I voted for the Mays commentary, put out by Westminster Press, mostly because this is the only one I can really remember anything about. I know I have consulted the two by Fortress press (Paul and Wolff), but sorry, I don't remember too much about them -- my knowledge of critical commentaries on the minor prophets is still all too sparse at this young age in my life. At the very least, even if you have radical differences of theological thought than the commentaries, I have always found all the commentaries and works put out in the Westminster Old Testament Library to be highly useful. And though I haven't had as much experience with the commentaries put out by Fortress, I have normally found them to be useful and worth the effort of consulting.

Bottom line: I'd go with Mays.

__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI

They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?