
03-01-2005, 09:33 AM
|
 | Owner and Card Conjurer | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Coconut Creek, FL (or wherever I am)
Posts: 4,901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 105 Times in 43 Posts
| |
|
Its different than Robertson's book. it actually sustains the orthodox historical terminology of the covenants, as well as properly defining covenant as a pact or agreement, unlike Robertson's book. Its prupose is to be "the" replacement for that book in terms of bringing the church back to the WCF's interpretation of the Scriptures. Robertson departs from that.
|