07-26-2008, 10:37 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sarver, PA
Posts: 11,997
Thanks: 5,111
Thanked 2,652 Times in 1,607 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by panta dokimazete  As you know - I greatly appreciate the exegetical genius of John Calvin, however, he is mistaken - in this particular instance. Quote:
In commenting on Psalm 81:3, John Calvin observed:
The Levites, under the law, were justified in making use of instrumental music in the worship of God; it having been his will to train his people, while they were yet tender and like children, by such rudiments, until the coming of Christ. But now when the clear light of the gospel has dissipated the shadows of the law, and taught us that God is to be served in a simpler form, it would be to act a foolish and mistaken part to imitate that which the prophet enjoined only upon those of his own time. From this, it is apparent that the Papists have shown themselves to be very apes in transferring this to themselves.
In a similar vein, Calvin remarks upon Psalm 33:2.
I have no doubt that playing upon cymbals, touching the harp and the viol, and all that kind of music, which is so frequently mentioned in the Psalms, was a part of the education; that is to say, the puerile instruction of the law: I speak of the stated service of the temple. For even now, if believers choose to cheer themselves with musical instruments, they should, I think, make it their object not to dissever their cheerfulness from the praises of God. But when they frequent their sacred assemblies, musical instruments in celebrating the praises of God would be no more suitable than the burning of incense, the lighting of lamps, and the restoration of the other shadows of the law. The Papists, therefore, have foolishly borrowed this, as well as many other things, from the Jews. Men who are fond of outward pomp may delight in that noise; but the simplicity which God recommends to us by the apostle is far more pleasing to him.
| from here
Couple of items:
It doesn't seem as if he can decide whether it was strictly a ceremonial institute or an aid for singing (keeping the worshipers in tune or training them to sing in tune, as it were).
As far as the correlation to the other elements - the apostle enjoined us to use the Psalms as our guide and the Psalms don't refer to incense or lamps for use in worship. It seems to me the Lord preserved the worship He expects. John was just caught up in his disgust with all things that could be perceived as Romish. | Thomas Aquinas, who is more Roman than anyone in history, also wrote against the use of instruments in worship.
Why would the Psalms need to reiterate what was already in progress at the Temple? Take a look at these verses.
As far as incense take a look at Psalm 66:15.
Last edited by Backwoods Presbyterian; 07-26-2008 at 10:47 PM.
Reason: Took Quick on Reply button, Revised link
|