Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer  What you have just stated is that there is no infallible human knowledge. |
Oh yawn, no I did not Matthew.
[SNIP theology lesson by Rev. Winzer]
Thanks, gottcha.
Quote:
|
At the end of the day you have managed to prove that the critique does in fact depend upon scepticism for its validity.
|
Funny, this is! You were giving a
critique? And here I was all along assuming you were asking a
question. It's really odd in light of the fact that I basically begged you to make yourself a bit more clear! You never even read the article! You don't know what internalism is. You don't know what infallibilism is. And yet you can critique it? Matthew, is that really intellectually virtuous? Showing thyself a workman approved?
Quote:
|
Christians, who understand by faith, are left with no alternative but to reject this scepticism which masquerades under the name of philosophy, for the basic reason that it leaves them with no faith.
|
Whatever you say...