10-13-2008, 12:22 AM
|
 | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Johnston  Nothing is wrong with some kinds of skepticism since neither me, nor Bergman, nor any externalist, are saying that we can't know anything. We are saying that internalism is a false constraint to place on knowledge. So your charge of skepticism is unfounded. If you mean that we're skeptical of internalism, then you are correct! But this isn't a problem unless internalism is assumed the be the truth of the matter. And this, of course, begs the question. | The scepticism I am referring to is not to a specific position which purports to give an account of knowledge, but to the possibility of knowledge itself. I would like to know if the criticism itself does not remove the possibility of the perfect knowledge of Jesus. Would Jesus' perfect knowledge have involved him in the regress problems which are attributed to internalism?
__________________
Yours sincerely, 
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
|