Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007  Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformingstudent [...]The point being limited atonement. He can accept the doctrine of election with no problem but why he can't see particular redemption is beyond me. Why is that so difficult for so many to accept? | In my experience it's because there are a raft of verses which suggest that Christ died for more than the elect; he died for the "world", "all" etc. (John 3:16; 1 Tim. 4:10 ...).
Moreover, in my experience, "limited atonement" is regularly misconstrued by all sides of the debate. The popular books on the 5 points of Calvinism often misrepresent Dort concerning particular redemption. For a look at the primary sources in the reformed tradition go here. |
The Heidleberg Catechism is considered to be 'Reformed' yet it leans very heavily toward the UL position. See this thread:
The Heidelberg Catechism and unlimited atonement