Originally Posted by fredtgreco

YX,

You are missing the point. It is not that a doctrine is contained in the creed, but it is what type of error is held. So for example, we can say that to be opposed to infant baptism is contrary to the Westminster Confession, for example. But that does not make a credobaptist a heretic. On the other hand, one could take a different view of baptism, such as baptismal salvation or a complete rejection of baptism, and that would be a far more serious matter.

I'm sorry, but this whole thread is unhelpful. To equate a difference (even with the creeds) on the timing of the final resurrection with an outright rejection of the resurrection is ludicrous. Full preterism is heresy, both because it contradicts the creeds, and the clear teaching of Scripture.

I will ask you directly, and I will report the thread and ask the Administrators to wait for a response:

Are you a full preterist? Is that why you started this thread, to gain a foothold for full preterism?