Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum  Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV I gues it is a valid question. If the Hebrews could hang or cut off one's head, why stone when that takes longer?
In our society today, we have faster and quicker methods of execution which I believe we are obligated to use. Epecially since Godhas not revealed for us the manner of execution anymore.
But why was God not obligated to use the least "cruel" methodof execution? Does he get a special prerogative not to pursue the most "humane" form of captial punishment? Cutting of heads seemed reserved for kings, but why not hang? People were hung on trees, but not "hung by the neck till dead" were they? Why stoning? A valid question. Any answers? | |
When we try to identify the most "humane" forms of execution, are we respecting other human beings, or are we trying to do what will least offend everyone who opposes the death penalty? However, I think it's possible that the state is allowed to be more "merciful" than the OT law prescribes, as long as it doesn't harm victims. I wonder if a quick execution is righteous mercy? Or does it depend on the situation and whether the criminal is penitent? I don't know how to begin answering this question, really.
But if, as Backwoods and I agreed earlier, stoning is intended to display the reality of sin to the community, maybe it is better. Maybe it offends us because we just don't understand how bad sin is.