No, I didn't read the article; at present I don't have time or energy to work through logical symbols. I was responding to what was presented on this thread: will the same criticism apply where perfect knowledge exists; if it won't, then the criticism is nothing more than scepticism.
Jesus didn't speak on epistemic matters, but an epistemic model must be able to account for the structures of Jesus' human knowledge where Jesus is believed to possess perfect knowledge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Johnston  Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Johnston His conclusion: "Why don’t internalists recognize that by avoiding regress problems they make their positions vulnerable to the Subject’s Perspective objection?" | Would this be true for Jesus also? Just asking to test the waters and see if the criticism against internalism is reducible to scepticism. | For one thing, many things are true of God that are not true of mere creatures.
Secondly, I have no clue what you're referring to. Did you read the article? Why think Jesus was an internalist? I don't recall him speaking on these matters. |