View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 04:28 PM
JohnOwen007's Avatar
JohnOwen007 JohnOwen007 is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 676
Thanks: 92
Thanked 232 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
Can anyone point me to some citations from the Institutes or other writings by Calvin that show definitively that Calvin believed in Limited Atonement?
Scholars are divided on whether Calvin adhered to LA. (For a good succinct and clear summary of the debate see Andrew McGowan's book The Federal Theological of Thomas Boston). Part of the problem is reading a more developed understanding of particular redemption (of say Owen) back into the earlier Calvin. Sure, the topic had been debated before (e.g. Gottschalk) and during (e.g. Bucer) Calvin's life; he was aware of issues surrounding the extent of the atonement. However, the tradition continued to develop after him.

It's clear to me that Calvin didn't fit the Owenian schema. See all of these quotations here.
__________________
Marty
Minister / Theological Educator
Anglican Church of Australia
(On Sabbatical) Cambridge, UK.
"There is nothing so necessary to draw us to repentance as good thoughts of God." (Thomas Manton)
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JohnOwen007 For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (07-21-2008), christianyouth (07-24-2008), DMcFadden (07-25-2008), KMK (07-22-2008), panta dokimazete (07-21-2008)