09-29-2008, 12:48 AM
|
 | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,334
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,328 Times in 1,952 Posts
| |
Sorry Richard; in the context of the discussion I assumed "erroneous" doctrine was at issue. Hope that clarifies. Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover  Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover So, if I "propagate" the doctrine of substitutionary atonement "with stubbornness and zeal" that doctrine can be called a heresy? Please... | Substitutionary atonement is truth, not error. | Yes, but, just going by what you stated in your post, the doctrine could be considered heretical based on the "stubbornness" or "zeal" with which it is promoted.
You're usually a wise soul, Matthew, but that post of yours has really got me scratching my head. |
__________________
Yours sincerely, 
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
|