View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2008, 08:57 PM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
Contra_Mundum Contra_Mundum is offline.
Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,143
Thanks: 66
Thanked 3,288 Times in 1,163 Posts
I can accept an argument that a honorific like "Rev." is a mistake, even if I think it isn't a mistake.

What I can't accept is the claim that it is an error to have attribution of titles that are the product of an individual's being invested of office. The Apostle Paul? Sorry, that's not a misrepresentation. Neither is "Elder" So-and-so, or "Deacon" Xyz, or "Minister" or "Pastor" Bruce.

These are simply the old anabaptist (fanatic) arguments against offices of any kind. Which, of course, meant in the end that they were led by charismatics beholden and responsible to none.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post:
Archlute (11-28-2008), Backwoods Presbyterian (12-01-2008), caddy (12-01-2008), Christusregnat (12-02-2008), Dearly Bought (11-27-2008), Joshua (11-27-2008), jwithnell (11-28-2008), Kevin (11-27-2008), KMK (12-02-2008), nicnap (12-02-2008), nleshelman (11-28-2008), PointyHaired Calvinist (11-28-2008), Semper Fidelis (12-03-2008), TaylorOtwell (11-27-2008), Theoretical (11-27-2008), TimV (11-28-2008), toddpedlar (11-28-2008), Zenas (12-02-2008)