church "mission statements" that allow "unordained" Deacons, those Elders could, if they could talk their churches into it, allow their 5 year old daughters to be "unordained" Deacons.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:51 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO
And there is the rub. Why would the study committee not study the question in relation to Scripture rather than the BOC?
Thank you! My thoughts exactly. I mean, sure the BCO is useful, but the Scripture is of first importance (Or at least, it should be!).

By the way, the PCA BCO already allows individual Sessions to "select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in distress or need." (BCO 9-7).

Thus BCO already allows for women to engage in diaconal service, but that service is to be at the direction of the Elders, and under the supervision of the ordain diaconate.

This overture seems to me to indicate more of a motive of pride than service. Those who speak of a desire to be of service to the church often seem to be more interested in the office or title, than the actual service itself.

Now, before everyone jumps on me...I know I'm overstating the case, but hopefully to make the point.

No change is needed in the BCO. The BCO already provides for women to be involved in diaconal service. It simply does not provide that the OFFICE is open to women.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Presbyterian Deacon For This Useful Post:
JBaldwin (04-11-2008), Southern Presbyterian (04-11-2008)
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:08 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,472
Thanks: 1,652
Thanked 1,063 Times in 689 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO
And there is the rub. Why would the study committee not study the question in relation to Scripture rather than the BOC?
Thank you! My thoughts exactly. I mean, sure the BCO is useful, but the Scripture is of first importance (Or at least, it should be!).

By the way, the PCA BCO already allows individual Sessions to "select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in distress or need." (BCO 9-7).

Thus BCO already allows for women to engage in diaconal service, but that service is to be at the direction of the Elders, and under the supervision of the ordain diaconate.

This overture seems to me to indicate more of a motive of pride than service. Those who speak of a desire to be of service to the church often seem to be more interested in the office or title, than the actual service itself.

Now, before everyone jumps on me...I know I'm overstating the case, but hopefully to make the point.

No change is needed in the BCO. The BCO already provides for women to be involved in diaconal service. It simply does not provide that the OFFICE is open to women.

I hope there's enough boiling water in this pot for two.

Seriously though, it does seem to be a pride or power issue. What God fearing church and it's elders would say to any member, male or female, you can't visit the sick, you can't feed the hungry, you can't voluntarily clean the fellowship hall bathrooms because you're not a deacon(ess)? Obviously none would. So if a person (again, male or female) feels lead of the Lord to serve his/her fellow man is such ways why is the title deacon necessary? I see no command in Scripture that requires a title for us to serve one another.

*getting off my now.*

Last edited by Southern Presbyterian; 04-11-2008 at 08:09 PM. Reason: spelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:23 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neverwhere, USA
Posts: 2,156
Thanks: 478
Thanked 322 Times in 203 Posts
The Bayly blog has discussed the women deacons issues...and specifically Tim Keller

Women deacons...the nub of the issue

Tim Keller...women deacons serving communion

A brief discussion of the danger Redeemer Presby presents with their violation of BCO

Tim Keller "rebranding sin" (it's in the USA Today article linked from the blog post)...yes, I know this is not a discussion about deaconesses...but interesting to note.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig For This Useful Post:
Archlute (04-11-2008)
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:29 PM
LAYMAN JOE's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 843
Thanks: 150
Thanked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvanlaan View Post
Quote:
Hence we have deaconesses.
Are they formally ordained (laying of hands) or simply titled 'deaconess' for their role of service?
Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
What is the title for the men that are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained?
__________________
Joe
Presbyterian Reformed Church of Charlotte
SC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:35 PM
wsw201's Avatar
The BOOOOT
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,622
Thanks: 37
Thanked 164 Times in 111 Posts
Not only does the PCA BCO allow for women to serve under the direction of the diaconate but they also have WIC (Women In the Church). So the idea of having a position called "Deaconess" is unwarranted. Plus there is no Scriptural warrant for this position. Some try and use Pheobe and play around with 2 Tim but it takes some serious exegetical gymnastics to pull it off.
__________________
~Wayne Wylie~
Member, Mid Cities Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Ruling Elder - Inactive
http://www.mcopc.org
Bedford, TX

Job 28:28 - And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to wsw201 For This Useful Post:
Craig (04-11-2008)
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:43 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neverwhere, USA
Posts: 2,156
Thanks: 478
Thanked 322 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Seriously though, it does seem to be a pride or power issue. What God fearing church and it's elders would say to any member, male or female, you can't visit the sick, you can't feed the hungry, you can't voluntarily clean the fellowship hall bathrooms because you're not a deacon(ess)? Obviously none would. So if a person (again, male or female) feels lead of the Lord to serve his/her fellow man is such ways why is the title deacon necessary? I see no command in Scripture that requires a title for us to serve one another.

*getting off my now.*
A deacon is more than a custodian or one who passes out food...it is a position of authority...Stephen was noted for his ability to teach...and it was his final sermon/indictment that led to his martyrdom. After my pastor has been preaching on this subject for the last month or so, I'm convinced deacons do, in fact, exercise authority...and that a deaconness is not the same thing as a deacon.

Unfortunately, there are churches in the PCA that think little of violating the BCO...women have hands laid on them for their "commissioning" at the *same time* men are...thus, it becomes clear they believe men and women may hold the *same* office Liberti PCA doing exactly that (click on image #12)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig For This Useful Post:
Christusregnat (04-11-2008)
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:44 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wsw201 View Post
Not only does the PCA BCO allow for women to serve under the direction of the diaconate but they also have WIC (Women In the Church). So the idea of having a position called "Deaconess" is unwarranted. Plus there is no Scriptural warrant for this position. Some try and use Pheobe and play around with 2 Tim but it takes some serious exegetical gymnastics to pull it off.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:51 PM
JBaldwin's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,257
Thanks: 904
Thanked 1,244 Times in 667 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO
And there is the rub. Why would the study committee not study the question in relation to Scripture rather than the BOC?
Thank you! My thoughts exactly. I mean, sure the BCO is useful, but the Scripture is of first importance (Or at least, it should be!).
My first thought was they will address according to the BCO, because the Scriptures already told them what they are supposed to do and they don't like it. It's easier to get around a manmade ordinance than it is the Word of God.
__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 08:54 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
The Closer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,472
Thanks: 1,652
Thanked 1,063 Times in 689 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
A deacon is more than a custodian or one who passes out food...it is a position of authority...Stephen was noted for his ability to teach...and it was his final sermon/indictment that led to his martyrdom. After my pastor has been preaching on this subject for the last month or so, I'm convinced deacons do, in fact, exercise authority...and that a deaconness is not the same thing as a deacon.
I'm sorry, I thought the discussion was about those in "service roles" needing a title for that function. Thus the genesis of the term deaconess if the person serving happens to be a woman. Maybe I've misread the intent of the thread.

Personally, growing up in an Independent Baptist church, the deasonesses were what we called the wives of the deacons.

I agree with your statement above.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
Craig (04-11-2008)
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 09:04 PM
LAYMAN JOE's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 843
Thanks: 150
Thanked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvanlaan View Post

Are they formally ordained (laying of hands) or simply titled 'deaconess' for their role of service?
Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
What is the title for the men that are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained?
Does anyone know the answer to my above question considering chapter 9-7 PCA BCO. What is the title given to the men appointed by the deacons for their service?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 09:48 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,700
Thanks: 1,904
Thanked 920 Times in 528 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernPuritan? View Post
allowing a deaconess in the church that would be interesting.. they obviously could not be elders and such. but there are a few female deacons mentioned in the NT. So let them deal with things like visitation, food ministries,- things that wifes would do more naturally or something along those lines
Howdy Jeff,

The deaconesses in the New Tesament include the following:

Paul
Christ
The Civil Magistrate
Stephen
Phillip

In the book of Romans, the two deacons that are mentioned are Phoebe and the Civil Magistrate.

First, deaconess is not a biblical term. The Greek only knows of "diakonos" and applies it to anyone who happens to perform services on behalf of others.

Christ served the circumcision; Paul served Christ; Stephen served God; the Magistrate serves God.

The book of Romans is a non-ecclesiatical book. It knows little/nothing of church forms, offices, etc. It knows theology, and lots of it. In a book so structured, the only other conspicuous use of "diaconos" (beside that of Phoebe) is that applied to the civil power, which is the "servant of God" - His deacon.

Anywho, there are all kinds of servants in the NT. The question is, who is qualified for the office of deacon in the church? See Acts 6 for the answer: the male members of the congregation. This is explicit by the fact that Peter gathered the heads of households and told them:

"3Brothers, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them 4and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word." 5This proposal pleased the whole group. They chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit; also Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas from Antioch, a convert to Judaism. 6They presented these men to the apostles, who prayed and laid their hands on them. "

Notice, men were gathered, men elected, men served. Very simple.

What's even more simple is the fact that the deacon's role GREW OUT OF THE APOSTLES / ELDERS' office, and therefore, of necessity, carries authority over the entire church.

Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA

"He who drinks much beer, sleeps well. He who sleeps well, does not sin. He who does not sin, goes to heaven." Martin Luther
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 09:52 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,390
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,571
Thanked 1,975 Times in 1,097 Posts
Any PB'r going to be on Bills and Overtures at PCA GA this year; my pastor will be. Should wey open a thread under Presbyterian Polity to discuss this overture when it comes up during GA like we did the FV last year?
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
Westminster Letter Press
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:05 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,465
Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,419 Times in 1,385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
Any PB'r going to be on Bills and Overtures at PCA GA this year; my pastor will be. Should wey open a thread under Presbyterian Polity to discuss this overture when it comes up during GA like we did the FV last year?
I'll be on Overtures this year (as last). This Overture is very disconcerting.

I won't go into all the details, since this Board affects nothing, and the GA is much more significant. I will give my remarks there.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
NaphtaliPress (04-11-2008), Pilgrim (04-14-2008)
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:06 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,390
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,571
Thanked 1,975 Times in 1,097 Posts
You'll have to introduce yourself to my pastor, Arnie Robertstad if you rub elbows; he's also my sister's husband.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:17 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,465
Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,419 Times in 1,385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
You'll have to introduce yourself to my pastor, Arnie Robertstad if you rub elbows; he's also my sister's husband.
Absolutely.

And I do think it would be a good idea to open a thread on this like last year.

I just won't be contributing.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:20 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post

Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
What is the title for the men that are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained?
Does anyone know the answer to my above question considering chapter 9-7 PCA BCO. What is the title given to the men appointed by the deacons for their service?
First of all, 9-7 says that it is Session (the Elders) not the Deacons who appoint these individuals.

Secondly, There is no title given to them. That was my point when I said earlier:
Quote:
This overture seems to me to indicate more of a motive of pride than service. Those who speak of a desire to be of service to the church often seem to be more interested in the office or title, than the actual service itself
They are simply "godly men and women of the congregation" who are selected and appointed by session "to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in distress or need." (BCO 9-7).

If theirs is a desire to serve, and they have not been ordained to the office of deacon, they ought to be willing to do so without a man-made title, IMHO
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Presbyterian Deacon For This Useful Post:
Southern Presbyterian (04-12-2008)
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 11:21 PM
wsw201's Avatar
The BOOOOT
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,622
Thanks: 37
Thanked 164 Times in 111 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAYMAN JOE View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post

Deaconesses are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained members.
What is the title for the men that are members of the diaconate for their service, but not ordained?
Does anyone know the answer to my above question considering chapter 9-7 PCA BCO. What is the title given to the men appointed by the deacons for their service?
There is no title. Scripture doesn't give them a title so neither does the PCA BCO.

The men who may help the Deacons, just like any woman, are simply Christians looking to excercise their gifts in the church. A title should not be necessary.

IMHO, giving women titles like deaconess is just a copitulation to the postmodern, egalitarian kingdom of man.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wsw201 For This Useful Post:
Presbyterian Deacon (04-11-2008), Southern Presbyterian (04-12-2008)
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:12 AM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
Quote:
Overture 9 recommends that General Assembly “erect a study committee on deaconesses” to determine whether the election of women to the office of deacon is contrary to the Book of Church Order (BCO).
Contrary to the Book of Church Order, and contrary to the Scripture, IMO

Some would argue that deaconesses are contrary to Scripture, certainly Calvin recognized them, but the BCO is often amended or changed.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:19 AM
Stephen's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
An overture has been made to the 36th General Assembly of the PCA, but it still must go to the Bills and Overtures Committee (B&O). B&O can still vote against recommending it to the floor of GA, so until an action is made by the committee it is still speculation. I understand the concern of many on this issue, and I certainly have some reservations, but we have to wait for B&O to meet and make a recommendation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69