View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2008, 10:54 AM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 5,177
Thanks: 1,992
Thanked 460 Times in 272 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Calamy guilty of calumny!

I know this will be defended as GNC, but these kinds of statements are really an argument from sentimentality. It moves the discussion forward about as well as us credos following Gill and posting that infant baptism is Part and Pillar of Popery, etc. But if we must post them all there is a quote from Owen that conveys a similar message.
I agree and it was this kind of argumentation that really began to turn me off to the paedo view with which I fully intended to agree. I recommend, if the paedos truly desire to further their cause, they refrain from such statements. It makes them sound elitist.

Question: Does the paedo desire that every believing parent, regardless of their conscience, baptize their infants? Is that really what you are after? IOW, would you have me go against my own confession and baptize my infant in order to avoid charges of cruelty?