|
That is where I first posted a question? And Yes, I would like a specific answer I guess.
Which do you consider to be a heresy that doesn't cling to a confession? The credo or the FV?
I agree that dispensationalism is outside and heresy and should be repented of. I do not believe it puts one completely outside of being redeemed. I believe that semi-pelagianism is the same. It should be repented of. I also believe the FV should be repented of. What thinkest thou? What are the legitimate errors of the FV in your thinking Tom. I specifically mentioned the efficacy of Baptism since that was the topic in this thread. Should the FV's doctrine concerning the efficacy of Baptism be repented of?
I guess we need a doctrine of heresy. One which notices variant levels of degree and teaching. But I think that tends to confuse issues somewhat when the word is used alone.
|