View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 10:51 PM
larryjf's Avatar
larryjf larryjf is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,442
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 75
Thanked 307 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by a mere housewife View Post
how can we make an assumption that baptism should be administered in the same way as circumcision when girls are now baptised?
We must look at the history of Redemption, and how it becomes more expansive to answer your question.

The Covenant of Grace has gone through an ever-widening scope until the consummation in Christ when the whole world is in God's redemptive focus.

Abraham (man) --> Jacob (family) --> Moses (nation) --> David (kingdom) --> Christ (world)

So yes, under Christ even females are brought into the covenant sign because the scope was widened to include all types of people from every nation.

But to suggest that children would no longer be included would be to suggest that the covenant did not expand, but in fact the scope was restricted further in the NT than in the OT.
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
“The Christian must not be of such a complying nature as to cut the coat of his profession according to the fashion of the times…" - William Gurnall
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post:
Greg (06-26-2008), Me Died Blue (06-25-2008)