View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 09:47 PM
JohnV JohnV is offline.
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dunnville, ONT., Canada
Posts: 4,421
Thanks: 4
Thanked 88 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by panta dokimazete View Post
- John, thanks for pressing the issue and framing the discussion. This is a subject of particular interest to me (as a matter of fact, I have even started a blog on it ) and I certainly appreciate all the dialogue/guidance from all, thus far, public and private.

So, just to be clear for all - we are presupposing the RPW, right?

Edited to add: I will be presupposing the RPW.
JD:

It is my persuasion that it is a philosophical impossibility to not presuppose the RPW. Whether you deny it or adopt a changed version of it you are always presupposing the RPW. It cannot be avoided. That's one of the points I hope comes up later.
__________________
JohnV :detective:

John Vandervliet
Ontario, Canada
member of: Canadian Reformed Church
"In coming to understand anything we are rejecting the facts as they are for us in favour of the facts as they are" C.S Lewis, An Experiment in Criticism
The Following User Says Thank You to JohnV For This Useful Post:
panta dokimazete (08-02-2008)