View Single Post
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009, 02:09 PM
Grimmson's Avatar
Grimmson Grimmson is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 116
Thanks: 15
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
No. It was not wrong. These weren't mere individual citizens taking up arms against those in authority. Rather, these were magistrates standing up against a tyrannical king for the good of the people over whom they ruled/served. If there are two magistrates to whom you're accountable, and one is more just than the other, to whom do you submit? The answer is easy: the more just of the two.
I have a couple questions:

(1) Is the lesser magistrate morally permitted to rebel against a greater magistrate? If so, why?

(2) Where is the Biblical evidence for this principle of following the just magistrate when they conflict? Is Judges the best book to look for that?
One more question:

Is it impossible for the greater magistrate to be considered a rebel or does being the highest magistrate exempt you from that charge?
I think to answer this question, 1 Samuel 15, is the perfect example because of his rebellious action against the word of God. So they cannot be exempted from the charge.
__________________
David Jolley
Currently SBC, may change
Confessions: 1680-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
Escondido, CA