Quote:
Originally Posted by shackleton  I read several of Gentry's books and I think they make a lot sense. Now I am listening to lectures and reading Riddlebarger on prophecy and Revelation. (His book "Amillinnialism" and "Man of Sin") It seems to me that he spiritualizes things too much. He says that preterism is a response to the dispy sense to push everything ahead to the future and so they pull it all back to the past. But I think he (since he is a former dispy), spirtualizes things because of his past history of taking prophecy so literal.
Some of what he says makes sense but he seems to not think that any of the writing of the NT refers to things that happened in the first century.
Any thoughts? Am I off base or do others see this? |
I agree. Riddlebarger's work was the first stuff I had ever read on the Millennium and eschatology in general. However after reading Gentry and other Post-Millennialists (especially for some reason Iain Murray's "The Puritan Hope") I find their argumentation much stronger.