The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church Office

Church Office Discussions related to Church Office - Pastors, Elders, Deacons, Doctors, & Evangelists.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 84
14 members and 70 guests
asc, CredoFidoSpero, DD2009, DMcFadden, Gord, Jerusalem Blade, LeeJUk, madman63, nicnap, PointingToChrist, SolaScriptura, StainlessThroughGrace
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2009, 09:01 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
Dust up over Baptist Press Article on Mark Driscoll

Dust up over Baptist Press Article on Mark Driscoll One Pilgrim’s Progress
__________________
Christian
One Pilgrims Progress
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2009, 01:05 AM
Ask Mr. Religion's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 619
Thanks: 142
Thanked 260 Times in 151 Posts
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
__________________
Patrick
Member, PCA
Chandler, AZ
ReformedTheologyInstitute.com


I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ask Mr. Religion For This Useful Post:
Ivan (02-14-2009), Jesus is my friend (02-14-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2009, 09:15 PM
Michael Butterfield's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pickens, MS
Posts: 322
Thanks: 19
Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
Let us hope for both!
__________________
Michael J. Butterfield, M.Div. RTS Jackson, MS
Presently living in Pickens, MS
Attend Pickens and Tchula, MS PCA Churches

No man can know sin without knowing the law: and herein appears to me one of the prevailing defects of modern preaching: I mean the neglect of holding up this perfect mirror, in which the sinner shall see reflected his own moral image. (John Angell James)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2009, 10:03 PM
Kevin's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,573
Thanks: 1,579
Thanked 927 Times in 483 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
He has.

I pray that I will be as open to correction as he has been.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kevin For This Useful Post:
Honor (03-07-2009), The Deeps (03-07-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 08:47 AM
Rich Koster's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,326
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 621
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
Another article about Driscoll......there was a thread about 2 weeks ago on this. I still say pray for him and send him letters of encouragement. We all need our rough edges polished off. Loving correction with encouragement will cause a person to grow. Harsh bashings from the blogosphere just raise the level of frustration and usually shut down the line of communication.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA
Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rich Koster For This Useful Post:
CNJ (03-06-2009), nicnap (02-15-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 09:39 AM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline now.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Great, more positive contributions from the Baptist Press.

I've listened to some of Driscoll's sermons, including some on his series from the Song of Solomon, and while explicit at times, I didn't find them unnecessarily vulgar or crude. But I'm sure that's very relative. I'm sure to young 20-something men in Seattle who are addicted to p*rn it's totally tame, but to fundy 60 year old SBCer's, to mention oral sex is probably considered X rated.
__________________
Alex
Member of Carmel Baptist Church (SBC)
Matthews, NC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to asc For This Useful Post:
BlackCalvinist (03-07-2009), charliejunfan (02-15-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 09:56 AM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
See here (comment #2) for a careful and comprehensive assessment of the issue.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 10:47 AM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 198
Thanked 637 Times in 278 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
Online presence: blog | twitter | facebook


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post:
charliejunfan (02-15-2009), CNJ (03-06-2009), Jesus is my friend (03-07-2009), Josiah (03-06-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 01:23 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 1,079
Thanks: 144
Thanked 233 Times in 153 Posts
I've never seen Calvinism described as vulgar before, that is if that is what they are trying to imply.
__________________
T W Hopper
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church
Currently between churches since PRC closed here - attending Crossroads Christian Church.
Canberra, Australia.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 02:02 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
With all due respect, Rae, this response is ridiculous. If you're not going to read the posted link, why respond at all? Given your simplistic knee jerk response, it's obvious you didn't read the BP article or the Slice post that was cited.

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 03:07 PM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline now.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
could you provide a link showing this?
i couldn't find one after a google search and a brief search on the resurgence site.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 03:32 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
Here's the link to the Slice post referenced in the Baptist Press article, from which you can go to the page in question on the Mars Hill site. We can take the discussion into the Tool Shed if the mods deem it appropriate.

Slice of Laodicea Blog Archive **Updated**Defenders of X-Rated Driscoll, Meet the Remnant!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 05:35 PM
asc's Avatar
asc asc is offline now.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 641
Thanks: 172
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Here's the quote from Resurgence (Driscoll's site):

"We do not endorse everything on this website, but if you want to read some commentary on the issue from Christian married women, you can go to Christian Nymphos."

Hardly a glowing endorsement of the website.

I took a brief look at the website in question, too. It didn't look outrageous to me; just very explicit, like a sex manual. It makes very clear statements about sex being only between a husband and wife. The only big problem i can see it that it's open to anyone surfing the web, even children.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to asc For This Useful Post:
Honor (03-07-2009), Rich Koster (02-19-2009)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2009, 07:28 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
IMO if Driscoll has to give so many qualifications and warnings about the risks of sodomy, then maybe, just maybe that's an indication that it's something that ought not to be done.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2009, 06:09 PM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 198
Thanked 637 Times in 278 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
With all due respect, Rae, this response is ridiculous. If you're not going to read the posted link, why respond at all? Given your simplistic knee jerk response, it's obvious you didn't read the BP article or the Slice post that was cited.

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
Hi. I hadn't been back to this thread since my initial reply, so I hadn't seen this.

In fact, I had read the BP article and the Slice post beforehand, and (especially knowing the current struggle among big SBC names regarding Calvinism), I stand by my original response.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2009, 01:58 AM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post

Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
With all due respect, Rae, this response is ridiculous. If you're not going to read the posted link, why respond at all? Given your simplistic knee jerk response, it's obvious you didn't read the BP article or the Slice post that was cited.

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
Hi. I hadn't been back to this thread since my initial reply, so I hadn't seen this.

In fact, I had read the BP article and the Slice post beforehand, and (especially knowing the current struggle among big SBC names regarding Calvinism), I stand by my original response.
The issue has nothing to do with Calvinism whatsoever and IMO the blindness of those Calvinists who only perceive political motives in those who raise concerns is regrettable to say the least. (It's either that or the ridiculous assertion that the critics seek to impose "Old South" or 1950's mores.) But my experience with this controversy (as well as a few other factors), has me almost totally convinced that the SBC is not the place for me, although I will continue to serve in our local church until the Lord sees fit to move us elsewhere.

Moreover, until the BP article and one non-Calvinist SBC blogger raised concerns, the vast majority of Driscoll critics with which I was familiar were Calvinists.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:45 AM
BlackCalvinist's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,979
Thanks: 546
Thanked 248 Times in 98 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I have heard that Driscoll has started to repent of his past antics and taken the vulgarity down a notch or two.
Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
With all due respect, Rae, this response is ridiculous. If you're not going to read the posted link, why respond at all? Given your simplistic knee jerk response, it's obvious you didn't read the BP article or the Slice post that was cited.

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
You might want to read the article from Tim Brister that is referenced by the article posted above.

My Take on Baptist Press Throwing Mark Driscoll Under the Bus Provocations & Pantings

Some of you on this board are some of the most grace-LESS people I've ever seen when it comes to discussing things and people like Driscoll.

Brister nails it correctly when he says "Driscoll cursing was news....FIVE YEARS AGO".
__________________
K. Joel Gilliard, Husband of Danielle since 7/11/09 (I married up!)
Theologically Correct dot Com
http://www.theologicallycorrect.com
MEMBER: Wallace PCA in College Park, MD as of 10/18/09
The Blog: THINK! - Wrestlin' With Wordz -N- Ideaz
Now announcing: Life | Doctrine | Music - join the message board now! Site launch with streaming radio coming in 11/09!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2009, 07:51 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCalvinist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post

Yes. This was a couple of years ago. Apparently Baptist Press and Slice of Laodicea haven't caught up yet.

This article is just an attempt by the SBC powers-that-be to discredit the scary scary Calvinism that they're afraid of. The logic of the article goes something like this . . .

1) Mark Driscoll has said things that some might consider "vulgar".
2) Vulgarity is bad.
3) Mark Driscoll is a Calvinist.
4) Calvinism is bad.

Ridiculous.
With all due respect, Rae, this response is ridiculous. If you're not going to read the posted link, why respond at all? Given your simplistic knee jerk response, it's obvious you didn't read the BP article or the Slice post that was cited.

Driscoll has a site linked RIGHT NOW from his webpage called "Christian Nymphos" that defends sodomy and sells sex toys. Even the iMonk called it "a borderline p0rn site" and Driscoll's linking to it "a serious piece of stupid" and refused to defend him in this case. (Slice is a Calvinist site BTW.) The reporting is accurate (regardless of whatever motivated the timing) and it's not just dredging up "old news."
You might want to read the article from Tim Brister that is referenced by the article posted above.

My Take on Baptist Press Throwing Mark Driscoll Under the Bus Provocations & Pantings

Some of you on this board are some of the most grace-LESS people I've ever seen when it comes to discussing things and people like Driscoll.

Brister nails it correctly when he says "Driscoll cursing was news....FIVE YEARS AGO".
Kerry,

With all due respect you are about five years behind WRT the blog conversations here. The issue in this case isn't cussing at all. You'd know that if you were paying attention instead of posting knee jerk responses. The response of Timmy Brister and others in trying to paint the BP article and other recent criticisms of MD as simply a rehash of the old "cussing" topic amounts to a politically motivated "Hear no evil, See no evil, Speak no evil" approach.

I commented heavily on Brister's posts. But if you had read them you'd know that too.

Here's my final response to Timmy Brister and other defenders of Driscoll that you and others who haven't kept up with this might want to take a gander at:

Summary on the Mark Driscoll/Baptist Press/Young Leader Controversy



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 01:53 PM
BlackCalvinist's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,979
Thanks: 546
Thanked 248 Times in 98 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Kerry,

With all due respect you are about five years behind WRT the blog conversations here. The issue in this case isn't cussing at all.
No, it's supposedly coarse language, use of inuendo and such. I'm quite up to speed, thanks. But it's usually all lumped together, since the issue continues to always be Driscoll's language.

I've been paying attention - same talk, different year. Just swap out the word 'cussin' for 'coarse jesting' and apply necessary scriptures condemning to make your point.

Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I haven't read or I'm not paying attention.... it means I disagree with you. Your opinion isn't always truth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to BlackCalvinist For This Useful Post:
raekwon (03-08-2009)
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 02:02 PM
Hamalas's Avatar
whippersnapper
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 2,744
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 1,465
Thanked 539 Times in 328 Posts
"Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself lest you too be tempted. Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ."
-Galatians 6:1-2

Praying for grace and discernment in our discussions here.
__________________
Ben Franks

I attend: Ketoctin Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
in Purcellville, Virginia
I'm a member of: Heartland Community Church (PCA)
in Wichita, Kansas
I blog here (along with my Dad): http://rrfranks.blogspot.com/
And I'm a student here: www.phc.edu

"Remember the speeches we have spoken so often over our mead, when we raised boast on the bench, heroes in the hall, about hard fighting. Now may the man who is bold prove that he is."-Aelfwine at the Battle of Maldon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Hamalas For This Useful Post:
Ex Nihilo (03-08-2009)
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 02:28 PM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 198
Thanked 637 Times in 278 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCalvinist View Post
Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I haven't read or I'm not paying attention.... it means I disagree with you.
This is something we should all keep in mind.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69