Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer  Sorry Richard; in the context of the discussion I assumed "erroneous" doctrine was at issue. Hope that clarifies. Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer
Substitutionary atonement is truth, not error.
| Yes, but, just going by what you stated in your post, the doctrine could be considered heretical based on the "stubbornness" or "zeal" with which it is promoted.
You're usually a wise soul, Matthew, but that post of yours has really got me scratching my head. | |
I knew what you meant, and agree. Paul lists 'heresies' as a lust of the flesh in Gal 5:20. Error, in and of itself, is not a lust, divisiveness is.