|
I'm sorry Adam. You're reasoning does not follow. The OP was about Warren - is he Kuyperian. Warren has been criticized by at least one of the faculty at WSC publicly and Theonomists have been criticized by another member of the faculty. Was Warren criticized for being Kuyperian? Not that I've ever read or heard.
It does not at all do for the preserving of your neighbors' name to not only jump from Warren to Kuyper to FV to Theonomy in a tenuous connection but to then lay the charge at the entire faculty? This isn't even a close call. To actually ascribe to the faculty that they are "...happy that the FV has emerged..." is beyond the pale. You don't even have to be a Puritan to figure that out.
I was moderating. This is the standard here. You have just agreed the standard of the 9th Commandment was violated. A man's "good name" is not trashed when one points out a sin accurately. We could never point out sin if this was the case.
I am rebuked regularly and I do not hold my name so precious that I am unwilling to receive that rebuke and consider my sin and thank my brother for restoring me.
It was a reminder of the standards of conduct here and a clear violation thereof. As you agree that the 9th Commandment was clearly violated there's really no need to debate that point.
|